I ntroduction to Nuclear Fusion
Prof. Dr. Yong-Su Na
2
Tokamak stability
3
- Considering plasma states which are not in perfect
thermodynamic equilibrium (no exact Maxwellian distribution, e.g. non-uniform density), even though they represent
equilibrium states in the sense that the force balance is equal to 0 and a stationary solution exists, means their entropy is not at the maximum possible and hence free energy appears
available which can excite perturbations to grow:
unstable equilibrium state
- The gradients of plasma current magnitude and pressure are the destabilising forces in connection with the bad magnetic field
curvature: The ratio of these two free energies turns out to be βp
Tokamak Stability
4
• Definition of Stability
- Assuming all quantities of interest linearised about their equilibrium values.
i t i t t
i r i r i
e e
r Q e
r
Q
1( )
1( )
1
~ /
0
1
Q
) Q ,
~ ( )
( )
,
( r t Q
0r Q
1r t
Q
small 1st order perturbationIm ω > 0 (ωi > 0): exponential instability Im ω ≤ 0 (ωi ≤ 0): exponential stability
Stability
metastable
linearly unstable non-linearly unstable stable
i
r
i
t
e
ir Q t
r
Q ~ ( , ) ( )
1 1
5
• The Energy Principle
- Representing the most efficient and often the most intuitive method of determining plasma stability.
2
0
K
W
stable 0
W
stableV S
F W W
W
W
S S dS n n p B
W [[ /2 ]]
2 1
0 2 2
V V
B r d W
0 2
ˆ1
2 1
F P J Q p p
Q r d
W * 2 *
0 2
) (
) 2 (
1
- If the minimum value of potential energy is positive for all displacements, the system is stable.
- It it is negative for any displacement, the system is unstable.
Tokamak Stability
6
Energy required to compress the plasma: main source of potential energy for the sound wave
Energy necessary to compress the magnetic field: major potential energy contribution to the compressional Alfvén wave
Energy required to bend magnetic field lines: dominant potential energy contribution to the shear Alfvén wave
destabilising
current-driven (kinks) modes (+ or -) Pressure-driven modes (+ or -)
stabilising
F P Q B p p J b Q
r d
W
2 2( )( ) ( )
2
1 *
||
2 * 2
0 2
0 2
• The Intuitive Form of δW
FTokamak Stability
7
pressure driven instabilities (Rayleigh-Taylor or
interchange instability)
• Instabilities
- Two sources of free energy available:
plasma current
pressure gradient of a plasma
current driven instabilities (kink mode or sausage)
http://www.hosecouplingsuk.com/fabrication/fire-hose-assembly.htm
Tokamak Stability
x
x
8
Flux conservation Topology unchanged
Reconnection of field lines Topology changed
•
Ideal MHD instabilities- current driven (kink) instabilities internal modes
external modes
- pressure driven instabilities interchange modes ballooning modes
- current+pressure driven: Edge Localised Modes (ELMs) - vertical instability
•
Resistive MHD instabilities- current driven instabilities tearing modes
neoclassical tearing modes (NTMs) - nonlinear modes
sawtooth disruption
•
Microinstabilities - TurbulenceTokamak Stability
9
Ideal MHD instabilities in a Tokamak
- fast growth (microseconds)
- the possible extension over the entire plasma
10
• The most Virulent Instabilities
Ideal MHD Instabilities
• Kink modes
11
q-profile
3
0 0.5 0.95
Normalised radius 1
5
2
Advanced scenario Baseline scenario
q95
4 Hybrid scenario
- Causing a contortion of the helical plasma column - Driven by the radial gradient of the toroidal current - External kind modes:
Fastest and most dangerous Arising mainly when qa < 2
Ideal MHD Instabilities
http://www.maysville-online.com/news/local/tollesboro-home-destroyed-in-fire/article_a5e0eb4e-235b-5c7d-afee-74bf98c4e738.html http://www.bbc.co.uk/bitesize/higher/physics/radiation/waves/revision/1/
m: poloidal mode number m = 1
m = 2
m = 3
- Stabilising effect by the conducting wall and strong toroidal magnetic field
12
Kruskal-Shafranov criterion:
stability condition for external kink mode for the worst case
1 q
aDetermining plasma current limit
set by kink instabilities → safety factor
p P
a
I
B a
I R
aB B
R
q aB
0 0 0/ 2
stabilising
destabilising
] MA [
/ 5
/
2 a
2B
0R
0a
2B R
0I
KS
2 1
0
/
0 0
R I a
aB B
R q aB
KS p
a
Imposing an important constraint on tokamak operation:
toroidal current upper limit: Kruskal-Shafranov current (I < IKS)
Ideal MHD Instabilities
• Kink modes
- A toroidally confined plasma sees ‘bad’ convex curvature of the helical magnetic field lines on the outboard side of the torus.
• Interchange modes
13
x
x
http://blog.naver.com/PostView.nhn?blogId=ray0620&logNo=150112423635&parentCategoryNo=1&viewDate=¤tPage=1&listtype=0 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:St_Louis_Gateway_Arch.jpg
Ideal MHD Instabilities
F. F. Chen, “An Indispensable Truth”, Springer (2011)
• Interchange modes
14
- A toroidally confined plasma sees ‘bad’ convex curvature of the helical magnetic field lines on the outboard side of the torus.
- The average curvature of B-field lines over a full poloidal rotation is ‘good’ for windings with a rotational transform ι ≤ 2π, i.e., q ≥ 1.
- Interchange perturbations do not grow in normal tokamaks if q ≥ 1.
Ideal MHD Instabilities
Unstable Stable
15
• Ballooning modes
Ideal MHD Instabilities
- locally grow in the outboard bad curvature region: ballooning modes - A high local pressure gradient is responsible for driving the
ballooning instability.
- Can be suppressed almost everywhere in the plasma by establishing appropriate pressure profiles and appropriate magnetic field line
windings.
J.P. Freidberg, “Ideal Magneto-Hydro-Dynamics”, lecture note
https://kr.fotolia.com/tag/%ED%92%8D%EC%84%A0%EB%B6%88%EA%B8%B0
16
• Edge Localised Modes (ELMs)
- current driven (peeling mode) and pressure driven (ballooning mode) combined instability
Ideal MHD Instabilities
17
• Edge Localised Modes (ELMs)
Ideal MHD Instabilities
- current driven (peeling mode) and pressure driven (ballooning mode) combined instability
18
A. Critical ∇p in H-mode barrier region reached
→ short unstable phase (ELM event)
B. Energy and particle loss reduces gradients.
C. Gradients build up during reheat/refuelling phase.
• Edge Localised Modes (ELMs)
Ideal MHD Instabilities
19
LCFS
A. Critical ∇p in H-mode barrier region reached
→ short unstable phase (ELM event)
B. Energy and particle loss reduces gradients.
C. Gradients build up during reheat/refuelling phase.
• Edge Localised Modes (ELMs)
Ideal MHD Instabilities
20
t = 2650 A-1 t = 2700 A-1 t = 2890 A-1 - Non-linear MHD simulations with JOREK
Huysmans, Czarny, NF 47 659 (2007)
Evolution of ballooning mode
• Edge Localised Modes (ELMs)
Ideal MHD Instabilities
21
- Non-linear MHD simulations with JOREK
• Edge Localised Modes (ELMs)
Ideal MHD Instabilities
22
- Standard ELM dynamics in the KSTAR visualized by ECEI
1 2 3
100 ms 200 ms 0 ms
LCFS
(1) Initial Growth
4
400 ms
LCFS
(2) Saturation
G.S. Yun et al., PRL (2011)
• Edge Localised Modes (ELMs)
Ideal MHD Instabilities
23
(3) ELM crash
5 ms 10 ms 15ms 25ms
0 ms
z (cm)
R (cm) R (cm)
LCFS
Particles/heat transport through the finger
Filaments elongate poloidally
A narrow finger- like structure
develops
- Standard ELM dynamics in the KSTAR visualized by ECEI
• Edge Localised Modes (ELMs)
Ideal MHD Instabilities
G.S. Yun et al., PRL (2011)
• Edge Localised Modes (ELMs)
Ideal MHD Instabilities
26
Courtesy of Y. M. Jeon (NFRI)
- Full suppression by 3D magnetic perturbation
• Vertical Instability
25
X Ip
Ideal MHD Instabilities
- Macroscopic vertical motion of the plasma towards the wall
J.P. Freidberg, “Ideal Magneto-Hydro-Dynamics”, lecture note
26
Ideal MHD Instabilities
• Vertical Instability
J.P. Freidberg, “Ideal Magneto-Hydro-Dynamics”, lecture note
R
p
B
I
B
R27
Ideal MHD Instabilities
• Vertical Instability
J.P. Freidberg, “Ideal Magneto-Hydro-Dynamics”, lecture note
R
p
B
I
RB
KSTAR & ITER 28
- For a circular cross sections a moderate shaping of the vertical field should provide stability.
- For noncircular tokamaks, vertical instabilities produce important limitations on the maximum achievable elongations.
- Even moderate elongations require a conducting wall or a feedback system for vertical stability.
Ideal MHD Instabilities
• Vertical Instability
J.P. Freidberg, “Ideal Magneto-Hydro-Dynamics”, lecture note