• 검색 결과가 없습니다.

atresia, we reviewed 96 esophageal atresia cases

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "atresia, we reviewed 96 esophageal atresia cases "

Copied!
9
0
0

로드 중.... (전체 텍스트 보기)

전체 글

(1)

= Abstract =

~j ~ ~J ~ s=.. ~l Sll ~

-171.-J7J~ 96~1 ;7;1~ *~-

Seventeen Years' Experience with Ninety- six Esophageal Atresias

Yang-Soon Chun, M.D., Sung-Eun Jung, M.D., Soong-Cheal Lee, M.D., Kwi-Won Park, M.D. and Woo-Ki Kim, M.D.

Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine Seoul, Korea

To study the clinical profiles and outcome of surgery

in infants with esophageal

atresia, we reviewed 96 esophageal atresia cases

who

were treated from April, 1978 to June, 1995. There were 51 male and 45 female infants, a ratio of 1.1:1. The low birth weight(

<2500g) patients were 32%. Clinical findings at the time of diagnosis

inculded drooling in 57%, choking in 50%, cyanosis in 38%, respiratory distress in 27%

and swallowing difficulty in 20

%.

Gross classification

included

6 cases of type A esophageal atresia(6%)

, 79 cases of type C(82%). 3 cases of type E (3%) and 8 cases

of type F(8%). Associated anomalies occurred in 34

infants(35%).

Among them, car- diac anomalies were most common(60%). A primary repair of the defect was carried out in 76 patients with type A or

C.

A staged operation comprising a repair or gastric tube interposition after gastrostomy was performed in 8 patients. In all 3

infants

with H-type, a division of fistula

was

performed. Esophageal resection and anasto- mosis was done in 8 infants with esophageal stenosis. In one infant, a gastrostomy was performed and he expired before staged operation. Anastomotic complications incuded leakage

in

16 cases(l7%), stricture in 37 cases(39%) and recurrent tracheoesopohageal fistula in 3 cases(3%). The mortality rate was 14% and the lead- ing cause of death was peumonia. The overall survival rate was 86%, and according to Waterston cirteria, the survival rates were 93%, 85% and 58% in class A, Band C, respectively. 75 patients were followed up with median follow up 6.4 years. Among them, 93% were uneventful and 7% had frequent pneumonia.

Index Words:Esophageal atresia

~ 1=-~-€:- 1992\1.£ "'~%qj~:ll!.~~ ~Tll]2J ~ o].!f-<>l1:i%

~ ::=-~-€:- 1995\1.£ L1l~.2j~~j:j .:}7-1] ~~L1lj:joJl"'~ ".}.li~~%

(2)

Haightl7} 1941\1 ~3':s.. ~~Aj 6.).s:. iEllj:)]~

~ 71:ii:\-6.).s:.~ ~o}~ Aj~"i.2..s.. ;:;'Ili~ 0lcjJ 711 4i-"i~ ;:;'1li~9.j ~~01 9l~q.

~71 {It:!:.2..s.. %~Ad iEl1t:g9.j -'f1~.s:.7} '7t0}~Jl

2.3.4 ~tJ1"i~ ~.llL~ ~AgO} :ii:\-c.l5!.. ~tH 1500g 01<'>} A~~~1%0}9.j Age 01 7}-'6-<'>}711 ~~q567.

T-?l tlJ~9.j ~~5!.. 01 ~~9.j %~%Jl} J..}uJ%

01 ~~~o-j ~AH Til.. A}uJ -'tl~.2..5!..A~ ~~'Vd ~ .s:. ililj:)] A}~~17} o}\::! %'t!- 71~, ~<'>I ~AJ 71"&j01 tJ1~~Jl 9lc}.89 °1t.'~~ ;:;'1~"i~ %'t!- 71"&jojl tJ1

~ ~A~~ ~T2.J- "i~"i~ ;:;,lli7} -tl~Ad ~.s:. ili1 j:)]~9.j tJ~ %~% ~ A}uJ%% ~~}..171c.l2.j- A}

li~ c}.

A~A}~.g. -tl~Ad ~.s:. iEl1j:)]~9.j ~JAJ"i ~Acl%

0.,to}.!i.Jl T-?l ~ ~Jl} %% ~~tl1 .!i.71 -'f1tH ~

~T~ A1~g~c}.

1978\1 4-%l.-!f-E~ 1995\1 6-%l.7J}:A.1 }..~%tJ1~.llL ~ -'tl ~o}.2.jJl}ojH Y-?l~.g. 104"119.1 -tl~Ad ~.s:. ili1 j:)]~ ~o}% % 9.j.!j!-71~ ~~01 7}-'6-~r;j 96"119.1

~o}%~ tJ1AJ.2..5!.. 9.j.!j!-71~% ~~<'>}e:j ~tJ"i ~ AJ Jl~~ }..1~~<'>}';?;.C}.

'J o} 43"11. e:jo} 40"11 5!..}..~ 'J1..:j1l1-c 1.1:1 01

~c}(.R 1).

Table 1. Distribution by the Sex Sex

Male Female Total

No. (%)

51 (53.1)

45 (46.9) 96 (100.0)

J,jA, ~~I%o}-c 1.1kg .2..5!..A~ "2}AgO} % ~~01~

Jl ~ Jl ~~I %o}-c 3.9kg .2..5!..A~ ~Ag AI ITa 'IT ~~1 % .g. 2.8kg ';?;.c}. 2.5kg u1 uJ.«.1 A~~Ag ~~1%0}7} 32.

3'10~ ~}:A.mq(.R 2).

Table 2. Brith Weight

Birth weight(g) No. (%)

~ 1500 2 ( 2.1)

1501-2000 6 ( 6.2)

2001- 2500 23 ( 24.0)

>2500 65 ( 67.7)

Total 96 (l00.0)

3. ~~ g~

T-?l~ Til.. ~AJ ~AJ.g. E}<ell ~1l1Jl}q 55"11 (57.3%), T%A1 ~%~~ 45"11 (46.9%), ;<a~~

36"11(37.5%), ~%~~ 26"11(27.1%), ~<,>}~~

20"11(20.8%)';?;.c}(.R 3).

Table 3. Clinical Manifestations

Symptoms No. %

Drooling 55 (57.3)

Choking after feeding 45 (46.9 )

Cyanosis 36 (37.5)

Respiratory difficulty 26 (27.1 )

Swallowing difficulty 20 (20.8 )

Gross ~*~ojl u:};: ~s:. ili1j:)] %~.g. ~s:. ili1 j:)] uJ 9l-c 7,S.!f-(type A) 6"11 (6.3 % ), ~ s:. ilil j:)] 2.J-

~-'f1-!f- 71:ii:\-~s:.~7} %~~ 7,S.!f-(type C) 79"11 (82.3%), ~s:. ili1j:)] ~01 71:ii:\-~s:.~uJ 9l-c H- type(type E) 3"11 (3.1 %), -tl~Ad ~-'f1-!f- ~s:. ~ .3} (type F) 8"11 (8.3% )';?;.Jl -6.)s:. ililSll2.J- -2--'f1-!f- 71:ii:\-~s:.~7} %~~ 7,S.!f- (type B), ~-'f1-!f-2.J- -2- -'f1-!f- 0J~ 71:ii:\--6.)s:.~7} %'t!-~ 7,S.!f- (type D) -c

~7,j<'>}:A.1 *<'>mc}(.R 4).

(3)

Table 4. Type of Anomaly(Gross classification56)

Anomaly No. %

A. EA without TEF 6 ( 6.3)

B. EA with proximal TEF 0

C. EA with distal TEF 79 ( 82.3)

D. EA with double TEF 0

E. TEF without EA(H-type) 3 ( 3.1) F. Congenital esophageal stenosis 8 ( 8.3)

Total 96 (100.0)

Table 5. Associated Anomalies

No. (%)

Congenital heart disease 24 (60.0 )

Imperforate anus 6 (15.0)

Gastroin test ina I 2 ( 5.0)

Antral web ( 2.5)

Duoderal aresia 1 ( 2.5)

Bony anomalies 8 (18.0)

Cleft palate 5 (12.0)

Polydactyly 2 ( 5.0)

Syndactyly ( 2.5)

Total 40 (100.0)

Table 6. Surgical Procedures

Anomaly type A (6)

C (78)

E (3)

F (8)

GT : gastrostomy

Initial Primary repair( 1 ) GT(3)

CE and GT(1)

Primary repair(75) GT(3)

Fistula devision ( 3 )

Resection & anastomosis ( 6 ) GT(2)

CE : cervical esophagostomy

919iq.

%~ 7]~91 -;--ff-.£e ~7.J 7]~ 24oJ], ±ll~Jo] 6 oj], ~~7]1l] 7]~ 2oJ], ~Zjll] 7]~ 8oJ]~qOl

5 ).

~ 5:. ill] ±ll iF~ oj] u:j-~ -Y-'€ lolJ

ttl

~ if. 6 oj] 7] -'€

~6j 91q. Type A 6oJ]91 ~~ loJ]e ~~t.3"j ~ -y-,€~ A]t;~i>}~.:u. 5oJ]e~A~ .!fl.!f--'€ A]t;~~ o]~t -y-,€.£A~, 3oJ]e ~~}.3"j ~-y-,€o] 2oJ]e ~.!fl~ 7-1

~]-,€o] A]t;~~9iq. Type C 78oJ]91 ~~ 75 oj] ::

~~}.3"j ~-y-,€~ A]t;~i>t~.:u. 3oJ]e .!fl.!f--'€ A]t;~~

0] ~t-Y-'€ .£A~ 1 oj] oJ]A~:: ~.!fl~ 7-j;'.]-,€o] 2 oj] oJ]A~

e ~~}.3"j ~-y-,€o] Alt;~~9iq. Type E(H-type) 3oJ]e .£.-'¥- 7]~~5:..!f- 7.J;ljl-,€o] A]t;~~9i.:u. Type Fe ~;3} .!f-.!fl ~5:. 1i;lj]-,€ ~ ~-Y0l A]-t;~~9iq.

.£.~ ~At~ ~ 7t'o~ ~

=;12f91

~il.£ -Y-'€~

A]i5~~.Q.t9 -Y-'€~ 7~~~ ~5:. ~oa-'€0ly. methy- lene blue tesV·J -'T-*o] ~e ?,;! ~ ~«}i>t.:u. %~~

;Ij]7-1i>mq.. -Y%e ~-Y.!f- -'T-*ol ~e ?,;!°l ~«}

¥!

~ A] ~i>}~ q..

Treatment

Secondary

Primary repair(2) Reversed gastric tube (1) Reversed gastric tube (1)

Reversed gastric tube (1) Primary repair(2)

Resection & anastomosis (2)

(4)

Table 7. Postoperative Complications

Complcation Initial therapy Result Additional Therapy Result Anastomotic Conservative Improved(lS)

leackage(l6 ) management Expired(l)

Anastomotic Balloon Improved (23)

stricture( 37) dilatation(30) Stationary(5) R & A(5) Improved( 3) Expired(2) Expired(2)

Bougienation( 6) Improved ( 4)

Stationary(2) R & A(2) Improved(l ) Expired( 1) Esophagoplasty( 1) Improved( 1)

Recurrent

tracheo- Improved (2)

esophageal Revision (3) Recur & expire(l) fistula(3)

*

R & A : resection and anastomosis

E~)..~ ~~l~~Jl lcj]c

if-l-

~ .!ill'€l"6'-.Q..5!. )..}uJ-

"5}~q.

~W.!f- ~:3f~ T~+ 7~~~ )"]ii~~ ~£ ~oa~

AJ- 37cj] (38.5%) oj])..~ ~7,'!~~Jl 23cj]c l~

Y1

A1 3~9.J %{i ~f<J-~~ ~{!~~Jl 4cj]c bougie

~;<'J-~ .Q.~ ~{!~~q. lcj1c %{i ~;<.J-~olY­

bougienation ~ )..lii~"5}A] ?iJl l:l}~ ~£ Aa-os~

~ A1ii~"5}O:j ~{!~~q. 2cj1c

%"'a

~AJ-~9.J W

~ ~.Q.~ )..}uJ-"5}~Jl %{i ~;<J-~~ ~{!~A1 ?i~

g

301]~ AnT~~ 1i~] ~ ~~ ~W~~ A1

ii~<5-}O:j 3cj]~ ~{!~~Jl 2cj1c T~+ z{z{ llllra :l!} AJ-.!f- ~VJ-~ *'€l.9.J W~"6'-.Q.~ )..}uJ-"5}~q. ~

~ %{i ~;<.J-~9.J W~~.Q.~ )..}uJ-~ 2cj]~ ~~%.!f­

E.~ T~% A1t5~~ lcj1~ ~].2j"5}1i':! AnT~o] ~.R~

~.£9.J -61£ ~3f~ 3401] %- 7cj]~)..~ 20.5%~q.

~~~ 71~1~~ A]ii~~ 3cj1 %- 2cj]c ~~.!f- ~:t!

~:3f.Q.~ ~~ Aa-os~ + ~{!~~q.

7]~-61£3f- An~~ 3cj](4%) oj])..~ 'V-~cr;~l ::J.

%- 2cj]c AnT~~ ~{!~~Jl lcj]c AnT~~ A]

t5~ ~.Q.Y-

An

~"5}O:j .!ill '€l ~.Q..5!. )..}uJ-"5}S1 q( R

7).

~W.!f- 4'-*:l!} ~W.!f- ~:3f0] %Jt}~ 7.H-c 11 cjmq.

13cj] (17 %) 9.J )..}uJ- :@O}7} 91 <>1)..~ ).~ ~~.g. 86.

5%~q. )..}uJ- ~~.Q.~~ lll]ra llcjl, ~W.!f- 4'-*

~ ~~

if-l-

lcjl, %-~%~ lcj1 ~q(R 8).

9. Wasterston Criteria

:@O ~ ~.g. Waterston Criteria oj1 u:}2.} ~-ff-"5}O:j ).~~%% ~~"6\l li!..1i':! A:;t 43cj1 (47.8%) 'F 301]

7} )..}uJ-"5}O:j ).~~% 93%, B:;t 35cj](38.9%) 'F 5cj17} )..}uJ-"5}O:j ).~~% 85.7%, C"ir 12cj] (13.3%) 'F 5cj17} )..}uJ-"5}O:j ).~~% 58.3%~q(R 9).

Table 8. Causes of Death Causes

Pneumonia Empyema Mediastimitis

No.

11 1 1

-143-

(5)

· Ttlble 9. Waters ton Risk Groups and Survival Survival Group Description

A BW>2500g and well B BW 1800-2500g and

well or

BW> 2500g with mod- erate anomaly or pneumonia

C BW<1800g or BW>1800g with se-

vere anomaly or pneumonlu

BW: birth wei'ght

No.( %) 43(47.8)

35(38.9)

12(13.3) rales(%)

93.0 85.7

58.3

75oJ]9.J ~o}oj]Ai ~-3:j ~A7} 7}~i5t(i!H:·t:-l] ~-3:j

7]7,}9.J 'F0J~~ 6.4\1o]~q. 39oJ](78.7%)9.J ~

°t7} -3i?8~ ~]'F ~7}~ .!!o]ni ;ct7Ji5t71] At~JI

HoJ] (14.7%)9.J ~0}7t ~~:£ Qoj-ff- '~P'Jg .!!S1

~ 4 t.Jl4.3j ;<']li oj]

1(!-g i5tS1JI 5oJ] (6.6 % ) 9.J

~0}7} 1(!-*.3j ~%7] {}~~£. '?J~~ ~~o] 'V.

~q.

1Hi~ -61:£ 3!l]~9.J ~Jt!~H -"g-eAt%~ 1939\1

~1(!-oj] Leven14 4 Ladd15oj] 9.J8Jl ut£. ut£. .!!JI

£l~~t:-l] .!f- ~At .£..!f- ~A"T'-~£. ~-f-~ A]-&~4- 0\ 7.)- "T'-~ £"1 7\ ~~ £ -f- 70J 7<\1. ~

¥-

~ £ -f-~ ~ 75 -¥- ~:£ -f-9t ~ -f-~ ~ ~ i5t~ ::@ t--¥- nJ.!f-~ -aa

AJ~O] A]-&~£l~q. 1941\1 Haight17t 7-i%~£.

l1~-VJ ~:£ 3!l]~ ~ 7]:t!~:£-f- ~OH]Ai ~A ~

~g ~ifA]~~t:-l] 1936\1 Lanman13o] 7]~~qj

£. ~ =;12}91 ~-2-~4 ~% ~tJ-g At%~q. "T'-

~~oj] 0] ~ot~ ~tJ-.!f- T~o] ~-"g~~4 l:l].y

~-3i .B..~~£' ;<']li£l~JI ~oj] ~-"g~ ~~.!f- ~

~~ ~Jt!9.J ~70J~£. ;<.]li£IOi ?8 AJ.3j9.1 AJ70J%

lll4fi5}S1q.

1943\1 Haightl~ .::I9.J "T'-~ <IJ~% Jf-~ =;12}

91 ~-2-~~£. .lil.?8i5tS1~t:-l] :J. o]-&c ~~.!f- ~ 50. -¥-~ .'I:.~o] Jf-~oj]Ai ci 'i'lqJI -"gzj-~7] trJl~

o]q. 0]4- l1{!-"J -61£ 3!l]~ ~ot9.J ;<']li~ lll4f.3j 91 ~::@% 7-l%i5toj -"g-e%9.J ~7}~ 7}Ai~q· ~

;.\ij l1{!-"J -61:£ 3!l]~9.J .y~.3j 7-1;<'] ~ cio]AJ 914 .3j %.:g- AJ ~ ~£. 7,}-'r £I A] ?i JI, Jf-11.3j~.5!.. 'F.B..

~ ?;! -€:- .y~::@ ~o t9.J -"~ c.].3j AJJ:11~ .3j?8 i5} 711 -&

A]8Jl 0j: i5}~ ?;!0]q16.1718. o]?;!-€:- %~~ "5"J-"gAl] If- oj, %9.1-"J 3!l]'€loj] qj~ t-.!f- %c.];<']li, %1(!-!f:! {l 70J 7]-aa 4 :t!~!f:! {l.!f-::@ 9.J ~]li ~ "T'-'2lJ ~ 8Jl ~,

{} ~71 ~if-aa .lil.?8 ~% ~-U~q . .::I~14 oJ1917}

'V.g .y 'V.~t:-ll. 9.lif ~t-7]7t ~.B..~ {l~ ~~

-¥-::@o] 'V.~ ~Jf-0]q. ~~i5}~ if7]7} 7]:t!~£-f­

~ ~8Jl 1Ill}Ai47} fL4.3j9.1 ~7] ~ 0i~71]i5tJI ~

7t if7]£ llll%~Oi .5f1 ll}~!i\ .5f1~0\ &~!8.q19,20.

0] 75Jf- 7]:t!~£-f-9.J g if ~Al] ~ qj7ij ~.3j~£.

~7]~ 7ijl1 AlZlq. ~:£ ~~~ ::-:-A] A]-&~W "T'-£

'V.JI ~0}9.J ~% AJJ:117} 7ijl1~ uJllltA] 7-l0~ ~

7]W "T'-£ 'V.q.21 ~7,}Z1 ~'2 i!ll~9.J ~Jf-oj]5O. ~

;<'}.3j ~tJ-% A]£8Jl ~.y 'V.~ a:jClllJ~~O] -'r%

£IOi ~~t:-l] a:j7]oj] ~ Livaditis ~s:.-2- ~Al]~22,

::@llJ ~-Ol~ -61:£ AJ-aa~ 2324, ~.5f1.!f- ~5::.9.J %~

.5f1 ~c.] 25, ~ 7oJ~ i5toj]Ai9.J ~7-} ~-W26, q1Cl:JI] ~

.!f- ~:£-f-~% ~~ -61:£ ~70J~27, -¥-A] ~ ~

~ AJ-¥- -61 5::. ~ i5}.!f- -61 5::. ~ 7oJ~ 28,30 ~ 0] 'V. q.

pt~, -&::@~, {l70J~, {l;;<.J.y~, 0JOJ~ ~ "5"J-"gAl]

;<.]li9.J ~::@ oj] 11

'?J

Oi -"g .e% 9.J JI] ~ .3j 91 ~ 7} 7}

o]-f-Oi:;sq. Randolph %31-€:- (~A.3j ~-W% A]is~

<'>tS1% trJl Waters ton criteria oj] ut:: Ag-e%~

class A, 100%, class B, 97%, class C, 20% £. .!!

JI<'>}S1JI q1Cl:JI] ~~~ A]is~A] class C9.J -"g-e~

0] 75 % llt7.] "5"JAJ<'>tS1 g % .!!JI<'>tS1 q. Ai At~ 9.J

~Jf- class A, 93%, class B, 86%, class C, 58%

£.Ai .5f19.J .!!JI~ojj l:lj8Jl -"g-e%oj Q.j=7,} ~Oi~ g

~ "T'- 'V.~~4 .g.~ s:0}914ojj Ai 1992\1 Kim32

0] 1978\1 .!f-El 1990\,!llt:>-) 67oJ) ~ .£.o} ~1E~

tgA]9.J -"g-e% 73%ojjAi 86%.5!.. 13%9.J -"g-e%

~7t7} :t!~£l~q. ~-2- class C ~otojjAi -"g-e%

9.J ~7t7} .!!JI£lJI 'V.~t:-l] 1955\1 .!f-El 1969\1 AtO) 30%!i\ -"~-e%oj)"i 1970\1 -¥-El 1984\1 At 0] 77%9.J -"g-e%9.J 7ij {j 0) 0]-f-0i:;sq33,34. Spitz7

~ Ai~-"g ~l]~ot~ ci o]AJ ~7] ~7-} ~-w9.J -¥-.3j

%~o] o}yt:q.JI 7)~<'>PBAl 2000g 0]<,>}9.J Ai~-"g

(6)

jJl%oj-9.]

).~~%%

61 %.5!.. .!2..Jl"8"m.Jl

Pohlson

%

34~

2,500g 01"8"j-9.]

Al~).~

jJ]%oj-9.] 250\] % 200\1 7j-

).~~~

80%9.]

~.g.. ).~~%~

.!2..Jl"8"j-oj Sf19.] .!2.

.Jl%4

~7-1"8"j-~q

. .::1c14

).~~%9.]

"5"-7j-ojls:.

~T

i>j-.Jl

~~.!jL T~' ~~.!jL ~:?,}, 7]~~s:.f- 7~~

%9.]

"i"-1i-~ ~~"5"-~

%%

~).~~q.

01 %

~~-¥­

T~.g.. "i"-1i-~ %~%9.]

7j-AJ

%~~ ~~

%9.] "8"j- Y-.5!.."'1 0]9-]

~).~oj] ~oj"8"j-:C ~:::::.5!..:C *~"'j-.5!..

silk "'j-%Z9. 35. 36,

~~-¥- AJ~:P740, ~Sf1-¥- ~s:.9.] %

~Sf1~ liJ-ej.5!.. ~~ "51~l,

711i-.3J

~1lll41

%01

~

q.

~~-¥- T~9-]

Jt}s:.:c 4%394Zojl"'1 36%4041.43 77j-7.1

.!2..Jl~.Jl ~

q. 9-

~ ~ ~-¥- T~.g.. t:J17R

"i"-1i- :q:.

2~ojl"'1 4~

AOlojl

~).~"8"j-oj -!-~~.5!..

E.)-'<lj

~

1l'<lj°l 4E.)-'dq.

-!-~ {}~.5!.. ~~ ~% ~~ol

4

E.)-~

"i"-s:.

~

q. 4-

~ T~.g..

t:J17H

~71

"i"-1i-.3J 7-1

li~ ~~.5!.. ~q

. .::1c14

t:J1-¥-~9-] ~~-¥- T~.g..

ulu]"8"j-.Jl "i"-1i-:q:.

5~ojl"'i 8~

"'j-°1

"'1i5~"8"j-:C

-6Js:.

~OJ1i-ojl

9.]%1l

~~~q.

0] 7clJf-:C

t:J1-¥-~

7H"i"-1i- 9-]

~~'il:l°l

:AlA.:!

.5!.. ~~q.

:Al:A}%9-] 7cH- 160\1

(17%)9.]

~~-¥- T~ol ~~:Cr~l 10\1~ ~191~

150\]:C

u1u]~ T~.5!.."'i Ai~.5!.. ~~q. 4~

0l}.J

9-l

%{}

~AJ1i-°1 ~~~t'i ~~-¥- 7{;l~~

8%44oj1

"'1 49%43.45 77j-7.1

.!2..Jl~<>1 ~q.

:A17.}%9-] 7cH- 37

0\19-]

~~-¥- 7{;l~01 ~~~4 4~

°VJ9-] %{}

~

AJ1i-°1

~~~t'i 7cH-~

%{}

~AJ1i-9.] ~~"5"-~.5!..

"'}DJ~ 20\1~ ~1%-¥-E1

"i"-1i-%

"'1i5~~

10\1

~ ~1~

"8"}1i':! 70\1.5!.."'1 21 % 9-]

~ ~-¥-

7{;l.:3}% .!i!. oj Sf19-] .!i!.

.Jl~4 tl1;::~ ~4~ .!i!.~q.

ojc17}7.1

{}i5~ ~~

01

~~.!f'- 7{;l~ojl

-¥l:oj"8"}:C

?}~.5!.. .!i!..Jl~:Cr~l

oj

71oj1~ *~",}.5!..

silk"'j-%7, 01%

~~4647, ~~-¥­

AJ~48, ~~.!f'- T~ ~

Sf1-6Js:.

~_ff-45.497} .¥.-y~

q. 71-¥l:-6J s:. f- 7H

~

9.] Jt}s:.:c 5 % ojl "'i 11 % 77}7.1

.!i!..Jl~~q3Z5051. Al:Aj-~9.] 7cl4-

30\1 (3.1 % )oj1"'1

71~-6Js:.if- 7H~%

.!i!.oj Sf19.] .!i!..Jl% .!i!.q ';>t.g.. 7H

~~% .!i!.~q. 71~-6Js:.if- 7H~~ ~~-¥- *~{}9.]

T~.5!..

oJ

~

.;;-::::: {}

cg ~ ~

oJ

f:~l"'a.Q..5!..

71

~~

s:.

if-

AJ ~1

.!f'-.!fl

.!f'-~

oj1 9-] %1l

~).~

"8"}:C

?}.Q..5!..

).g z.t

~

q41. 1962\! Waters ton %5 Z.g.. "i"-1i-{i

~A}~9.]

%~ }.JEl1~ 0\1~~ ~ ~*"8"j-oj tl1.li!."8"}~ ~117-11 ~

s:. 'iJ -o}oj Sf1"'B

~ ~~.5!..

:Ai

~).g ~11

%, 1111 '€l,

% tfr

71

~

%%

.~"y"8"}~q. 0lci~ ~~~ l:I}'l~.5!.."8"}oj

'\'i'.g.. :::::01-.914

9.]",}%~

Waterston class B, C

~

9-] .li!.1:1 "i"-1i-%

~7]"8"}~q. ~7Hs:.

Waterston

~

*~01 ~ej

1':°1.Jl

~~4 ~~ ~IA%.g..

019-] % iL}.aoj1

9.]~% ~171"8"}.Jl

'V,q185354. U:}C+"'i

~7H:C

~i

g

~171~~%

ulloj1 tl1%1l Waterston criteria :c

:~lA9.]

0\1

~~

7-1li

~

1:1 oj1 'V, <>1 %

iL}.a

°

1 1f:l.

<>1 7.]

.Jl 'V,

~ ,,}).~1

° 1 q. <>1 tt1 Ai 7.j-%.g.. <>1 u1

~ ~* ~

s:.

7-l-¥-"8"}.Jl "i"-1i-.3J 7-1li9.] 7.1

~~.5!.."'i ~6}9-].).g

ej.3J

~El1 ~1:1 ~ ~RElj~q18. tfrrrl 9:.

q-e Al7.}%.g.. {i

.!8-.3J~

Waterston cirteria 9.]

t;!!~% "'1s:.~t:P·755.

A1:A}%9.]

7cl4-

Waterston criteria ojl

U:}C+ ~01-%

%

~*%1l .!i!.~.Q.4 {l).~oj- %~7.1- ~lli, D}~,

"i"- 1i-

tlJ~

%9.]

7~{}~.5!..

"i"-1i- "'171:C 01

~*~ojl ~ 7-11~01 7R~~~~q. {l)'~01- %~A ~ej, *~.3J

~.:g.. ~%71.

"i"-1i-

tlJ~9-] ~{i4

-ylJjl {l).g01-

01-~

9-]

~.!i!., %tfr 71~9.] ~71 ~~ ~ ~lli, ~~-¥­

~~"5"-9.] ~z.t.3J ~7,:!, ~~-¥- 7{;l~9.] ~AJ1i- ~

Sf1 -6J s:.

~

*9-] .3J -s-.3J

~

7-1li.5!.. {}

~}.a

-6J s:. llll $:Jl

~

oj-9-1

).g~%ol ~7j-~~.Jl °1~1

:::::;:;:'9-1

O\l~~ ~l 91~ t:J1.!f'-~9.]

-6Js:. 1ll1$:Jl

~01-7} ).g~"8"}:C

"'1t:J17}

~'M?}°1 71t:J1~q.

A1 7.1-%

~

960\19-1 {}

~ }.a -6J

s:. llll $:Jl

~ ~~

"8"j-oj

qg9.]

~4~ ~~q.

1) ';:f1-:jtll:C 1.1:1.5!..

l:Il~"8"mq.

2)

~).~"'1

llan-

7.11%~

2.8kg

~.Jl

2.5kg ul1il-9-]

Ai~).~

jJ1%0j-7}

32.3%~ ~}7.mq.

3)

9-"5"-}.J~

q'<lj

~tl]

4q, "i"-%"')

~% ~~,

78

~~ %o]~q.

4) Gross

~*~oj] 9-1~ %1l.!f'-~.3j *~.g..

Type C 7} 7j-AJ fi.g.. Jt}s:..5!..

-¥l:~~~q(82.3%)

. 5)

%tfr {}~}.a 7]~01

35%ojl"'1

~~~~.Jl

01 %

{l

AJ

71~01

7}AJ fi.g.. Jt}s:..5!..

~~~~q(60

%)

6) "i"-1i-

~

Type

A,

C9.]

7cl4- ~ ~}.3j ~ ~%

"'1

i5~

"8"}~.Jl ~~}.3j ~~ol ~7j-~~ ~{}?oj ~~ ~

oj-ojl"'l

Q;jSf1~

{}'iJ1i-°l

"'li5~~~q. Type E

CH-type)9-]

7cl4- ~s:.71~if- AJ~l1i-°l.

Type

F9.]

7cl4- ~s:.7{;l~.!f'-Sf1 AJ~l ~ ~~ ~~1i-°l

(7)

- :t.o}9-1>4 : ;<J]1 -tl ;<J] 2 ~ 1995'-;1 -

:3j-, 7]:.tl: ~s:.-'f- 7-H~ %o]~q.

8) ).~-e-%.g. 86%~jl Waterston Criteria oj] rr:j-

~ A~ -e-%.g. Class A, 93 %, Class B, 86 %, Class, 58%~q.

9) ~~ ~;..} ~:ll} 93%91 ~O}7} 7,27J~jl 7%91

~O}7} ?[.g. ~%7] ~'i'l.9...£ ~H:!~ ~ ~o] ~

REFERENCES

1. Haight C, Towsley HA: Congenital atresia of the esophagus with tracheoesophageal fis- tula; extrpleural ligation of fistula and end- to-end anastomosis of esophageal segments.

Surg Gynecol Obstet 76: 672-688, 1943 2. Beasley SW, Auldist AW, Myers NA: Cur-

rent surgical management of oesophageal atresia and/or tracheoesophageal fistula.

Aust N Z J Surg 59:707-712,1989

3. Louhimo I, Lindahl H: Esophageal atresia:

primary results of 500 consecutively treated patients. J Pediatr Surg 18:217-219, 1983 4_ Rivosecchi M, Bagolan P, Matarazzo E:

Esophageal atresia; critial review of 10 years experience_ Pediatr Surg Int 4: 95-100 1989

5. Abrahamson J, Shandling B: Esophageal atresia in the underweight baby; a chal- lenge. J Pediatr Surg 7:608-613,1972 6. Rickham PP: Infants with esophageal atre-

sia weighing under three pounds_ J Pediatr Surg 16: 595-598, 1981

7. Spitz L, Kiely E, Brereton RJ: Esophageal atresia; five-year experence with 148 cases.

J Pediatr Surg 22:103-108,1987

8. Bishop PJ, Klein MD, Philipport AI, Hixion DS, Ertzler JH: Traspleural repair of esoph- ageal atresia without a primary gastrosto- my; 240 patients treated between 1951 and

1983. J Pediatr Surg 20: 823-828, 1985 9. Chittmittrapap S, Spitz L, Kiely EM: Oe-

sophageal atresia and associated anomalies.

Arch Dis Child 64: 364, 1989

10. Durston W: A narrative of monstrous birth in plymouth October 22,1670; together with the anatomical observation taken thereupon by William Durston, Doctor in physick, and communication to Dr. Tim Clerk. Philos Trans T Soc 5:2096,1670

11. Gibson T: The anatomy of humane bodies epitomized, 6th ed, London, Awnsha &

Churchill, 1703, cited from Randolph JG:

Esophageal atresia and congenital stenosis in welch KJ, Raudolph JG, Ravitch MM et al (eds): Pediatric surgery ( ed 4), chapter 68, Chicago, IL, Yearbook, Medical publishers INC, 1986, Pp682-697

12. Vogt EC: Congintal esophageal atresia. Am J Roentgenol 22: 463 1929 I 13. Lanman TH: Congenital atresia of the

esophagus. A study of 32 cases. Arch Surg 41: 1060-1083, 1940.

14. Leven NL: Congenital atresia of the esopha- gus with tracheoesophageal fistula; Report of successful extrapeuralligation of fistulous communication and cervical esophagostomy.

J Thorac Surg 10:648-657,1941

15. Ladd WE : The surgical treatment of esoph- ageal atresia and tracheoesophageal fistulas N Eng J Med 230: 625-637, 1944

16. Grosfeld JL, Ballantine RVN: Esophageal atresia and tracheoesophageal fistula;effect of delayed thoracotomy on survival. Surgery 84:394, 1978

17. Randolph JG, Altman RP, Anderson KD:

Selective surgical management based upon clinical status in infants with esophageal atresia. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 74: 335- 342, 1977

18. Randolph JG, Neuman KD, Anderson KD:

(8)

Current results in repair of esophageal atre- sia with tracheoesophageal fistula usmg physiologic status as a guide to therapy.

Ann Surg 209:526-531,1989

19. Jones TB, Kirchner SG, Lee FA: Stomach rupture associated with esophageal atresia, tracheoesophageal fistula and ventilatory assistance. Am J Radiol 134: 675, 1980 20. Malone PS, Kiely EM, Brain AJ: Tracheo-

esophageal fistula and preoperative mechani- cal ventilation. Aust N Z J Surg 60: 525, 1990, Cited from Spitz L, Liely E, Brereton RJ, Drake D: Management of esophageal atresia. World J Surg 17:296-300, 1993 21. Holmes SJK, Kiely EM, Spitz L: Tracheo-

esophageal fistula and the respiratory dis- tress syndrome. Pediatr Surg Int 2: 16, 1987 22. Livaditis A: Esophageal atresia; a method of

over bridging large segmental gaps. Z Kinderchir 13: 298-306, 1973

23. Devenport M, Bianchi A: Early expenence with oesophageal flap oesophagoplasty for repair of oesophageal atresia. Pediatr Surg Int 5: 332-335, 1990

24. Gough MH: Esophageal atresia; Use of an anterior flap in the difficult anstomosis. J Pediatr Surg 15:310,1980

25. Beasley SW: Oesophageal atresia without fistula. in Beasley SW, Myers NA, Auldist AwCeds): OesophagecaJ atresia, London, Chapman & Hall, 1991, Pp137-159

26. Mackinley G A, Burtles R: Oesophageal atre- sia, paralysis and ventilation in management of wide gap. Pediatr Surg Int 2: 10, 1987 27. Kimura K, Soper RT: Multistaged extratho-

racic esophageal elongation for long gap esophageal atresia. J Pediatr Surg 29: 566- 568, 1994

28. 0lqj12j: ~Z!Z1 ~~ ~5:. il11~-6'-~ ~~}~ ~ 5:. ~~. ~o}.21:ilj- ~11.-t! ~11~ : 53-58, 1995 29. Howard R, Myers NA: Esophageal atresia;

A techlllque for elongating the upper pouch.

Surgery 58: 725, 1965

30. Mahour GH, Wolley MM, Gwinn JL: Elon- gation of the upper pouch and delayed anas- tomotic reconstruction in esophageal atresia.

J Pediatr Surg 9:373, 197~

31. Kim WK: Esophageal atresiaCT - E fistu- la); an index for neonatal surgery. Early Human Develop 29: 369-373, 1992

32. Manning PB, Morgan RA, Coran AG: Fifty years experience with esophageal atresia and tracheoesophageal fistula. Ann Surg 204: 446-453, 1986

33. Wise WE, Caniano DA, Harmel RP: Tra- cheoesophageal anomalies in Waterston C neonates; a 30-year perspective. J Ped Surg 22: 526-529, 1987

34. Pohlson EC, Schaller RT, Tapper D: Im- proved survival with primary anstomosis in the low birth weight neonate with esophage- al atresia and tracheoesophageal fistula. J Pediatr Surg 23:418-421,1988

35. Cudmore RE: Oesophageal atresia and tracheo-oesophageal fistula, in Rickham PP, Lister J, Irving IMCeds): Neonatal Surgery Ced 2), Butterworths, London, 1978, Pp189- 208, cited from Engum SA, Grosfeld JL, West KW, Rescorla FJ, Tree Scherer III LR : Analysis of morbidity ana mortality in 227 cases of esophageal atresia and/or tra- cheoesophageal fistula over two decades.

Arch Surg 130: 502-506, 1995.

36. Randolph JG : Esophageal atresia and con- genital stenosis, in Welch KJ, Randolph JG, Ravitch MM Ceds): Pediatric SurgeryCed 4), Chapter 68, St Louis, Mo, Mosby-year Book, 1986, Pp682-697

37. Hagberg S, Rubenson A, Sillen V, Werkmaster K: Management of long-gap esophagus; expenence with end-to-end anstomosis under maximal tension. Prog

- 147-

(9)

Pediatr Surg 19:88-92,1986

38. Howell CG, Davis JB Jr, Parrish RA: Pri- mary repair of esophageal atresia; how long a gap? J Pediatr Surg 22:42-43,1987 39. O'Neill JA, Holcomb GW, Neblett WW: Re-

cent experience with esophageal atresia.

AnnSurg 195:739-745, 1982

40. Sillen U, Hagberg S, Rubenson A, et al:

Management of esophageal atresia; Review of 16 years' experience. J Pediatr Surg 23:

805-809, 1988

41. Holder TM, Ashcraft KW: Complications of pediatric surgery; prevention and manageh- ment in Welch DJ(ed): Esophagus, Philadel- phia, Pa, WB Saunders Co: 1982, Pp 199- 207

42. Touloukian RJ: Long-term results follow- ing repair of esophageal atresia by end - to

-end anastomosis and ligation of tracheo- esophageal fistula. J Pediatr Surg 16: 983- 988, 1981

43. Leendertes VK, Tibboel D Hazebrock FW J:

Postoperative morbidity in patients with esophageal atresia. Pediatr Surg Int 2: 2-5, 1987

44. Holder TM, Ashcraft KW Sharp RJ: Care of infants with esophageal atresia, tracheo- esophageal fistula and associated anomalies.

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 94: 828-835, 1987 45. Holder TM: Esophageal atresia and tracheo-

esophageal fistula, in Ashcraft KW, Holder TM(eds): Pediatric Esophageal surgery, philadelphia, Pa, Grure station: 1987, Pp 29 -52

46. Hicks LM, Manfield PB: Esophageal atresia and tracheoesophageal fistula: review of thirteen years' experience. J Thorac Cardiov- asc Surg 81: 358-363, 1981

47. Holder TM, Cloud DT, Lewis JE Jr, Pilling GP IV: Esophageal atresia and tracheo- esophageal fistula: a survey of its members

by the surgical section of the American Academy of Pediatrics. Pediatrics 34: 542- 549, 1964

48. Jolly SG, Johnson DG, Roberts CC: Patterns of gastroesophageal reflux in children follow- ing repair distal tracheoesophageal fistula. J Pediatr Surg 15: 857 -862, 1980

49. Aprigliano F: Esophageal stenosis in chil- dren. Ann OtoI89:391-395, 1980

50. Ein SH, Stringer DA, Stephen CA, Shand- ling B: Recurrent tracheoesophageal fistulas seventeen-year review. J Pediatr Surg 18:

436-441, 1983

51. Kafrouni G, Baick CH, Wooley MM: Recur- rent tracheoesophageal fistula: a diagnostic problem Surgery 68: 889-894, 1970

52. Waterston DJ, Bonham-Carter RE, Aber- deen E: Esophageal atresia; tracheoesopha- geal fistula;a study of survival in 218 in- fants. Lancet 1 :819-822,1962

53. Ein SH, Shand ling B, Wesson D: Esophageal atresia with distal tracheoesphageal fistua;

associated anomalies and prognosis in 1980s.

J Pediatr Surg 24:1055-1059,1989

54. Poenaru D, Laberge JM, Neilson IR: A new prognostic classification for esophageal atre- sia. Surgery 113:426-432, 1993

55. Shaul DB, Schwartz MZ, Marr CC: Primary repair without routine gastrostomy as the treatment of choice for neonates with esoph- ageal atresia and tracheoesphag-

eal fistula. Arch Surg 124: 1188-1191, 1989 56. Gross RI;:: Surgery of infancy and child- hood. Philadelphia, W. B. Saunders Co, 1953, cited from Randolph JG : Esophageal atresia and congenital stenosis, in Welch KJ, Ran- dolph JG, Ravitch MM, et al (eds) : Pediat- ric Surgery(ed 4), Chapter 68. Chicago, IL, Yearbook, Medical Publishers INC, 1986, Pp682-697

수치

Table  1.  Distribution  by the Sex  Sex  Male  Female  Total  No.  (%) 51  (53.1) 45 (46.9)  96  (100.0 )
Table 6.  Surgical Procedures
Table  7.  Postoperative Complications

참조

관련 문서

It considers the energy use of the different components that are involved in the distribution and viewing of video content: data centres and content delivery networks

After first field tests, we expect electric passenger drones or eVTOL aircraft (short for electric vertical take-off and landing) to start providing commercial mobility

1 John Owen, Justification by Faith Alone, in The Works of John Owen, ed. John Bolt, trans. Scott Clark, &#34;Do This and Live: Christ's Active Obedience as the

Method We obtained blood samples from 49 patients who underwent surgical treatment for esophageal squamous cell cancer (ESCC) We performed ctDNA analysis with

To this end, prior studies of the type of value, design paradigm and design value were considered, and three types of design value (practical value,

addition of each monomer molecules to the chain end addition of each monomer molecules to the chain end involves an attack by the radical site on the unsaturated

To this end, the actual situation of using board games of special teachers, the level of use, satisfaction with board games, the perceptions of special

At the end of the study, a reevaluation of each study case was performed with the same questionnaire. The result shows there has been a meaningful result in the group