New Classfication Criteria of RA
Sung-Hwan Park
Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital
Catholic University of Korea
Rheumatoid arthritis
Common autoimmune disease characterized by persistent inflammation of joints resulting
in progressive destruction of cartilage and bone
History of Rheumatoid arthritis
Sydenham : first case report in 1676
Example of RA-like disease: Early 17th, Deutch Art
Garrod, 1859: Rheumatoid, Gout and Rheumatic fever Charles, 1957: describe RA
Etiology원인
Pathogenesis of RA
Management of RA
Early, accurate diagnosis Early DMARD therapy
Strive for remission in all patients
Monitor carefully for treatment toxicities Consider and treat comorbid conditions
Breedveld, F C et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2004;63:627-633
Criteria for RA(1987, ACR)
1. Morning stiffness lasting more than 1 hour
2. Arthritis of 3 or more joints – soft tissue swelling or joint effusion
3. Arthritis of hand – wrist, MCP, PIP 4. Symmetric arthritis
5. Rheumatoid nodules
6. Serum rheumatoid factor 7. Radiographic changes
• 4 of the 7 criteria are required
• 1-4 ; must present for at least 6 weeks
• 2-5 ; must be observed by physician
Radiologic findings of RA
• Periarticular soft tissue swelling
• Periarticular osteoporosis
• Marginal erosion
• Symmetric joint space narrowing
• Subchondral cyst
• subluxation
Radiologic findings of RA
Bone erosion
Radiologic findings of RA
Lack of sensitivity in early disease The classification criteria set :
widespread international use to define RA
; well accepted as providing the benchmark for disease definition
newly presenting patients with undifferentiated synovitis
1)identify the subset at high risk of chronicity and erosive damage
2) be used as a basis for initiating disease
modifying therapy
Classification criteria vs Diagnostic criteria
not on developing diagnostic criteria
or providing a referral tool for primary care physicians.
separate body of work is needed to develop
such tools, which may be informed by classification criteria.
to facilitate the study of persons at earlier stages of the disease.
Phase 1:
to identify the contributions of clinical and laboratory variables that in practice were the most predictive of the decision to initiateDMARD therapy in a patients with early undifferentiated synovitis
• Phase 2 :
contribution of clinical andlaboratory factors deemed to be important in influencing the probability of developing
“persistent inflammatory and/or erosive arthritis
Phase 3 :
to utilize the results of Phases 1 and2 to develop a scoring system that would be applicable to newly presenting patients with
undifferentiated inflammatory arthritis to permit identification of those with a high probability of developing persistent and/or erosive RA.
Large joint
Joint involvement
Excluded from Assessment
5
3
2
1
3
1
1 3
2
3
5
42, Male
Polyarthralgia for 3 mo : both hand PIP, feet MTP, shoulder, and wrist
Morning stiffness (+) : 2 hours
Medication Hx : none,
Tender J. : 8 Swollen J. count : 7
RF : 66.9 IU/mL, Anti CCP Ab : 54.2 U/mL
ESR : 59mm/h, CRP : 2.9mg/dL
1) Joint involvement;(4-10 small jt); 3 2) Serology ;3
3) Acute phase reactant; 1 4) Duration 1
• 5/7; RA(1987 criteria)
• 8/10; definite RA
MTX 20mg
• 40, Female
- Both MTP joint pain for 6 months
- Recently developed Lt. 3rd PIP joint pain ( 1 month ago)
• morning stiffness (+) : > 1 hour
• Medication Hx : none
• TJ count : 7, SJ count : 6
• ESR : 30 mm/hr, CRP : 0.43 mg/dL
• RF : 137.2 IU/mL, Anti CCP Ab : 65.5 IU/mL
1) >4 small jt Joint ; 3 2) Serology ; 3
3) Acute phase reactant; 1 4) Duration 1
• 5/7; RA(1987 criteria)
• 8/10; definite RA
Clinical remission
Radiographic remission
Take home message
Early, accurate diagnosis Early DMARD therapy
The treatment target is clinical remission Monitor carefully for treatment toxicities Consider and treat comorbid conditions