Resorption of bone graft after maxillary sinus grafting and simultaneous implant placement

12 As such, using finite element modeling, the effect of stress distribution around the internal non-submerged type implants on marginal bone resorption

Methods to overcome insufficient bone due to poor bone quality, the pneumatization of a maxillary sinus and other anatomical limitations of implant placement

Histopathologic findings of control group at 4 weeks show little bone- implant contact (BIC) around the implant (asterisks) and new-bone formation in the defect

The grafted particulated tooth driven allografts were partially surrounded with new bone matrix and fairly supported graft associated new bone formation with some

5) After GBR, the membrane was removed i n i ni ti al ti me, the usage of nonabsorbabl e membrane and autogenous bone resul ted i n the mostfavorabl e bone formati

success rates of dental implants placed at the time of or after alveolar ridge augmentation with an autogenous mandibular bone graft and titanium mesh: a 3-to

In 4-week group, the group filled with bone graft with decortication revealed larger new bone formation area than shown in the group that had a defect area

Histologic evaluation of early human bone response to different implant surfaces2. Histologic evaluation of human bone integration on machined and