• 검색 결과가 없습니다.

A Study on the Effect of Dredging and Operation of Weirs on Hydraulic Characteristics in Nakdong River

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "A Study on the Effect of Dredging and Operation of Weirs on Hydraulic Characteristics in Nakdong River"

Copied!
12
0
0

로드 중.... (전체 텍스트 보기)

전체 글

(1)

Received March 6, 2013/ revised May 7, 2013/ accepted July 3, 2013

Copyright ⵑ 2013 by the Korean Society of Civil Engineers

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0)

 ǣŠ––’ǣȀȀ†šǤ†‘‹Ǥ‘”‰ȀͳͲǤͳʹ͸ͷʹȀ•…‡ǤʹͲͳ͵Ǥ͵͵ǤͷǤͳͺʹͻ ™™™Ǥ•…‡Œ‘—”ƒŽǤ‘”Ǥ”

ᙗᦗᇓ#⟖ኂ#⺾⛢#⇍#⟖Ὢ⢚⛢⃺#Ⱳ⮿⮎#᫮ἶ#㴎ὂ㡷⛯#⮮ጪ

ੲ୨ࢢ ȵࠑਏ૗

Ahn, Jung Min*, Lyu, Siwan**

A Study on the Effect of Dredging and Operation of Weirs on Hydraulic Characteristics in Nakdong River

ABSTRACT

It is essential to understand the hydraulic characteristics in accordance with the changes in the river environment and operating hydraulic structures for increasing flood-control capacity. The objective of this study is to analysis the effect of dredging and operation of weirs on hydraulic characteristics in Nakdong River(SeongjuImhaejin). HEC-RAS model has been used to examine the hydraulic characteristics with considering the flow transition through the unsteady flow analysis and the information about the specifications of multi-functional weirs. The relationship between Manning n and roughness height k, the effect of weir installation and operation on the flow and stage, and the bed change resulted from the river treatment project have been examined by steady and unsteady flow analysis. It is expected that the result from this study can be the basic data for the river treatment and management.

Key words : HEC-RAS, Hydraulic characteristic, Nakdong river, River treatment

Ⅹಾ

ᙹญǍ᳑ྜྷ᮹⬉ŝᱢᬕᩢŝ⪮ᙹʑ⦝⧕ᱡqᮥ᭥⧕ᕽ۵⦹⃽ᙹญ✚ᖒᨱݡ⦽ᱢᱩ⦽ᯕ⧕a⦥ᙹᱢᯕʑভྙᨱᅙᩑǍᨱᕽ۵Ӻ࠺vᙹĥ

ɩ⪙vᮁ᯦ḡᱱ⦹ඹෝݡᔢᮝಽᵡᖅၰᙹญ᜽ᖅྜྷᬕᩢᨱ঑ෙᙹญ✚ᖒᩢ⨆ᮥᇥᕾ⦹ᩡ݅. ᙹญ✚ᖒᇥᕾᮥ᭥⧕HEC-RAS ༉⩶ᮥᯕᬊ

⦹ᩡᮝ໑, ᇡᱶඹ⮱෥⧕ᕾᮥ☖⧕⮱෥᮹⃽ᯕෝၹᩢ⦹Łᙹญ᜽ᖅྜྷᬕᩢᮥ᭥⦽݅ʑ܆ᅕᱽᬱᮥᱢᬊ⦹ᩡ݅. ᳑ࠥĥᙹ᪡᳑Łs᮹šĥ, ᱶඹ᪡ᇡᱶඹ⮱෥⧕ᕾ, ᔍᨦᱥŝ⬥⦹⃽݉໕əญŁ݅ʑ܆ᅕᬕᩢᨱ঑ෙ⦹⃽⮱෥ᨱݡ⧕݅bࠥಽᩑǍෝ⦹ᩡ݅. Ӻ࠺vᙹĥᵝ᫵š ᝍǍeᮥᵲᝍᮝಽɪĊ⦽ḡ⩶ᄡ⪵ၰᙹญǍ᳑ྜྷᬕᩢᨱ᮹⦽⪮ᙹᨱݡእ⦹Łᵝ᫵ḡᱱᄥᮁపᱥݍᨱ᮹⦽⪮ᙹ❭ᨱݡ⧕ᇥᕾࡽᯱഭ۵⧊

ญᱢᯙ⦹⃽šญෝ᭥⦽ʑⅩᯱഭಽ⪽ᬊࢁᙹᯩᮥäᯕ݅.

áᔪᨕ HEC-RAS, ᙹญ✚ᖒ, Ӻ࠺v, ⦹⃽ᱶእ

1. ᕽು

ᬑญӹ௝⦹⃽ᮡࠥ᜽⪵᪡ᔑᨦ⪵ෝÑ⊹໕ᕽᯕ⻰⊹ᙹෝᵲᝍᮝಽ}ၽࡹᨕ᪵ᮝ໑↽ɝॅᨕḡǍ᪉ӽ⪵॒᮹ჵḡǍᱢᯙʑ⬥ᄡ⪵ಽ

ᯙ⧕࠭ၽ⪙ᬑၰḲᵲ⪙ᬑaኩჩ⦹íၽᔾࡹŁᯩ݅. ✚⯩, ᬑญӹ௝۵ᱽႊ⇶᳑᭥ᵝ᮹⊹ᙹݡ₦ᮝಽᯙ⦹ᩍ⊹ᙹ᭥⨹ࠥa᷾a⦹Ł

ᯩʑভྙᨱᯕᨱݡ⦽ݡ᮲₦ᮝಽᵡᖅᨱ᮹⦽⪮ᙹႊᨕ܆ಆ᷾ݡෝᱽᦩ⦹ᩡ݅(ǎ☁⧕᧲ᇡ, 2009a). 4ݡvᔕญʑᔍᨦᮡᵡᖅᮥ☖⦽

⪮ᙹႊᨕ܆ಆ᷾ݡᔍᨦ᮹ݡ⢽ᱢᔍಡಽɪĊ⦽⦹⃽᮹ྜྷญᱢ⪹Ğᄡ⪵ၰᔩಽᬕ⦹⃽᜽ᖅ᯦ࠥᮝಽ⪮ᙹၽᔾ᳑Õ᮹ᄡ⪵ෝ᧝ʑ⦹ᩡ݅.

ƒ–‡”‰‹‡‡”‹‰ սėॡ

(2)

⪮ᙹᰍ⧕šญႊᦩᨱݡ⦽Ǎ᳑ᱢݡ₦ᮡʑ᳕⦹ࠥ᮹℉ࢱ⪮ᙹప

ᮥᇥݕ⦹ᩍᵝᄡḡᩎ᮹⪮ᙹ⦝⧕᮹ᰁᰍᖒᮥ᪥⪵᜽┅໑, ᖅĥ

ႊჶᨱ঑௝ᙹᄡŖe᮹ၙšၰ⊽ᙹᖒᮥ᷾ḥ᜽┍ᙹᯩ۵ๅᬑ

ᝅᬊᱢᯙႊᦩᯕ௝Ł⧁ᙹᯩ݅. ǎ☁⧕᧲ᇡ(2009a)ᨱᕽ᯦ࠥ⦽

“4ݡv ᔕญʑ ษᜅ░⥭௽”ᨱᕽ۵ օ޽௡ऽᨱᕽ ௝ᯙvᨱ ݡ⧕

ᱽ᜽⦽“Room for the River"᮹}ֱᮥ᯦ࠥ⦹ᩍ⦹ࠥᵡᖅ, ⪮ᙹ░

ᵡᖅ, ᱽႊ⬥♕॒ᮥʼnᯱಽ⦽⪮ᙹݡ₦ᮥᙹพ⦹ᩡ݅. ə్ӹ

ݡȽ༉⦹⃽Ŗᔍ᜽⧪ŝ޵ᇩᨕ⪮ᙹʑ⦹⃽᮹⮱෥ᮥႊ⧕⧁ᙹ

ᯩ۵ᙹญ᜽ᖅྜྷ᮹ᖅ⊹۵⪮ᙹᰍ⧕᭥⨹ᖒᮥ᷾a᜽⎑Ł, ᵡᖅᨱ

঑ෙɪĊ⦽⦹⃽݉໕ᄡ⪵۵ʑ᳕᮹ᙹ᭥-ᮁపšĥłᖁ᜾᮹ᝁ഑

ࠥෝᱡ⦹᜽⎑݅. ᯕ్⦽ɪĊ⦽ᄡ⪵ᨱ঑ෙᩩ⊂ᇩa܆⦽⦝⧕ෝ

↽ᗭ⪵⦹ʑ ᭥⧕ᕽ۵ ⦹⃽ᨱᕽ᮹ ⮱෥✚ᖒᨱ ݡ⦽ ᱶ⪶⦽ ᳑ᔍ

ၰᇥᕾᯕ⦥ᙹᱢᯕŁ, ၽᔾ⧁ᙹᯩ۵ᰍӽᨱᖁᱽᱢᮝಽݡ᮲⦹ʑ

᭥⦽ ᙹญ᜽ᖅྜྷ ᬕᩢᨱ ঑ෙ ᙹญ✚ᖒᇥᕾᯕ ⦥᫵⦹݅.

⦹⃽᮹ᙹญ✚ᖒᇥᕾᨱš⦽ᩑǍಽǎ᫙᮹Ğᬑ, ᙹ⊹༉ߙยᮥ

⪽ᬊ⦽⪮ᙹᩩ⊂ၰᅖǍݡ₦ᨱš⦽ᩑǍaᵝෝᯕ൉໑ݡ⢽ᱢᮝ ಽHicks and Peacock(2005)۵Peace Riverෝݡᔢᮝಽ⪮ᙹᩩ⊂

ᮥ ᭥⦽ HEC-RAS༉⩶᮹ ᇡᱶඹ ༉᮹ ᱢ⧊ᖒᮥ ⠪a⦹ᩡŁ, Pappenberger et al(2005)۵⦹ඹჵ௭ᙹ᭥š⊂ᯱഭෝ⪽ᬊ⦽

HEC-RAS ᇡᱶඹ༉᮹ෝᙹ⧪⦹ᩍๅ}ᄡᙹᇩ⪶ᝅᖒᮥ⠪a⦹

ᩡᮝ໑Prafulkumar et al(2011)ᮡLower Tapi vᮥݡᔢᮝಽ

⪮ᙹᩩ⊂ᮥ ᭥⦽ HEC-RAS ༉⩶ ๅ}ᄡᙹ ᅕᱶᮥ ᙹ⧪⦽ ၵ

ᯩ݅. ǎԕ᮹Ğᬑ, ʡᄲ₍ŝᯕ᳦ᕾ(2009)ᮡ⦹⃽ᅖᬱᮝಽᯙ⧕

ᙹญ⦺ᱢ᫵ᗭaɪᄡ⦽⦹⃽ᨱᕽ᮹ᱶ⪶⦽᳑ࠥĥᙹෝᔑᱶ⦹ʑ

᭥⦽ႊჶᮥࠥ⇽⦹ʑ᭥⧕HEC-RAS᪡2₉ᬱᙹญ⧕ᕾႊჶᮥ

ᯕᬊ⦹ᩡŁᯕᔢḥ॒(2010)ᮡ1₉ᬱᇡᱶඹ༉⩶ᯙFLDWAV

༉⩶ᮥᯕᬊ⦹ᩍӺ࠺v⦹ඹ᮹⪮ᙹ✚ᖒᮥᇥᕾ⦹ᩡ݅. ʡᵝᩢ

॒(2010)ᮡHEC-RAS ၰFLDWAVෝᯕᬊ⦹ᩍ⦽vᮥݡᔢᮝ ಽĥ⫮⪮ᙹ᭥ෝá☁⦹ᩡᮝ໑v⩶᜾॒(2011)ᮡHEC-RASෝ

ᯕᬊ⦹ᩍɚ⦽⪮ᙹᔍᔢᨱݡ⦽ᱡඹḡ᮹⪮ᙹ᭥ᱡq⬉ŝෝᇥᕾ

⦽ၵᯩ݅. ʡ᧲ᙹ(2010)۵ʑ᳕᮹ᙹྙ⦺ᱢ༉⩶ᮡ⦹⃽Ǎ᳑ྜྷᨱ

᮹⦽ ႑ᙹᩢ⨆ ॒ᮥ Łಅ⦹ḡ ༜⦹ʑ ভྙᨱ ᙹญ⧕ᕾ ༉⩶᮹

ᄲ⧪Ǎ⇶ᯕᇩa⦝⦹݅Ł⦹ᩡᮝ໑, ᯕෝᅕ᪥⦹ʑ᭥⧕1₉ᬱ

ᙹญ⧕ᕾ༉⩶ᯙFLDWAVෝ₥┾⦹ᩍ⪮ᙹᩩᅕ᜽ᜅ▽Ǎ⇶ᮥ

☖⦽ ⪮ᙹᩩᅕ ⇵ḥ᮹ ⦥᫵ᖒᮥ ᨙɪ⦹ᩡ݅.

4ݡvᔕญʑᔍᨦᮡ⦹ࠥԕᵡᖅŝᙹญ᜽ᖅྜྷᖅ⊹ಽᯙ⧕ᰁᰍ ᱢ ᭥⨹ᖒᮥ ԕ⡍⦹Ł ᯩ݅. ⦹⃽ᮥ ⬂݉⦹۵ Ǎ᳑ྜྷᮡ ⮱෥ᮥ

۵ᱽႊၰ⦹ᔢᮥᖙǕ᜽┍ᙹᯩ݅. ᅙᩑǍᨱᕽ۵4ݡvᔕญʑᔍ ᨦᱥŝ⬥⦹⃽݉໕ᮥᯕᬊ⦹ᩍ1₉ᬱᙹญ༉⩶ᮥǍ⇶⦹Łᇡᱶඹ

⮱෥ ⧕ᕾᮥ ☖⧕ ⮱෥᮹ ᱥᯕෝ ၹᩢ⦹Ł ᙹญ᜽ᖅྜྷ ᬕᩢᮥ

☖⦽ᙹญ✚ᖒᮥᇥᕾ⦹ᩡ݅. Ӻ࠺vᙹĥᵝ᫵šᝍǍeᮥᵲᝍᮝ

ಽɪĊ⦽ḡ⩶ᄡ⪵ၰᙹญǍ᳑ྜྷᬕᩢᨱ᮹⦽⪮ᙹᨱݡእ⦹Ł

ᵝ᫵ḡᱱᄥᮁపᱥݍᨱ᮹⦽⪮ᙹ❭ᱥ❭᧲ᔢ⧕ᕾᮥ☖⧕ᇥᕾࡽ

ᯱഭ۵ ⧊ญᱢᯙ ⦹⃽šญෝ ᭥⦽ ʑⅩᯱഭಽ ⪽ᬊࢁ ᙹ ᯩᮥ

äᯕ݅.

2. ᩑǍԕᬊ

2.1 ۩ঃ஺લ

ᩑǍݡᔢǍeᮡӺ࠺vᙹĥ᮹ᖒᵝᙹ᭥⢽ḡᱱᇡ░ᯥ⧕ḥᙹ

᭥⢽ḡᱱᯕ໑ݡᔢḡᩎ⩥⫊ᮡFig. 1ŝz݅. ɩ⪙vᯕ⧊ඹ⦹۵

Ӻ࠺v⦹ඹǍeᮡᩑ⠪Ɂvᙹపၰ⪮ᙹʑvᙹపᯕⓍŁ, ⠪ḡ᮹

እᮉᯕ ׳ᮝ໑, ⦹⃽Ğᔍ۵ ᪥อ⦹݅. ੱ⦽, ⪮ᙹ᮹ ḡᗮ᜽eᯕ

ʙŁᯕಽᯙ⧕⪮ᙹ᜽Ӻ࠺vᙹ᭥ᔢ᜚ᨱ᮹⦽ḡඹ⦹⃽᮹ԕᙹ႑ ᱽᇩపᯕӹ, ❭ᯕ⦲॒⋉⚍ᨱ᮹⦽⪮ᙹ⦝⧕aᵝಽၽᔾ⦽݅(ǎ

☁⧕᧲ᇡ, 2009). ᖒᵝᙹ᭥⢽۵No.384ᯕŁᯥ⧕ḥᙹ᭥⢽۵No.163 ᯕ໑ǍeÑญ۵᧞106.9 kmᯕ݅. ݡᔢǍeԕᨱ۵ǎa⦹⃽ᯙ

ɩ⪙v, ⫊v, ԉvᯕ⧊ඹ⦹Łᯩᮝ໑4ݡvᔕญʑᔍᨦᮥ☖⧕

vᱶŁಚᅕ, ݍᖒᅕ, ⧊⃽₞ֶᅕ, ₞ֶ⧉ᦩᅕaÕᖅࡹᨩ݅. bḡඹ ᮹ᮁ᯦ŝ݅ʑ܆ᅕaᖅ⊹ࡹᨕᯩ۵⦹⃽ᱶእʑᅙĥ⫮(ǎ☁⧕᧲

ᇡ, 2009b)ᔢ᮹݉໕ჩ⪙۵ɩ⪙vNo.363, ⫊vNo.259, ԉv

No.202, vᱶŁಚᅕNo.364+268, ݍᖒᅕNo.322+295, ⧊⃽₞ֶ

ᅕNo.263+504, ₞ֶ⧉ᦩᅕNo.174+445 ᯕ݅. ⦹ඹಽᇡ░Ñญ ۵vᱶŁಚᅕḡᱱ97.5 km, ɩ⪙v⧊ඹḡᱱ96.7 km, ݍᖒᅕ

ḡᱱ77.1 km, ⧊⃽₞ֶᅕḡᱱ48.1 km, ⫊v⧊ඹḡᱱ45.8 km, ԉv⧊ඹḡᱱ17.1 km, ₞ֶ⧉ᦩᅕḡᱱ5.1 kmᯕ݅. ↽ᝍᇡ

ෝᩑđ⦽⦹ࠥᖁ⩶ᮡๅᬑอł⦽⩶┽ෝӹ┡ԕ໑ᅖᰂ⦽ḡ⩶✚

ᖒᮥӹ┡ԕŁᯩ݅. ԕᇡᵝ᫵ḡᱱᮝಽ۵ɩ⪙v⧊ඹ⬥⪵ᬱᙹ᭥

⢽a᭥⊹⦹ŁᯩŁ, ݍᖒᅕᱥŝ⬥ಽŁಚƱᙹ᭥⢽᪡⩥⣮ᙹ᭥⢽

a᭥⊹⧕ᯩ݅. ੱ⦽, ⫊v⧊ඹ⬥ᱢ⡍Ʊᙹ᭥⢽, ԉv⧊ඹ⬥

ḥ࠺ᙹ᭥⢽a᭥⊹⧕ᯩʑভྙᨱš⊂ᙹ᭥᪡ ĥᔑᙹ᭥እƱෝ

☖⦽ ᙹญ✚ᖒ á☁a a܆⦹݅.

2.2 ۚ࡟ୀ߹֜ౠࢫլծ୺Ս

ݡ⢽ᱢᯙእᱶᔢ⦹⃽ᙹญ⧕ᕾ༉⩶ᮝಽ۵HEC-RAS(Hydrologic Engineering Center, 2010)᪡FLDWAV(Fread and Lewis, 1998)

༉⩶ᮥॅᙹᯩᮝ໑, ǎԕᨱᕽ⪮ᙹᇥᕾᮥ᭥⦽⦹⃽᮹ᙹญ⧕ᕾᇥ

᧝ᨱๅᬑ⡎մí⪽ᬊࡹᨕ᪵݅. HEC-RAS۵ၙᮂǑŖᄲ݉᮹

HEC(Hydrologic Engineering Center)ᨱᕽ}ၽࡽʑ᳕᮹HEC-2

༉⩶ᮥ ၽᱥ᜽┉ äᮝಽ windowsᔢᨱᕽ GUI⪹Ğᮥ ᱽŖ⦹ᩍ

ᔍᬊ⦹ʑᛍᬕᯙ░⟹ᯕᜅෝw⇵ŁᯩŁ, ݅᧲⦽ᙹญǍ᳑ྜྷ᮹

ᬕᩢᮥၹᩢ⧁ᙹᯩ۵Ğĥ᳑ÕᮥǍᖒ⧁ᙹᯩ݅. FLDWAV

༉⩶ᮡ݅ʑ܆ᅕ᪡zᮡa࠺ᅕᨱݡ⦽⮱෥⧕ᕾᯕᇩa܆⦹ḡอ,

(3)

Fig. 1. Index Map of the Nakdong Basin and River

ǎԕ᮹ĞᬑᱥĞᙹ॒(2007)ᮡᯕෝᙹᱶ⦹ᩍ⦽vᅙඹ᮹⮱෥⧕

ᕾᨱ ᱢᬊ⦽ ၵ ᯩ݅. ࢱ ༉⩶ᮡ zᮡ Saint-Venant ႊᱶ᜾ᮥ

ᮁ⦽₉ᇥჶᮥᱢᬊ⦹ᩍ⣡ᯕ⦹ḡอ, ḡ⩶᯦ಆႊ᜾ᨱᕽ₉ᯕa

ᯩ݅. HEC-RASᨱᕽ۵ᝅ⊂ࡽ݉໕ᯱഭෝ⪽ᬊ⧁ᙹᯩ۵ၹ໕, FLDWAV۵᳭ᬑݡ⋎᮹ᱶ⩶ᱢᯙ⦹ࠥ݉໕ᯕ᫵Ǎࡹᨕᙹᝍ-⦹

⡎ᨱݡ⦽šĥෝᖅᱶ⧕ᵝ۵ᇡaᱢᯙ᯲ᨦᯕ⦥᫵⦹Ñӹ, ༉⩶ᯕ

ၽᔑ⧁Ğᬑ, smoothing ʑჶᮥ☖⧕݉໕ᮥᅕᱶ⧕᧝⦽݅. ঑௝

ᕽ, FLDWAV۵݅ʑ܆ᅕ᪡zᮡᙹญǍ᳑ྜྷ᮹ᱶ⪶⦽ḡ⩶ᯱഭ

᯦ಆᯕᇩa܆⦹݅. ੱ⦽, ↽ɝၙʑᔢℎᙹྙ}ၽᇡᙹญᇥŝᨱᕽ ۵ᙹญ⠪a❡(Hydraulic Evaluation Team)ᮥǍᖒ⦹ᩍ⪮ᙹᩩ⊂

༉ऩ᮹༉⩶ᇩᦩᱶ, ၽᔑྙᱽ⧕đʑჶၙእ, ᇡᱢ⧊⦽ḡ⋉ᕽ/ᖅ

໦ᕽ, ݅ᙹ᮹đ⧉, AWIPS ქᱥŝPC ქᱥ᮹ᇩᯝ⊹, Ʊᮂŝᱶ᮹

ၙእ ੱ۵ እ⬉ᮉᖒ ॒ᨱ ݡ⧕ ⠪a⦹ᩡŁ, FLDWAV ༉⩶ᮥ

HEC-RAS ༉⩶ᮝಽݡℕෝ⇵ḥᵲᨱᯩ݅(NWS, 2007; ʡɚᙹ

॒, 2009). HEC-RAS۵ᙹḩ, ᮁᔍᯕᘂᨱݡ⦽༉᮹aa܆⦹ʑ

ভྙᨱ⨆⬥, ༉᮹ჵ᭥⪶ᰆᖒᯕᬊᯕ⦹ʑভྙᨱᅙᩑǍᨱᕽ۵

HEC-RASෝ₥┾⦹ᩡ݅. ༉⩶᮹⦹ᔢ݉໕ᮡᔍᨦᱥŝ⬥ಽǍᇥ

⦹ᩍǍ⇶⦹ᩡ݅(Fig. 2). ᔍᨦᱥ݉໕ᮡǎ☁⧕᧲ᇡ(2009b)ᨱᕽ

ᙹพ⦽⦹⃽ᱶእʑᅙĥ⫮݉໕ᮥᯕᬊ⦹ᩡᮝ໑, ᔍᨦ⬥݉໕ᮡ

bŖǍᄥӺ࠺vᝅ᜽ᖅĥᅕŁᕽ(ǎ☁⧕᧲ᇡ, 2009c; ǎ☁⧕᧲ᇡ, 2009d; ǎ☁⧕᧲ᇡ, 2009e; ǎ☁⧕᧲ᇡ, 2009f)᮹ĥ⫮݉໕ᮥᯕ ᬊ⦹ᩡ݅. ੱ⦽, ݅ʑ܆ᅕᱽᬱၹᩢᮥ᭥⧕Table 1ŝzᯕᙹญǍ

᳑ྜྷᨱݡ⦽ᱽᬱᮥᙹḲ⦹ᩍFig. 3ŝzᯕǍ⇶⦹ᩡ݅. HEC-RAS ᨱᕽ۵ᙹญǍ᳑ྜྷ᮹ᙹྙᬕᩢᮥŁಅ⦹ʑ᭥⧕ᕽTime Series Gate Openings, Elev Controlled Gates, Navigation Dams, Rules ᮹4aḡႊჶᮝಽǍᖒ⧁ᙹᯩᮝ໑ᅙᩑǍᨱᕽ۵Time Series Gate Openings ᪖ᖹᮥᱢᬊ⦹ᩍ༉⩶ᮥǍᖒ⦹ᩡ݅. a࠺ᅕᬕᩢ

᳑Õᮥᱢᬊ⦹ʑ᭥⧕2}᮹a࠺ᅕa᳕⊹ࡽvᱶŁಚᅕ᮹Ğᬑ, Gate 1ᮡ ᙹྙ׳ᯕ 20 m, ⡎ 45 m, Gate 2۵ ᙹྙ׳ᯕ 3 m,

⡎3 mಽᖅᱶ⦹ᩡŁ, Gate type۵Sluice, Weir ⩶┽۵Ogee, Weir ĥᙹ۵1.82ෝᱢᬊ⦹ᩡ݅. 3}᮹a࠺ᅕa᳕⊹ࡽݍᖒᅕ᮹

Ğᬑ, Gate 1~3᮹ᙹྙ׳ᯕ21 m, ⡎40 mಽᖅᱶ⦹ᩡŁ, Gate type۵Sluice, Weir ⩶┽۵Ogee, Weir ĥᙹ۵1.8ᮥᱢᬊ⦹ᩡ݅.

3}᮹a࠺ᅕa᳕⊹ࡽ⧊⃽₞ֶᅕ᮹Ğᬑ, Gate 1~3᮹ᙹྙ׳ᯕ

(4)

Fig. 2. Profile of Before/After for the Four Major Rivers Restoration Project

Table 1. Specifications of Weir

Weir Changnyong-Haman Habcheon-Changnyong Dalseong Gangjeong-Goryeong Height (m) 10.7(EL.-5.7m~5m) 9(EL.1.5m~10.5m) 9.5(EL.4.5m~14m) 14(EL.5.5m~19.5m) Control

Gate

Length (m) 549.3 138 589.5 953.5

Height (m) 7.08

(EL.-2.08m~EL.5.0m)

Lift(B40×H9×3) (EL.1.5m~EL.10.5m)

9.59 (EL.4.5m~EL.14.09m)

11 (EL.8.5m~EL.19.5m)

Gate type Rising sector

(B40×H7.08×3)

190(uncontrol(110)+

hybrid weir(80))

Rising sector (B40×H8×3)

Rising sector (B45×H11.03×2)

Design flood(100yr) (/s) 16,600 14,600 14,300 13,200

Design flood level

(before/after) (EL.m) 13.98/12.92 19.33/18.38 22.72/21.96 24.66/24.05

Management level

(Upstream/Downstream) (EL.m) 5.0/0.76 10.5/5.0 14.0/10.5 19.5/14.0

29.869 m, ⡎40 mಽᖅᱶ⦹ᩡŁ, Gate type۵Sluice, Weir ⩶┽۵ Broad Crested, Weir ĥᙹ۵1.71ᮥᱢᬊ⦹ᩡ݅. 3}᮹a࠺ᅕa

᳕⊹ࡽ₞ֶ⧉ᦩᅕ᮹Ğᬑ, Gate 1~3᮹ᙹྙ׳ᯕ20 m, ⡎40 mಽ ᖅᱶ⦹ᩡŁ, Gate type۵Sluice, Weir ⩶┽۵Ogee, Weir ĥᙹ۵

1.82ෝᱢᬊ⦹ᩡ݅. ᔢඹ݉Ğĥ᳑Õᮝಽ۵ᖒᵝᙹ᭥⢽᮹š⊂ᮁ

ప, ⦹ඹ݉ Ğĥ᳑Õᮡ ᯥ⧕ḥᙹ᭥⢽᮹ š⊂ᙹ᭥, ɩ⪙v, ⫊v

əญŁԉv᮹ᮁ᯦ᮁపᮡᖒᕽᙹ᭥⢽, ᵞŁᙹ᭥⢽əญŁÑൂv ᙹ᭥⢽š⊂ᮁపᮥbb⪽ᬊ⦹ᩡ݅. bᙹ᭥⢽᮹š⊂ᮁపᮡš⊂

ࡽᙹ᭥ᯱഭෝၵ┶ᮝಽ⦽ǎᙹྙ᳑ᔍᩑᅕ(2006, ÕᖅƱ☖ᇡ)ᨱ

ᱽ᜽ࡹᨕᯩ۵ᙹ᭥-ᮁపłᖁ᜾ᮥᯕᬊ⦹ᩍᮁపᮝಽ⪹ᔑ⦹ᩍ

ᱢᬊ⦹ᩡ݅(Fig. 4). ⪮ᙹᇥᕾᮥ᭥⦽ᙹ⊹༉᮹۵ᇡᱶඹಽ⧕ᕾ⦹

ᩡᮝ໑2006֥ၽᔾ⦽┽⣮“ᨱ᭥ܩᦥ(EWINIAR)” ᔍᔢᮥᖁᱶ

⦹ᩡ݅. ┽⣮“ᨱ᭥ܩᦥ”۵2006֥7ᬵ10ᯝᇡ░7ᬵ11ᯝʭḡ

⦽ၹࠥᨱᔢය⦹ᩡŁ┽⣮ᔢයᱥၽᔾ⦽Ḳᵲ⪙ᬑ᪡7ᬵ11ᯝᇡ░

7ᬵ13ᯝʭḡၽᔾ⦽Ḳᵲ⪙ᬑa࠺ၹࡹᨕᯕᵲ℉ࢱ⩶┽᮹ᙹྙ

łᖁᯕၽᔾ⦹ᩡ݅. ᨱ᭥ܩᦥ۵ᰍᔑ⦝⧕a18,344ᨖᬱၽᔾ⦹ᩡ

(5)

(a) Gangjeong-Goryeong (b) Dalseong

(c) Habcheon-Changnyong (d) Changnyong-Haman

Fig. 3. Cross-Section of Weir

(a) Discharge (b) Stage

Fig. 4. Boundary Condition

ᮝ໑ ᯕ۵ 1904֥ᇡ░ 2009֥ʭḡ ၽᔾ⦽ ┽⣮ᔍᔢ ᵲ 3᭥ᨱ

⧕ݚ⦽݅(ǎa┽⣮ᖝ░, 2011).

2.3 ऀ୨ࠑැজଭෂ૬ন

ᝅᱽᯱᩑᨱᕽ}ᙹಽ⮱෥ᮡ᜽eᨱݡ⧕ᄡ⦹۵ᇡᱶඹᯕ݅.

⦹⃽⮱෥ᇥᕾ᮹Ğᬑ, ᇡᱶඹ᪡ᱶᔢඹ۵ᙹ⊹༉᮹đŝᨱⓑ

₉ᯕa ၽᔾ⦽݅. ᱶᔢඹ۵ ᜽eᨱ ঑ෙ ⮱෥ ᄡ⪵ෝ Łಅ⦹ḡ

ᦫᦹʑভྙᨱ⮱෥ᱥᯕaၹᩢࡹḡᦫᦥ, ᇡᱶඹᨱእ⧕ᔢݡᱢᮝ ಽ℉ࢱᮁపᨱᕽⓑsᮥࠥ⇽⦽݅. ঑௝ᕽ, ⦹⃽ᱽႊᖅĥ᮹ᦩᱥ⊂

ᨱᕽᅙ݅໕ྙᱽaᨧḡอ, ᖅĥእᬊၰ⦹⃽᮹⬉ᮉᱢᬕᩢ⊂໕ᨱ ᕽ۵ྙᱽᱱᯕၽᔾ⧁ᙹᯩ݅. ᬑ⬉ᖎ(2002)ŝASCE(1996)ᨱᕽ ۵⦹⃽ᙹ᭥a᜽eᨱݡ⧕ɪĊ⦹íᄡ⪵⦹Ñӹ, ⦹ᔢĞᔍa

ๅᬑ᪥อ⦹ᩍ႑ᙹ᭥⬉ŝav⦹íӹ┡ԁĞᬑ⦹⃽ԕ⮱෥ᮥ

ᇡᱶඹಽ⧕ᕾ⧁äᮥǭŁ⦽ၵᯩ݅. 4ݡvᔕญʑᔍᨦᮥ☖⧕

(6)

Fig. 5. Relationship of k and n

Fig. 6. Comparison of Results Calculated by HEC-RAS Using Equation 1(Hwaweon Gauging Station)

⦹ࠥԕ݅ʑ܆ᅕaᖅ⊹ࡹᨩʑভྙᨱ, ݅ʑ܆ᅕ᮹a࠺ᅕၰŁᱶ ᅕᨱ঑ෙᱡඹ⬉ŝaၽᔾ⦹໑, ᵡᖅᨱ঑ෙɪĊ⦽⪹Ğᄡ⪵ಽ

⦹⃽ᙹ᭥a᜽eᨱݡ⧕ɪĊ⦹íᄡ⪵⧁ᙹᯩ݅. ঑௝ᕽ, ᅙ

ᩑǍᨱᕽ۵HEC-RASෝᯕᬊ⦹ᩍᇡᱶඹ⮱෥⧕ᕾᮥᙹ⧪⦹ᩡ

݅. ʡᕽᵡ॒(2012)ᮡᇡᱶඹᙹญᝅ⨹ᮥᙹ⧪⦹ᩍHEC-RAS᮹

ᇡᱶඹᙹ⊹༉᮹ᱢᬊᖒᮥá☁⦽đŝ, ᙹ᭥đŝ᮹᪅₉۵ᱡᮁప ᨱᕽ1 mm, Łᮁపᨱᕽ2 mm᮹ᙹ᭥₉(3%)aၽᔾ⦹ᩡŁᮁపᮡ

↽ݡ1%᪅₉aၽᔾ⦹ᩍᱥၹᱢᮝಽHEC-RASaᇡᱶඹ⮱෥

ᄡ⪵ෝ ᱶ⪶⦹í ༉᮹⦹۵ äᮝಽ ⠪a⦹ᩡ݅.

3. ᙹญ✚ᖒᇥᕾၰŁₑ

3.1 ౖୡ࠻Թ࣡৤ॺ୨ࢫՑஹ

⮱෥ᨱݡ⦽⦹ࠥ᮹ᱡ⧎ᱶࠥෝ⢽᜽⦹۵᳑ࠥĥᙹ۵⦹⃽᮹

ᮁపၰᙹ᭥ෝđᱶḴ۵aᰆᵲ᫵⦽ᙹ⊹ᵲ᮹⦹ӹᯕ໑᳑ࠥĥᙹ ᮹sᨱ᮹⧕ᙹ᭥᮹ᔢ᜚ၰ⦹vᯕđᱶࡽ݅. ᳑ࠥĥᙹ۵ᙹ⊹༉᮹

đŝᨱ ၝq⦹ʑ ভྙᨱ ⦹⃽᮹ ᖅĥ⪮ᙹ᭥ đᱶᨱ ঑ෙ ᱽႊ

ᖅĥ᜽ᙹ᭥᮹ŝݡੱ۵ŝᗭᔑᱶᮝಽᖅĥእᬊၰᱽႊ᮹ᦩᱥᨱ

ᩢ⨆ᮥ ၙ⋁ ᙹ ᯩ݅. ᳑ࠥĥᙹ۵ ʑᅙᱢᮝಽ۵ ⦹ᔢ᮹ ✚ᖒᨱ

᮹⧕đᱶࡹḡอ⦹⃽⮱෥ᮥĥᔑ⧁Ğᬑ᜾ᔾ, Ǎ᳑ྜྷ, ᔍ⧪,

⦹ᔢᄡ⪵, ᮁᔍప, ᙹ᭥, ᮁప॒᮹݅᧲⦽᫵ᯙॅᮥ᳑ࠥĥᙹᨱ

ၹᩢ᜽┍ᙹᯩ݅. ᯕ᪡zᯕ᳑ࠥĥᙹsᨱ۵⮱෥ᨱݡ⦽ᇩ໦⪶⦽

᫵ᗭॅᯕᩍ్aḡ༉᧲ᮝಽ}᯦ࡹᨕᯩ݅. ᳑ࠥĥᙹෝᔑᱶ⦹۵

ႊჶᮝಽ۵ᙹ⊹༉⩶ᮥᯕᬊ⦹ᩍ š⊂ᙹ᭥ၰĥᔑᙹ᭥እƱෝ

☖⧕᳑ࠥĥᙹෝᔑᱶ⦹۵ႊჶŝ, Cowan(1956)ŝChow(1959) ᮹ࠥ⢽ෝᯕᬊ⦹۵ႊჶ, ʑ᳕⦹⃽ᖅĥᨱᕽᔍᬊ⧩޹᳑ࠥĥᙹෝ

ₙŁ⦹ᩍš⧪ᱢᮝಽᱢᬊ⦹۵ႊჶᯕᯩ݅. Manning᮹᳑ࠥĥᙹ ۵ᅕ☖nᮝಽ⢽᜽⦹ᩍᔍᬊ⦹ḡอ⦹⃽}ᙹŖᔍa᪥ഭࡽᅖ݉໕

⦹ࠥ᮹Ğᬑᨱ۵⧊ᖒ᳑ࠥĥᙹ, ᷪᱡᙹಽ᪡⪮ᙹ░ෝ⧊ᖒ⦽᳑ࠥ

ĥᙹෝNᮝಽ⢽᜽⦹ᩍᔍᬊ⦹ʑࠥ⦽݅. ᝅྕᨱᕽ۵☖ᔢᱢᮝಽ

⦹⃽ᱶእʑᅙĥ⫮ᅕŁᕽᨱʑᰍࡹᨕᯩ۵sᮥᯕᬊ⦹Ñӹʑ᳕

⦹⃽ᖅĥᨱᕽᔍᬊ⦹޹⧊ᖒ᳑ࠥĥᙹෝ⪽ᬊ⦹Łᯩ݅. ᯕ్⦽

ႊჶᮡᖅĥ⪮ᙹ᭥ෝᔑᱶ⦹ʑ᭥⦹ᩍ℉ࢱᮁపᮥᯕᬊ⦹ᩍᔑᱶ

⦹ᩡÑӹ1₉ᬱ༉⩶ᨱǎ⦽ࡹᨕᔑᱶࡽsᯕʑভྙᨱᇡᱶඹ

ྙᱽෝ⧕ᕾ⦹Ñӹ݅₉ᬱᙹ⊹༉ߙยᮥᯕᬊ⦽ᱶၡ⦽ᙹ⊹á☁

ᨱ ݡ⦽ ྙᱽᱱᮥ aḡŁ ᯩ݅.

✚⯩, ᅙ ᩑǍᨱᕽ ḥ⧪⦹Łᯱ ⦹۵, 4ݡvᔕญʑ ᔍᨦ ᱥŝ

⬥ᵡᖅၰᙹญ᜽ᖅྜྷᬕᩢᨱ঑ෙᙹญ✚ᖒá☁ෝ⦹ʑ᭥⧕ᕽ۵

ᔍᨦ⬥᳑ࠥĥᙹsᯕ⦥᫵⦹݅. ⦹ḡอ, ᵡᖅ⬥ᄡ⪵⦹íࡹ۵

᳑ࠥĥᙹsᮥ⇵ᱶ⧁ᙹᨧ݅. ঑௝ᕽ, ᅙᩑǍᨱᕽ۵Manning᮹

᳑ࠥĥᙹaᦥܭ, ᳑Łs(Roughness height k)ᮥ₥┾⦹ʑಽ⦹ᩡ

݅. Strickler(1923)ᨱ ᮹⧕ ᱽᦩࡽ ᳑Łsᮡ Manning ĥᙹ᪡

ݍญྜྷญᱢᯙ᮹ၙa⪶ᝅ⦹݅. ᯕĥᙹ۵Ğĥ໕᳑ࠥ׳ᯕ᮹

1/6 ᜚ᨱ እಡ⦹ʑ ভྙᨱ ᳑ࠥ ׳ᯕ ⇵ᱶᨱᕽ ⓑ ᪅₉ෝ ԕࠥ

əđŝᨱ۵ⓑᩢ⨆ᮥၙ⊹ḡᦫ۵݅(ᬑ⬉ᖎ, 2002). Nassar(2011) ۵ Nile vᮥݡᔢᮝಽManning ᳑ࠥĥᙹ᪡᳑Łsᮥbbᱢᬊ⦹

ᩍ ⦹ࠥ⮱෥⧕ᕾᨱ ݡ⦽ ๅ}ᄡᙹ ၝqࠥ ᇥᕾᮥ ᙹ⧪⦽ đŝ,

᳑Łsᮥᱢᬊ⧁Ğᬑᮁᗮ⮱෥ᩩ⊂᮹ᱶ⪶ᖒᯕ⨆ᔢࡽ݅Ł⠪a

⦽ၵᯩ݅. Thoman and Nisbet(2007)ᮡ⪮ᙹ⮱෥ᨱݡ⦽ᙹ⊹༉

᮹᜽Manning ᳑ࠥĥᙹᨱእ⧕᳑Łsᯕᙹ᭥ᄡ⪵ᨱݡ⦽ᄡ⪵ෝ

ᅕ݅޵᯹Łಅ⦽݅Ł⠪a⦹ᩡ݅. Manning nᨱݡ⦽Strickler᮹

ႊᱶ᜾ᮡᯕ⬥ᨱNikuradse(1933)ᨱ᮹⧕ᕽ༉௹᯦ᯱⓍʑෝᯕᬊ

⦽ᝅ⨹ᮥ☖⧕š᮹ษₑĥᙹෝᱶᖒᱢᮝಽ₟Łᯱ᜽ࠥ⦹ᩡŁ, Williamson(1951)۵ Nikuradse(1933)᮹ ᩑǍđŝෝ ၵ┶ᮝಽ

Eq. (1)ŝ zᮡ nŝ k᮹ šĥ᜾ᮥ ᱽᦩ⦹ᩡ݅(Fig. 5).

ƌ á ƉÞÎîÓßîÏÓíÑ (k in meters) (1)

ᅙᩑǍᨱᕽ۵Ӻ࠺v⦹⃽ᱶእʑᅙĥ⫮(ǎ☁⧕᧲ᇡ, 2009b)ᨱ

ᙹพࡹᨕᯩ۵᳑ࠥĥᙹnᮥEq. (1)ᮥᯕᬊ⦹ᩍ᳑Łsᮝಽ⪹ᔑ

(7)

Table 2. The Set of Simulated Scenarios

Case Bed condition Weir operation condition Analysis condition

1 Before - Unsteady flow

2 After Full open gate Unsteady flow

3 After Closed gate Unsteady flow

4 Before - Steady flow

Fig. 7. Roughness Height k

(a) Hwaweon (b) Goryeonggyo (c) Hyeonpung

(d) Jeokpogyo (e) Jindong

Fig. 8. Results Simulated for the Case 1 Using HEC-RAS ᱢᬊ⦹ᩡᮝ໑, 2006֥┽⣮“ᨱ᭥ܩᦥ” ᔍᔢᮝಽᇡᱶඹ༉᮹ෝ

ᙹ⧪⦹ᩍ⪵ᬱᙹ᭥⢽ḡᱱᨱᕽ᮹ᙹ᭥đŝෝእƱ⦹ᩡ݅(Fig. 6).

Williamson(1951)ᨱ᮹⧕ᱽᦩࡽᄡ⪹᜾ᮡá☁đŝ, Manning nŝ᳑Łsᱢᬊᨱ঑ෙᙹ᭥đŝ᮹₉ᯕaၽᔾ⦹ḡᦫᦹʑভྙᨱ

┡ݚ⦽ äᮝಽ ❱݉ࡹᨩ݅.

3.2 ෇ܑஜডࢫۗ׆ۇ࣪૶ઽ઩ݗࠛ৤ࠤ൉ন

⦹ࠥᵡᖅၰ݅ʑ܆ᅕᬕᩢᨱ঑ෙᙹ⊹༉᮹᜽ӹญ᪅ᖅᱶᮡ

Table 2᪡z݅. Case 2۵༉ुᙹྙᯕ}ႊࡹᨕᯩ۵᳑Õᮥᱢᬊ⦹

ʑ᭥⧕Time Series Gate Openings᪖ᖹᨱᕽᙹྙ᮹׳ᯕෝ0mᮝ ಽᖅᱶ⦹ᩡ݅. 1₉ᬱ⦹ࠥ⇵ᱢ᜽, ᜽ĥᩕvᬑ, ᙹ᭥, ᮁపŝ

zᮡᔢඹĞĥ᳑Õᮡᙹญ༉⩶᮹ᦩᱶ⪵ෝ᭥⧕ᔢඹᨱᕽᮁ᯦ࡹ

۵↽ᗭᮁపᮥ300 ⽎/secಽᱢᬊ⦹ᩡᮝ໑↽ᗭᮁపᯕ⦹᮹ᮁపᮡ

↽ᗭᮁపᮝಽݡℕ⦹ᩡ݅. ᳑ŁsᮡEq. (1)ᮥᯕᬊ⦹ᩍ⪹ᔑࡽ

sᮥ⦹ࠥ᪡⪮ᙹ░ෝǍᇥ⦹ᩍᱢᬊ⦹ᩡ݅(Fig. 7). ༉᮹ʑeᮡ

2006֥7ᬵ8ᯝᇡ░2006֥7ᬵ25ᯕ໑, ⪹ᔑࡽ᳑Łsᮥᱢᬊ⦹

ᩍĥᔑࡽCase 1᮹ᙹ⊹༉᮹đŝ۵Fig. 8ŝz݅. bᙹ᭥š⊂ᗭ

(8)

Table 3. The Review of Reproducibility for Models

Statistics method Hwaweon Goryeonggyo Hyeonpung Jeokpogyo Jindong

RMSE(m) 0.994 1.280 1.186 1.153 0.658

NSEC 0.960 0.920 0.936 0.910 0.964

Table 4. Specifications of Results Simulated for Scenario Using HEC-RAS

Station Max Value Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 Case 4

Hwaweon

Discharge(/sec) 12,921 12,877 13,193 13,340.8

Stage(m) 23 21.6 22.1 23.91

Velocity(m/sec) 2.1 2.3 2.3 1.98

Goryeonggyo

Discharge(/sec) 12,832 12,278 13,165 13,340.8

Stage(m) 21.6 20.2 20.7 22.52

Velocity(m/sec) 2.3 2.5 2.5 2.17

Hyeonpung

Discharge(/sec) 12,808 12,276 12,991 13,340.8

Stage(m) 21 19.5 19.6 21.91

Velocity(m/sec) 2.5 2.6 2.8 2.33

Jeokpogyo

Discharge(/sec) 14,332 14,268 14,273 15,910.3

Stage(m) 17.3 16.6 16.6 18.34

Velocity(m/sec) 2.6 2.5 2.5 2.62

Jindong

Discharge(/sec) 17,109 17,023 17,042 18,726

Stage(m) 13 12.8 12.9 13.72

Velocity(m/sec) 3.5 3 3 3.6

ᄥಽᱶపᱢ☖ĥʑჶᨱɝÑ⦹ᩍš⊂᜽ĥᩕᯱഭ᪡ĥᔑđŝෝ

ᯕᬊ⦹ᩍ ⠪ɁᱽŒɝ᪅₉(Root mean square error, RMSE)᪡

Nash-sutcliffe ⬉ᮉĥᙹ(Nash-sutcliffe efficiency coefficient, NSEC)ಽᇥᕾ⦹ᩡ݅. ⠪ɁᱽŒɝ᪅₉۵⢽ᵡ⠙₉᮹ᯝၹ⪵ࡽ᜾

ᮝಽᝅᱽsŝ⇵ᱶs᮹₉ᯕa᨝ษᯙaෝ᦭ᙹᯩ۵ᙹ⊹ಽ៉

0ᨱɝᱲ⧁ᙹಾᱶ⪶ᖒᯕ׳ᮡäᮥ᮹ၙ⦹໑ᯕ᪡۵ၹݡಽNash- sutcliffe ⬉ᮉĥᙹ۵ ⇵ᱶ⊹᪡ ᝅ⊂⊹a ᯝ⊹⦹໕ 1.0ᯕŁ, ə

sᯕ0ŝ1.0 ᔍᯕᨱᯩᮝ໕⇵ᱶ⊹ෝᔍᬊ⦹۵äᯕᝅ⊂⊹᮹

⠪Ɂᮥᯕᬊ⦹۵äᅕ݅ᳬᮡđŝෝ᨜ᮥᙹᯩ݅. ੱ⦽, 0ᅕ݅

᯲ᮝ໕༉⩶᮹⇵ᱶđŝaӹᒹÑӹᝅ⊂ᯱഭaᯝšᖒᯕᨧᮭᮥ

᮹ၙ⦽݅. bႊჶᮡš⊂᜽ĥᩕᯱഭ᪡b༉⩶ᄥĥᔑđŝෝ

ᯕᬊ⦹ᩡᮝ໑bႊჶᄥᔑ⇽᜾ᮡ(2)᪡(3)ŝz݅. Table 3ᮡ

HEC-RAS ༉⩶ᮝಽĥᔑࡽđŝෝRMSE᪡NSECಽᇥᕾ⦽

đŝᯕ݅. b ᙹ᭥š⊂ᗭ ᄥಽ ᇥᕾ đŝ, ḥ࠺ᙹ᭥⢽ḡᱱᨱᕽ

aᰆ᯲ᮡ᪅₉aၽᔾ⦹ᩡᮝ໑, ŁಚƱᙹ᭥⢽ḡᱱᨱᕽaᰆⓑ

᪅₉aၽᔾ⦹ᩡ݅. ༉ुᙹ᭥⢽ḡᱱᨱᕽNSECa0.9 ᯕᔢ᮹

đŝaӹ┡ԍʑভྙᨱᙹ⊹༉⩶ᨱ᮹⦽đŝ᮹ᝁ഑ࠥa׳݅Ł

⧁ ᙹ ᯩ݅. ᇡᇥᱢᮝಽ ᱡᙹ᭥ᯝ Ğᬑ, š⊂ sŝ ᇩᯝ⊹⦹۵

ᇡᇥᨱݡ⧕ᕽ۵ᩍ్aḡ᫵ᯙᯕᯩᮥᙹᯩ۵ߑ, əᬱᯙᮝಽ۵

⦹⃽⩶ᔢ᮹ ᇩᯝ⊹᪡ ḡඹ ᮁ᯦ᮁప ᔑ⇽ᨱᕽ ၽᔾ⧁ ᙹ ᯩ۵

᪅₉௝Ł ❱݉ࡽ݅.

«¦¬ž áöćć§ÎāƇ á Îƌ Þ¨Ƈà ±ƇßÏ (2)

§¬žœ á Î à ć

āƇ á Î

§ Þ¨Ƈà ¨¦ßÏ

āƇ á Î

§ Þ¨Ƈà ±ƇßÏ

(3)

ᩍʑᕽ,¨Ƈ۵š⊂ᙹ᭥,±Ƈ۵ĥᔑᙹ᭥, Nᮡߑᯕ░}ᙹ,¨¦۵

š⊂⠪Ɂsᯕ݅.

Table 4᪡ Fig. 9۵ ᜽ӹญ᪅ᨱ ঑ෙ ᙹญ✚ᖒᮥ Caseᄥಽ

ᇥᕾ⦽ đŝෝ ࠥ᜽⦽ äᯕ݅. Case 1~3ᮥ ᇥᕾ⦽ đŝ, ᔍᨦ

ᱥŝ⬥⦹ࠥᵡᖅᨱ঑ෙ⦹ᔢᄡ⪵ಽ᧝ʑࡹ۵ᮁప, ᙹ᭥, ᮁᗮ᮹

ၝqࠥa ⦹ඹ ᅕ݅ ᔢඹ ḡᱱᨱᕽ ޵ Ⓧí ӹ┡ԍŁ, ᔍᨦ ⬥

⦹ᔢ݉໕ᨱᕽ᮹a࠺ᅕ}⠱ᨱ঑ෙᮁప, ᙹ᭥, ᮁᗮ᮹ၝqࠥ۵

⪵ᬱၰŁಚƱᙹ᭥⢽ḡᱱᨱᕽⓍíӹ┡ԍ݅. ᔍᨦᱥŝᔍᨦ

⬥ᙹ᭥đŝෝእƱ⦹໕, 0.2~1.5 m ჵ᭥ᨱᕽᙹ᭥ᱡ⦹⬉ŝa

ӹ┡ԍᮝ໑݅ʑ܆ᅕ᮹ᙹྙᮥ݌Łᬕᩢ⧁Ğᬑᱡᙹ᭥ᨱᕽšญ

(9)

(a) Hwaweon (b) Goryeonggyo (c) Hyeonpung

(d) Jeokpogyo (e) Jindong

Fig. 9. Results of Water Level Simulated for Scenario Using HEC-RAS

ᙹ᭥a⩶ᖒࡹ۵äᮥ᦭ᙹᯩᨩᮝӹ, Łᙹ᭥ᨱᕽ۵ᙹྙ}⠱ᨱ

঑ෙᙹ᭥ᩢ⨆ᮡⓍḡᦫᮡäᮝಽӹ┡ԍ݅. ݅ʑ܆ᅕ۵Łᱶᅕ᪡

a࠺ᅕಽ ᖅĥࡹŁ ᯩᮝӹ, Łᱶᅕ᮹ ᔢ݉ᇡa ĥ⫮⦹ᔢŁᅕ݅

׳ᮡĞᬑ۵ၹऽ᜽⦹⡎᮹ᱥ݉໕ᮥa࠺ᅕಽᖅĥ⧕᧝⦹ḡอ, ᯝᇡ⬂݉Ǎeᨱᕽอa࠺ᅕෝᖅ⊹⦹ᩡʑভྙᨱ⪮ᙹ᜽a࠺ᅕ ᮹ᬕᩢᯕๅᬑᨕಖŁa࠺ᅕᬕᩢᨱ঑ෙ℉ࢱᙹ᭥ᱡ⦹⬉ŝ۵

Ⓧḡᦫᮡäᮝಽӹ┡ԍ݅. ᯕෝ᳦⧊ᱢᮝಽŁಅ⧕ᅝভ, ݅ʑ܆

ᅕᬕᩢᮥ☖⦽⬉ŝ᷾ݡ۵⊹ᙹᅕ݅۵ᯕᙹᨱᵲᱱᮥࢱᨕᩑǍෝ

ḥ⧪⦹۵äᯕၵ௭Ḣ⦹݅Ł❱݉ࡹ໑, ⪮ᙹʑ݅ʑ܆ᅕᬕᩢᮡ

a࠺ᅕෝ༉ࢱ}ႊ⦽ᔢ┽ᨱᕽᬕᩢ⦹۵äᯕ┡ݚ⦹݅Łᔍഭࡽ

݅. ᮁᩎᮁ⇽ᙹྙłᖁ᮹℉ࢱᮁపᯕĥᗮᮁ᯦ࡹ۵äᮝಽaᱶ⦹

ᩍᱶᔢᔢ┽ಽ༉᮹⦽Case 4۵⪮ᙹ❭᮹qᙁ⬉ŝ॒ᯕྕ᜽ࢉᮝ ಽ៉Case 1ᨱᕽᔑᱶࡽ⪮ᙹ᭥ᅕ݅᧞1 m aపᙹ᭥aŝݡ

⇵ᱶࡹᨩ݅. ᱥĞᙹ॒(2005)ᮡᇡ॒ඹ༉⩶ᨱ᮹⦽⪮ᙹ᭥ĥᔑđ ŝa ᇡᱶඹ ༉⩶᮹ s ᅕ݅ 0.2~1.0 m ᱶࠥ Ⓧí ᔑᱶࡽ݅۵

ᩑǍđŝෝၽ⢽⦽ၵᯩᮝ໑, ᯕ۵⪮ᙹపᯕ50% ᱶࠥ᷾a⦹ᩡᮥ

ভ᪡ ݡ॒⦽ đŝ௝Ł ⦹ᩡ݅.

Fig. 10ᮡCaseᄥvᱶŁಚᅕ, ݍᖒᅕ, ⧊⃽₞ֶᅕ, ₞ֶ⧉ᦩᅕ ᮹Ḣᔢඹᮁ᯦ᮁᗮᮥࠥ᜽⦽äᯕ݅. ᱡᮁపᯕᮁ᯦ࢁভCase 1ᨱ እ⧕ Case 2᪡ Case 3᮹ Ğᬑ ᮁᗮᯕ ᯲ᦥḡ۵ äᮥ ᦭

ᙹ ᯩᨩ݅. Case 2۵ Fig. 9ᨱ ࠥ᜽ࡽ ၵ᪡ zᯕ ᵡᖅᨱ ᮹⧕

ԏᦥḥ⦹ᔢŁᨱᕽ݅ʑ܆ᅕ᮹a࠺ᅕa}ႊࡹᨕᮁ᯦ࡹ۵ᮁప ᯕᱡඹ⬉ŝᨧᯕ⦹ඹಽᮁ⦹ࡹᨕᙹᝍᯕԏᦥᲭʑভྙᨱᮁᗮࠥ

ᱡ⦹ࡽäᮝಽ❱݉ࡽ݅. ੱ⦽, Case 3᮹Ğᬑ݅ʑ܆ᅕ᮹šญᙹ᭥

ᬕᩢᨱ ᮹⧕ ⮱෥ᯕ ᱶℕࡹᨕ ᮁᗮᯕ qᗭࡽ äᮝಽ ❱݉ࡹ໑,

ᮁᗮ᮹ᱡ⦹۵⦹ᔢᨱ᯲ᬊ⦹۵ᱥ݉᮲ಆᮥ qᗭ᜽┅ʑভྙᨱ

⠪Ɂ⦹ᔢ᮹ᱥ݉᮲ಆᯕ⦹ᔢǍᖒྜྷḩ᮹⦽ĥᱥ݉᮲ಆᨱ⦥᫵⦽

᮲ಆᅕ݅ ᯲ᮡ Ğᬑ ᮁ᯦ࡽ ᮁᔍa ♕ᱢࢁ äᮝಽ ᩩᔢࡽ݅.

ᅙᩑǍᨱᕽᱢᬊ⦽Case 2᪡Case 3ᮡḡ⩶᳑Õᮥĥ⫮݉໕ᮝ ಽᱢᬊ⦹ᩡʑভྙᨱᝅᱽᔢ⫊ŝ݅ෝᙹᯩ݅. ঑௝ᕽ, ⦹ࠥ᪡

⪮ᙹ░ᨱݡ⦽⩥⫊⊂పᮥ☖⧕≉ाࡽḡ⩶Ŗeᱶᅕෝᱢᬊ⦹ᩍ

⇵aᱢᯙá☁a⦥᫵⧁äᮝಽ❱݉ࡽ݅. ੱ⦽, ⨆⬥݅᧲⦽a࠺ᅕ

}⠱᜽ӹญ᪅ᨱ঑ෙᙹญ✚ᖒᩢ⨆ၰ⦹ᔢÑ࠺ᇥᕾᮥᙹ⧪⦹ᩍ

4ݡvᔕญʑ ᔍᨦᮝಽ ɪᄡ⦽ ⦹⃽⪹Ğᨱ ݡ⦽ ŝ⦺ᱢ ྜྷ⪹Ğ

(10)

(a) Gangjeong-Goryeong (b) Dalseong

(c) Habcheon-Changnyong (d) Changnyong-Haman

Fig. 10. Results of Velocity Simulated for Scenario Using HEC-RAS

šญℕĥෝ⪶ᅕ⦹Łʑ⬥ᄡ⪵॒ᔩಽᬕ⪹Ğྙᱽᨱᖁᱽᱢᮝಽ

ݡ᮲⦹ʑ᭥⦽ᔾ┽ᱢᩢ⨆, ݅ʑ܆ᅕԕ┢ᙹ᪡᳑ඹၽᔾ, ᮁᔍ⋉ᱥ

⧕᧝ ⧁ äᮝಽ ᔍഭࡽ݅.

4. đು

ᅙ ᩑǍᨱᕽ۵ 4ݡvᔕญʑᔍᨦᮥ ☖⧕ ᄡ⪵ࡽ ⦹ࠥḡ⩶ ၰ

ᙹญǍ᳑ྜྷᬕᩢᨱ᮹⦽ᩢ⨆ᮥá☁⦹ʑ᭥⧕༉⩶ᮥǍ⇶⦹Ł

2006֥┽⣮“ᨱ᭥ܩᦥ” ᔍᔢᮥݡᔢᮝಽ1₉ᬱᇡᱶඹ⮱෥⧕ᕾ

ᮥ☖⦽ᙹญ✚ᖒᮥᇥᕾ⦹ᩡ݅. ᱶඹ᪡ᇡᱶඹ⮱෥⧕ᕾ, ᳑ࠥĥᙹ

᪡᳑Łs᮹šĥ, ᔍᨦᱥŝ⬥⦹⃽݉໕əญŁᙹྙᬕᩢᨱ

঑ෙ⦹⃽⮱෥ᨱݡ⧕݅bࠥಽᩑǍෝ⦹ᩡᮝ໑əđುᮡ݅ᮭŝ

z݅.

(1) ᱶᔢඹ᮹Ğᬑ᜽eᨱ঑ෙ⮱෥ᄡ⪵aŁಅࡹḡᦫʑভྙᨱ

⮱෥ᱥᯕaၹᩢࡹḡᦫᦥ, ᇡᱶඹᨱእ⧕ᔢݡᱢᮝಽ℉ࢱ

ᮁపၰᙹ᭥ᨱᕽⓑsᮥࠥ⇽⦹໑ᔍᨦᱥ݉໕ᮝಽ⮱෥⧕ᕾ

ᮥᙹ⧪⦽đŝ, bᙹ᭥⢽ḡᱱᄥಽᮁపᮡ419.8~1617 ⽎/sec, ᙹ᭥۵ 0.72~1.04 m ŝݡ ᔑᱶ⦹۵ äᮝಽ ӹ┡ԍ݅.

(11)

(2) 4ݡvᔕญʑᔍᨦᱥŝ⬥ᵡᖅၰᙹญ᜽ᖅྜྷᬕᩢᨱ঑ෙ

ᙹญ✚ᖒá☁ෝ⦹ʑ᭥⧕ᕽ۵ᔍᨦ⬥᳑ࠥĥᙹsᯕ⦥᫵⦹

ḡอ, ᵡᖅ⬥ᄡ⪵⦹íࡹ۵᳑ࠥĥᙹsᮥ⇵ᱶ⧁ᙹᨧʑ

ভྙᨱᅙᩑǍᨱᕽ۵Williamson(1951)ᨱ᮹⧕ᱽᦩࡽᄡ⪹

᜾ᮥᯕᬊ⦹ᩍManning᮹᳑ࠥĥᙹᨱᕽ᳑Łs(Roughness height k)ᮝಽᄡ⪹ᱢᬊ⦹ᩡŁ2006֥┽⣮“ᨱ᭥ܩᦥ” ᔍᔢ ᮝಽᇡᱶඹ༉᮹ෝᙹ⧪⦹ᩍ⪵ᬱᙹ᭥⢽ḡᱱᨱᕽ᮹ᙹ᭥đŝ

ෝእƱ⦽đŝ, Williamson(1951)ᨱ᮹⧕ᱽᦩࡽᄡ⪹᜾ᮡ

ᱢ⧊⦽ äᮝಽ ❱݉ࡹᨩ݅.

(3) ᔍᨦᱥŝ⬥᮹⦹⃽݉໕⮱෥⧕ᕾᮥᙹ⧪⦽đŝ, ᔍᨦᱥᅕ݅

ᔍᨦ⬥ᙹ᭥a0.2~1.5 m ჵ᭥ᨱᕽᱡ⦹ࡹ۵äᮝಽӹ┡ԍ݅.

ᙹྙᬕᩢᨱ঑ෙᱡᙹ᭥᪡Łᙹ᭥ᨱᕽ᮹ᩢ⨆ᮡCase 2᮹

Ğᬑᱡᙹ᭥ᨱᕽ۵šญᙹ᭥aᮁḡࡹ۵äᮥ⪶ᯙ⦹ᩡŁ, Ł ᙹ᭥ᨱᕽ۵Case 2᪡Case 3᮹ᙹ᭥a0~0.5 m᮹ჵ᭥ᨱᕽ

ᙹ᭥₉a ၽᔾ⦹ᩡ݅. Łᙹ᭥ᨱᕽ᮹ ᙹྙ}⠱ᨱ ঑ෙᙹ᭥

ᩢ⨆ᮡⓍḡᦫᮡäᮝಽӹ┡ԍ݅. ə్ӹ, ᱡᮁపᨱᕽCase 2᪡Case 3ᮡᮁᗮ᮹qᗭಽᮁᔍ♕ᱢᯕၽᔾ⧁äᮝಽᩩᔢࡽ

݅.

(4) ݡȽ༉☁༊Ŗᔍ॒ᮝಽᄡ⪵ࡽ⦹⃽⪹Ğ᮹ᙹญ, ᙹḩ, ᮁᔍ,

⊽ᙹŖeᦩᱶᖒá☁॒ᱶపᱢᇥᕾᮥ᭥⧕ᕽ۵⨆⬥, ĥ⫮݉

໕ᯕᦥܭ, ᔍᨦ⬥⊂పࡽ⦹⃽݉໕ᯱഭෝၹᩢ⧕᧝ࢁäᯕ໑

ḡ⩶ᯱഭᐱอᦥܩ௝, ⦹⃽ᱥၹᨱÙ⊽⦹ᔢŁ, ⦹ᔢ☁, ᮁᗮ, ᙹ᭥, ᜾ᔾ⃽ᯕ, ᙹḩ, ᮁపᨱݡ⦽š⊂ᯕ࠺ၹࡹᨕ᧝⧁äᯕ

݅. š⊂ࡽᙹญ✚ᖒᯱഭෝၵ┶ᮝಽᖁ݉᭥⦹⃽šญᐱอ

ᦥܩ௝ ໕ᱢᯙ }ֱ᮹ ⦹⃽šญෝ ☖⧕ ǎᇡᱢᮝಽ ၽᔾ⧁

ᙹᯩ۵♕ᱢ, ᖙǕ, ⠙ᙹ᭥, ᜾ᔾ⃽ᯕ॒ᮥŁಅ⦽⦹⃽šญa

⦥᫵⦹໑ᯕ۵ǎaᙹญǍ᳑ྜྷšญᨱᗭ᫵ࡹ۵สݡ⦽ᯱᬱ

ᮥ ↽ᱢ⪵⦹Ł ᦩᱶᱢ ⦹⃽šญෝ ᭥⦽ ʑⅩᯱഭಽ ⪽ᬊࢁ

ᙹ ᯩᮥ äᯕ݅.

qᔍ᮹ɡ

ᅙᩑǍ۵ǎ☁Ʊ☖ᇡÕᖅʑᚁ⩢ᝁᔍᨦ᮹ᩑǍእḡᬱ(11ʑᚁ

⩢ᝁC06)ᨱ ᮹⧕ ᙹ⧪ࡹᨩ᜖ܩ݅.

References

ASCE (1996). River hydraulics. Technical engineering and design guide as adepted from us army corps of engineers, No. 18, ASCE, New York.

Chow, V. T. (1959). Open-channel hydraulics, McGraw-Hill Book Co., New Yourk.

Cowan, W. L. (1956). “Estimating hydraulic roughness coefficients.”

Agricultural Engineering, Vol. 37, No. 7, pp. 473-475.

Fread, D. L. and Lewis, J. K. (1998). NWS FLDWAV Model, NWSReport, Hydrologic Research Laboratory, NWS Office of Hydrology, NWA, Silver Spring, MD.

Hydrology Engineering Center (2010). HEC-RAS river analysis system user's manual, US Army Corps of Engineers, Davis, CA.

Hicks F. E. and Peacock T. (2005). “Suitability of HEC-RAS for flood forecasting.” Canadian Water Resources Journal/Revue Canadienne des Ressources Hydriques, Vol. 30, No. 2, pp.

159-174.

Jun, K. S., Kim, J. S. and Kim, H. J. (2005). “Estimation of design flood stream water levels.” Proceedings of 2005 Korean Society of Civil Engineers, Korean Society of Civil Engineers, pp.

2904-2916 (in Korean).

Jun, K. S., Kim, J. S. and Lee, S. H. (2007). “Enhancement of FLDWAV model for its application to the main reach of the Han River.” Journal of Korea Water Resources Association, Vol. 40, No. 2, pp. 135-146 (in Korean).

Kang, H. S., Kim, S. E. and Hong, H. J. (2011). “Numerical investigations of flood level reduction via securing lateral river space for extreme flood.” Journal of Korean Society of Hazard Mitigation, Vol. 11, No. 6, pp. 217-226 (in Korean).

Kim, B. C. and Lee, J. S. (2009). “Evaluation of river flood stability after river restoration.” Journal of Korea Contents Association, Vol. 9, No. 10, pp. 417-426 (in Korean).

Kim, J. Y., Lee, J. K. and Ahn, J. S. (2010). “Optimization for roughness coefficient of river in Korea - review of application and Han river project water elevation-.” Korean Society of Civil Engineers, Vol. 30, No. 6B, pp. 571-578 (in Korean).

Kim, K. S., Kim, J. S. and Kim, W. (2009). “Comparison and analysis of one-dimensional models for river flow analysis.”

Water and Future, Korea Water Resources Association, Vol. 42, No. 7, pp. 56-61 (in Korean).

Kim, S. j., Hong, S. j., Yoon, B. m. and Ji, U. (2012). “Feasibility analysis of hec-ras for unsteady flow simulation in the stream channel with a side-weir detention basin.” Journal of Korea Water Resources Association, Vol. 45, No. 5, pp. 495-503 (in Korean).

Kim, Y. S. (2010). “Plan of flood forecasting during four major rivers restoration - management of channel and river facilities.”

Four Major Rivers Restoration 2nd Conference. Water and the Future, Korea Water Resources Association, Vol. 43, No. 2, pp.

14-17 (in Korean).

Lee, S. J., Shin, H. H., Kim, J. C. and Hwang, M. h. (2010). “Flood characteristics at nakdong estuary with 1 dimensional unsteady model.” Journal of The Korean Environmental Sciences Society, Vo. 19, No. 2, pp. 149-155 (in Korean).

Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs (2006). Korea hydrological investigation yearbook (in Korean).

Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs (2009). Plan of watershed comprehensive design for Nakdong river (in Korean).

Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs (2009a). Master plan of the four major rivers restoration project (in Korean).

(12)

Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs (2009b). The basic plan of stream-improvement for Nakdong river-Geumho river~Estuary (in Korean).

Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs (2009c). The detail design of development of residential sites for Nak river 18 district (in Korean).

Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs (2009d). The detail design of development of residential sites for Nak river 20 district (in Korean).

Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs (2009e). The detail design of development of residential sites for Nak river 22 district (in Korean).

Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs (2009f). The detail design of development of residential sites for Nak river 23 district (in Korean).

Nassar M. A. (2011). “Multi-parametric sensitivity analysis of CCHE2D for channel flow simulations in Nile River.” Journal of Hydro-environment Research, Vol. 5, pp. 187-195.

National Typhoon Center (2011). Typhoon white book.

Nikuradse, J. (1933). Laws of flow in rough pipes. NACA TM 1292.

NWS (2007). Evaluation of difference hydraulic models in support of nationa weather service operations, Final Report of the Hydraulic Model Evaluation Team, NWS, NOAA.

Pappenbergera, F., Bevena, K., Horrittb, M. and Blazkova, S.

(2005). “Uncertainty in the calibration of effective roughness parameters in HEC-RAS using inundation and downstream level observations.” Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 302, pp. 46-49.

Prafulkumar, V. T., Prem, L. P. and Prakash, D. P. (2011).

Calibration of HEC-RAS model on prediction of flood for lower Tapi river. India. Journal of Water Resource and Protection, Vol.

3, pp. 805-811.

Strickler, A. (1923). Beitrage zur frage der geschwindigkeitsformel und der rauhigkeitszahlen fur strome. kanale und geschlossene leitungen, Mitteilungen des Eidgenossischen Amtes fur Wasser- wirtschaft 16, Bern, Switzerland (Translated as Contributions to the question of a velocity formula and roughness data for streams, channels and closed pipelines. by T. Roesgan and W. R. Brownie, Translation T-10, W. M. Keck Lab of Hydraulics and Water Resources, Calif. Inst. Tech., Pasadena, Calif. January 1981).

Thomas, H. and Nisbet T. R. (2007). “An assessment of the impact of floodplain woodland on flood flows.” Water and Environment Journal, Vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 114-126.

Williamson, J. (1951). “The laws of flow in rough pipes.” La Houille Blanche, Vol. 6, No. 5, p. 738.

Woo, H. S. (2002). River hydraulics, Cheong moon gak (in Korean).

수치

Fig. 1. Index Map of the Nakdong Basin and River  ǎԕ᮹ĞᬑᱥĞᙹ॒(2007)ᮡᯕෝᙹᱶ⦹ᩍ⦽vᅙඹ᮹⮱෥⧕ ᕾᨱ ᱢᬊ⦽ ၵ ᯩ݅
Fig. 2. Profile of Before/After for the Four Major Rivers Restoration Project
Fig. 3. Cross-Section of Weir
Fig. 6. Comparison of Results Calculated by HEC-RAS Using  Equation 1(Hwaweon Gauging Station)
+5

참조

관련 문서

“A study on rainfall characteristics and deter- mination of probability rainfall amount at various district in Korea.” Journal of the Korean Society of Civil Engineers,

Biological assessment of water quality by using epilithic diatoms in major river systems (Geum, Youngsan, Seomjin River), Korea, Journal of Korean Society on Water Environment,

Occurrence and succession pattern of cyanobacteria in the upper region of the Nakdong River: Factors influencing Aphanizomenon bloom, Journal of Korean Society on

Ryu(2008), Topographical Change Monitoring of the Sandbar and Estimation of Suspended Solid Flux in the Nakdong River Estuary, Journal of the Korean Society

Flow Characteristics Depending upon Installing Training levee in Channel Junction, 2009 Korean Society of Civil Engineers Conference Water Resources Section,

“Analysis of GIUH model by using GIS in river basin.” Journal of the Korea Water Resources Association, Vol.. “GIUH Variation by estimating locations.” Journal of Korean Society

“Research on Performance Test of 2-Stage Heat Pump System using River Water as a Heat Source”, Journal of The Society of Air- Conditioning and Refrigeration Engineers of

S., 2010, “Tool Geometry Optimization and Magnetic Abrasive Polishing for Non-ferrous Material,” Journal of the Korean Society of Machine Tool Engineers , Vol.