• 검색 결과가 없습니다.

3 Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3 Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "3 Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3 Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam"

Copied!
146
0
0

로드 중.... (전체 텍스트 보기)

전체 글

(1)

3 Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3 Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam

BENDING OF HOMOGENEOUS BEAMS

REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM BEHAVIOR

DESIGN OF TENSION REINFORCED REC. BEAMSS G O S O O C C S DESIGN AIDS

PRACTICAL CONSIDERATIONS IN DESIGN PRACTICAL CONSIDERATIONS IN DESIGN REC. BEAMS WITH TEN. AND COMP. REBAR T BEAMS

T BEAMS

447.327

Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab. I

(2)

3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam

Typical Structures Typical Structures

(3)

3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam

Typical Structures Typical Structures

(4)

3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam

Typical Structures Typical Structures

(5)

3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam

Typical Structures Typical Structures

(6)

3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam

BENDING OF HOMOGENEOUS BEAMS

3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam

BENDING OF HOMOGENEOUS BEAMS Concrete is homogeneous?

Concrete is homogeneous?

Reinforced Concrete is homogeneous?

The fundamental principles in the design and analysis of

reinforced concrete are the same as those of homogeneous structural material.

Two components Internal forces

at any cross section

Two components

normal to the section - flexure tangential to the section - shear at any cross section tangential to the section shear

(7)

3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam

REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM BEHAVIOR REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM BEHAVIOR Basic Assumptions in Flexural Design

1. A cross section that was plane before loading remains plane under load

plane under load

F unit strain in a beam above and below the neutral axis are proportional to the distance from that axis;

axis are proportional to the distance from that axis;

strain distribution is linear G Bernoulli’s hypothesis ( not true for deep beams)

( not true for deep beams)

(8)

3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam

REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM BEHAVIOR REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM BEHAVIOR Basic Assumptions in Flexural Design

2. Concrete is assumed to fail in compression, when ε = ε (limit state) = 0 003

when εc = εcu (limit state) = 0.003

3. Stress-strain relationship of reinforcement is assumed to p be elastoplastic (elastic-perfectly plastic).

G Strain hardening effect is neglected

4. Tensile strength of concrete is neglected for calculation of flexural strength

of flexural strength.

(9)

3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam

REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM BEHAVIOR

f ) l f h l

Basic Assumptions in Flexural Design

cf.) Typical s-s curve of homogeneous material

proportional

not proportional not proportional

(10)

3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam

REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM BEHAVIOR REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM BEHAVIOR Basic Assumptions in Flexural Design

5. Compressive stress-strain relationship for concrete may be assumed to be any shape (rectangular

may be assumed to be any shape (rectangular, trapezoidal, parabolic, etc) that results in an acceptable prediction of strength.p p g

G Equivalent rectangular stress distribution

(11)

3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam

REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM BEHAVIOR

3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam

REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM BEHAVIOR Behavior of RC beam under increasing load

(12)

3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam

REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM BEHAVIOR

3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam

REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM BEHAVIOR Behavior of RC beam under increasing load

entMome

EI M y =

= ε

φ y EI

Curvature

(13)

3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam

REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM BEHAVIOR

3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam

REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM BEHAVIOR Elastic uncracked Section

not homogeneous homogeneous

uncracked transformed section

A (n-1)A

section

As (n-1)As

In elastic range

s

c f

f F Es f f

f

s s c c

f

f = =

= ε

ε F fs = s fc = nfc

(14)

3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam

REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM BEHAVIOR

3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam

REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM BEHAVIOR Example 3.1 (SI unit)

A rectangular beam 250

As = 1,520 mm2

650 600

As 1,520 mm

fcu = 27 MPa (cylinder strength) fr = 3.5 MPa (modulus of rupture) fr 3.5 MPa (modulus of rupture) fy = 400 MPa

(unit: mm) D25

Calculate the stresses caused by a

bending moment M = 60 kN·m (unit: mm)

bending moment M = 60 kN m

(15)

3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam

REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM BEHAVIOR

3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam

REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM BEHAVIOR Solution

250

2.0 105

7 84 8 Es

n = = × =

650 600

3 7.84 8

8,500

c cu

n = E = f =

650

(n 1)As = ×7 1,520 10,640= mm2

transformed area of rebars

D25

transformed section

(16)

3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam

REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM BEHAVIOR

3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam

REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM BEHAVIOR Solution

Assuming the uncracked section

250 Assuming the uncracked section, neutral axis

2

( 1) bh n A d

dA + −

650 600

( 1) 2

( 1) 342

x s

s

n A d Q ydA

y A dA bh n A

= = = + −

+ −

650

342 mm

=

3

2 bh h

I y dA y bh + ⎜

D25 2

12 2

( ) ( 1)

x

s

I y dA y bh

d y n A

= = +

+

transformed section 6, 477 106 4

s

= × mm

(17)

3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam

REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM BEHAVIOR

3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam

REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM BEHAVIOR Solution

Compressive stress of concrete

at the top fiber 250

c 3.17

x

f M y MPa

= I =

650 600600

Tension stress of concrete at the bottom fiber

D25

( ) 2.85

ct r

x

f M h y MPa f

= I = <

Assumption of uncracked, transformed section is justified !! D25

(18)

3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam

REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM BEHAVIOR

3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam

REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM BEHAVIOR Solution

Stress in the tensile steel 250

( ) 19 12

f M d MP

600

( ) 19.12

s

x

f n M d y MPa

= I =

650 600

Compare fc and fs with fcu and fy respectively!!!

D25 D25

(19)

3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam

REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM BEHAVIOR

3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam

REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM BEHAVIOR Elastic Cracked Section

This situation is under service load state

f > f f < 11 f f < f

(20)

3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam

REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM BEHAVIOR REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM BEHAVIOR Elastic Cracked Section

To determine neutral axis

kd (1)(1)

0 )

2 ( )

( kd nA d kd = kd

b s

(21)

3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam

REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM BEHAVIOR REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM BEHAVIOR Elastic Cracked Section

Tension & Comp. force

) (kd f b

C c ( ) T A f (2)

2 b kd

C = fc T = As fs (2)

(22)

3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam

REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM BEHAVIOR REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM BEHAVIOR Elastic Cracked Section

Bending moment about C

) (

)

( jd A f jd T

M = T( jd) = A f ( jd) (3)

M s s (3)

) ( jd A

fs = M (4)

F As( jd)

Bending moment about T

f ( )( ) ) 2

( f b kd jd jd

C

M = = c (5)

2M

2

2 kjbd

fc = M (6)

F How to get k and j ?

(23)

3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam

REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM BEHAVIOR REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM BEHAVIOR Elastic Cracked Section

bd As ρ =

Defining Then, As = ρbd (7)

Substitute (7) into (1) and solve for k

k ( )2 2 (8)

0 ) 2 (

)

( kd nA d kd = kd

b s

n n

n

k = (ρ )2 + 2ρ ρ (8)

/ 3 d d kd

f ) / 3

1

jd d kd j k

= −

cf.)

F 1 See Handout #3-3

j = − 3

F See Handout #3 3

Table A.6

(24)

3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam

REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM BEHAVIOR REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM BEHAVIOR Example 3.2 (Quiz)

The beam of Example 3.1 is subjected to a bending

moment M=120 kN·m (rather than 60 kN·m as previously).

Calculate the relevant properties and stress right away!!

(25)

3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam

REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM BEHAVIOR REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM BEHAVIOR Flexural Strength

fav

α = (9)

fck

α

fav = ave. compressive

(9)

av stress on the area bc

b f

C f bc ( ) C =α ck (10)

(26)

3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam

REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM BEHAVIOR REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM BEHAVIOR Flexural Strength

αα 0.72 fck ≤ 28 MPa

decrease by 0.04 for every 7 MPa 28 MPa ≤ fck ≤ 56 MPa β

0.56 fck > 56 MPack

0.425 fck ≤ 28 MPa

decrease by 0.025 for every 7 MPa 28 MPa ≤ fck ≤ 56 MPa 0.325 fck > 56 MPa

(27)

3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam

REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM BEHAVIOR REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM BEHAVIOR Flexural Strength

This values apply to compression zone with other cross sectional shapes (circular, triangular, etc)

However, the analysis of those shapes becomes complex.

Note that to compute the flexural strength of the section it Note that to compute the flexural strength of the section, it is not necessary to know exact shape of the compression stress block. Only need to know C and its location.

stress block. Only need to know C and its location.

These two quantities are expressed in α and β .

(28)

3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam

REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM BEHAVIOR REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM BEHAVIOR Flexural Strength

G The higher compressive strength, the more brittle.

(29)

3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam

REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM BEHAVIOR REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM BEHAVIOR Flexural Strength

Tension failure (εu<0.003, fs =fy)

Equilibrium Equilibrium

T

C = αfckbc = As fs (11) Bending moment

) (d c f

A Tz

M = = s s β (12)

or M = Cz = α f bc dck ( βc) (13)

(30)

3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam

REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM BEHAVIOR REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM BEHAVIOR

Tension failure (εu<0.003, fs =fy)

Neutral axis at steel yielding, fs = fy

d f f

A ρ

ck y ck

y s

f d f b

f f c A

α ρ

α =

= (14)

From Eq.(11)

Nominal bending moment

( ) f dy

M A f d c bdf d ρ

β ρ β

= ( ) =

n s y y

ck

M A f d c bdf d

β ρ β f

= = α

2 1 fy 2 1 0 59 fy

f bd ρ f bd ρ

ρ β ρ

= y 1 = y 1 0.59 (15)

ck ck

f bd f bd

f f

ρ β ρ

= α =

(15)

(31)

3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam

REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM BEHAVIOR REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM BEHAVIOR Flexural Strength

Compression failure (εu=0.003, fs < fy)

Hook’s law Hook s law

s s

s E

f = ε (16)

from strain diagram

c E d

f = ε (17)

Equilibrium

E c fs εu s

d c

(17)

f bc A f A E d c

α = = ε (18)

(32)

3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam

REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM BEHAVIOR REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM BEHAVIOR

Compression failure (εu=0.003, fs < fy)

Solving the quadratic for c

2 + A E c A E d = 0

bc

f k ε ε

αfckbc + AsεuEsc AsεuEsd 0 (19) α

= c

(19) (20)

N i l b di t

s =

f (21)

Nominal bending moment

n =

Mn (22)

(33)

3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam

REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM BEHAVIOR REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM BEHAVIOR Flexural Strength

Balanced reinforcement ratio ρb

The amount of reinforcement necessary for beam fail to The amount of reinforcement necessary for beam fail to by crushing of concrete at the same load causing the steel to yield; (εu=0.003, fs =fy)

steel to yield; (εu 0.003, fs fy)

ρ < ρb lightly reinforced, tension failure, ductile

ρ = ρb balanced, tension/comp. failure

ρρ > ρρbb heavily reinforced, compression failure, brittle y p

(34)

3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam

REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM BEHAVIOR REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM BEHAVIOR

Balanced reinforcement ratio ρb

Balanced condition

y

s f

f = y fy

ε = (23)

Substitute Eq. (23) into Eq.(17)

y

s f

f

s

y E (23)

c c E d

fs =εu s

d c

y u

uε ε

ε

= + (24)

c

Substitute Eq. (24) into Eq.(11)

(25)

u

fck ε ρ α

s s

ckbc A f

f =

α

(25)

y u

u y

b ck

f ε ε

ρ = +

(35)

3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam

REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM BEHAVIOR

3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam

REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM BEHAVIOR Example 3.3 (SI unit)

A rectangular beam 250

As = 1,520 mm2

650 600

As 1,520 mm

fcu = 27 MPa (cylinder strength) fr = 3.5 MPa (modulus of rupture) fr 3.5 MPa (modulus of rupture) fy = 400 MPa

(unit: mm) D25

Calculate the nominal moment Mn

at which the beam will fail (unit: mm)

at which the beam will fail.

(36)

3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam

REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM BEHAVIOR

3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam

REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM BEHAVIOR Solution

Check whether this beam fail in tension or compression

1 520

A 1,520

0.0101 (250)(600)

As

ρ = bd = =

(0.72)(27) 0.003

0.0292 400 0.003 0.002

ck u

b

y u y

f f

α ε

ρ ρ

ε ε

= = = >

+ +

F The beam will fail in tension by yielding of the steel

(37)

3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam

REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM BEHAVIOR

3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam

REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM BEHAVIOR Solution

Using Eq. (15) for tension failure

f

2 1 0.59

(0 0101)(400)

y

n y

ck

M f bd f

f

ρ ρ

=

2 (0.0101)(400) (0.0101)(400)(250)(600) 1 0.59

332 kN m 27

=

= 332 kN m

(38)

3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam

DESIGN OF TENSION REINFORCED REC. BEAMS DESIGN OF TENSION REINFORCED REC. BEAMS

Korea’s design method is Ultimate Strength Design.

called as Limit States Design in the US and Europe

1. Proportioning for adequate strength 1. Proportioning for adequate strength 2. Checking the serviceability

:deflections/crack width compared against limiting values :deflections/crack width compared against limiting values

(39)

3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam

DESIGN OF TENSION REINFORCED REC. BEAMS Equivalent Rectangular Stress Distribution

DESIGN OF TENSION REINFORCED REC. BEAMS

is called as Whitney’s Block (Handout #3-1)

What if the actual stress block is replaced by an What if the actual stress block is replaced by an

equivalent rectangular stress block for compression zone.

Actual Equivalent

Actual Equivalent

(40)

3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam

DESIGN OF TENSION REINFORCED REC. BEAMS DESIGN OF TENSION REINFORCED REC. BEAMS Equivalent Rectangular Stress Distribution

. equi ck

ck

actual f bc f ab C

C =α = γ =

αc Go to

P.25

γ = a

F

c a = β1

α G

β1

γ = α

a

γdepends on α,β

a = βc

2 G a = β1c

β β1 = 2

(41)

3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam

DESIGN OF TENSION REINFORCED REC. BEAMS DESIGN OF TENSION REINFORCED REC. BEAMS Equivalent Rectangular Stress Distribution

fck, MPa

< 28 35 42 49 56 ≤

α 0.72 0.68 0.64 0.60 0.56

β 0.425 0.400 0.375 0.350 0.325

β1=2 β 0.85 0.801 0.752 0.703 0.654

γ= α/ β1 0.857 0.849 0.851 0.853 0.856

- γ is essentially independent of fck.

β 0 85 0 007 (f 28) d 0 65 ≤ β ≤ 0 85 - β1 = 0.85 - 0.007×(fck -28) and 0.65 ≤ β1 ≤ 0.85

(42)

3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam

DESIGN OF TENSION REINFORCED REC. BEAMS DESIGN OF TENSION REINFORCED REC. BEAMS Equivalent Rectangular Stress Distribution

- KCI 6.2.1(6) allows other shapes for the concrete stress block to be used in the calculations as long as they result g y in good agreement with test results.

- KCI6.2.1(5) makes a further simplification. TensileKCI6.2.1(5) makes a further simplification. Tensile stresses in the concrete may be neglected in the cals.

G Contribution of tensile stresses of the concrete below N.A. is very small.

“Concrete Stress Distribution in Ultimate Strength Design”Concrete Stress Distribution in Ultimate Strength Design

Handout #3-2 by Hognestad

(43)

3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam

DESIGN OF TENSION REINFORCED REC. BEAMS Balanced Strain Condition

DESIGN OF TENSION REINFORCED REC. BEAMS

steel strain is exactly equal to εy and

concrete simultaneously reaches y εuu =0.003

Eq. (24)

d εu

d c

y u

uε ε +

=

Equilibrium C=T

0.85 0.85 1

s y b y ck ck

A fs yf = ρρbbd ffy = f abfck = ffck ββ1cb

(44)

3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam

DESIGN OF TENSION REINFORCED REC. BEAMS Balanced Strain Condition

DESIGN OF TENSION REINFORCED REC. BEAMS

Balanced reinforcement ratio

y u

u y

ck y

b ck

f f d

f c f

ε ε

β ε β

ρ = 0.85 1 = 0.85 1 + (26)

Apply εu =0.003 and Es=200,000 MPa

1 1

0.003 600

0.85 0.85

0 003 600

ck ck

b

y y y y

f f

f f f f

ρ = β = β

+ (27)

0.003 y

y y y

s

f f f f

+ E

(45)

3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam

DESIGN OF TENSION REINFORCED REC. BEAMS Underreinforced Beams

DESIGN OF TENSION REINFORCED REC. BEAMS

In actual practice, ρ should be below ρb for the reasons,

1. Exactly ρ= ρb, then concrete reaches the comp. strain limit and steel reaches its yield stress

reaches its yield stress.

2. Material properties are never known precisely.

3 Strain hardening can cause compressive failure although ρ may be 3. Strain hardening can cause compressive failure, although ρ may be

somewhat less than ρb.

4. The actual steel area provided, will always be equal to or larger than 4. The actual steel area provided, will always be equal to or larger than

required based on ρ.

5. The extra ductility provided by low ρ provides warning prior to failure.

(46)

3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam

DESIGN OF TENSION REINFORCED REC. BEAMS KCI Code Provisions for Underreinforced Beam

DESIGN OF TENSION REINFORCED REC. BEAMS

By the way, how to guarantee underreinforced beams?

F KCI Code provides,

(1) The minimum tensile reinforcement strain allowed at nominal strength in the design of beam.g g

(2) Strength reduction factors that may depend on the tensile strain at nominal strength. g

Note Both limitations are based on the net tensile strain εt of the rebar farthest from the compression face at the

of the rebar farthest from the compression face at the depth dt. (d dt)

(47)

3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam

DESIGN OF TENSION REINFORCED REC. BEAMS KCI Code Provisions for Underreinforced Beam

DESIGN OF TENSION REINFORCED REC. BEAMS

(1) For nonprestressed flexural members and members with factored axial compressive load less than 0.1fckAg, εt shall not be less than 0.004 (KCI 6.2.2(5))

Substitute dt for d and εt for εy

ε d c

( ( ))

d c

y u

uε ε

ε

= +

f

F t u dt c ε = ε c

f ε

0.85 1 ck u b

y u y

f f

ρ β ε

ε ε

= + F 0.85 1 ck u

y u t

f f

ρ β ε

ε ε

= +

The reinforcement ratio to

(48)

3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam

DESIGN OF TENSION REINFORCED REC. BEAMS KCI Code Provisions for Underreinforced Beam

DESIGN OF TENSION REINFORCED REC. BEAMS

Maximum reinforcement ratio (KCI 2007) 85

0 85

0 β fck εu β fck εu

ρ (29)

004 .

85 0 . 0 85

.

0 1 1

max = +

= +

u

u y

ck t

u u y

ck

f f f

f

β ε ε

β ε

ρ (29)

Cf.) (prior to KCI 2007

ρb

ρmax = 0.75 (28)

& ACI 2002) ρmax ρb

εt = 0.00376 at ρ= 0.75ρb for fy=400 MPa.

(28)

F

0.00376 < 0.004 ,i.e., KCI 2007 is slightly conservative.

F

(49)

3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam

DESIGN OF TENSION REINFORCED REC. BEAMS KCI Code Provisions for Underreinforced Beam

DESIGN OF TENSION REINFORCED REC. BEAMS

εu = 0.003 εu = 0.003 εu = 0.003

c

dt

εt = 0.002 εt = 0.004 εt = 0.005

0 003

c c 0 003 c 0 003

Minimum

net strain Tension

controlled Compression

controlled

= =

+ 0.003

0.600 0.003 0.002

t

c

d = =

+ 0.003

0.429 0.003 0.004

t

c

d = =

+ 0.003

0.375 0.003 0.005

t

c d

net strain

for flexural controlled member controlled

member

(50)

3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam

DESIGN OF TENSION REINFORCED REC. BEAMS KCI Code Provisions for Underreinforced Beam

DESIGN OF TENSION REINFORCED REC. BEAMS

(2) Transition

zone Tension

controlled Compression

controlled

(2)

Φ = 0.85

Φ = 0 70

Φ = 0.70 + (εt - 0.002) 0.85 Φ = 0.65 + (εt- 0.002) 200/3 Spiral

Other Φ = 0.70

Φ = 0.65

( t ) /

Other

εt = 0.002 εt = 0.005

(51)

3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam

DESIGN OF TENSION REINFORCED REC. BEAMS KCI Code Provisions for Underreinforced Beam

DESIGN OF TENSION REINFORCED REC. BEAMS

Nominal flexural strength

a

n s y 2

M = A f d a

A fs y

(30)

s yf

a = (31)

(52)

3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam

DESIGN OF TENSION REINFORCED REC. BEAMS Example 3.4 (the same as Ex.3.3)

DESIGN OF TENSION REINFORCED REC. BEAMS

A rectangular beam As = 1,520 mm2

250

As 1,520 mm

fcu = 27 MPa (cylinder strength)

fr = 3.5 MPa (modulus of rupture) 650 600 fr 3.5 MPa (modulus of rupture)

fy = 400 MPa

Calculate the nominal strength Mn

using the equivalent stress block (unit: mm) D25

using the equivalent stress block. (unit: mm)

(53)

3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam

DESIGN OF TENSION REINFORCED REC. BEAMS Solution

DESIGN OF TENSION REINFORCED REC. BEAMS

Maximum reinforcement ratio f k ε

max 0.85 1

0.004

(27) 0.003

(0 85)(0 85) 0 0209 0 0101

ck u

y u

f f

A

ρ β ε

= ε

+

(27) 0.003

(0.85)(0.85) 0.0209 0.0101

(400) 0.003 0.004

As

= = > = bd

+

F This beam is underreinforced (tension controlled) and will fail yielding of the steel

(54)

3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam

DESIGN OF TENSION REINFORCED REC. BEAMS Solution

DESIGN OF TENSION REINFORCED REC. BEAMS

Depth of stress block

(1520)(400) A f (1520)(400) 0.85 (0.85)(27)(250) 106

s y ck

a A f mm

= f b = =

106

a

Nominal Strength

(1520)(400) 600 106 333

2 2

n s y

M = A f d a = = kN m

C thi ith E l 3 3 !!!

Compare this with Example 3.3 !!!

(55)

3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam

DESIGN OF TENSION REINFORCED REC. BEAMS

Nominal flexural strength (Alternative)

DESIGN OF TENSION REINFORCED REC. BEAMS

Eq(31) can be written w.r.t. ρ

ρ f d 0.85

y ck

a f d

f

= ρ (32)

Nominal flexural strength

f d f

( ) 2 1 0.59

1.7

y y

n y y

ck ck

f d f

M bd f d f bd

f f

ρ ρ

ρ ρ

= =

(33)

Ass

a/2

참조

관련 문서

The key procedure of seismic design is consisted of decision of design earthquake, dynamic seismic response analysis, seismic design of structures and equipment,

저작권법에 따른 이용자의 권리는 위의 내용에 의하여 영향을 받지 않습니다.. 이것은 이용허락규약 (Legal Code) 을 이해하기

XRD analysis, surface roughness test, FE-SEM imaging, and biaxial flexural strength test were performed... Results: In the result of XRD analysis, an phase change occurred

„ 모듈화 : 전체 프로그램의 복잡한 문제를 함수 내부의 문제로 국한시켜 프로그램을 체계적으로 쉽게 프로그래밍을 해나갈 수

™ Embedded commands: database commands are embedded in a general-purpose programming language.. ™ Library of database functions: available to the host language for

– Cross section of a beam in Cross section of a beam in pure bending remain plane – (There can be deformation in (There can be deformation in.

Direct method of solution of variational problem is one of the most powerful tools for obtaining numerical results in practical problems of engineering

• Symmetric beams under the action of arbitrary loadings which are in the plane of symmetry and oriented normal to the center line of the beam. •