• 검색 결과가 없습니다.

불포화 풍화토 사면의 모관흡수력 분포에 대한 지반조건과 강우강도의 영향

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "불포화 풍화토 사면의 모관흡수력 분포에 대한 지반조건과 강우강도의 영향"

Copied!
9
0
0

로드 중.... (전체 텍스트 보기)

전체 글

(1)

** ᩑᖙݡ⦺Ʊ ☁༊⪹ĞŖ⦺ŝ ၶᔍŝᱶ ([email protected])

Received June 6 2012, Revised July 11 2012, Accepted April 1 2013

Copyright ⵑ 2013 by the Korean Society of Civil Engineers

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0)

 ǣŠ––’ǣȀȀ†šǤ†‘‹Ǥ‘”‰ȀͳͲǤͳʹ͸ͷʹȀ•…‡ǤʹͲͳ͵Ǥ͵͵Ǥ͵ǤͳͲͳ͹ ™™™Ǥ•…‡Œ‘—”ƒŽǤ‘”Ǥ”

⍆㦪㰒#㩋㰒㝞#♪′ⴖ#⁦ኾ㴟⟖ᷣ#⍂㦪⮎#ᢾ㬚#⽾⇖⸮ሲኺ#ᇓⱮᇓᦂⴖ#⮿㭣

׌૳ࢢ ȵଲֈ૴ ȵ׌୨ฅ

Kim, Yong Min*, Lee, Kwang Woo**, Kim, Jung Hwan***

Influence of Soil Characteristic and Rainfall Intensity on Matric Suction of Unsaturated Weathered Soil Slope

ABSTRACT

The monolithically coupled finite element analysis for a deformable unsaturated soil slope is performed to investigate matric suction distribution on a soil slope subjected to rainfall infiltration, which can consider the hydraulic-mechanical characteristics for the analysis. The soil-water characteristic curves (SWCC) are experimentally determined to estimate three types of hydraulic properties of domestic areas. Based on the physical properties, the distribution of matric suction is investigated by considering the major factors, such as soil conditions, rainfall intensities, and slope angles. It is found from the results of this study that the matric suction rapidly decreases with an increase in rainfall intensity, regardless a slope angle. The slope surface is more easily saturated when its saturated hydraulic conductivity is smaller than rainfall intensity, and for the case of multi-layered soil slope, hydraulic characteristics of slope surface has a significant influence on matric suction distribution.

Key words : Unsaturated soil, Seepage analysis, Slope failure, Soil-water characteristic curve, Matric suction, Finite element analysis

Ⅹಾ

ᅙᩑǍᨱᕽ۵vᬑ⋉⚍ᨱ᮹⦽ᔍ໕᮹༉š⯂ᙹಆᇥ⡍✚ᖒᮥᇥᕾ⦹ʑ᭥⦹ᩍᙹญ⦺ᱢ-ᩎ⦺ᱢ✚ᖒᮥŁಅ⦽࠺᜽ᩑĥ⧕ᕾᮥᙹ⧪⦹ᩡ݅.

ᯕෝ᭥⧕, ǎԕ3aḡḡᩎᨱᕽ₥≉⦽⣮⪵☁ෝݡᔢᮝಽ⧉ᙹ✚ᖒłᖁ(SWCC)ᮥᔑᱶ⦹ᩡᮝ໑, ᯕෝ☁ݡಽḡၹ᳑Õ, vᬑ✚ᖒ, ᔍ໕Ğᔍ ᨱ঑ෙ༉š⯂ᙹಆ᮹ᄡ⪵ෝš⊂⦹ᩡ݅. əđŝ, vᬑvࠥa᷾a⧉ᨱ঑௝ᔍ໕ԕ᮹༉š⯂ᙹಆᮡɪĊ⯩qᗭ⦹۵Ğ⨆ᯕӹ┡ԍᮝ໑, ᔍ ໕Ğᔍᨱ۵ⓑᩢ⨆ᮥၼḡᦫ۵äᮝಽӹ┡ԍ݅. ੱ⦽vᬑvࠥᅕ݅⡍⪵⚍ᙹĥᙹa᯲ᮡḡၹᮡ⢽⊖ᨱᕽ⡍⪵aᛞíᯝᨕӹ۵äᮥ⪶ᯙ⦹

ᩡᮝ໑, ݅⊖ᮝಽ᳕ᰍ⦹۵Ğᬑᨱࠥᔍ໕⢽⊖ḡၹ᮹ᙹญ⦺ᱢ✚ᖒᯕ༉š⯂ᙹಆᇥ⡍ᨱⓑᩢ⨆ᮥᵝ۵äᮝಽӹ┡ԍ݅.

áᔪᨕ ᇩ⡍⪵☁, ⋉⚍⧕ᕾ, ᔍ໕❭ƕ, ⧉ᙹ✚ᖒłᖁ, ༉š⯂ᙹಆ, ᮁ⦽᫵ᗭ⧕ᕾ

1. ᕽು

↽ɝᱥᖙĥᱢᮝಽʑ⬥ᄡ⪵ᨱ᮹⦽⡎ᬑ, ⡎ᖅ, ᛩ⟝┽⣮॒ŝzᮡᩩᔢ⦹ḡ༜⦽ᯕᔢʑ⬥⩥ᔢᯕӹ┡ӹŁᯩᮝ໑, Ḳᵲvᬑ᮹

ၽᔾኩࠥa᷾aࡹ໕ᕽᔍ໕❭ƕaኩჩ⦹íၽᔾ⦹Łᯩ݅. ✚⯩ᬑญӹ௝᮹Ğᬑᨱ۵ǎ☁໕ᱢ᮹᧞70%aᔑḡಽǍᖒࡹᨕᯩŁ, ᬑʑᨱၽᔾ⦹۵ᔍ໕❭ƕ۵vᬑ⋉⚍ಽᯙ⦽᧶ᮡ❭ƕaݡᇡᇥᯕʑভྙᨱᔑᔍ┽᪡☁ᕾඹ᮹ᵝ᫵⦽ᬱᯙᯕࡹŁᯩ݅(᳑ᖒᮡŝ

ᯕ᜚௹, 2000; ʡᰍ⪮ ॒, 2002; Jeong et. al., 2008; Kim et al., 2012).

‡‘–‡…А‹…ƒŽ‰‹‡‡”‹‰ ݓъėॡ

(2)

Õ᳑⦽ ḡၹᔢ┽ᨱᕽ vᬑa ᯝᱶ ʑe ࠺ᦩ ĥᗮ ḡᗮࡹ໕

ḡၹ᮹ ⡍⪵ࠥၰ ⧉ᙹእa ᷾a⦹íࡹŁ ᔍ໕ ԕ༉š⯂ᙹಆ (matric suction)ᯕ⩥ᱡ⯩qᗭ⦹ᩍᔍ໕᮹ᇩᦩᱶᯕ᷾a⦹í

ࡽ݅(Lambe, 1996; Ng and Shi, 1998). ੱ⦽ᇩ⡍⪵ᔍ໕ᨱᕽ۵

ᖁ⧪vᬑᨱ᮹⧕ḡၹ᮹Ⅹʑvࠥa᳭ᬑࡹʑভྙᨱᦩᱶᖒᨱ

ⓑᩢ⨆ᮥၙ⊽݅(Rahardjo et al., 2009). ঑௝ᕽᔍ໕❭ƕෝᩩᔢ

⦹Łᯕᨱᱢᱩ⦹íݡ᮲⦹ʑ᭥⧕ᕽ۵ᇩ⡍⪵ḡၹ᮹༉š⯂ᙹಆ ŝ vᬑ✚ᖒŝ᮹ šĥෝ ໦⪶⯩ Ƚ໦⧁ ᙹ ᯩᨕ᧝ ⦽݅.

ʑ᳕᮹vᬑ᜽ᔍ໕ᦩᱶ⧕ᕾᮡḡ⦹ᙹ᭥ෝʑᵡᮝಽᱡ໕ᇡ۵

⡍⪵ᔢ┽ಽ, ḡ⦹ᙹ᭥ᔢᇡ۵Õ᳑ᔢ┽ಽaᱶ⦽⬥ᵝಽ⦽ĥ⠪

⩶ჶᮥᯕᬊ⦹ᩡᮝӹ, ᯕ్⦽⧕ᕾᮡᇩ⡍⪵ᔍ໕❭ƕ᮹ᵝ᫵⦽

ᬱᯙᯕࡹ۵ᩢ⨆ᯙᯱॅᮥᱢᱩ⯩Łಅ⧁ᙹᨧʑভྙᨱ⋉⚍ಽ

ᯙ⦽ᇩ⡍⪵ᔍ໕᮹Ñ࠺ᄡ⪵ෝ⧊ญᱢᮝಽŁಅ⦹ʑaᨕಖ݅.

঑௝ᕽᇩ⡍⪵☁᮹⋉⚍Ñ࠺ᮥ⧕ᕾᱢᮝಽᱲɝ⦹ಅ۵ᩑǍaḥ

⧪ࡹᨕ᪵݅(Lam et al., 1987). ↽ɝᨱ۵vᬑ⋉⚍ᨱ᮹⦽ḡ⢽໕

⡍⪵ʫᯕෝᩩ⊂⦹Łᔍ໕᮹ᦩᱶᖒᮥ⠪a⧁ᙹᯩ۵ᔢᬊ⥥ಽ əఉ(GEO-SLOPE, 2012; FEFLOW, 2012)ᯕ ॒ᰆ⧉ᨱ ঑௝

ᯕෝ⪽ᬊ⦽ᔍ໕ᦩᱶ⧕ᕾᩑǍa⪽ၽ⯩ḥ⧪ࡹŁᯩ݅(Kim et al., 2004; ᱶᔢᖍ ॒, 2009; Rahardjo et al., 2010).

⦽⠙, ʑ᳕᮹ᔢᬊ⥥ಽəఉॅŝᙹ⧪ࡹᨕ᪉ᩑǍॅᮡ⋉⚍⧕ᕾ ŝᔍ໕᮹ᩎ⦺ᱢÑ࠺ᮥᇥญ⦹ᩍ⧕ᕾ⦹۵݉ĥ⧕ᕾ(staggered analysis)ᮥᵝಽᔍᬊ⦹ᩡ݅(Duncan, 1996). ə్ӹᝅᱽ⩥ᔢᨱ ᕽ۵ḡ⢽໕ᨱvᬑa ⋉⚍⦹໕ᕽḡၹ᮹eɚእෝᄡ⪵᜽┅Ł

əಽᯙ⦹ᩍ⮺᮹ᄡ⩶ᯕᔾʑ໕ᕽᇩ⡍⪵⚍ᙹĥᙹaݍ௝ḡí

ࡽ݅. ᯕ్⦽Ñ࠺ᯕၹᅖࡹ໕ḡၹ᮹⋉⚍܆(infiltration rate)ᯕ

ݍ௝ḡíࡹŁḡ⢽໕ᮝಽᇡ░ᯝᱶ⦽⡍⪵ݡ(wetting band)a

⩶ᖒࡹᨕᔍ໕᮹᧶ᮡ❭ƕෝᮁၽ⦹۵ᬱᯙᯕࢁᙹᯩ݅(ʡᰍ⪮

॒, 2002; Kim et al., 2004; Jeong et al., 2008). ੱ⦽ᮁ⬉᮲ಆᮡ

⋉⚍ᨱ঑ෙᄡ⩶ŝ༉š⯂ᙹಆ᮹Ⓧʑᨱ঑௝ᄡ⪵⦹အಽ⋉⚍

⧕ᕾŝ ᔍ໕᮹ᄡ⩶ ၰ Ñ࠺⧕ᕾᯕ ᇥญࡹᨕ ᙹ⧪ࡹ໕ᱶ⪶⦽

ᔍ໕ԕ᮹⮺᮹vࠥ⧕ᕾᮥᙹ⧪⧁ᙹᨧíࡽ݅. Alonso ॒(1988)

ᮡᇩ⡍⪵☁᮹⮱෥-ᄡ⩶ᯕᩑšࡽ⧕ᕾႊჶᮥᱽᦩ⦹ᩍᯕෝᔍ໕

vᬑ ⋉⚍⧕ᕾᨱ ᱢᬊ⦹ᩡᮝ໑, Cho and Lee(2001)۵ ᯕ్⦽

ᩑĥ⧕ᕾᮥ☖⧕vᬑᨱ᮹⦽ᔍ໕᮹ᇩᦩᱶີ⍅ܩ᷹ᮥᩑǍ⦹ᩡ

Ł, ᮲ಆᰆ(stress field)ᮝಽᇡ░ᔍ໕᮹❭ƕ໕ŝᦩᱥᮉᮥᔑᱶ⦹

ᩍ ᔍ໕ ᦩᱶᖒ ⠪a ᜽ᜅ▽ᮥ }ၽ⦹ᩡ݅.

ᅙᩑǍᨱᕽ۵⋉⚍᪡⮺᮹Ñ࠺⧕ᕾᮥ࠺᜽ᨱᙹ⧪⦹Łeɚᙹ ᦶŝ ᄡ⩶ᯕ ᩑĥࡽ ᮁ⦽᫵ᗭ⧕ᕾᮥ ᙹ⧪⦹ᩡᮝ໑, ᇩ⡍⪵☁᮹

ᙹญ⦺ᱢ✚ᖒᮥݡ⢽⦹۵⧉ᙹ✚ᖒłᖁᝅ⨹ᮥ☖⧕ǎԕᵝ᫵ᔑ ḡᨱᇥ⡍ࡹᨕᯩ۵ᇩ⡍⪵⣮⪵☁᮹✚ᖒჵ᭥ෝđᱶ⦹ᩡ݅. ᯕ

ෝၵ┶ᮝಽvᬑ᳑Õ, ḡၹ᳑Õ, ᔍ໕Ğᔍᨱ঑ෙᇩ⡍⪵⣮⪵☁

ᔍ໕᮹⋉⚍⧕ᕾᮥᙹ⧪⦹ᩍḡၹԕ༉š⯂ᙹಆ᮹ᄡ⪵ෝš⊂⦹

Łᯱ ⦽݅.

2. ᇩ⡍⪵⣮⪵☁ḡၹ᮹⧉ᙹ✚ᖒłᖁ

⧉ᙹ✚ᖒłᖁ(soil-water characteristic curve)ᮡᇩ⡍⪵ḡၹ ᮹Łᮁ⦽✚ᖒᯕ໑, ḡၹ᮹ᙹญ⦺ᱢ✚ᖒŝᩎ⦺ᱢ✚ᖒᮥđᱶ

⦹۵ๅᬑᵲ᫵⦽ʑᅙྜྷᖒᯕ௝⧁ᙹᯩ݅. ᯝၹᱢᮝಽ⧉ᙹ✚ᖒł ᖁᮡḡၹᯕwŁᯩ۵ྜྷ᮹᧲ŝ༉š⯂ᙹಆ(matric suction)ŝ᮹

šĥಽᱶ᮹ࡽ݅. ḡၹᗮྜྷ᮹᧲ᮡᵲప⧉ᙹእ(gravimetric water content), ℕᱢ⧉ᙹእ(volumetric water content) əญŁ⡍⪵ࠥ

(degree of saturation)ಽ⢽⩥⧁ᙹᯩᮝӹ⋉⚍⧕ᕾᮥ᭥⧕ᕽ۵

ᇩ⡍⪵ḡၹ᮹Ǎᖒ᫵ᗭᯙ⮺᯦ᯱ, ྜྷ, Ŗʑ᮹ᖙaḡǍᖒᖒᇥᮝ ಽŁಅࡹᨕ᧝⦽݅. ᯕ్⦽✚Ḷভྙᨱ⡍⪵ḡၹ⧕ᕾᨱᕽᔍᬊࡹ

۵ᵲప⧉ᙹእ(Ww/Ws)ᅕ݅۵eɚŖʑෝŁಅ⦹۵ℕᱢ⧉ᙹእ (Vw/V ) }ֱᮝಽ⢽⩥⦹۵äᯕၵ௭Ḣ⦹݅. ə్အಽᇩ⡍⪵

ḡၹ᮹⧉ᙹ✚ᖒłᖒᮡℕᱢ⧉ᙹእ᪡༉š⯂ᙹಆšĥ᮹łᖁᮝಽ

⢽⩥⦽݅. ঑௝ᕽᅙᱩᨱᕽ۵ᬑญӹ௝᮹ᔑḡ᮹ݡᇡᇥᮥ₉ḡ⦹

Łᯩ۵⪵v⣮⪵☁ḡၹ᮹⧉ᙹ✚ᖒłᖁᮥᔑᱶ⦹ʑ᭥⧕ᕽᬙ, ʡ⧕, ᩍᵝḡᩎ᮹⣮⪵☁ෝݡᔢᮝಽᝅ⨹ᮥᙹ⧪⦹ᩡᮝ໑, ᝅ⨹ᰆ

⊹᪡ ᝅ⨹ႊჶᮡ ݅ᮭŝ z݅.

2.1 ਓ෠ୋ౿ࢫਏ߹

⧉ᙹ✚ᖒłᖁᔑᱶᮥ᭥⦹ᩍ᜽ഭ᮹༉š⯂ᙹಆᮥ᳑ᱩ⧁ᙹ

ᯩ۵GCTS SWC-150 ᰆእ(Pham and Fredlund, 2004)ෝᯕᬊ⦹

ᩡᮝ໑, Fig. 1ŝzᯕᦶಆ᳑ᱩᰆ⊹(pressure panel), ⦹ᵲᰍ⦹ᰆ

⊹(Loading shaft), ᇡ⦝⊂ᱶᰆ⊹(Volume tube), ᦶಆᖡ(pressure chamber), ᖙ௝ၚॵᜅⓍ(HAVE disks)॒ᮝಽǍᖒࡹᨕᯩ݅. Pres- sure chamber۵ ᝅ⨹ᰆ⊹ ᦩᨱ ᖙ௝ၚॵᜅⓍෝ ᯕᬊ⦹ᩍ ׳ᮡ

ᦶಆŝ ᰆ᜽e ᝅ⨹ᮥ ☖⧕ ⧉ᙹ✚ᖒłᖁᮥ ⊂ᱶ⧁ ᙹ ᯩࠥಾ

⦽݅. ᖙ௝ၚॵᜅⓍ۵ ༉š⯂ᙹಆᨱ ঑௝ čॽ ᙹ ᯩ۵ ᱶࠥa

݅෕ʑভྙᨱ᜽ഭ᮹᳦ඹᨱ঑௝bʑ݅ෙᦶಆ᮹ᖙ௝ၚॵᜅⓍ

ෝᔍᬊ⧕᧝⦽݅(༉௹: 100~300kPa, ᝅ✙ḩ༉௹: 300~500kPa, ᱱ☁: 1500kPa). ᝅ⨹ʑ᮹ᱢᬊa܆⦽༉š⯂ᙹಆ᮹ჵ᭥۵0.1~

1500kPaᯕ໑, pressure cell ၲᇡᇥᨱ2}᮹ቑ౼ᮝಽᩑđࡹᨕ

ᯩᨕ᜽ഭ᮹⧉ᙹእᄡ⪵ෝ⊂ᱶ⧁ᙹᯩ݅. ⧉ᙹ✚ᖒłᖁᮡ⣮⪵

☁᜽ഭ᮹ᔢݡၡࠥᨱ঑௝ๅᬑၝq⦹íᄡ⦹ʑভྙᨱ(ᯕȽ⩥॒, 2007)ᅙᝅ⨹ᨱᕽ۵᜽ഭ᮹↽ᗭ݉᭥ᵲప(γmin)ŝ↽ݡ݉᭥ᵲప (γmax)ᮥᔑᱶ⦹Ł50% ᔢݡၡࠥᨱ⧕ݚ⦹۵᜽ഭపᮥđᱶ⦹ᩡ

݅. ੱ⦽Ɂ॒⦽݅ḱᮥ᭥⧕3݉݅ḱჶᮥᯕᬊ⦹ᩡᮝ໑, ᔢ⨆⋉⚍

ෝ ᯕᬊ⦹ᩍ ᜽ഭෝ ⡍⪵᜽⎑݅.

⧉ᙹ✚ᖒłᖁᮡ⡍⪵ࡽ᜽ഭᨱŖʑᦶᮥa⦹ᩍᇩ⡍⪵ᔢ┽ಽ

อॅᨕ႑⇽ࡽeɚᙹ᮹ᇡ⦝ෝ☖⧕ℕᱢ⧉ᙹእෝᔑᱶ⦹۵Õ᳑

ŝᱶ(drying process)ŝ႑⇽ࡽeɚᙹaԕᇡಽ⯂ᙹࡹ۵᜖ᮅŝ ᱶ(wetting process)ᮥ ☖⧕ ᔑᱶ⧁ ᙹ ᯩ݅. ᜖ᮅŝᱶᮥ ☖⧕

(3)

(a) Schematic diagram of SWCC apparatus (b) SWCC apparatus Fig. 1. GCTS pressure plate apparatus

Table 1. Physical properties of soils

Property Seoul Yeoju Gimhae

Specific gravity (Gs) 2.64 2.65 2.68

Max. dry unit weight (γdmax, kN/m3) 17.5 16.5 15.8

Min. dry unit weight (γdmin, kN/m3) 13.5 13.3 12.2

Uniformity coefficient(Cu) 9.3 3.6 2.3

Coefficient of gradation(Cc) 0.77 1.11 0.3

USCS SP SW SW

Fig. 2. Grain-size distribution curves

⧉ᙹ✚ᖒłᖁᮥᔑᱶ⦹۵äᯕᝅᱽḡၹŖ⦺ᱢᯙྙᱽ᪡ᮁᔍ⦽

ႊჶᯕḡอÕ᳑ŝᱶᯕ⬥ᨱ᜖ᮅŝᱶᮥ༉ᔍ⧕᧝ ⦹ʑভྙᨱ

ᔢݚ⦽᜽eᯕᗭ᫵ࡽ݅. ঑௝ᕽᅙᩑǍᨱᕽ۵Õ᳑ŝᱶᮥ☖⧕

⧉ᙹ✚ᖒłᖁᮥᔑᱶ⦹ᩡ݅. ᯕಆ⩥ᔢᮥw۵⧉ᙹ✚ᖒłᖁᮡ᧞

2kPaᱶࠥ᮹༉š⯂ᙹಆ₉ᯕෝᅕᯕ໑(Huang et al., 2011), ⡍⪵

ℕᱢ⧉ᙹእa݅෕íӹ┡ӹŖʑ⧉᯦⊹ӹᇩ⡍⪵⚍ᙹĥᙹᨱᩢ

⨆ᮥ ၙ⊽݅(ʡᰍ⪮ ॒, 2012).

ᅙ ᩑǍᨱᕽ۵ ᬑญӹ௝ ᔑᦦḡᩎᨱ ᇥ⡍⦹۵ ⪵v⣮⪵☁ෝ

ݡᔢᮝಽʡ⧕, ᕽᬙ, ᩍᵝḡᩎᨱᕽ₥≉⦽3aḡ⮺᜽ഭॅᨱ

ݡ⧕⧉ᙹ✚ᖒłᖁᝅ⨹ᮥᙹ⧪⦹ᩡ݅. ᝅ⨹᜽ഭ۵☖ᯝᇥඹჶᔢ

SP, SW ĥᩕಽ⪶ᯙࡹᨩᮝ໑༉ु᜽ഭᨱᕽ4ჩℕ☖ŝᮉᯕ

90%ᯕᔢ, 200ჩℕ☖ŝᮉᯕ1%ၙอᮝಽ ӹ┡ԍ݅. b᜽ഭ᮹

ʑᅙᱢᯙྜྷญᱢ✚ᖒॅᮡTable 1ᨱᱶญ⦹ᩡᮝ໑, Fig. 2ᨱ3aḡ

᜽ഭᨱ ݡ⦽ ᯦ࠥᇥ⡍łᖁᮥ ࠥ᜽⦹ᩡ݅.

(4)

Fig. 3. SWCC for the three soils: experimental data and fitted curves

Table 2. Curve-fitting parameters for the SWCC and saturated permeability of the soils

Type Type A Type B

α 0.0423 /kPa 0.27 /kPa

n 2.06 3.1

Saturated volumetric

water content (θs) 0.41 0.36 Residual volumetric

water content (θr) 0.054 0.037 Saturated permeability (ks) 4.67 × 10-6 m/sec 5.12 × 10-5 m/sec

2.2 ऄඑฃණฃഠ஺ࢱଭ෌৤൉নմটॺ୨

⧉ᙹ✚ᖒłᖁᮡ☁พᯱ᮹᯦Ğŝ᯦ࠥᇥ⡍, ǍᖒᖒᇥəญŁ

eɚእ॒ŝzᯕ⮺᮹᳦ඹᨱ঑௝݅ෙ⩶┽ෝᅕᯙ݅. ᯕłᖁ᮹

⩶┽ෝđᱶḴ۵ᵲ᫵⦽᫵ᗭ۵Ŗʑ⧉᯦⊹(air-entry value)᪡

᯵ඹℕᱢ⧉ᙹእ(residual volumetric water content)ಽӹ٭ᙹ

ᯩ݅. ᇩ⡍⪵⣮⪵☁᮹✚ᖒᮥᔑᱶ⦹ʑ᭥⦹ᩍ݅᧲⦽᯦ࠥᇥ⡍,

݅ḱ⧉ᙹእ, eɚእෝaḥ᜽ഭෝᕽᬙ, ᩍᵝ, ʡ⧕ḡᩎᨱᕽ₥≉

⦹ᩍ ᝅ⨹⦹ᩡᮝ໑, ᯦ࠥᇥ⡍᪡ eɚእෝ ᯙ᭥ᱢᮝಽ ᳑ᖒ⦹ᩍ

⇵aᝅ⨹ᮥᙹ⧪⦹ᩍ⧉ᙹ✚ᖒłᖁᮥ⢽⩥⦹ᩡ݅. Fig. 3ᮡ⮺ᨱ

ݡ⦽༉š⯂ᙹಆᨱ঑௝႑⇽ࡹ۵eɚᙹ᮹᧲ᮥ⊂ᱶ⦽đŝෝ

༉š⯂ᙹಆŝℕᱢ⧉ᙹእ᮹šĥಽ⢽⩥⦽⧉ᙹ✚ᖒłᖁᮥӹ┡ԙ

äᯕ݅.

☁พᯱ᮹᯦ĞᯕእƱᱢⓍŁɁ॒⦽ᔍḩ☁ḩ᮹ᩍᵝ⣮⪵☁۵

᯲ᮡ༉š⯂ᙹಆ᮹ᄡ⪵ᨱࠥⓑℕᱢ⧉ᙹእ᮹ᄡ⪵ෝᅕᯕŁ, ᔍ ḩ☁ḩᨱእ⧕᯦Ğᯕ᯲ᮡᝅ✙ḩᯕӹᱱ☁ḩᮥ⡍⧉⦹۵ᕽᬙ

᜽ഭ۵࠺ᯝ⦽༉š⯂ᙹಆ᮹ ᄡ⪵ᨱ঑ෙℕᱢ⧉ᙹእ᮹ᄡ⪵a

ᱢŁᔍḩ☁ḩᨱእ⦹ᩍⓑ᯵ඹ⧉ᙹእෝw۵݅. ᝅ⨹ߑᯕ░۵

van Genuchten(1980)᮹⧉ᙹ✚ᖒłᖁ᜾ᮥᯕᬊ⦹ᩍ☖ᯝᇥඹჶ ᔢ SPᨱ ⧕ݚ⦹۵ ᕽᬙḡᩎ(Type A)ŝ SWᨱ ⧕ݚ⦹۵ ᩍᵝ, ʡ⧕ḡᩎ(Type B)᮹⧉ᙹ✚ᖒłᖁᮝಽǍᇥ⦹ᩡ݅. Table 2ᨱ

ӹ┡ԙၵ᪡zᯕ⧉ᙹ✚ᖒłᖁ᮹Ŗʑ⧉᯦⊹۵Type Aḡၹᯕ

Type Bḡၹᅕ݅᧞6.4႑Ⓧíӹ┡ԍᮝ໑, ⧉ᙹ✚ᖒłᖁ᮹ʑᬙ ʑෝđᱶḴ۵nsŝ᯵ඹℕᱢ⧉ᙹእ۵bb1.5႑₉ᯕෝӹ┡ԕ ᨩ݅.

3. ⋉⚍⧕ᕾ

3.1 ஺ࢼࢺ୨ਐ

ᯱᩑᔢ┽᮹⮺ᮡ☁พᯱ(ns),ྜྷ(nw), Ŗʑ(na)ಽǍᖒࡹᨕᯩᮝ ໑, ℕᱢእ(1 = ns+nw+na)ᨱ঑௝b᫵ᗭॅᮥǍᇥ⦹۵mixture theory(Coussy, 2010)aᇩ⡍⪵☁ḡ႑ႊᱶ᜾᮹ɝeᮥᯕ൉Ł

ᯩ݅. ᇩ⡍⪵☁᮹ၙḡᙹ۵☁พᯱ᮹ᄡ᭥(u)᪡☁พᯱԕᇡᨱᕽ

ၽᔾࡹ۵eɚᙹᦶ(Pw)ᯕ໑, ᯕෝĥᔑ⦹ʑ᭥⧕ᕽ۵ࢱ}᮹ḡ႑

ႊᱶ᜾ᯕ⦥᫵⦹݅. ḡ႑ႊᱶ᜾ᮡྜྷℕᨱ᯲ᬊ⦹۵༉ु⯹ॅᮡ

⠪⩶ᮥᯕ്݅۵⠪⩶ႊᱶ᜾(balance equation)ŝྜྷℕ᮹ḩపᯕ

᜽eᨱ঑௝ᄡ⦹ḡᦫ۵݅۵ḩపᅕ᳕᮹ჶ⊺(balance of mass)ᮥ

ʑᅙaᱶᮝಽ⦹Łᯩ݅. ᇩ⡍⪵ḡၹ᮹ᮁ⦽᫵ᗭ⧕ᕾᮥ᭥⦹ᩍ

⋉⚍ᨱ᮹⦽ḡၹ᮹Ñ࠺ŝᙹญ⦺ᱢ-ᩎ⦺ᱢ(hydro-mechanical)

✚ᖒᮥ࠺᜽ᨱŁಅ⦹ᩍ⧕ᕾ⧁ᙹᯩ۵ᙹ⊹⧕ᕾ⎵ऽෝǍᖒ⦹ᩡ

ᮝ໑ ḡ႑ႊᱶ᜾ᮡ ݅ᮭŝ z݅(Kim, 2010).

ℌṙಽᇩ⡍⪵☁ԕྜྷ᮹ᯕ࠺ᮡ⮺᯦ᯱ᮹ᬡḢᯥᨱ᳦ᗮࡹʑ

ভྙᨱ⮺᯦ᯱᨱݡ⦽⠪⩶ႊᱶ᜾(balance of linear momentum) ᮝಽᇡ░ᄡ᭥ෝĥᔑ⧁ᙹᯩ݅. ࢹṙಽᇩ⡍⪵☁ԕྜྷ᮹⮱෥

ᮥ❭ᦦ⦹ᩍeɚᙹᦶᮥĥᔑ⧁ᙹᯩ۵ྜྷᨱݡ⦽⠪⩶ႊᱶ᜾

(balance of mass of the water)ᮝಽᇡ░eɚᙹᦶᮥĥᔑ⧁ᙹ

ᯩ݅. bb᮹⠪⩶ႊᱶ᜾ॅᮡ݅ᮭEqs. (1) and (2)᪡z݅(Borja, 2004).

0 g

DIVσ+ρ = (1)

w S v vw

s p

n S + DIV =DIV~

& (2)

ᩍʑᕽDIV(divergence)۵ෝ᮹ၙ⦹໑,σ۵ᱥ᮲ಆ, ρ۵

ၡࠥ, g۵ᵲಆaᗮࠥ, nᮡeɚශ, S۵⡍⪵ࠥ, s۵༉š⯂ᙹಆ, p& ۵ ᜽eᨱ ঑ෙ eɚᙹᦶ, v۵ ⮺ ᯦ᯱ᮹ ⮱෥ ᗮࠥ,w v~w۵

ᝅᱽ ྜྷ᮹ ᗮࠥ(vw)᪡ ⮺ ᯦ᯱ᮹ ᗮࠥ(v)᮹ ₉ᯕෝ ӹ┡ԙ݅.

3.2 କ෉૬ীැজଡ଍෉ੵճࠤஶ

ᮁ⦽᫵ᗭ⧕ᕾᮥ᭥⦹ᩍ⮺᮹ᄡ᭥᪡ԕᇡeɚᙹᦶᮥĥᔑ⧁

ᙹᯩ۵እᖁ⩶᧞⩶(coupled nonlinear weak form)ᮥᮁࠥ⦹ʑ

᭥⧕ aᵲ᯵ඹ⧎ჶ(method of weighted residual)ᮥ ᱢᬊ⦹ᩡ

ᮝ໑, 2aḡၙḡᙹᨱݡ⧕⧪಍⧉ᙹ(matrix form) ⩶┽ᯙᮁ⦽᫵

ᗭႊᱶ᜾ᮝಽ⢽⩥⦹ʑ᭥⧕ᕽ⩶ᔢ⧉ᙹ(shape function)ෝᱢᬊ

(5)

Fig. 4. Soil slope mesh used for seepage analysis and ground water level

Table 3. Analysis cases

Soil type Slope angle Slope height Rainfall intensity Rainfall duration Water table

Type A 30°

10m

10mm/h

24~72hr Dry condition

Type B 45° 30 mm/h

- 60° 50 mm/h

⦹ᩡ݅. b᫵ᗭ(element)ॅᯕaḡŁᯩ۵ԕಆ(internal force)ŝ

᫙ಆ(external force) ᄂ░ॅ᮹⠪⩶᳑Õᨱ᮹⦹ᩍĥᔑsॅᮥ

٥ᱢ᜽┅໕ᩑĥࡽእᖁ⩶⡍ྜྷᖁၙᇥႊᱶ᜾(coupled nonlinear parabolic partially differential equation)ᮥ ᱥℕ ᫵ᗭᨱ ݡ⧕

Eq. (3)ŝ zᮡ ⧪಍ ⩶┽ಽ ⢽⩥⧁ ᙹ ᯩ݅.

) ( ) ( )

(D D F D F D

C &+ INT = EXT (3)

ᩍʑᕽ =θ D d

,

= θ&

&

& d

D ,

=

) , ( )

(

0 ) 0

( , 1,

θ

θ θ

θ K d

D K

C dINT INT

,

=

) , (

) ( ) , ) (

( , 2, ,

θ θ θ

θ θ

d F

F d D F

F INT

INT d INT

d INT

,

= dEXTEXT

EXT

F d D F

F ,

, ( , )

)

( θ θ

ᮥ ᮹ၙ⦽݅.

Backward Euler ႊჶᮥᯕᬊ⦽ԕᰍᱢႊჶ(fully-implicit time integration)ᮥ☖⧕᭥Eq. (3)ŝzᮡ⧪಍ႊᱶ᜾ᮥNewton- Raphson ႊჶᮥᔍᬊ⦹ᩍၙḡᙹᯙḡၹ᮹ᄡ᭥᪡ԕᇡeɚᙹᦶ

ᮥ ĥᔑ⧁ ᙹ ᯩᮝ໑, Eqs. (4) and (5)ಽ ݅᜽ ⢽⩥ࡽ݅.

) ( ) ( )

( +1 +1+ +1 = EXT n+1 INT n

n

n D F D F D

D

C & (4)

) ( )

( )

( +1 +1+ +1 +1= EXT n+1 n

n n

n D K D D F D

D

C & (5)

⧪಍ ႊᱶ᜾ᮡ Newton-Raphson ႊჶᨱ ᮹⧕ ᖁ⩶⪵ࡽ ⩶

┽ಽ⩥ᰍ᜽e݉ĥ(tn+1)ᨱᕽ⧕ᕾᯕᙹ⧪ࡹ໑ԕಆᨱݡ⧕ᕽ

1 1

1) ( )

( n+ n+ n+

INT D K D D

F ᯥᮥaᱶ⧁ᙹᯩ݅. đŝᱢᮝಽᙹญ⦺ᱢ -ᩎ⦺ᱢ⮺᮹Ñ࠺ᮥእᖁ⩶ᱲɝႊჶᯙၹԕᰍᱢႊჶ(semi- implicit time integration)ᮝಽđŝෝࠥ⇽⦹ᩡ݅(Kim, 2010).

4. vᬑ✚ᖒᨱ঑ෙᇩ⡍⪵⣮⪵☁ᔍ໕᮹ᙹ⊹⧕ᕾđŝ

ḡၹ᳑Õ, vᬑ✚ᖒ, ᔍ໕Ğᔍᨱ ঑ෙ ᇩ⡍⪵ ⣮⪵☁ ᔍ໕᮹

༉š⯂ᙹಆᇥ⡍ᄡ⪵ෝᇥᕾ⦹ʑ᭥⧕ᕽ3ᰆᨱᕽᱽ᜽⦽࠺᜽⧕ᕾ

⥥ಽəఉᮥᯕᬊ⦹ᩍ⋉⚍⧕ᕾᮥᙹ⧪⦹ᩡ݅. ḡၹ᳑Õᮡ2ᰆᨱᕽ

ᨙɪ⦽ၵ᪡zᯕǎԕ3aḡḡᩎᨱᕽ₥≉⦽⣮⪵☁ෝݡᔢᮝಽ

⧉ᙹ✚ᖒłᖁᝅ⨹ᮥ☖⧕Type A᪡Type BಽḡၹᮥǍᇥ⦹ᩡ݅.

vᬑ✚ᖒᮡvᬑvࠥ᪡ḡᗮ᜽eᮝಽӹ٭ᙹᯩ۵ߑ, vᬑvࠥ۵

ᯝᔢᨱᕽᯱᵝၽᔾࡹ۵10mm/h᪡᧶ᮡᔍ໕❭ƕෝᮁၽ⧁a܆

ᖒᯕⓑ30mm/h, 50mm/hෝᔍᬊ⦹ᩡ݅(ᱶᔢᖍ॒, 2009). vᬑ ḡᗮ᜽e᮹Ğᬑᨱ۵vᬑvࠥᨱ᮹⧕ᔍ໕⢽⊖ᇡa᪥ᱥ⡍⪵ࡹ

۵᜽eอⓝ⧕ᕾᮥᙹ⧕⦹ᩡᮝ໑əჵ᭥۵12᜽e~72᜽eᯕ݅.

ੱ⦽ᅙ⧕ᕾᨱᕽ۵Fig. 4᪡zᯕᔍ໕׳ᯕa10mಽᯝᱶ⦹໑, ᔍ໕᮹Ğᔍ۵30°, 45°, 60°ಽᄡ⪵᜽⍽a໕ᕽ༉š⯂ᙹಆᨱၙ⊹

۵ᩢ⨆ᮥᇥᕾ⦹ᩡ݅. ᔍ໕ᱥℕᩢᩎᮡ॒ႊ(isotropic)ᯙḡၹᮝ ಽaᱶ⦹ᩡᮝ໑, ᳭ᬑ⊂໕ŝ⦹ᇡĞĥ໕ᮡᇩ⚍ᙹĞĥ᳑Õᮝಽ

ᯕᨱᙹḢ⦽ႊ⨆ᮝಽ۵Ŗʑ᪡ྜྷ᮹⮱෥ᯕၽᔾ⦹ḡᦫ۵݅Ł

aᱶ⦹ᩡ݅. ੱ⦽ ᳭ᬑ⊂໕ᮡ ᙹ⠪ႊ⨆ ᄡ᭥ෝ, ⦹ᇡ Ğĥ໕ᮡ

ᩑḢႊ⨆᮹ᄡ᭥ෝǍᗮ⦹ᩡ݅. Ⅹʑḡ⦹ᙹ᭥۵Õʑ᜽ෝaᱶ⦹

ᩍᔍ໕ၵ݆ᨱᕽ3m ׳ᯕᨱᕽᇡ░7°ĞᔍෝaḡŁᖁ⩶ᱢᮝಽ

᷾a⦹۵äᮝಽᖅᱶ⦹ᩡᮝ໑, ḡ⦹ᙹ᭥ᔢᇡᯙᇩ⡍⪵☁ᩢᩎᨱ ᕽ׳ᯕᨱ঑௝↽ݡ༉š⯂ᙹಆᮥ-75kPaಽaᱶ⦹ᩡ݅(Rahardjo et al., 2007; Rahardjo et al., 2010). Table 3ᮡ⧕ᕾ᮹᳦ඹෝ

ӹ┡ԕŁᯩᮝ໑, Table 4۵⧕ᕾᨱᔍᬊࡽḡၹ᮹vࠥᱶᙹෝ

ᱶญ⦹ᩡ݅.

Fig. 5۵Type A(ks=4.67 × 10-6 m/sec)ḡၹ᮹45°Ğᔍෝw۵

ᔍ໕ᨱᕽ᜽eᨱ঑ෙ༉š⯂ᙹಆᄡ⪵ᇥ⡍ࠥᯕ໑, bb᮹᫵ᗭ ۵9}ᱩᱱᮝಽǍᖒࡹᨕᯩʑভྙᨱ4}᮹༉ᕽญᱩᱱᨱᕽ

᨜ᨕḥ༉š⯂ᙹಆ᮹⠪Ɂsᮝಽӹ┡ԕᨩ݅. Fig. 5ᨱᕽ᪡zᯕ

vᬑvࠥa ⓕᙹಾ ᔍ໕ ⢽⊖ ၰ ԕᇡḡၹᯕ ⡍⪵ࡹ۵ ᜽eᯕ

(6)

Table 4. Properties of soils used in numerical analysis

Type Type A Type B

Lame parameter (λ,μ) 29 × 106, 7 × 106 Pa Solid real density (ρsR) 2700 kg/m3 Water real density (ρ )wR 1000 kg/m3 Air real density (ρ )aR 1.2 kg/m3 Viscosity of water (ηw) 10-3 Pa·s

Initial porosity (n = nw+ na) 0.41 (=0.2+0.21) 0.38 (=0.18+0.2) Saturated permeability (ks) 4.67 × 10-6 m/sec 5.12 × 10-5 m/sec Residual degree of saturation (Sr) 0.131 0.08

(a) Element A (b)Element B

Fig. 5. Variation of matric suction with slope angle 45°(Type A)

(a) 10mm/h (element A) (b) Saturation time with slope angle

Fig. 6. Effect of slope angle for matric suction (Type A)

ṈᦥḡŁ༉š⯂ᙹಆᯕɪĊ⯩qᗭ⧉ᮥ᦭ᙹᯩ݅. ✚⯩, ᔍ໕

ԕᇡ(element A)ᅕ݅ᔍ໕⢽⊖ᨱᕽ(element B) ༉š⯂ᙹಆᯕ

ዉญqᗭ⦹ᩍ⡍⪵ᔢ┽ᨱࠥݍ⦽݅. ᯕ۵Fig. 5(a)ᨱᕽ᪡zᯕ

ᔍ໕⢽⊖ᨱᕽԕᇡಽྜྷᯕ⋉⚍ࡹ۵ŝᱶᨱᕽ༉š⯂ᙹಆᯕqᗭ

ࡹ۵ ᜽eᯕ ḡᩑࡹʑ ভྙᯕ݅.

Fig. 6ᮡ ᔍ໕Ğᔍa ༉š⯂ᙹಆᨱ ၙ⊹۵ ᩢ⨆ᮥ ᇥᕾ⦹ʑ

᭥⦹ᩍType A ḡၹᨱᕽ᮹đŝෝእƱࠥ᜽⦹ᩡ݅. vᬑvࠥa

10mm/h᮹Ğᬑᨱᕽ۵ḡၹ᮹⡍⪵⚍ᙹĥᙹᅕ᯲݅ᮡ᧲᮹እa

ԕಙʑভྙᨱ⡍⪵aၽᔾ⦽Ŕᮡᨧᨩᮝӹ(Fig. 6a), Fig. 6(b)ᨱ ᕽ᪡zᯕvᬑvࠥa10mm/hᯕᔢ᮹Ğᬑᨱᕽ۵ݡᇡᇥ⢽⊖ḡၹ

(7)

(a) Element A (b)Element B Fig. 7. Variation of matric suction in two types of soil (30mm/h)

Fig. 8. Vertical displacement on the top surface of slope ᯕ⡍⪵ࡹᨩᮝ໑, ᔍ໕Ğᔍᨱ۵ⓑᩢ⨆ᯕᨧ۵äᮝಽӹ┡ԍ݅.

vᬑḡᗮ᜽eᯕ᷾a⧉ᨱ঑௝༉š⯂ᙹಆᯕqᗭ⦹۵ᱶࠥ۵݅

ᗭ ₉ᯕa ᯩᮝӹ, ↽᳦ᱢᮝಽ ⡍⪵ࡹ۵ ᜽ᱱᯕ Ñ᮹ ࠺ᯝ⦹ʑ

ভྙᨱ ᔍ໕Ğᔍ۵ ༉š⯂ᙹಆ qᗭᨱ ⓑ ᩢ⨆ᮥ ᵝḡ ᦫ۵݅.

ᷪ, Ğᔍᨱ঑ෙᔍ໕᮹ᦩᱥᮉ᷾qᮡᩎ⦺ᱢšĥᨱ᮹⧕ᔍ໕⪽

࠺ಆᄡ⪵॒ᨱⓍí᳭ᬑࡹŁ, ༉š⯂ᙹಆᮡĞᔍᨱ᮹⦽ᩢ⨆ᅕ

݅ ḡၹ᳑Õᯕӹ vᬑvࠥᨱ ⓑ ᩢ⨆ᮥ ၼᦥ ᔍ໕᮹ ᦩᱶᖒᮥ

qᗭ᜽┅íࡽ݅. Chen and Young(2006)ᮡᔍ໕᮹Ğᔍᨱ঑௝

⋉⚍ʫᯕ(infiltration depth)᮹₉ᯕaⓍḡᦫᮭᮥᅕŁ⦽ၵᯩ݅.

Fig. 7ᮡᔍ໕Ğᔍ30°ᨱᕽ᮹ḡၹ᳑Õᨱ঑ෙ༉š⯂ᙹಆ᮹

ᇥ⡍ࠥෝࠥ᜽⦹ᩡ݅. Fig. 7(a)ᨱᕽ᪡zᯕ ᔍ໕ԕᇡ(element A)ᨱᕽ᮹ ༉š⯂ᙹಆᮡ ⚍ᙹĥᙹa vᬑvࠥᅕ݅ ⓑ Type B (ks= 5.12x10-5 m/sec)ḡၹᨱᕽ዁෕íqᗭ⦹ᩡᮝ໑, Type A (ks= 4.67x10-6 m/sec)ḡၹᨱᕽ۵vᬑa᜽᯲ࡽ18᜽eᯕ⬥ᨱ

༉š⯂ᙹಆᯕqᗭ⦹ʑ᜽᯲⦹ᩡ݅. ↽᳦ᱢᮝಽ۵⚍ᙹĥᙹav ᬑvࠥᅕ᯲݅ᮡType Aḡၹᨱᕽຝᱡ⡍⪵aၽᔾ⦹ᩡ݅. əญŁ

Fig. 7(b)ᨱࠥ᜽⦽ၵ᪡zᯕType BḡၹᨱᕽⅩʑ༉š⯂ᙹಆᮡ

Type Aḡၹᨱእ⧕዁෕íqᗭ⦹۵Ğ⨆ᮥᅕᯕḡอType Aḡၹ

⢽⊖ᨱᕽຝᱡ⡍⪵ࡹᨩᮝ໑, ᜽eḡᩑ⩶ᔢᮡӹ┡ӹḡᦫᦹ݅.

Cho and Lee(2001)᮹ᩑǍđŝᨱᕽ۵⡍⪵⚍ᙹĥᙹavᬑvࠥ

ᅕ݅ ᯲ᮥ ভ ᔍ໕ ⢽⊖ᨱᕽ᮹ ༉š⯂ᙹಆᯕ ɪĊ⯩ qᗭ⦹ᩍ

ຝᱡ⡍⪵aၽᔾ⦽݅ŁᅕŁ⦹Łᯩ݅. ə౨ḡอᅙᩑǍđŝᨱᕽ ۵Ⅹʑ༉š⯂ᙹಆ(0~24᜽e)ᯕ⚍ᙹĥᙹaⓑType B ḡၹᨱᕽ

዁෕íqᗭ⦹۵äᮝಽӹ┡ԍ݅. ᯕ్⦽༉š⯂ᙹಆ᮹ᄡ⪵۵

ḡၹ᳑Õᨱ঑௝݅෕íӹ┡ӹ໑, ᇩ⡍⪵ḡၹ᮹⚍ᙹĥᙹ᪡⧉ᙹ

✚ᖒłᖁ᮹Ŗʑ⧉᯦⊹, ᯵ඹℕᱢ⧉ᙹእ, ⡍⪵ℕᱢ⧉ᙹእᨱⓍí

᮹᳕⦹ʑভྙᨱ⋉⚍⧕ᕾ᜽ᔍᬊࡽ⧉ᙹ✚ᖒłᖁ᮹₉ᯕಽᯙ⧕

༉š⯂ᙹಆ᮹ qᗭĞ⨆ᯕ ᔢᯕ⦹í ӹ┡ӽ äᮝಽ ❱݉ࡽ݅.

Fig. 8ᮡᔍ໕ᔢᇡḡၹ᮹b᫵ᗭᨱᕽၽᔾ⦽↽᳦ᙹḢᄡ᭥

ෝࠥ᜽⦽äᯕ݅. Type Aḡၹ᮹ᄡ᭥aType Bḡၹᅕ݅↽ݡ

8mmⓍíၽᔾ⦹ᩡᮝ໑, ᔍ໕⢽⊖ᨱᕽມᨕḩᙹಾᄡ᭥a᷾a

⦹۵ Ğ⨆ᮥ ӹ┡ԩ݅. ᄡ᭥۵ vᬑᨱ ᮹⧕ ⋉⚍a ၽᔾ⦹໕ᕽ

Ⅹʑeɚශᯕᄡ⦹íࡹŁeɚශ᮹ᄡ⪵۵ḡၹ᮹⧉ᙹ✚ᖒłᖁ ŝᇩ⡍⪵⚍ᙹĥᙹ॒ᮥᄡ⪵᜽┅໑, ᫵ᗭ(element)᮹vᖒ⧪಍

(stiffness matrix)ĥᔑᨱᩢ⨆ᮥၙ⊹ʑভྙᨱḡၹ᳑Õᨱ঑௝

ᄡ᭥ၽᔾᱶࠥa݅෕íӹ┡ԍ݅. ᯕ᪡zᯕvᬑ⋉⚍ᨱ᮹⧕

☁พᯱॅeᨱᦶ⇶ᯕၽᔾ⦹Łᯱᵲᨱ᮹⦽ᩑḢႊ⨆ᄡ⩶ᯕၽᔾ

(8)

Fig. 9. Non-homogeneous soil slope mesh with two layers

Fig. 10. Variation of matric suction at A element (45°, 30mm/h)

(a) Surface layer: Type A and subsurface layer: Type B

(b) Surface layer: Type B and subsurface layer: Type A Fig. 11. Distribution of matric suction in two layered soil slope

(30mm/h)

⧉ᨱ঑௝ḡၹeɚශᯕqᗭ⦹ᩍᔍ໕ԕᇡᨱᕽၽᔾࡹ۵༉š⯂

ᙹಆᮡ Ⅹʑᨱ ᷾a⦹݅a qᗭ⦹۵ Ğ⨆ᮥ ᅕᯙ݅.

ḡɩʭḡ۵Ɂḩ⦽݉ᯝ⊖ᨱݡ⧕⋉⚍⧕ᕾᮥᙹ⧪⦹ᩡᮝӹ, ᝅᱽ⩥ᔢᨱᕽ۵ᖒ☁ӹᯱᩑ♕ᱢᨱ᮹⧕݅⊖ᮝಽḡၹᯕ᳑ᖒࡹ

ᨕᯩ۵Ğᬑa⮵⦹݅. ঑௝ᕽᅙᩑǍᨱᕽࠥᔍ໕⢽⊖ᮥ঑௝

᧞2mࢱ̹อⓝḡၹ᮹᳦ඹෝǍᇥ⦹ᩍ⋉⚍⧕ᕾᮥᙹ⧪⦹ᩡ݅

(Fig. 9). ᔍ໕ԕᇡ(element A)ᨱᕽ᮹᜽eᨱ঑ෙ༉š⯂ᙹಆ᮹

ᄡ⪵۵Fig. 10ᨱӹ┡ԕᨩᮝ໑, 2}᮹⊖ᮝಽ᳕ᰍ⦹۵ḡၹԕ᮹

༉š⯂ᙹಆᄡ⪵۵ᔍ໕ԕᇡ᮹ᬱḡၹᅕ݅⢽⊖ḡၹ᮹ᙹญ⦺ᱢ

✚ᖒᨱ঑௝Ⓧí᳭ᬑࡹᨕ⢽⊖ᨱᇥ⡍⦹۵ḡၹ᮹⚍ᙹĥᙹa

ᬱḡၹᅕ᯲݅ᮥĞᬑᛞí⡍⪵ࡹ۵äᮥ⪶ᯙ⧁ᙹᯩ݅(Fig.

11). Fig. 11(a)ᨱᕽᅕᯕ۵ၵ᪡zᯕ, ᔍ໕⢽⊖ᇡᨱᕽ᧲᮹eɚᙹ ᦶᯕၽᔾ⦹۵äᮡ⢽⊖ᯕ⡍⪵ࡽ⬥(eɚᙹᦶ=0) bnodal point ᨱ ḡᗮᱢᮝಽ vᬑvࠥa ᱢᬊࡹŁ ᯩʑ ভྙᮝಽ ❱݉ࡽ݅.

5. đು

ᅙᩑǍᨱᕽ۵ᇩ⡍⪵⣮⪵☁ᔍ໕ᨱ⋉⚍⦹۵vᬑᨱݡ⦹ᩍ

ḡၹ✚ᖒ, vᬑ✚ᖒəญŁᔍ໕ĞᔍෝŁಅ⦽ᔍ໕᮹⋉⚍Ñ࠺

✚ᖒᮥᇥᕾ⦹ᩡ݅. ᯕᨱǎԕ᮹3aḡḡᩎᨱᕽ₥≉⦽⣮⪵☁ෝ

ݡᔢᮝಽ⧉ᙹ✚ᖒłᖁᮥđᱶ⦹Ł, ᮁ⦽᫵ᗭ⧕ᕾ⥥ಽəఉᮥᯕ ᬊ⦹ᩍᔍ໕ԕ༉š⯂ᙹಆ᮹ᄡ⪵ᇥ⡍ෝš⊂⦹ᩡ݅. ᅙᩑǍđŝ

݅ᮭŝ zᮡ đುᮥ ᨜ᮥ ᙹ ᯩᨩ݅.

(1) vᬑ᜽, ᔍ໕ԕᇡ᮹༉š⯂ᙹಆᮡvᬑvࠥa᷾a⧉ᨱ঑௝

qᗭ⦹۵እᮉᯕ᷾a⦹ᩍ዁ෙ᜽eᨱᔍ໕⢽⊖ḡၹᮥ⡍⪵᜽

┅໑, ᔍ໕ᮥǍᖒ⦹۵ᇩ⡍⪵ḡၹ᮹ᙹญ⦺ᱢ✚ᖒᨱ঑௝

ᔍ໕ ԕᇡෝ ⡍⪵᜽┅۵ ᜽eᮥ ḡᩑ᜽┕ᮥ ᦭ ᙹ ᯩᨩ݅.

(2) vᬑvࠥaḡၹ᮹⡍⪵⚍ᙹĥᙹᅕ݅ⓑĞᬑ, ᔍ໕᮹Ğᔍᨱ

঑ෙ༉š⯂ᙹಆ᮹ᄡ⪵۵ၙၙ⦹໑, ༉š⯂ᙹಆᮡĞᔍᨱ᮹

⦽ᩢ⨆ᅕ݅۵ḡၹ᮹ᙹญ⦺ᱢ✚ᖒŝvᬑvࠥa⮺᮹vࠥᨱ

ⓑ ᩢ⨆ᮥ ၙ⊽݅.

(3) ḡၹ᮹⡍⪵⚍ᙹĥᙹavᬑvࠥᅕ݅ⓑĞᬑᨱ۵༉š⯂ᙹಆ ᯕqᗭ⦹۵᜽eᮡ዁෕ӹ, ⡍⪵⚍ᙹĥᙹavᬑvࠥᅕ᯲݅

ᮡĞᬑᨱ۵⢽⊖ḡၹ᮹⡍⪵aຝᱡၽᔾ⦽݅. đŝᱢᮝಽ,

(9)

⚍ᙹĥᙹa᯲ᮡḡၹᨱᕽ⡍⪵aᛞíᯝᨕӹ۵äᮥ᮹ၙ⦹

໑, ݅⊖ḡၹᨱᕽࠥ༉š⯂ᙹಆ᮹ᄡ⪵۵ᬱḡၹ᮹✚ᖒᅕ݅۵

ᔍ໕⢽⊖ ḡၹ ✚ᖒᨱ ঑௝ Ⓧí ᳭ᬑࡽ݅.

qᔍ᮹ɡ

ᯕםྙᮡ2011֥ࠥᱶᇡ(Ʊᮂŝ⦺ʑᚁᇡ)᮹ᰍᬱᮝಽ⦽ǎᩑ Ǎᰍ݉᮹ ḡᬱᮥ ၼᦥ ᙹ⧪ࡽ ᩑǍᯥ(No.2011-0030842).

References

Kim, J. H., Park, S. W., Jeong, S. S. and Yoo, J. H. (2002). “A study of stability analysis on unsaturated weathered slopes based on rainfall-induced wetting.” Journal of Korean Geotechnical Society.

Vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 123-136 (in Korean).

Kim, J. H., Hwang, W. K., Song, Y. S. and Kim, T. H. (2012). “Effect of matric suction in soils due to hysteretic soil water characteristic curves.” Journal of Korean Geotechnical Society. Vol. 28, No. 4, pp. 91-100 (in Korean).

Kim, J. H. and Hwang, Y. C. (2011). “Finite element analysis of partially saturated soil considering pore-air pressure.” Journal of Korean Geotechnical Society. Vol. 27, No. 3, pp. 95-102 (in Korean).

Lee, K. H, Jeong, S. S. and Kim. T. H. (2007). “Effect of fines on the stability of unsaturated soil slopes.” Journal of Korean Geotech- nical Society. Vol. 23, No. 3, pp. 101-109 (in Korean).

Jeong, S. S., Choi, J. Y. and Lee, J. H. (2009). “Stability analysis of unsaturated weathered soil slopes considering rainfall duration.”

Journal of Korean Civil Engineers Society. Vol. 29, No. 1, pp. 1-9 (in Korean).

Cho, S. E. and Lee, S. R. (2000). “Slope stability analysis of unsatu- rated soil slopes due to rainfall infiltration.” Journal of Korean Geotechnical Society, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 51-64 (in Korean).

Alonso, E. E., Batlle, F., Gens, A. and Lloret, A. (1988). “Consolida- tion analysis of partially saturated soils-Application to earthdam construction.” Numerical Methods in Geomechanics, Innsbruck, pp. 1303-1308.

Borja, R.I. (2004). “Cam-clay plasticity. Part V : A Mathematical Framework for Three-phase Deformation and Strain Localization Analyses of Partially Saturated Porous Media.” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, Vol. 193, pp. 5301-5338.

Chen, L. and Young, M. H. (2006). “Green-Ampt infiltration model for sloping surfaces.” Water Resources Research, Vol. 42, pp. 1-9.

Cho, S. E. and Lee, S. R. (2001). “Instability of unsaturated soil slopes due to infiltration.” Computers and geotechnics, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp. 185-208.

Coussy, O. (2010). Poromechanics, John Wiley and Sons, New York.

Duncan, J. M. (1996). “State of the art: Limit equilibrium and finite- element analysis of slopes.” Journal of Geotechnical engineering, Vol. 122, No. 7, pp. 577-596.

Hughes, T. J. R. (1987). The finite element method, Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, pp. 1-51, 57-75.

Geo-slope International. (2012). Seep/w for finite element seepage analysis, user’s guide, Calgary, Alta., Canada.

FEFLOW (2012). FEFLOW for fluid flow analysis, user’s guide, DHI-WASY, GmbH, Germany.

Jeong, S. S., Kim, J. H. and Lee, K. H. (2008). “Effect of clay content on well-graded sands due to infiltration.” Engineering Geology, Vol. 102, No. 1-2, pp. 74-81.

Kim, J. (2010). Plasticity modeling and coupled finite element analysis for partially-saturated soils, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Colorado, Boulder, US.

Kim, J., Jeong, S. and Richard, A.R. (2012). “Instability of partially saturated soil slopes due to alternation of rainfall pattern.” Engin- eering Geology, Vol.147-148, pp.28-36.

Kim, J., Jeong, S., Park, S. and Sharma, J. (2004). “Influence of rainfall-induced wetting on the stability of slopes in weathered soils.” Engineering Geology, Vol. 75, No. 3-4, pp. 251-262.

Laloui, L., Klubertanz, G. and Vulliet, L. (2003). “Solid-liquid-air coupling in multiphase porous media.” International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp. 183-206.

Lam, L., Fredlund, D. G. and Barbour, S. L. (1987). “Transient seepage model for saturated - unsaturated soil systems : A Geotechnical Engineering Approach.” Canadian Geotechnical Journal, Vol. 24, No. 4, pp. 565-580.

Lambe, P. C. (1996). Residual soils, In: special report 247. Landslides:

Investigation and Mitigation, Washington DC: TRB, National Research Council, pp. 507-524.

Ng, C. W. W. and Shi, Q. (1998). “A numerical investigation of the stability of unsaturated soil slopes subjected to transient seepage.”

Computers and geotechnics, Vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 1-28.

Pham, H.Q. and Fredlund, D.G. (2004). “New apparatus for the of the 57th Canadian Geotechnical Conference, Quebec, Quebec City, Canada.

Rahardjo, H. and Leong, E.C. (1997). “Soil-water characteristic curves and flux boundary problems.” Unsaturated Soil Engineering : Practice-Geotechnical Special Publication, Vol. 68, pp. 88-112.

Rahardjo, H., Nio, A. S., Leong, E. C. and Song, N. Y. (2010). “Effect of groundwater table position and soil properties on stability of slope during rainfall.” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Vol. 136, No. 11, pp. 1555-1564.

Rahardjo, H., Ong, T. H., Rezaur, R. B. and Leong, E. C. (2007).

“Factors controlling instability of homogeneous soil slopes under rainfall.” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engin- eering, Vol. 33, No. 12, pp. 1532-1543.

Rahardjo, H., Rezaur, R. and Leong, E. (2009). Mechanism of rainfall-induced slope failures in tropical regions, 1st Italian Workshop on Landslides, Vol. 1.

van Genuchten, M. (1980). “Closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils.” Soil Science Society of America Journal, Vol. 44, No. 5, pp. 35-53.

수치

Table 1. Physical properties of soils
Fig. 3. SWCC for the three soils: experimental data and fitted curves
Fig. 5 ۵Type A(k s =4.67 × 10 -6  m/sec) ḡၹ᮹45°Ğᔍෝw۵
Table 4. Properties of soils used in numerical analysis
+3

참조

관련 문서

Piles do not support the load rather acts as a medium to transmit the load from the foundation to the resisting sub-stratum – Friction pile( 마찰말뚝 ): driven at a site where

– Friction pile( 마찰말뚝 ): driven at a site where soil is not economical or rather possible to rest the bottom end of the pile on the hard stratum, Load is carried by

In this context, this study compared and analyzed a variety of soil decontamination methods used to evaluate the wide-area soil contaminated with Cs:

→ axial STRAIN distribution is linear over the section ← Eq.(5.30) axial stress distribution → piecewise linear (Fig.. 5.5 Beams subjected to

In this study, the numeral analysis has been conducted to verify the effect on behavior of abutment and under ground when Lightweight Air-trapped soil(ATS)

Figure 2(continued)Formulas for Stresses in Semi-Infinite Elastic Foundation 7.1-165.. DM 7.1-167, Difference between square and strip footings.. DM 7.1-168, Vertical stress

In order to do that, it is necessary to obtain the soil water characteristic curve which shows nonlineer relationship between matric suction and volumetric water contents..

Based on the factor analysis, the emission sources were regarded to be soil, anthrophogenic sources, sea salt and industrial sources, respectively.... List