• 검색 결과가 없습니다.

第48回 韓經硏 포럼

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "第48回 韓經硏 포럼"

Copied!
36
0
0

로드 중.... (전체 텍스트 보기)

전체 글

(1)

2007. 3. 27(火)

주 제 : 한국과 세계경제전망

-엔 캐리 트레이드 청산가능성 관련 연 사 : 임지원 박사(JP Morgan 서울지점상무)

KOREA ECONOMIC RESEARCH INSTITUTE FORUM

第48回 韓經硏 포럼

(2)

A T T H E C R O S S R O A D S

Jiwon Lim

Senior Economist, JPMorgan Chase (822) 758-5509

jiwon.c.lim@jpmorgan.com

CONFIDENTIALCTLYPRIVATEAND

(3)

Agenda

Page

세계경제전망

개요 1

5

한국경제와 환율전망

엔캐리거래의 기술적 요인 16

23

HECROSSROADS

(4)

Unwinding of JPY carry trading (엔캐리거래 청산과 엔달러환율 추이)

JPY against USD JPY against USD

160 러시아 채무불이행선언 + LTCM 부도

100 120 140

엔론 회계부정

?

80

95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07

외국인 일본주식 매수와 본국송금

G7 meeting (Dubai)

(5)

US subprime mortgage problems (서브프라임대출부실)

서브프라임 모기지 연체율 (

60일 이상 연체)

% of outstanding subprime loans; first liens, ARMs 서브프라임 모기지 연체율 (

60일 이상 연체)

% of outstanding subprime loans; first liens, ARMs

12 13

6 7 8 9 10 11 12

4 5 6

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007

(6)

엔캐리청산과 세계경제성장

산업생산증가율, 세계평균

% change, 전년동기비 산업생산증가율, 세계평균

% change, 전년동기비

12

1998 episode

0 4 8

1998 episode

2002 episode

(8) (4)

95 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06

(7)

Agenda

Page

세계경제전망

개요 1

5

한국경제와 환율전망

엔캐리거래의 기술적 요인 16

23

HECROSSROADS

(8)

세계경제전망

GDP 성장율 : JPMorgan 예측치 GDP 성장율 : JPMorgan 예측치

% over a year ago % over previous period, saar

2006 2007 2008 1Q06 2Q06 3Q06 4Q06 1Q07 2Q07 3Q07 4Q07

Global 3.7 3.4 3.1 4.6 3.6 2.9 4.1 2.8 3.5 3.6 3.4

U.S. 3.3 2.5 2.6 5.6 2.6 2.0 2.2 2.0 3.0 3.5 3.0

n

The growth backdrop remains healthy

n

Corporates positioned to expand; global policy supports growth; an oil drag fades

n

Asia and Emerging market economies normalize

n

A divide between output and demand

U.S. 3.3 2.5 2.6 5.6 2.6 2.0 2.2 2.0 3.0 3.5 3.0

Euro 2.8 2.5 2.0 3.4 4.0 2.1 3.6 1.5 2.3 2.3 2.0

Japan 2.2 2.9 2.5 2.8 1.4 0.3 4.8 2.0 2.8 2.9 3.0

China 10.7 10.0 9.5 9.0 14.9 9.9 6.8 9.5 11.7 10.8 10.4

EMAsia (ex. China and India) 5.4 4.9 4.9 5.5 3.9 7.7 3.7 5.0 5.6 5.3 5.3

A divide between output and demand

n

Goods producers in the midst of an inventory correction

n

Final consumption is firming, setting a stage for a modest rebound in global growth

n

Inflation risk shifting to resource utilization

제전망

(9)

모기지 이외의 소비자 대출연체율 모기지 이외의 소비자 대출연체율

1.0% 8%

모기지 대출연체율 (30일이상 연채) 모기지 대출연체율 (30일이상 연채)

5.0 15

U.S. subprime mortgage problems more likely sectoral shock

(서브프라임부실은 국지적 문제일 가능성이 높으나… )

Percent, sa Percent, sa

Subprime

0.0%

0.2%

0.4%

0.6%

0.8%

1.0%

1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006

2%

3%

4%

5%

6%

7%

8%

Credit card loans

Prime auto loans 1.0

2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0

1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 5 7 9 11 13 15

Prime

10

모기지 금리 모기지 금리

% p.a., weekly average

550

모기지 대출신청—purchase index 모기지 대출신청—purchase index

March 16, 1990 = 100, sa

0 2 4 6 8 10

1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007

30-year fixed

1-year ARM

300 350 400 450 500 550

2003 2004 2005 2006 2007

전망

(10)

40

신규 주택 착공

Million units, saar, 3mma 신규 주택 착공

Million units, saar, 3mma 서브프라임 모기지: 신규 대출과 주택판매

(전년동기대비)

서브프라임 모기지: 신규 대출과 주택판매 (전년동기대비)

Gauging the impact on housing market

(미국: 서브프라임 대출 부실이 주택시장에 미치는 영향은 한동안 지속될듯)

서브프라임 모기지 신규대출

2.0 2.5

(40) (20) 0 20

2004 2005 2006

주택 구입 체감 지수 주택 구입 체감 지수

170 80

Index, Umich survey sa, NAHB

주택판매

주택 판매:

신규 vs. 기존

Million units, saar, both scales 주택 판매:

신규 vs. 기존

Million units, saar, both scales

1.25 6.9

0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0

1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006

110 120 130 140 150 160 170

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007

30 40 50 60 70 80

Consumers

Builder

0.95 1.05 1.15

Jan-06 Apr-06 Jul-06 Oct-06 Jan-07

6.1 6.3 6.5 Existing home sales 6.7

New home sales

제전망

(11)

70

75 55

Inventory correction broadens to manufacturing

(미국: 제조업재고조정은 마무리단계인것으로 판단됨)

제조업 재고율 (판매 대비)

%, sa

제조업 재고율 (판매 대비)

%, sa

제조업 수주 vs. 재고 – ISM survey Index, sa, 3mma for both scales 제조업 수주 vs. 재고 – ISM survey Index, sa, 3mma for both scales

Customers’ inventories 1.4

1.35 12

45 50 55 60 65 70

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007

35 40 45 50

재고대비 수주율 vs. 제조업 생산증가율 재고대비 수주율 vs. 제조업 생산증가율

New orders

Manufacturing IP

Sa %ch saar, 3m/3m

1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006

15

소비증가율, % 3m/3m, saar 소비증가율, % 3m/3m, saar

Retail sales

0.95 1.05 1.15 1.25 1.35

2005 2006 2007

(6) (3) 0 3 6 9 Manufacturing IP 12

ISM: new orders to inventory

(5) 0 5 10

2003 2004 2005 2006 2007

Personal consumption expenditures Retail sales

전망

(12)

Profit margins and the U.S. business cycle

(미국: 기업이윤과 경기순환)

세후 기업부문 이익

% of GNI

세후 기업부문 이익

% of GNI

가격지수를 통해본 기업이익

Ratio: Price index to unit labor costs 가격지수를 통해본 기업이익

Ratio: Price index to unit labor costs

0.08 1.05

미국 고정투자와 신규실업수당신청

% change oya and 000s sawr

미국 고정투자와 신규실업수당신청

% change oya and 000s sawr

24 250

실질 연준금리

Fed funds rate less oya core PCE inflation (%) 실질 연준금리

Fed funds rate less oya core PCE inflation (%)

0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08

50 53 57 61 65 68 72 76 80 83 87 91 95 98 02 06

0.90 0.95 1.00 1.05

50 53 57 61 65 68 72 76 80 83 87 91 95 98 02 06

(16) (8) 0 8 16 24

1Q84 4Q87 3Q91 2Q95 1Q99 4Q02 3Q96 250 300 350 400 450 500 고정투자

실업수당신청

1984 1989 1994 1999 2004

(5) 0 5 10 15

60 62 65 67 70 72 75 77 80 82 85 87 90 92 95 97 00 02 05 4%

제전망

(13)

4 5

4 6

Headline inflation down, but demand-side pressures not fading

(미국: 인플레압력 지속)

소비자 물가, % oya

소비자 물가, % oya 단위당노동비용 (% oya)단위당노동비용 (% oya)

Headline

80 82 84 86 1 2 3

2003 2004 2005 2006 2007

(2) 0 2

1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006

Cumulative move (bp)

Length (months)

End real rate %

2004—2006 425 24 2.6

1999—2000 175 12 4.8

연준의 금리인상 사이클 연준의 금리인상 사이클 제조업 가동율 (%, Sa)

제조업 가동율 (%, Sa)

LT average Core

72 74 76 78 80

1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005

1999—2000 175 12 4.8

1994—1995 300 12 3.5

1988—1989 325 11 5.1

1986—1987 138 10 3.5

LT average

전망

(14)

Euro area “cyclical” uplift now well established

(Euro : 견조한 성장세 당분간 계속될 것으로 전망)

산업전망 지수

%bal, EC survey 산업전망 지수

%bal, EC survey

소비자 전망 지수

%bal, EC survey 소비자 전망 지수

%bal, EC survey

0 10

0 10

건설 전망 지수

%bal, EC survey 건설 전망 지수

%bal, EC survey

개인부분 대출 증가율

% oya

개인부분 대출 증가율

% oya

(40) (30) (20) (10) 0

1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006

(40) (30) (20) (10) 0

1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006

20 12

(60) (40) (20) 0

1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006

4 6 8 10

1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006

제전망

(15)

4

… but still with more evidence on “structural” downshift

(Euro: 잠재성장율 하락으로 인플레 압력은 상승)

노동 생산성

전년동기대비, 1인당 국내총생산 노동 생산성

전년동기대비, 1인당 국내총생산

경제활동 인구

% oya, sum of employment and unemployment 경제활동 인구

% oya, sum of employment and unemployment

안정세 2.0

4.5

85 86 (2)

(1) 0 1 2 3

1Q82 4Q86 3Q91 2Q96 1Q01 4Q05

n Euro experiencing a solid cyclical recovery in demand

제조업 가동율과 실질 정책금리

% pts

제조업 가동율과 실질 정책금리

% pts

유럽 중앙은행 긴축기조 유지 유럽 중앙은행 긴축기조 유지

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5

1Q95 1Q961Q97 1Q981Q99 1Q001Q01 1Q021Q03 1Q041Q05 1Q06

(0.5) 0.5 1.5 2.5 3.5

1Q98 1Q99 1Q00 1Q01 1Q02 1Q03 1Q04 1Q05 1Q06 78 79 80 81 82 83 84

85 n Limited supply potential pressures inflation outlook n Labor productivity

n Resource utilization

n ECB likely to raise the policy rate further for now n The Euro to rise against USD in the near-term Real policy rate

Mfg capacity utilization

전망

(16)

China’s tightening to continue

(중국의 긴축정책은 한동안 지속 전망)

중국: 소매판매와 수출 (전년동기대비) 중국: 소매판매와 수출 (전년동기대비)

45

15 Retail sales 17

중국 명목 GDP와 상하이 A-지수 중국 명목 GDP와 상하이 A-지수

2,500

3,000 SH A-share index Nominal GDP 22,000 RMB, billion Index, 1990 = 100

15 25 35

Jan-05 M ay-05 Sep-05 Jan-06 M ay-06 Sep-06

9 11 13 15

Exports 1,000

1,500 2,000 2,500

97 99 01 03 05 07

7,000 12,000 17,000

지준율, % 지준율, %

9 10 11

Nov 3, 06 Jan 5, 07

Feb 16, 07

RMB : 달러대비환율 vs. 실질실효환율 RMB : 달러대비환율 vs. 실질실효환율

7.7

7.8 102

REER 104

USD/CNY, inverted JPMorgan, index, 2,000=100

4 5 6 7 8 9

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007

Jun 16, 06 Jul 21, 06

Nov 3, 06 7.8

7.9 8.0 8.1 8.2 8.3

2005 2006 2007

92 94 96 98 100 102

USD/CNY spot rate

제전망

(17)

7

U.S. Japan Euro

정책금리 – 미국, 유로, 일본 (% p.a.) 정책금리 – 미국, 유로, 일본 (% p.a.)

Bank of Japan to raise policy rate, but only slowly

(일본의 금리인상은 점진적으로 이루어질 것으로 판단)

중앙은행 정책금리

(% p.a.) - JPMorgan 전망

중앙은행 정책금리

(% p.a.) - JPMorgan 전망

Official interest

rate Current Mar-07 Jun-07 Sep-07 Dec-07 Global GDP-weighted avg. 4.51 4.58 4.59 4.71 5.00

1 2 3 4 5 6

Global GDP-weighted avg. 4.51 4.58 4.59 4.71 5.00 ex. U.S. GDP-weighted avg. 4.14 4.26 4.27 4.44 4.47 U.S. Federal funds rate 5.25 5.25 5.25 5.25 5.75 Canada Overnight fund.

rate

4.25 4.25 4.25 4.75 5.25

Euro Refi rate 3.50 3.75 3.75 4.00 4.00

U.K. Repo rate 5.25 5.25 5.25 5.50 5.50

Japan Overnight call rate 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.75 0.75 China 1-year working

capital

6.12 6.39 6.66 6.75 6.75

Hong Kong

Discount window base

6.75 6.75 6.75 6.75 7.25

Taiwan Official discount 2.75 2.75 2.75 2.875 3.00

-1 0 1

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007

Taiwan Official discount rate

2.75 2.75 2.75 2.875 3.00

전망

(18)

Agenda

Page

세계경제전망

개요 1

5

한국경제와 환율전망

엔캐리거래의 기술적 요인 16

23

THECROSSROADS

(19)

n

Short JPY positions held by short-term players, such as hedge funds and Japanese retail investors using FX margin trading, is estimated to comprise about 20% of JPY carry trades.

엔캐리거래 – 단기투자자 최근 동향

JPMorgan flow of funds JPY position and USD/JPY JPMorgan flow of funds JPY position and USD/JPY

-350 -250

123 past y ear av erage100

JPM Flow of Funds, JPY spec position (inv erted)

n

Much of short-term JPY shorts, mainly from foreign accounts, seems to have been closed out.

n

JPY short position against USD held by Japanese retail margin traders stayed relatively stable.

n

New people who joined this market in 2H06 look just interested in USD/JPY.

n

The estimated amount of FX margin was

doubled in the past one year. We would not be surprised if the amount placed in FX margin

-250 -150 -50 50 150 250 350

Jan-06 Apr-06 Jul-06 Oct-06 Jan-07

107 111 115 119

USD/JPY

일본 개인투자자들의 외환 position (vs. JPY) million each currency unit

일본 개인투자자들의 외환 position (vs. JPY) million each currency unit

20,000 USD NZD AUD

surprised if the amount placed in FX margin trading accounts were to double from current level, in light of the household’s JPY760 trillion “cash and deposits” and assuming not even 0.1% of this amount shift to FX margin

account.

0

5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000

Jul-06 Sep-06 Nov-06 Jan-07 Mar-07

래의기술적요인

(20)

n

More than 70% of JPY carry trades are likely foreign bond investments by Japanese investors: Their net investments in foreign bonds since the BOJ started ZIRP in 1999 amount to JPY30 trillion.

n

A large number of baby boomers are set to retire in 2007–09, which means that retirement benefits to be paid out in the next three years could be JPY3–5 trillion more than in a typical year. If a portion of these funds is put into foreign securities investments, there would be some downward pressure on JPY.

엔캐리거래: 일본개인투자자의 해외채권 투자 동향 (1)

일본거주민의 해외 투자 일본거주민의 해외 투자

JPY trillion +:outflow from Japan +:inflow to Japan

Total by Investment

Trusts Lifers Trust accounts

Investment

Trusts Uridashi

1998 1.8 0.4 2.7 3.5 0.6 3.8 2.7 15.1 15.6 1.9 0.8

1999 3.7 0.0 -0.1 3.1 -0.9 3.5 1.1 10.4 13.1 11.2 -2.3

2000 2.2 0.3 0.0 0.9 -1.4 0.0 2.5 4.2 12.9 -0.2 10.1

2001 1.5 0.4 4.6 0.6 1.3 0.6 3.9 12.5 10.7 3.8 1.8

Current Account Foreign bonds investment by Japanese

Foreign stocks investment by

Japanese JPN stocks

by foreigners

JPN bonds by foreigners FDI Total

2001 1.5 0.4 4.6 0.6 1.3 0.6 3.9 12.5 10.7 3.8 1.8

2002 4.6 0.4 1.1 1.2 0.8 3.8 2.9 14.4 14.1 -1.3 -3.6

2003 0.7 0.3 5.5 0.0 3.2 4.7 2.6 16.7 15.8 9.8 -2.2

2004 3.2 1.9 2.9 0.6 3.4 1.7 2.5 14.4 18.6 10.5 4.5

2005 1.5 1.0 -0.8 2.4 4.0 2.9 4.7 14.7 18.3 12.6 6.2

2006 1.5 2.0 -0.2 1.9 3.4 1.8 6.6 14.9 19.8 8.1 6.5

Source: MoF

JPY 30 trillion

거래의기술적요인

(21)

n

Japanese retail investors still have only 2.3% foreign assets in their portfolio

n

If Japan's economy holds up, individuals are likely to be more willing to take risk and their investments in foreign currency-denominated assets could rise further.

n

Between 1985 and 88, the share of cash & deposit decreased 8%p. If it happens now, about JPY120 trillion will shift from cash & deposit.

엔캐리거래: 일본개인투자자의 해외채권 투자 동향 (2)

shift from cash & deposit.

of which foreign ccy denominated investment trusts

2005/1Q 769.8 383.1 38.0 13.6 84.3 21.4 6.2 5.9 1,424.3

2005/2Q 774.2 384.7 41.0 15.5 84.3 23.9 6.5 5.6 1,435.4

2005/3Q 767.7 386.7 44.7 17.6 96.4 25.0 6.4 5.3 1,456.2

2005/4Q 778.2 391.0 51.1 19.8 118.0 26.0 7.5 4.8 1,510.1

2006/1Q 765.9 394.1 55.0 21.7 118.0 26.9 7.0 4.6 1,502.2

2006/2Q 769.6 396.1 55.8 22.2 111.4 27.9 6.9 4.6 1,499.3

(q/q chage)

2005/1Q -12.1 2.4 1.5 1.3 4.6 1.6 -0.9 0.0 -9.5

2005/2Q 4.4 1.6 3.0 1.9 0.0 2.6 0.3 -0.3 11.0

Total JPY cash &

Deposit

Foreign currency deposits JGB

Securities investment

trusts

Stocks Insurance and

pension reserves

Foreign securities

가계부분의 금융자산 잔액 (JPY trillion) 가계부분의 금융자산 잔액 (JPY trillion)

2005/2Q 4.4 1.6 3.0 1.9 0.0 2.6 0.3 -0.3 11.0

2005/3Q -6.5 2.0 3.7 2.1 12.1 1.1 -0.1 -0.3 20.9

2005/4Q 10.5 4.2 6.4 2.2 21.6 1.0 1.1 -0.5 53.9

2006/1Q -12.3 3.1 3.9 1.9 0.0 0.9 -0.5 -0.2 -8.0

2006/2Q 3.7 2.0 0.8 0.5 -6.7 1.0 -0.1 0.0 -2.9

(share)

2005/1Q 54.0% 26.9% 2.7% 1.0% 5.9% 1.5% 0.4% 0.4%

2005/2Q 53.9% 26.8% 2.9% 1.1% 5.9% 1.7% 0.4% 0.4%

2005/3Q 52.7% 26.6% 3.1% 1.2% 6.6% 1.7% 0.4% 0.4%

2005/4Q 51.5% 25.9% 3.4% 1.3% 7.8% 1.7% 0.5% 0.3%

2006/1Q 51.0% 26.2% 3.7% 1.4% 7.9% 1.8% 0.5% 0.3%

래의기술적요인

(22)

엔캐리거래: 일본개인투자자의 해외채권 투자 동향 (3)

3% 7%

12%

27%

20s

가계부분의 연령별 금융자산 분포

§ People whose age is above 50 hold about 78% of total households’ financial assets (about JPY1,500 trillion).

§ People who are between 50 and 59 years old hold

23%

28%

20s 30s 40s 50s 60s 70s JPY 338 trillion

JPY 339 trillion JPY 394 trillion

Source: Nomura AM

50대의 금융포트폴리오 구성

§ People who are between 50 and 59 years old hold 50% in Cash and deposit in their portfolio.

§ Diversification of those assets is in focus.

50%

38%

12%

Cash & Deposit Insurance and others

Securities (incl.

Inv estment Trusts) JPY 170 trillion

거래의기술적요인

(23)

n

JPY finance mortgage loans are not really JPY-denominated loans. It is actually local currency loans with lower rates than otherwise because banks use cross currency swaps and the borrowers bear the currency risks

n

Therefore, it is impossible to estimate the amount from Japanese banks’ overseas loan data

n

In every high-yield countries, it is easy to make JPY financed loans. In other words, this JPY financed loans can

엔화자금 대출을 통한 엔캐리거래

n

In every high-yield countries, it is easy to make JPY financed loans. In other words, this JPY financed loans can be spread all over the world

KRW and JPY move KRW and JPY move

1,100 1,200 1,300 1,400

115 120 125 130 135 140 USD/JPY USD/KRW

900 1,000

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007

100 105 110 115

래의기술적요인

(24)

엔캐리거래 청산을 본격화시킬수 있는 위험요인은?

§ Higher volatility

§ In August 1998, sharp rise in volatility triggered by Russia's financial crisis and LTCM's collapse resulted in unwind of JPY carry trade. Not only interest rate gap, but also low volatility is important for JPY carry trade.

§ Japanese-based risks

정책금리: 일본 vs 세계평균

% p.a.

정책금리: 일본 vs 세계평균

% p.a.

4 5 6

Global average

§ Japanese-based risks

§ Unexpectedly hawkish BoJ taking real rates into much higher territory

§ Rapid slowdown in Japanese economy/stock market, eroding domestic confidence

§ Japan verbal intervention although real intervention is highly unlikely in near future.

§ US-based risks: Broad USD trends dominate USD/JPY

§ Unexpected dollar fall would weigh on USD/JPY as well

§ Heightening protectionist sentiment in Congress

§ Substantial slow down in US economy, which led to global

(1) 0 1 2 3 4

95 97 99 01 03 05 07

Japan

JPY- 실질실효환율

2000=100

JPY- 실질실효환율

2000=100

110 120

§ Substantial slow down in US economy, which led to global economic slow down

§ Non-Japan G7 growth: Protectionist rhetoric more likely if non-Japan G7 growth slows unexpectedly

§ We do not view potentially stronger CNY as a yen threat, at least beyond very temporary risks

60 70 80 90 100 110

95 97 99 01 03 05 07

거래의기술적요인

(25)

Agenda

Page

세계경제전망

개요 1

5

한국경제와 환율전망

엔캐리거래의 기술적 요인 16

23

HECROSSROADS

(26)

Real GDP growth likely to stabilize around its potential

(한국경제성장세는 잠재성장율 부근으로 접근하는 모습을 보일 것으로 전망)

실질 GDP (% change, annualized) 실질 GDP (% change, annualized)

12

From previous quarter

3 6 9

(3) 0

2003 2004 2005 2006 2007

From previous year

제와환율전망

(27)

106 2 108

Messages from key forward-looking indicators

(주요 선행지수의 움직임이 말해 주고 있는 것은… )

종합 선행지수

전월대비, 계절조정, 3개월 이동평균 종합 선행지수

전월대비, 계절조정, 3개월 이동평균

기업 경기 실사 지수: composite headline 100 = Neutral reading, sa

기업 경기 실사 지수: composite headline 100 = Neutral reading, sa

14,000 110

115

96 98 100 102 104 106

2004 2005 2006 2007

(1) 0 1

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007

소비자 전망지수: 6-month ahead outlook 100 = Neutral reading, sa

소비자 전망지수: 6-month ahead outlook 100 = Neutral reading, sa

건설수주

Won billions, sa 건설수주

Won billions, sa

4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000

2003 2004 2005 2006 2007

85 90 95 100 105 110

2004 2005 2006 2007

3mma

3mma

와환율전망

(28)

2,000 120

KRW strength has almost run its course

(원화 강세는 거의 끝나가는 것으로 보임)

실질실효환율 (REER) 2000=100

실질실효환율 (REER) 2000=100

Korea won against U.S. dollar

USD/KRW

Korea won against U.S. dollar

USD/KRW

200 0 500 1,000 1,500

1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005

80 90 100 110

실질실효환율 - 한국 2000=100

실질실효환율 - 한국 2000=100

Taiwan China Korea

50 100 150

1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 60

70

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Japan

제와환율전망

(29)

Korea’s growth underperforms in the current cycle

(이번 경기사이클에서 한국경제는 상대적으로 저성장한 반면 ...)

실질 GDP 성장율: 한국 vs. 세계경제 실질 GDP 성장율: 한국 vs. 세계경제

10

15 Korea Global

아시아 각국의 경제성장율

2006년 실질 GDP 성장율 (%)

아시아 각국의 경제성장율

2006년 실질 GDP 성장율 (%)

10.0 10

12 (10)

(5) 0 5

1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006

7.5 7.0

5.8 5.5 5.3 5.1 5.0 4.5 4.0

2.7

0 2 4 6 8 10

CH IN SG HK PH ID MY KR TH TW JP

와환율전망

(30)

50

… with external balances deteriorating

(… 경상수지는 빠르게 소진되고 있음)

아시아 각국의 경상수지 흑자 규모

(% of GDP)

아시아 각국의 경상수지 흑자 규모

(% of GDP)

35 2006 2007

경상수지와 무역수지 US$ billions

경상수지와 무역수지 US$ billions

Merchandise trade balance

(25) 0 25

1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005

5 10 5

10 15 20 25 30

Current account

무역수지를 제외한 경상수지 세부 항목 US$ billions

무역수지를 제외한 경상수지 세부 항목 US$ billions

Income balance

(20) (15) (10) (5) 0 5

1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005

(5) 0 5

SG MY HK TW CH PH KR ID TH IN

Service balance Income balance

Current transfer

제와환율전망

(31)

75 60

Capital account in surplus, but details not healthy

(자본수지의 대부분은 단기외채증가에서 비롯)

경상수지와 국내기업들의 선물환 매도 (US$ billion, annual)

경상수지와 국내기업들의 선물환 매도 (US$ billion, annual)

투자수지 세부항목 US$ billion, annual 투자수지 세부항목 US$ billion, annual

0 25 50

15.0

28.2

15.0 10

20 30 40

50 국내기업의 선물환

매도

경상수지 흑자 직접투자

기타투자

(25) 0

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006

10.3

15.0 15.0

6.1

(10) 0

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006

증권투자

와환율전망

(32)

USD weakness to continue, but at a moderated pace

(달러화 약세는 지속되나 보다 완만한 기조로 진행될 듯)

120 140

실질실효환율 – 미달러 실질실효환율 – 미달러

Index, 2000 =100

60 80 100 120

70 75 80 85 90 95 00 05

120 140

실질실효환율 –일본엔화와 유로화 실질실효환율 –일본엔화와 유로화

Index, 2000 =100

Euro

60 80 100 120

70 75 80 85 90 95 00 05

JPY

제와환율전망

(33)

100 105 4.0

세계 수출시장에서의 한국비중

% of total global exports 세계 수출시장에서의 한국비중

% of total global exports

수출 단가 지수 2000 = 100, sa 수출 단가 지수 2000 = 100, sa

All

Korea companies’ pricing power appears to have peaked

(원화절상과 한국기업의 가격경쟁력)

106 67

기업 이익 (% of GDP) 기업 이익 (% of GDP)

16

80 85 90 95 100

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2.5

3.0 3.5

1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004

원화 환율과 대기업 수출비중

KRW (in real effective exchange rate terms) 원화 환율과 대기업 수출비중

KRW (in real effective exchange rate terms)

Excluding shipment to China

88 91 94 97 100 103

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

57 59 61 63 65

12 13 14 15

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006

KRW (2000 = 100) 대기업 수출비중

(% of total)

와환율전망

(34)

Average 2000-04 2005 2006F 2007F 2008F

Real GDP, % change 5.4 4.0 5.0 4.3 4.8

Consumption¹ 2.2 2.1 2.8 2.3 2.6

Investment¹ 1.7 0.4 0.7 1.2 1.7

Net trade¹ 1.5 1.4 1.5 0.9 0.5

JPMorgan forecast

한국 경제 주요 지표 한국 경제 주요 지표

Net trade¹ 1.5 1.4 1.5 0.9 0.5

Consumer prices, % [y/y] 3.2 2.8 2.2 2.5 3.1

% Dec/Dec 3.2 2.6 2.1 2.9 3.4

Producer prices, % [y/y] 1.9 2.2 2.3 2.8 4.0

Government balance, % of GDP 3.5 2.7 2.0 1.5 1.0

Exchange rate, units/$, eop 1198 1012 930 990 1000

Merchandise trade balance ($ billion) 20.9 32.7 29.2 27.8 24.9

Exports 189.2 289.0 331.8 366.0 398.8

Imports 168.3 256.3 302.6 338.2 373.9

Current account balance 13.2 15.0 6.1 -1.2 -5.7

% of GDP 2.3 1.9 0.7 -0.1 -0.6

International reserves, ($ billion) 134.9 210.0 239.0 250.0 255.0

Total external debt, ($ billion) 149.6 190.3 230.3 233.3 228.3

Short-term² 49.1 65.8 99.8 101.8 95.8

Short-term² 49.1 65.8 99.8 101.8 95.8

Total external debt, % of GDP 26 23 24 25 25

Total external debt, % of exports³ 64 53 53 54 49

Interest payments, % of exports³ 3.3 3.4 3.5 2.5 2.6

¹ Contribution to growth of GDP

² Debt with original maturity of less than one year

³ Exports of goods, services, and net transfers

제와환율전망

(35)

Selected research in 2006-07

n Tracking a possible downturn in Korea’s housing cycle, February 16, 2007 n Structural problems lie behind Korea’s weak consumption, November 3, 2006 n Growth softening, but no serious downturn in store, September 15, 2006 n Korean exports are firm, but give producers little joy, July 21, 2006 n Korean exports are firm, but give producers little joy, July 21, 2006 n Korean economy to tread water, but not sink, June 23, 2006

n Korea’s consumption recovery poised to lose steam, May 12, 2006

n The Bank of Korea: tracking policy aims of the new MPC, March 24, 2006

n Korea vs. Taiwan: a tale of two economies and two markets, February 3, 2006

와환율전망

(36)

100663-003

This presentation was prepared exclusively for the benefit and internal use of the JPMorgan client to whom it is directly addressed and delivered (including such client’s subsidiaries, the “Company”) in order to assist the Company in evaluating, on a preliminary basis, the feasibility of a possible transaction or transactions and does not carry any right of publication or disclosure, in whole or in part, to any other party. This presentation is for discussion purposes only and is incomplete without reference to, and should be viewed solely in conjunction with, the oral briefing provided by JPMorgan. Neither this presentation nor any of its contents may be disclosed or used for any other purpose without the prior written consent of JPMorgan.

The information in this presentation is based upon any management forecasts supplied to us and reflects prevailing conditions and our views as of this date, all of which are accordingly subject to change. JPMorgan’s opinions and estimates constitute JPMorgan’s judgment and should be regarded as indicative, all of which are accordingly subject to change. JPMorgan’s opinions and estimates constitute JPMorgan’s judgment and should be regarded as indicative, preliminary and for illustrative purposes only. In preparing this presentation, we have relied upon and assumed, without independent verification, the accuracy and completeness of all information available from public sources or which was provided to us by or on behalf of the Company or which was otherwise reviewed by us. In addition, our analyses are not and do not purport to be appraisals of the assets, stock, or business of the Company or any other entity. JPMorgan makes no representations as to the actual value which may be received in connection with a transaction nor the legal, tax or accounting effects of consummating a transaction. Unless expressly contemplated hereby, the information in this presentation does not take into account the effects of a possible transaction or transactions involving an actual or potential change of control, which may have significant valuation and other effects.

Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, the Company and each of its employees, representatives or other agents may disclose to any and all persons, without limitation of any kind, the U.S. federal and state income tax treatment and the U.S. federal and state income tax structure of the transactions contemplated hereby and all materials of any kind (including opinions or other tax analyses) that are provided to the Company relating to such tax treatment and tax structure insofar as such treatment and/or structure relates to a U.S. federal or state income tax strategy provided to the Company by JPMorgan.

JPMorgan’s policies prohibit employees from offering, directly or indirectly, a favorable research rating or specific price target, or offering to change a rating or price target, to a subject company as consideration or inducement for the receipt of business or for compensation. JPMorgan also prohibits its research analysts from being compensated for involvement in investment banking transactions except to the extent that such participation is intended to benefit investors.

IRS Circular 230 Disclosure: JPMorgan Chase & Co. and its affiliates do not provide tax advice. Accordingly, any discussion of U.S. tax matters included herein (including any attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, in connection with the promotion, marketing or recommendation by anyone not affiliated with JPMorgan Chase & Co. of any of the matters addressed herein or for the purpose of avoiding U.S.

tax-related penalties.

JPMorgan is a marketing name for investment banking businesses of JPMorgan Chase & Co. and its subsidiaries worldwide. Securities, syndicated loan arranging, financial advisory and other investment banking activities are performed by a combination of J.P. Morgan Securities Inc., J.P. Morgan plc, J.P. Morgan Securities Ltd. and the appropriately licensed subsidiaries of JPMorgan Chase & Co. in Asia-Pacific, and lending, derivatives and other commercial banking activities are performed by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. JPMorgan deal team members may be employees of any of the foregoing entities.

This presentation does not constitute a commitment by any JPMorgan entity to underwrite, subscribe for or place any securities or to extend or arrange credit or to provide any other services.

THECROSSROADS

참조

관련 문서

쓰레기로 뒤범벅이 되어 생명의 지속성이 위협받고 있는 우리나라 바다와 강과 호수 및 저수지의 오염물질을 제거하고 산과 들과 흙을 뒤덮고 있는

맺음말

투자 및 소비 증가 금리상승, 주가 저평가.

주주자 본주의를 신봉하는 영미식 모델에서 재벌문제의 해결은 난망합니다... 겪었던 제조업의 경쟁력

- 카드채 카드채, , 내수부문 내수부문 中 中企여신 企여신 부실 부실 증가 증가 등 등 불안요인이 불안요인이 있으나 있으나

유엔기후변화협약 (UNFCCC)의 궁극적인 목적은 인간의 간섭에 의한 기후변화가 식량 생산과 지속가능한 발전을 위협하지 않을 수준으로 온실가스

[r]

상법, 증권거래법, 외감법, 각종 세법, 공인회계사법 형사범으로 끝나는 것이 아니라 민사소송의 대상임.