The role of lysophosphatidic acid receptor 1 in inflammatory response induced by lipopolysaccharide from Porphyromonas gingivalis in human periodontal ligament stem cells

Introduction Introduction

During the progression of periodontitis, oral bacteria exac- erbate immune responses. The continuous inflammatory im- mune response leads to tissue damage and bone loss due to the increase of osteoclasts and the decrease of osteoblasts [1].

Dental mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) hold a great potential for dental tissue regeneration [2]. Among different types of dental stem cells isolated from distinct parts of dental tissue, periodontal ligament stem cells (PDLSCs) from a fibrous con- nective tissue between tooth and alveolar bone is involved in the repair from periodontitis [3]. PDLSCs present multipotent Int J Oral Biol 45:42-50, 2020

pISSN: 1226-7155 • eISSN: 2287-6618 https://doi.org/10.11620/IJOB.2020.45.2.42

The role of lysophosphatidic acid receptor 1 in

inflammatory response induced by lipopolysaccharide from Porphyromonas gingivalis in human periodontal ligament stem cells

Dong Hee Kim ^1,2,3† , Eun Jin Seo ^1,2† , Gabor J. Tigyi ⁴ , Byung Ju Lee ³ , and Il Ho Jang ^1,2 *

1

Department of Oral Biochemistry, Pusan National University School of Dentistry, Yangsan 50612, Republic of Korea

2

Dental and Life Science Institute, Pusan National University School of Dentistry, Yangsan 50612, Republic of Korea

3

Department of Biological Sciences, College of Natural Sciences, University of Ulsan, Ulsan 44610, Republic of Korea

4

Department of Physiology, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN 38163, USA

Lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) is a lipid messenger mediated by G protein-coupled receptors (LPAR1-6). It is involved in the pathogenesis of certain chronic inflammatory and autoimmune diseases. In addition, it controls the self-renewal and differentiation of stem cells. Recent research has demonstrated the close relationship between periodontitis and various diseases in the human body. However, the precise role of LPA in the development of periodontitis has not been studied. We identified that LPAR1 was highly expressed in human periodontal ligament stem cells (PDLSCs).

In periodontitis-mimicking conditions with Porphyromonas gingivalis-derived lipopolysaccharide (Pg-LPS) treatment, PDLSCs exhibited a considerable reduction in the cellular viability and osteogenic differentiation potential, in addition to an increase in the inflammatory responses including tumor necrosis factor-a and interleukin-1β expression and nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells (NF-κB) activation. Of the various LPAR antagonists, pre-treatment with AM095, an LPAR1 inhibitor, showed a positive effect on the restoration of cellular viability and osteogenic differentiation, accompanied by a decrease in NF-κB signaling, and action against Pg-LPS. These findings suggest that the modulation of LPAR1 activity will assist in checking the progression of periodontitis and in its treatment.

Keywords: Periodontal ligament stem cell, Periodontitis, Lysophosphatidic acid receptor

Received June 16, 2020; Revised June 22, 2020; Accepted June 22, 2020

*Correspondence to: Il Ho Jang, E-mail: [email protected] https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0820-3035

†

Dong Hee Kim and Eun Jin Seo contributed equally to this work.

Copyright © The Korean Academy of Oral Biology

Original Article IJOB

differentiation capacities including osteogenic, adipogenic and chondrogenic lineages [4]. In addition, PDLSCs may mitigate adverse immune responses as MSCs from various other tis- sues do [5]. Furthermore, PDLSCs can be utilized in a wide range of regenerative medicine as they are an excellent source for the repair of bone or cartilage in other parts of body. Dur- ing the progression of periodontitis, alveolar bone surrounding the teeth is devastated by strong resorptive bone remodeling by osteoclasts activated by inflammatory immune responses.

Modulation of PDLSC activity in the inflammatory condition may provide a novel opportunity in reserving the demolishing process of periodontitis.

Lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) is a signaling phospholipid generated by the enzyme autotaxin. LPA binds to and stimu- lates a group of G protein-coupled receptors known as LPARs (LPAR1-6) [6]. The binding of LPA to LPARs activates down- stream signaling cascade including small GTPase, Ras, Rho, and Rac [7]. LPA signaling modulates a variety of cellular changes in proliferation, migration, adhesion, differentiation, and morphology [8]. The growing evidence suggests that LPA signaling regulates stem cells and progenitors in maintaining stemness and controlling the differentiation toward the intend- ed lineages in adult stem cells and embryonic stem cells [9].

LPA was shown to mildly increase the proliferation of PDLSCs, but a concern regarding the promotion of tumor growth and bone loss remains [10]. Further understanding of LPA signaling with moderation in PDLSCs is necessary for the application to periodontitis.

In this study, we identified that the LPAR1 antagonist (AM095) decreased the expression of pro-inflammatory cyto- kines and promoted the osteogenic differentiation of PDLSCs in inflammation-mimicking condition induced by Porphyromo- nas gingivalis (P. gingivalis, Pg). These findings indicate that LPAR1 is a potential therapeutic target in the development of treatment of periodontitis.

Materials and Methods Materials and Methods

1. Cell culture and reagents

Human PDLSCs were purchased from Lonza (Basel, Switzer- land, Cat No. CC-7049) and prepared according to the manu- facturer’s instructions, and cells at passage 3–9 were used for experiments. Cells were maintained in stromal cell growth me- dium with 5% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 0.1% human fibroblast growth factor, 0.1% insulin, and gentamicin/amphotericin-B

(Lonza, Cat No. CC-3205). Bacterial LPS of Pg (InvivoGen, San Diego, CA, USA) was suspended in endotoxin-free water as a stock solution (concentration 1 mg/mL). To determine ef- fect of LPAR inhibition, PDLSCs were incubated with LPAR1 antagonist (AM095), LPAR2 antagonist (Beck35), LPAR 1 and 3 antagonist (Ki16325), LPAR5 antagonists (TC-LPA5-4). LPAR antagonists were kindly provided by Dr. Gabor J. Tigyi (Univer- sity of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA).

2. Multilineage differentiation

The differentiation capacity of the PDLSCs were evaluated using the Human MSC Functional Identification Kit (R&D Sys- tems Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA, Cat. No. SC006). The cells were incubated in the differentiation media for 2–3 weeks and then evaluated for osteogenesis, adipogenesis, and chondro- gensis according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

3. Immunocytochemistry

Osteogenic and adipogenic cells were washed with phos- phate buffered saline (PBS) and fixed with 4% paraformal- dehyde for 20 minutes at room temperature. Chondrogenic pellets were washed with PBS and fixed with 4% paraformal- dehyde at room temperature for 20 minutes. Pelleted cells were dehydrated and placed in embedding medium (Tissue- Tek; Sakura Finetek USA Inc., Torrance, CA, USA), and sec- tions were prepared with a cryostat (thickness: 15 μm). Fixed cells or pellets were then incubated for 45 minutes at room temperature in a blocking solution containing 0.3% Triton X-100, 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA), and 10% normal donkey serum in 0.1 M PBS. The samples were then washed and incubated with anti-mFABP4 antibody (adipogenesis), an- ti-hOsteocalcin (osteogenesis) and anti-hAggrecan (chondro- genesis) overnight at 4℃. For immunofluorescence, samples were incubated with a combination of Alexa Fluor 594-labeled donkey anti-goat (1:2,000, Invitrogen Corp., Carlsbad, CA, USA, Cat No. A11058) and Alexa Fluor 488-labeled donkey anti-mouse secondary antibody (1:2,000, Invitrogen Corp., Cat No. A32766) for 1 hour at room temperature. Images were taken with EVOS

FL Auto 2 Imaging System (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).

4. Flow cytometry analysis

Analysis of fluorescence intensity of the stained cells was

performed using a FACSCanto flow cytometry system (BD Biosciences, San Diego, CA, USA). PDLSCs were dissociated with TrypLE

(Thermo Fisher Scientific), and cells were resus- pended in PBS with 1% FBS and aliquoted to be 1 × 10

cell/

tube for antibody labeling. Cells were blocked with 1% BSA in PBS and stained with directly-conjugated fluorescent antibod- ies: CD14-PE, CD34-FITC, CD44-FITC, CD45-PE, CD73- APC, CD90-PE, CD105-APC, CD166-PE (BD Biosciences, Cat No. 555398, 555821, 555478, 555483, 560847, 555596, 562408, 559263), following by counting 10,000 events. 7-AAD (BD Biosciences, Cat No. 559925) was added with 1:100 dilu- tion to distinguish live cells from dead cells. Obtained fluores- cence signals were analyzed using the FACSDiva (ver. 6.1.3, BD Biosciences) or the FlowJo (ver. 10, Tree Star Inc., San Carlos, CA, USA).

5. RNA isolation and quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)

To analyze mRNA expression in PDLSCs, RNA was extracted using Sensi-TriJol reagent (Lugen Sci Inc., Bucheon, Korea) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. RNA purity and con- centration were determined by NanoDrop ND-1000 Spectro- photometer (Nano Drop Technologies, Wilmington, DE, USA) using absorbance at 260 and 280 nm. cDNA was synthetized using the QIAGEN Whole Transcriptome Kit (QIAGEN, Valencia, CA, USA) and analyzed by real-time PCR using the following primer sets: LPA receptor 1 sense primer, 5’-GCT GCC ATC TCT ACT TCC AT-3’; LPA receptor 1 antisense primer, 5’-CCA TTC TGT GGC AAG ATG CT-3’; LPA receptor 2 sense primer, 3’-CAG CGC ATG GCA GAG CAT GT-5’; LPA receptor 2 anti- sense primer, 3’-CCA GGA CAT TGC AGG ACT CAC A-5’; LPA receptor 3 sense primer, 3’-AAC GTG AGC GGA TGT TCA CT- 5’; LPA receptor 3 antisense primer, 3’-CCG CGA TGA CCA GAG AAT TA-5’; LPA receptor 4 sense primer, 3’-TTC GAA CTA ATG TGG AGG AA-5’; LPA receptor 4 antisense primer, 3’-TGG AAT TGG AAG TCA ATG AA-5’; LPA receptor 5 sense primer, 3’-CAG AGC AAC ACG GAG CAC AG-5’; LPA recep- tor 5 antisense primer, 3’-CAC CAG AAT CAT GGC ATG GC- 5’; LPA receptor 6 sense primer, 3’-CTT CAC AAC ACG GAA TTG GC-5’; LPA receptor 6 antisense primer, 3’-AGT TAA CCA CAC GCC AGT GC-5’; actin sense primer, 3’-TCC ATC ATG AAG TGT GAC G-5’; actin antisense primer, 3’-TCA GGA GCA ATG ATC T-5’; interleukin (IL)-1 β sense primer, 3’-TCT TCG ACA CAT GGG ATA AC-5’; IL-1 β antisense primer, 3’

-CCT TGT ACA AAG GAC ATG GA-5’; tumor necrosis factor- a

(TNF- a) sense primer, 3’-CTC TTC TGC CTG CAC TTT G-5’;

TNF- a antisense primer, 3’-ATG GGC TAC AGG CTT GTC ACT C-5’. Real-time PCR experiments were performed by Bright- Green 2X qPCR MasterMix-ROX (abm, Vancouver, Canada) using the StepOnePlus Real-Time PCR System (Applied Bio- systems, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) for ∼ 40 cycles. Data were normalized for gene expression by using GAPDH as an internal control. The 2

method was used to analyze the relative quantification of gene expression.

6. Proliferation assay

PDLSCs viability was determined by 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol- 2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay. The PDLSCs were seeded in 48 well plates (Corning Incorporated, Corning, NY, USA) with a density of 2 × 10

cells/well in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO

at 37℃. After the sub- jection to varying experimental conditions, cells were washed with PBS and incubated with 200 μL of 0.5 mg/mL MTT (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) for 2 hours at 37℃. Cells were rinsed with PBS, and the formazan products were dissolved in 200 μL of dimethyl sulfoxide (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) for 15 minutes at room temperature with agitation. The absorbance at 540 nm was determined using microplate spec- trophotometer (BioTek Instruments, Winooski, VT, USA).

7. Immunoblotting

Proteins from PDLSCs were homogenized in M-PER lysis buffer (Pierce Chemical Co., Rockford, IL, USA) with a protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche, Rotkreuz, Switzerland). The extracted proteins (20 μg) were resuspended in sample buffer containing 62.5 mM Tris-HCl (pH 6.8), 10% glycerol, 2% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), 1% 2-mecaptoethanol, 0.02% bromophenol blue and separated by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophore- sis. Proteins on the gel were transferred onto a PVDF mem- brane (Merck KGaA) by an electrophoretic transfer cell (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA). The membrane was blocked in blocking buffer and incubated with anti-phospho-IKK (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA, Cat No. 2697), anti- IKK (Cell Signaling Technology, Cat No. 2694), anti-phospho- I κB (Cell Signaling Technology, Cat No. 2859), anti-IκB (Cell Signaling Technology, Cat No. 9242), anti-phospho-NF- κB p65 (Cell Signaling Technology, Cat No. 9242), anti-NF- κB p65 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Dallas, TX, USA, Cat No.

sc-8008), anti-beta actin (Sigma Aldrich, Cat No. A5316) and

anti-Histone H2B (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Cat No.

sc-8650) antibodies. Primary antibodies were detected us- ing horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-rabbit (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Cat No. sc-2004) or ant-mouse (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Cat No. 2005) antibodies. Immuno- activity was detected with an enhanced chemiluminescence kit (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech., Buckinghamshire, UK).

8. Induction of osteogenic differentiation

PDLSCs were grown in mineralization inducing me- dium containing 10% FBS, 50 μM ascorbic acid, 10 mM β-glycerophosphate and 0.1 μM dexamethasone in a-MEM.

To detect mineralization, cells were fixed with 4% paraformal- dehyde and stained with Alizarin red S (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) solution of 2% w/v diluted by deionized water at pH 4.3 for 20 minutes. To quantify the calcium deposition, the stained samples were destained and dissolved in 10% cetylpyridinium

chloride solution in 10 mM PBS (pH 7.0). The absorbance at 562 nm was determined using microplate spectrophotometer (BioTek Instruments).

9. Statistical analysis

Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation of results from three independent experiments. The Student’s t- test was used to determine the significance of difference be- tween two groups.

Results Results

1. Characterization of PDLSCs in MSC properties and LPAR expression

To evaluate the characteristics of PDLSCs as MSCs, PDLSCs were subjected to the tri-lineage differentiation and evaluated

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

CD14 CD34 CD45

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

0

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

CD44 CD73 CD90

Osteogenesis Adipogenesis Chondrogenesis

LPAR1 1.5

1.0

0.5

0.0

LP ARs mRNA (AU)

LPAR2 LPAR3 LPAR4 LPAR5 LPAR6

A B

C

Fig. 1. Characterization of stem cell properties of periodontal ligament stem cells (PDLSCs). (A) PDLSCs were induced to differentiated into osteogenic, adipogenic, and chondrogenic lineages. After 14–21 days of differentiation, cells were subjected to immunocytochemistry analysis for the marker expression;

FABP4 (adipogenesis), Osteocalcin (osteogenesis), Aggrecan (chondrogenesis). Scale bar = 100 μm. (B) The surface marker expression in PDLSCs were analyzed by flow cytometry analysis. Mesenchymal stem cell-associated surface markers, such as CD44, CD73, and CD90, and the hematopoietic markers, such as CD14, CD34 and CD45, were analyzed. (C) Expression of lysophosphatidic acid receptors (LPARs) was analyzed by quantitative real-time poly- merase chain reaction. LPAR1 mRNA expression is higher compared with the expression of LPAR2-6 mRNA.

AU, arbitrary unit.

for the surface marker expression. Multipotent differentiation potential of PDLSCs at the 4–6 passage was evaluated by os- teogenic, adipogenic and chondrogenic differentiation. After 21 days of differentiation-inducing culture, osteogenesis, adipo- genesis and chondrogenesis were analyzed by the immunos- taining using FABP4 (adipogenesis), Osteocalcin (osteogenesis) and Aggrecan (chondrogenesis) antibodies (Fig. 1A). Flow cytometry analysis showed that PDLSCs were positive for the expression of MSC surface markers, such as CD44, CD73, and CD90, but negative for hematopoietic stem cell markers, such as CD14, CD34, and CD45 (Fig. 1B). To evaluate the ex- pression of LPARs, PDLSCs in the maintenance culture were subjected to the quantitative real-time PCR analysis (Fig. 1C).

Among LPAR1-6, LPAR1 mRNA expression was significantly higher in comparison with other LPA receptors (LPA 2-6).

2. Effect of LPAR antagonists on the viability of PDLSCs

To evaluate the effect of LPAR signaling on the maintenance of PDLSC viability, various LPAR antagonists were treated on PDLSCs, followed by MTT assay. PDLSCs were treated with increasing doses (0, 0.5, 5 μM) of inhibitors for LPAR1 (AM095), LPAR2 (Beck35), LAPR 1and 3 (Ki16425) and LPAR5 (TC- LPA5-4) individually, and cells were subjected to MTT assay at different time pointes (24, 48, 72 hours). As shown in Fig.

2, most of LPAR antagonists, expect for Beck35 at 5 μM and Ki16425 at 72 hours, showed little effect on the viability of PDLSCs.

0 1.5

1.0

0.5

0.0

Cell viability (OD)

AM095 (LPAR1 antagonist)

( M) 

0.5 5 0 0.5 5 0 0.5 5

24 hr 48 hr 72 hr

0 1.5

1.0

0.5

0.0

Cell viability (OD)

Beck35 (LPAR2 antagonist)

( M) 

0.5 5 0 0.5 5 0 0.5 5

24 hr 48 hr 72 hr

0 1.5

1.0

0.5

0.0

Cell viability (OD)

Ki16425 (LPAR1, 3 antagonist)

( M) 

0.5 5 0 0.5 5 0 0.5 5

24 hr 48 hr 72 hr

0 1.5

1.0

0.5

0.0

Cell viability (OD)

TC-LPA5-4 (LPAR5 antagonist)

( M) 

0.5 5 0 0.5 5 0 0.5 5

24 hr 48 hr 72 hr

A B

C D

Fig. 2. The effect of lysophosphatidic acid receptor (LPAR) antagonists on the viability of periodontal ligament stem cells (PDLSCs). (A–D) Cell viability of

PDLSCs were analyzed using 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromideassay. PDLSCs were treated with LPAR antagonists (0.5, 5 μM)

for 24–72 hours.

3. Effect of LPAR antagonists on Pg-LPS-induced viability decrease and inflammatory response

To simulate the inflammatory condition, PDLSCs were treated with the increasing doses of Pg-LPS (0, 1, 10 μg) for varying time points (24, 48, 72 hours). PDLSCs viability was

significantly decreased with a high concentration of Pg-LPS treatment (10 μg) (Fig. 3A). To demonstrate the effect of LPAR antagonist on Pg-LPS-induced decrease of viability, various LPAR inhibitors were pre-treated for 3 hours prior to Pg-LPS treatment. As shown in Fig. 3B-3E, LPAR1, 2, and 3 antago- nists (AM095, Beck35, Ki16425) showed a significant recov-

0 1.5

1.0

0.5

0.0

Cell viability (OD)

Pg-LPS

( g) 

1 10 0 1 10 0 1 10

Cell viability (OD)

Pg-LPS ( g) AM095 ( M)

  1.5

1.0

0.5

0.0

0.5 5

* * ** *

24 hr 48 hr 72 hr

A B

Cell viability (OD)

Pg-LPS ( g) Beck35 ( M)

  1.5

1.0

0.5

0.0

0.5 5

* C

Cell viability (OD)

Pg-LPS ( g) Ki16425 ( M)

  1.5

1.0

0.5

0.0

0.5 5

* D

Cell viability (OD)

Pg-LPS ( g) TC-LPA5-4 ( M)

  1.5

1.0

0.5

0.0

0.5 5

E

IL-1 mRNA (AU) 

Pg-LPS ( g) AM095 ( M)

  6

4

2

0

0.5 5

* **

F

TNF- mRNA (AU) 

P AM095

g-LPS ( g) ( M)

  3

2

1

0

0.5 5

* G

Nuclear Cytoplasm p-IKK

IKK p-I B  I B 

-actin p-NF- B-p65  NF- B-p65  Histone H2B Pg-LPS ( g) AM095 ( M)

  5 0.5

H

Fig. 3. The effect of pre-treatment lysophosphatidic acid receptor (LPAR) antagonists and treatment of Porphyromonas gingivalis-derived lipopolysaccharide (Pg-LPS) on the viability of periodontal ligament stem cells (PDLSCs). (A) PDLSCs were treated with Pg-LPS at 1 and 10 μg for 24–72 hours. The viability of PDLSCs were analyzed using 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay. (B–E) PDLSCs were pre-treated with LPAR an- tagonists (0.5, 5 μM) for 3 hours and treated with Pg-LPS (10 μg) for 24 hours. The viability of PDLSCs were analyzed using MTT assay. (F, G) The relative expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines was analyzed using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction. PDLSCs were pre-treated with LPAR1 antag- onists (AM095) for 3 hours and treated with Pg-LPS (10 μg) for 24 hours. (H) The effect of LPAR1 on Pg-LPS-induced activation of p65 and phosphorylation of IκB, and IKK. PDLSCs were pre-treated with LPAR1 antagonist (AM095) for 3 hours and stimulated with Pg-LPS (10 μg) for 1 hour. The phosphorylation of IKK, IκB and p65 were detected by immunoblotting. β-actin and histone H2B were used the control.

OD, optical density; AU, arbitrary unit; IL-1β, interleukin-1β; TNF-a, tumor necrosis factor-a.

*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.

ery from Pg-LPS-induced inhibition. Among them, AM095 showed little adversary effect at the higher dose (5 μM).

LPAR5 antagonist (TC-LPA5-4), however, showed little effect.

To evaluate the effect of AM095 on the expression of the pro- inflammatory cytokines, IL-1 β and TNF-a mRNA expression was measured by qRT-PCR. As shown in Fig. 3F and 3G, Pg- LPS treatment increased the expression of IL-1 β and TNF-a in PDLSCs, and 3 hours pre-treatment of AM095 reduced Pg- LPS-induced expression. To determine the activation of NF- κB signaling in PDLSCs, immunoblotting was performed by prob- ing related signaling molecules. As shown in Fig. 3H, 1 hour Pg-LPS treatment significantly increased the phosphorylation

of IKK, I κB and p65 of NF-κB, all of which showed the reduc- tion in the phosphorylation with pre-treatment of AM095.

4. Effect of LPAR1 antagonist on Pg-LPS-induced decrease of osteogenic differentiation

To evaluate the effect of Pg-LPS and LPAR1 inhibitor, AM095, on the osteogenic differentiation of PDLSCs, cells were subjected to osteogenic culture in combination of Pg- LPS and AM095 treatment. Following osteogenic induction for 4, 7, and 14 days, PDLSCs exhibited gradual increase in the mineral formation, which was analyzed by Alizarin red S

Fig. 4. Osteogenic differentiation of periodontal ligament stem cells (PDLSCs) in response to the lysophosphatidic acid receptor 1 (LPAR1) antagonist in the inflammatory condition. (A) Alizarin red S staining of PDLSCs under 4, 7, or 14 day of osteogenic culture with or without Porphyromonas gingivalis-derived lipopolysaccharide (Pg-LPS) in combination with LPAR1 antagonist (AM095) (2%, w/v). (B–D) Alizarin red S staining was quantified by cetylpyridinium chlo- ride extraction and measuring the absorbance at 562 nm.

M., media; OD, optical density.

OD value (562 nm)

Osteogenic M.

Pg-LPS ( g) AM095 ( M)

  2.0

1.0

0.5

0.0

0.5 5

* B

1.5

4 days

***

***

OD value (562 nm)

Osteogenic M.

P

AM095 ( M) g-LPS ( g) 

 1.5

1.0

0.5

0.0

0.5 5

* C

7 days

***

**

OD value (562 nm)

Osteogenic M.

P

AM095 ( M) g-LPS ( g) 

 1.5

1.0

0.5

0.0

0.5 5

D

14 days

*

*** **

Osteogenic M.

Pg-LPS( g) AM095 ( M)

4 days

7 days

14 days

0.5 5

A

staining (Fig. 4). Pg-LPS treatment significantly decreased osteogenic differentiation at all time points. AM095 treatment, however, restored the osteogenic differentiation potential in the presence of Pg-LPS. These results suggest that LPAR1 blockade promoted the osteogenic differentiation of PDLSCs in periodontitis-mimicking inflammatory condition.

Discussion Discussion

The involvement of LPAR1 has in several diseases, including lung inflammation, diabetic nephropathy and neuropathic pain, has been reported [11-13]. In this study, we investigated the effect of LPAR modulation on PDLSCs. Among different LPAR modulators, LPAR1 inhibitor, AM095, rescued PDLSCs from Pg-LPS-induced decrease of cellular viability. AM095 itself showed little effect, neither increase nor decrease, on the vi- ability of PDLSCs. These PDLSCs exhibited the excellent cel- lular morphology, the surface expression of stem cell markers such as CD44, CD73, and CD90, and the differentiation poten- tial toward osteogenic, adipogenic, and chondrogenic lineages.

Among LPAR1-6, PDLSCs showed the higher expression of LPAR1 in comparison with other LPARs. Pg-LPS treatment on PDLSCs, which represents periodontitis condition, activated NF- κB pathway and decreased osteogenic differentiation of PDLSCs. Pre-treatment of AM095 along with Pg-LPS inhibited the activation of NF- κB signaling by reducing the phosphoryla- tion of IKK and NF- κB and restored the osteogenic differentia- tion potential of PDLSCs. These results indicate that LPAR1 takes an important part in the progression of periodontitis.

PDLSCs can be obtained from the periodontal tissue on the root surface of extracted teeth and present a potential source for stem cell therapy as they possess the characteristics of MSC [14,15]. PDLSCs have been suggested as a key contribu-

tor for the regeneration of dental tissue damaged by periodon- tal diseases. In LPS-induced inflammatory environment, the low level of bone formation is observed, but the cause-and- effect relationship between inflammation-PDLSC-bone loss remains yet to be understood. Previous studies have reported that NF- κB signaling is important in regulating the osteogenic differentiation of MSCs in inflammatory microenvironments [16,17]. The osteogenic differentiation of PDLSCs in the in- flammatory condition was also reported to be affected by NF- κB signaling [18]. In addition, LPAR1 is involved in the os- teogenic progression in the aortic valve through RhoA/ROCK- NF- κB pathway [19]. In present study, we identified that the NF- κB pathway was suppressed in LPAR1 antagonist treat- ment in PDLSCs at Pg-LPS-induced periodontitis-mimicking condition. These results indicate that the modulation of NF- κB signaling in PDLSCs weighs significantly in the protection from periodontitis.

In summary, our findings revealed the novel contribution of LPAR1 in the progression of Pg-LPS-induced periodontitis and suggest the targets for therapeutic intervention at the receptor level along with intracellular signaling clues, which may lead to the development of the original treatment for periodontitis.

Acknowledgements Acknowledgements

This work was supported by a 2-Year Research Grant of Pu- san National University.

Conflicts of Interest Conflicts of Interest

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

References References

1. Hajishengallis G. Periodontitis: from microbial immune subversion to systemic inflammation. Nat Rev Immunol 2015;15:30-44. doi: 10.1038/nri3785.

2. Sharpe PT. Dental mesenchymal stem cells. Development 2016;143:2273-80. doi: 10.1242/dev.134189.

3. Liu J, Yu F, Sun Y, Jiang B, Zhang W, Yang J, Xu GT, Liang A, Liu S. Concise reviews: characteristics and potential applica- tions of human dental tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cells 2015;33:627-38. doi: 10.1002/stem.1909.

4. Menicanin D, Mrozik KM, Wada N, Marino V, Shi S, Bartold

PM, Gronthos S. Periodontal-ligament-derived stem cells exhibit the capacity for long-term survival, self-renewal, and regeneration of multiple tissue types in vivo. Stem Cells Dev 2014;23:1001-11. doi: 10.1089/scd.2013.0490.

5. Zhu W, Liang M. Periodontal ligament stem cells: cur- rent status, concerns, and future prospects. Stem Cells Int 2015;2015:972313. doi: 10.1155/2015/972313.

6. Tigyi G. Aiming drug discovery at lysophosphatidic acid tar-

gets. Br J Pharmacol 2010;161:241-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-

5381.2010.00815.x.

7. Yung YC, Stoddard NC, Chun J. LPA receptor signaling:

pharmacology, physiology, and pathophysiology. J Lipid Res 2014;55:1192-214. doi: 10.1194/jlr.R046458.

8. Sheng X, Yung YC, Chen A, Chun J. Lysophosphatidic acid signalling in development. Development 2015;142:1390-5.

doi: 10.1242/dev.121723.

9. P ébay A, Bonder CS, Pitson SM. Stem cell regulation by lyso- phospholipids. Prostaglandins Other Lipid Mediat 2007;84:83- 97. doi: 10.1016/j.prostaglandins.2007.08.004.

10. Kim BC, Song JI, So KH, Hyun SH. Effects of lysophosphatidic acid on human periodontal ligament stem cells from teeth ex- tracted from dental patients. J Biomed Res 2019;33:122-30.

doi: 10.7555/JBR.32.20170123.

11. Chen X, Walther FJ, Laghmani EH, Hoogeboom AM, Hogen- Esch AC, van Ark I, Folkerts G, Wagenaar GT. Adult lyso- phosphatidic acid receptor 1-deficient rats with hyperoxia- induced neonatal chronic lung disease are protected against lipopolysaccharide-induced acute lung injury. Front Physiol 2017;8:155. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2017.00155.

12. Li HY, Oh YS, Choi JW, Jung JY, Jun HS. Blocking lysophos- phatidic acid receptor 1 signaling inhibits diabetic nephropathy in db/db mice. Kidney Int 2017;91:1362-73. doi: 10.1016/

j.kint.2016.11.010.

13. Gonz ález-Gil I, Zian D, Vázquez-Villa H, Hernández-Torres G, Mart ínez RF, Khiar-Fernández N, Rivera R, Kihara Y, Devesa I, Mathivanan S, Del Valle CR, Zambrana-Infantes E, Puig- domenech M, Cincilla G, Sanchez-Martinez M, Rodr íguez de Fonseca F, Ferrer-Montiel AV, Chun J, L ópez-Vales R, López- Rodr íguez ML, Ortega-Gutiérrez S. A novel agonist of the type 1 lysophosphatidic acid receptor (LPA1), UCM-05194, shows efficacy in neuropathic pain amelioration. J Med Chem

2020;63:2372-90. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.9b01287.

14. Tomokiyo A, Yoshida S, Hamano S, Hasegawa D, Su- gii H, Maeda H. Detection, characterization, and clini- cal application of mesenchymal stem cells in periodontal ligament tissue. Stem Cells Int 2018;2018:5450768. doi:

10.1155/2018/5450768.

15. Seo BM, Miura M, Gronthos S, Bartold PM, Batouli S, Bra- him J, Young M, Robey PG, Wang CY, Shi S. Investigation of multipotent postnatal stem cells from human periodontal ligament. Lancet 2004;364:149-55. doi: 10.1016/S0140- 6736(04)16627-0.

16. Guihard P, Danger Y, Brounais B, David E, Brion R, Delecrin J, Richards CD, Chevalier S, R édini F, Heymann D, Gascan H, Blanchard F. Induction of osteogenesis in mesenchymal stem cells by activated monocytes/macrophages depends on oncostatin M signaling. Stem Cells 2012;30:762-72. doi:

10.1002/stem.1040.

17. Singer NG, Caplan AI. Mesenchymal stem cells: mecha- nisms of inflammation. Annu Rev Pathol 2011;6:457-78. doi:

10.1146/annurev-pathol-011110-130230.

18. Chen X, Hu C, Wang G, Li L, Kong X, Ding Y, Jin Y. Nuclear factor- κB modulates osteogenesis of periodontal ligament stem cells through competition with β-catenin signaling in in- flammatory microenvironments. Cell Death Dis 2013;4:e510.

doi: 10.1038/cddis.2013.14.

19. Nsaibia MJ, Boulanger MC, Bouchareb R, Mkannez G, Le Quang K, Hadji F, Argaud D, Dahou A, Boss é Y, Koschinsky ML, Pibarot P, Arsenault BJ, Marette A, Mathieu P. OxLDL- derived lysophosphatidic acid promotes the progression of aortic valve stenosis through a LPAR1-RhoA-NF- κB pathway.

Cardiovasc Res 2017;113:1351-63. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvx089.