• 검색 결과가 없습니다.

A Study on the Optimum Design of Warm-up rate in a Air-Heated Heater System by Using CFD Analysis and Taguchi Method

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "A Study on the Optimum Design of Warm-up rate in a Air-Heated Heater System by Using CFD Analysis and Taguchi Method"

Copied!
11
0
0

로드 중.... (전체 텍스트 보기)

전체 글

(1)

C o p y r ig h t 2 0 0 5 K S A E 1 2 2 5 - 6 3 8 2 / 2 0 0 5 / 0 7 4 - 1 1 T r a ns a c tio ns o f K SA E , V o l. 1 3 , N o . 2 , p p .7 2 -8 2 (2 0 0 5 )

N o m e nc lature1 ) k : n u m b e r o f s ig n a l fa c to r M1, M2, M3 : s ig n a l fa c to r

*T o w h o m c o rr e s p o n d e n c e s h o u ld b e a d d re s s e d . c f d k m h @ h y u n d a i-m o to r.c o m

N1, N2 : n o is e fa c to r

r : e ffe c tiv e n u m b e r o f re p lic a tio n

r0 : n u m b er o f resp o n se d ata fo r each sig n al lev el SE : e rro r s u m o f s q u a re

ST : to ta l s u m o f s q u a re

S< : v a ria tio n o f lin e a r e ffe c t o f s ig n a l fa c to r

*

A Study on the Optimum Design of Warm-up rate in a Air-Heated Heater System by Using CFD Analysis and Taguchi Method

Minho Kim*

Research & Development Division for Hyundai Motor Company & Kia Motors Corporation, 772-1 Jangduk-dong, Whasung-si, Gyeonggi 445-706, Korea

(Received 6 September 2004 / Accepted 12 January 2005)

A b s trac t : T h e o b je c tiv e o f th is p a p e r is to d e s c rib e th e o p tim iz a tio n o f d e s ig n p a ra m e te rs in a la rg e -s iz e d c o m m e rc ia l b u s h e a te r s y s te m b y u s in g C F D (c o m p u ta tio n a l flu id d y n a m ic s ) a n a ly s is a n d T a g u c h i m e th o d . In o rd e r to o b ta in th e b e s t c o m b in a tio n o f e a c h c o n tro l fa c to r w h ic h re s u lts in a d e s ire d p e rfo rm a n c e o f h e a te r s y s te m , th e p a ra m e te r d e s ig n o f th e T a g u c h i m e th o d is a d o p te d fo r th e ro b u s t d e s ig n c o n s id e rin g th e d y n a m ic c h a ra c te ris tic . T h e re s e a rc h a c tiv ity m a y b e d iv id e d in to fo u r p h a s e s . T h e firs t o n e is a n a ly z in g th e p ro b le m , i.e ., a s c e rta in in g th e in flu e n tia l fa c to rs . In th e s e c o n d p h a s e th e le v e ls w e re s e t in s u c h a w a y th a t th e ir v a ria tio n w o u ld s ig n ific a n tly in flu e n c e th e re s p o n s e . In th e th ird p h a s e th e e x p e rim e n ta l ru n s w e re d e s ig n e d . In th e fin a l p h a s e th e p la n n e d ru n s w e re c a rrie d o u t n u m e ric a lly to e v a lu a te th e o p tim a l c o m b in a tio n o f fa c to rs w h ic h is a b le to p ro v id e th e b e s t re s p o n s e . In th is s tu d y , e ig h t fa c to rs w e re c o n s id e re d fo r th e a n a ly s is : o n e w ith tw o le v e l a n d s e v e n w ith th re e le v e l c o m b in a tio n s c o m p ris in g th e L1 8(21× 37) o rth o g o n a l a rra y . T h e re s u lts o f th is s tu d y c a n b e s u m m a riz e d a s fo llo w s ; (i)T h e o p tim u m c o n d itio n o f c o n tro l fa c to r is a s e t o f < A2 B1 C3 D3 E1 F2 G3 H2> w h e re A is s h a p e o f th e o u te r fin , B is p itc h o f th e o u te r fin , C is h e ig h t o f th e o u te r fin , D is th e in n e r fin n u m b e r, E is th e in n e r fin h e ig h t, F is le n g th o f th e fla m e g u id e , G is d ia m e te r o f th e h e a tin g e le m e n t a n d H is c le a ra n c e b e tw e e n a ir g u id e a n d h e a tin g e le m e n t. (ii)T h e h e a t c a p a c ity o f h e a te d d is c h a rg e a ir u n d e r th e o p tim u m c o n d itio n s a tis fie s th e e q u a tio n y = 0 .6 M w h e re M is a s ig n a l fa c to r. (iii)T h e w a rm -u p ra te im p ro v e s a b o u t th re e tim e s , m o re la rg e ly a s c o m p a re d w ith th e c u rre n t c o n d itio n , w h ic h re s u lts in a b o u t 9 .2 m in u te s re d u c tio n .

K e y w o rd s : D e s ig n p a ra m e te r( ), T a g u c h i m e th o d ( ), O rth o g o n a l a rra y ( ), C o m p u ta tio n a l

flu id d y n a m ic s ( ), B u s h e a te r( ), S ig n a l fa c to r( ), C o n tro l fa c to r( )

(2)

VE : e rro r v a ria n c e

Y : re s p o n s e o f c h a ra c te ris tic v a lu e

;, <* : flo w re s is ta n c e c o e ffic ie n t

< : s e n s itiv ity c o e ffic ie n t

1 .

.

.

(p re -h e a te r)

. ,

, , ,

, .

.

1 ,2 )

,3 ,4 )

5 )

.

(h e a te r u n it) .

.

.

(T a g u c h i

m e th o d )6 , 7 ) .

(v ita l

fe w ) ,

(o rth o g o n a l a rra y ) .

.

2 .

.

,

P T C (P o s itiv e T e m p e ra tu re C o e ffic ie n t th e rm is to r

h e a tin g e le m e n ts ), .

Heater radiator

Engine Heater

unit

Pre-heater Combustion

chamber

Heater radiator

Engine Heater

unit

Pre-heater Combustion

chamber

(a) Coolant-heated type

Heating element Heater Radiator

Combustion chamber Heating element

Heater Radiator

Combustion chamber Combustion

chamber Combustion

chamber

(b) Air-heated type Fig. 1 Schematic diagram of heating system

F ig . 1

.

, (h e a tin g e le m e n t),

(a ir g u id e ),

(b lo w e r) (h e a te r ra d ia to r)

.

,

(3)

M in h o K im

.

. Table 1 Comparison of pre-heater specification

Ite m s C o o la n t h e a te d ty p e A ir h e a te d ty p e R a te d v o lta g e (V ) 2 4 (2 0 ~ 2 8 ) 1 2 H e a t o u tp u t(k c a l/h ) 1 8 ,0 0 0 4 ,5 0 0

F u e l c o n s u m p tio n ( /h ) 2 .7 0 .6

E le c tric a l

c o n s u m p tio n (A ) 1 0 4

W a te r th ro u g h p u t( /h ) 4 ,8 0 0 N /A

W e ig h t(k g ) 2 7 3 .2

D im e n s io n

(L × W × H , m m ) 6 9 1 × 2 9 3 × 2 8 6 2 3 1 × 1 1 1 × 1 6 3

T a b le 1 .

. 4 0 °C

3 2 ° C .

4 0 ° C 2 0

. (w a te r p u m p )

.

.

3 . 3 .1

. (s ig n a l

fa c to r) (n o is e fa c to r)

,

(ro b u s t d e s ig n ) .

Fig. 2 Parameter diagram

F ig . 2

(p a ra m e te r d ia g ra m ) .

.

. T a b le 2 F ig . 3

(c o n tro l fa c to r) , (p itc h ),

, ,

, , ,

8 . (p a ra m e te r d e s ig n )

,

.

,

(4)

A S tu d y o n th e O p tim u m D e s ig n o f W arm - u p rate in a A ir- H e ate d H e ate r S y s te m b y U s in g C F D A n aly s is an d T ag u c h i M e th o d

.

3 .2

(in te ra c tio n )

L1 8 .

T a b le 2 2

1 3 7 L1 8(21× 37)

. T a b le 2 T a b le 3 L1 8

.

Table 2 Level of control factor

C o n tro l fa c to r L e v e l L e v e l L e v e l A T y p e o f o u te r fin R a d ia l A n n u la r - B P itc h o f o u te r fin 9 m m 1 3 m m 1 7 m m C H e ig h t o f o u te r fin 2 0 m m 3 0 m m 4 0 m m

D N u m b e r o f in n e r fin 1 2 1 5 1 8

E C le a ra n c e b e tw e e n

in n e r fin a n d fla m e g u id e 6 m m 9 m m 1 2 m m F L e n g th o f fla m e g u id e 4 5 m m 6 7 m m 9 0 m m G h e a tin g e le m e n t d ia m e te r R90 R100 R110 H C le a ra n c e b e tw e e n

a ir g u id e a n d o u te r fin 0 m m 1 0 m m 1 7 m m

3 .3

.

. 3

S ta n d a rd k -? .

3 .3 .1 F ig . 3

.

Table 3 Inner orthogonal array L1 8

C o n tro l fa c to r

A B C D E F G H

R 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

R 2 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2

R 3 1 1 3 3 3 3 3 3

R 4 1 2 1 1 2 2 3 3

R 5 1 2 2 2 3 3 1 1

R 6 1 2 3 3 1 1 2 2

R 7 1 3 1 2 1 3 2 3

R 8 1 3 2 3 2 1 3 1

R 9 1 3 3 1 3 2 1 2

R 1 0 2 1 1 3 3 2 2 1

R 1 1 2 1 2 1 1 3 3 2

R 1 2 2 1 3 2 2 1 1 3

R 1 3 2 2 1 2 3 1 3 2

R 1 4 2 2 2 3 1 2 1 3

R 1 5 2 2 3 1 2 3 2 1

R 1 6 2 3 1 3 2 3 1 2

R 1 7 2 3 2 1 3 1 2 3

R 1 8 2 3 3 2 1 2 3 1

4

1 2 5 3

6

7 10

1. Pre-heater 2. Combustion

chamber 3. Exhaust tube 4. Blower 5. Radiator 6. Air guide 7. Outer fin 8. Inner fin 9. Flame guide 10. Heater case 4

1 2 5 3

6

7 10

1. Pre-heater 2. Combustion

chamber 3. Exhaust tube 4. Blower 5. Radiator 6. Air guide 7. Outer fin 8. Inner fin 9. Flame guide 10. Heater case

1

9 3

7 3

4 5

10 6

2

1

9 3

7 3

4 5

10 6

2

8 7

2 8

7

2

B

C

D E

F G

H B

C

D E

F G

H

Q rYƒ’•š’Q ¥ª¡–`rŸŸ¦’£Q ¥ª¡–Z

Fig. 3 Heater unit model and fin shape

c o n -

ju g a te h e a t tra n s fe r .

.

s o lid (A L )

2 7 0 2 k g /m3, 2 3 7 W /m K .

(5)

(d iscretisatio n sch em e)

( u p w in d d if f e r e n c in g s c h e m e )

S IM P L E . (relax atio n

fa c to r) 0 .3 ,

0 .1 0 .9 5 .

9 0 ~ 1 1 0

7 0 ~ 9 0 .

3 .3 .2

.

.

(p o ro u s m e d ia )

(1 ) .

; < (1)

; <*

; <* 4 1 .7 3 4 7 .7 .

3 .3 .3

1 1 5 3 K .

2 5 8 K 2 7 3 K .

1 .6 m /s e c

.

. 4 .

4 .1

(fu n c tio n c h a ra c te ris tic s ) (n o is e )

S /N (s ig n a l-to -n o is e ra tio )

.

2 (tw o -

s te p o p tim iz a tio n ) . 1

S /N , 2

<

.

Table 4 Experimental results of orthogonal array

N o .

C h a ra c te ris tic v a lu e : h e a t c a p a c ity (k c a l)

M1 M2 M3

N1 N2 N1 N2 N1 N2

R 1 7 2 8 7 1 6 8 6 7 8 5 6 9 7 0 9 5 4

R 2 7 9 5 7 8 1 1 0 4 7 1 0 2 7 1 2 5 3 1 2 3 2

R 3 9 4 0 9 2 7 1 2 5 1 1 2 3 4 1 5 0 8 1 4 9 2

R 4 7 6 2 7 4 9 9 8 0 9 6 3 1 1 4 6 1 1 2 6

R 5 5 5 2 5 4 2 6 7 9 6 5 9 7 7 3 7 4 9

R 6 1 0 8 6 1 0 6 8 1 3 9 5 1 3 7 5 1 6 4 0 1 6 1 3

R 7 8 8 3 8 7 0 1 0 7 7 1 0 5 7 1 2 0 4 1 1 8 1

R 8 8 9 5 8 8 0 1 0 9 7 1 0 8 0 1 2 4 5 1 2 2 4

R 9 6 5 2 6 4 1 8 3 9 8 1 9 9 8 1 9 5 2

R 1 0 6 6 6 6 5 5 8 7 0 8 5 6 1 0 4 4 1 0 2 6

R 1 1 1 0 0 7 9 9 3 1 3 3 4 1 3 1 8 1 5 9 5 1 5 7 5

R 1 2 7 7 4 7 6 1 9 8 7 9 7 3 1 1 4 7 1 1 2 8

R 1 3 8 5 1 8 3 6 1 1 2 0 1 1 0 0 1 3 3 5 1 3 1 2

R 1 4 7 8 8 7 7 5 1 0 2 3 1 0 0 7 1 2 1 6 1 1 9 6

R 1 5 8 9 7 8 8 6 1 1 7 4 1 1 5 7 1 3 9 5 1 3 7 5

R 1 6 6 3 9 6 2 2 8 1 9 8 0 3 9 7 0 9 4 6

R 1 7 7 2 3 7 1 1 9 2 6 9 1 3 1 0 8 8 1 0 7 0

R 1 8 1 0 5 9 1 0 4 1 1 3 9 1 1 3 6 8 1 6 6 4 1 6 3 6

T a b le 4

. T a b le 4

T .

5 5 0 k c a l

1 6 6 0 k c a l .

R 1

R 1 8 .

(6)

Table 5 Data conversion process of each experiment

N o . ST S< SE VE S /N <

R 1 5 9 8 5 7 5 7 8 1 9 2 0 3 8 4 0 8 -4 0 .5 7 0 .1 9 0 R 2 2 0 9 0 7 3 2 0 6 7 1 4 2 3 6 0 4 7 2 -3 5 .6 5 0 .3 5 9 R 3 3 2 4 3 8 6 3 2 1 3 2 9 3 0 5 6 6 1 1 -3 4 .8 6 0 .4 4 7 R 4 1 4 8 1 9 3 1 4 5 0 9 7 3 0 9 6 6 1 9 -3 8 .3 8 0 .3 0 1 R 5 4 7 2 4 3 4 5 8 1 1 1 4 3 2 2 8 6 -4 0 .0 4 0 .1 6 9 R 6 3 0 7 3 2 1 3 0 2 2 8 4 5 0 3 7 1 0 0 7 -3 7 .3 0 0 .4 3 4 R 7 1 0 4 5 9 7 9 9 8 7 9 4 8 1 8 9 6 4 -4 1 .9 4 0 .2 4 9 R 8 1 2 4 4 9 0 1 2 0 9 7 0 3 5 2 0 7 0 4 -3 9 .7 3 0 .2 7 4 R 9 1 0 5 4 6 8 1 0 2 6 4 6 2 8 2 2 2 5 6 4 -3 9 .4 8 0 .2 5 3 R 1 0 1 4 1 7 7 9 1 4 0 5 4 7 1 2 3 2 2 4 6 -3 4 .5 0 0 .2 9 6 R 1 1 3 4 7 4 2 5 3 4 2 5 2 1 4 9 0 4 9 8 1 -3 6 .6 4 0 .4 6 2 R 1 2 1 4 0 2 5 1 1 3 6 9 3 5 3 3 1 6 6 6 3 -3 8 .9 3 0 .2 9 2 R 1 3 2 3 4 5 5 6 2 3 1 1 1 4 3 4 4 2 6 8 8 -3 6 .8 1 0 .3 7 9 R 1 4 1 8 2 0 6 2 1 7 9 8 2 5 2 2 3 7 4 4 7 -3 6 .0 3 0 .3 3 5 R 1 5 2 4 4 9 7 7 2 4 1 6 8 3 3 2 9 4 6 5 9 -3 6 .4 2 0 .3 8 8 R 1 6 1 0 9 0 8 7 1 0 7 4 1 5 1 6 7 2 3 3 4 -3 7 .0 0 0 .2 5 9 R 1 7 1 3 3 0 9 5 1 3 0 9 3 8 2 1 5 8 4 3 2 -3 7 .2 5 0 .2 8 6 R 1 8 3 6 4 2 0 3 3 5 9 9 6 1 4 2 4 2 8 4 8 -3 5 .7 9 0 .4 7 3

1 8 R 1 2 , R 1 3 , R 1 4

1 1 0 .5 m m2, 1 1 0 .4 m m2, 9 0 m m2 R 1 2

.

,

. T a b le 5 T a b le 4

S /N , (<)

. T ab le 5 .

- (ST) (2 )

- (r) (3 )

- (S<)

< (4)

- (SE) < (5 )

- (VE) (6 )

- S/N (A) A





< 

 (7)

- (<) & á Î



á Φ ² (8 ) ST

. S<

SE

VE S /N . S /N

. S /N

. M2

(9 ) .

< (9)

Ys Ms

<

. T a b le 6 T a b le 7 T a b le 5 S /N

L1 8 (21× 37) S /N . F ig . 4 F ig . 5 .

Table 6 Response table of S/N ratio

L e v e l A B C D E F G H

1 -3 8 .6 6 -3 6 .8 6 -3 8 .2 0 -3 8 .1 2 -3 8 .0 4 -3 8 .4 3 -3 8 .6 8 -3 7 .8 4 2 -3 6 .6 0 -3 7 .5 0 -3 7 .5 6 -3 8 .1 9 -3 7 .6 9 -3 6 .6 4 -3 7 .1 8 -3 7 .1 5 3 - -3 8 .5 3 -3 7 .1 3 -3 6 .5 7 -3 7 .1 6 -3 7 .8 2 -3 7 .0 3 -3 7 .9 0

(7)

M in h o K im

Table 7 Response table of <

L e v e l A B C D E F G H

1 0 .2 9 7 0 .3 4 1 0 .2 7 9 0 .3 1 3 0 .3 5 7 0 .3 0 9 0 .2 5 0 0 .2 9 8 2 0 .3 5 2 0 .3 3 4 0 .3 1 4 0 .3 2 0 0 .3 1 2 0 .3 3 6 0 .3 3 5 0 .3 5 8 3 - 0 .2 9 9 0 .3 8 1 0 .3 4 1 0 .3 0 5 0 .3 2 9 0 .3 9 0 0 .3 1 8

-39 -38 -37 -36

A1A2 B1B2B3 C1C2C3 D1D2D3 E1E2E3 F1F2F3 G1G2G3 H1H2H3

Design parameter

S/N(dB)

-39 -38 -37 -36

A1A2 B1B2B3 C1C2C3 D1D2D3 E1E2E3 F1F2F3 G1G2G3 H1H2H3

Design parameter

S/N(dB)

Fig. 4 Factorial effect chart of S/N

0.2 0.3 0.4

A1A2 B1B2B3 C1C2C3 D1D2D3 E1E2E3 F1F2F3 G1G2G3 H1H2H3

Design parameter

<

0.2 0.3 0.4

A1A2 B1B2B3 C1C2C3 D1D2D3 E1E2E3 F1F2F3 G1G2G3 H1H2H3

Design parameter

<

Fig. 5 Factorial effect chart of <

S /N

S /N

< A2B1C3D3E3F2G3H2>

. <

. (9 ) <

. <

< A2B1C3D3E1F2G3H2>

. S /N <

A

A2 S /N </

A2

.

B , C ,

D , F ,

G , H B1,

C3, D3, F2, G3, H2

B1, C3, D3, F2, G3, H2

.

E E3 E1

E3 ,

E1

.

< A2B1C3D3E1F2G3H2 >

.

Table 8 Result of confirmation experiment

C o n d itio n S et o f facto r

H eat cap acity (k cal)

S /N <

M1 M2 M3

N1 N2 N1 N2 N1 N2

B ase(R 4 ) A1B2C1D1

E2F2G3H3

7 6 2 7 4 9 9 8 0 9 6 3 1 1 4 6 1 1 2 6 -3 8 .4 0 .3

O p tim u m A2B1C3D3

E1F2G3H2

1 2 6 8 1 2 4 7 1 6 8 6 1 6 5 9 2 0 3 7 1 9 9 9 -3 5 .2 0 .6

4 .2 L1 8

< A2B1C3D3E1F2G3H2 >

. T a b le 8

S /N <

(7 ) (8 ) .

T a b le 8

S /N < . S /N

3 .2 d B < 2

.

5 .

.

(Id le ) 4 0 k p h

.

5 .1

A L s te e l

s c p . F ig . 6

. F ig . 7

(8)

A S tu d y o n th e O p tim u m D e s ig n o f W arm - u p rate in a A ir- H e ate d H e ate r S y s te m b y U s in g C F D A n aly s is an d T ag u c h i M e th o d

Fig. 6 Pre-heater speciment

Temperature recorder

Power supplier

Fuel pump

Air-heated type Fuel pre-heater system

Measurement points Air suction region

Temperature recorder

Power supplier

Fuel pump

Air-heated type Fuel pre-heater system

Measurement points Air suction region

Fig. 7 Shematic diagram of experiment apparatus

.

.

, , ,

. ,

.

1 /4 2 5 0 m3/h

. 2

2

0 .6 /h .

(th e rm o c o u p le )

4 .

5 .2

. F ig . 8

2 °C 4 2 0 m3/h

. 5

3 0 .2 ° C 8 3 %

. F ig . 9 2 5 0 m3/h

.

3 2 ° C 3 .8

5 0 0 ° C

6 .5 .

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35

base optimum

Model name

7HPSHUDWXUHGLIIHUHQFHû7 ])

Fig. 8 Experimental comparison between base design and optimum design

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70

0 2 4 6 8 10

Operation time(min) Temperature difference ¬T(“)

0 100 200 300 400 500 600

Gas temperature at combustion chamber(“) temperature difference

gas temperature

Fig. 9 Experimental results of warm-up performance

5 .3 5 .3 .1

(9)

. 4 0 k p h

4 0 k p h

-4 ° C -7 ° C .

3 2 ° C

2 0 4 0 k p h

3 0 2 0 4 0 k p h

, .

R H n o .3

. F ig . 1 0 .

.

Air-heated pre-heater Air-heated pre-heater

Coolant-heated pre-heater Coolant-heated pre-heater

Fig. 10 Comparison of heater unit configuration

5 .3 .2 F ig . 1 1

, 3 2 ° C

4

1 3 .2 3

.

0 .2 .

n o .3

n o .3

. 4

. 1 4

-10 0 10 20 30 40 50

0 5 10 15 20

€¡–£’¥š ŸQ¥šž–YžšŸZ

Discharge air temperature(])

air-heated type(optimum) coolant-heated type(previous model)

-10 -5 0 5 10 15

0 5 10 15 20

Operation time(min) Average air temperature at the seat (])

air-heated type(optimum) coolant-heated type(previous model)

Fig. 11 Experimental results under idle mode condition

-4 -2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16

0 5 10 15

Operation time(min) Temperature(×)

air-heated type(-4]) air_heated type(-2]) air-heated type(2]) coolant-heated type(-4]) coolant-heated type(-2]) coolant-heated type(2])

Fig. 12 Averaging temperature at the seat with respect to the variation of ambient air temperature

7 .5 °C ,

3 °C 4 ° C

. F ig . 1 2

. -4 ° C , -2 °C

3 2 ° C .

2 °C

1 /2 . F ig .

1 1 4

(10)

8 .

1 3 1 3

. 1 3

3 2 ° C

. 5 .3 .3 4 0 k p h

4 0 k p h F ig . 1 3

.

5 7 ° C 5 2 ° C .

6 5 °C 4 3

9 ° C . 4 0 k p h

.

1 .9 .

20 30 40 50 60 70 80

30 35 40 45 50

    Discharge air temperature(])

air-heated type(optimum) coolant-heated type(previous model)

10 15 20 25

30 35 40 45 50

Operation time(min) Average air temperature at the seat (])

air-heated type(optimum) coolant-heated type(previous model)

Fig. 13 Experimental results under driving mode condition

6 .

.

S /N <

A2, B1, C3, D3, F2, G3, H2

E

S /N <

E1

. C F D < A2B1C3D3E1F2G3H2>

S /N

3 .2 d B < 2

.

4

9 .

4

2 °C 4 ° C .

R e fe re nc e s

1 ) H . S . H u , D .C . H u a n g , C . W o jd y la , “ A T r a n s ie n t C o m p u te r A id e d E n g in e e r in g M o d e l f o r A u to m o b ile H e a te r S y s te m D e s ig n ,” S A E 2 0 0 0 - 0 1 - 1 2 7 4 , 2 0 0 0 .

2 ) D . H u a n g , H . H u , C . W o jd y la , “ D e v e lo p m e n t o f a C o m p u te r - A id e d E n g in e e r in g T o o l f o r A u to m o tiv e H e a te r S y s te m D e s ig n a n d its A p p lic a tio n s ,” S A E 2 0 0 1 - 0 1 - 1 7 5 7 , 2 0 0 1 . 3 ) A . P . T s a n tis , J . S . B r o w n , R . J . H u tte r , a n d P .

M , L y o n , “ I m p r o v e m e n ts in H e a te r , D e f r o s te r a n d E m is s io n P e r f o r m a n c e s U s in g a L a te n t H e a t S to r a g e D e v ic e ,” S A E 9 4 0 0 8 9 , 1 9 9 4 . 4 ) G . D . M a n d r u s ia k a n d A . C . A lk id a s , “ I m p a c t

o f E n g in e D e s ig n o n V e h ic le H e a tin g S y s te m P e r f o r m a n c e ,” S A E 9 7 1 8 3 9 , 1 9 9 7 .

5 ) J . K im , H . K im , J . P a r k , Y . Y o o , S . K im , Y . A h n , “ A S tu d y o n P e r f o r m a n c e o f P T C H e a te r b y F u e l I n je c tio n S y s te m ,” 2 0 0 2 K S A E S p r in g

(11)

M in h o K im

C o n f e r e n c e P r o c e e d in g s , p p .1 0 6 2 - 1 0 6 7 . 2 0 0 2 . 6 ) C . K e lly a n d L . K a c h a to r ia n , “ R o b u s t D e s ig n

f o r S ix S ig m a M a n u f a c tu r a b ility ,” S A E 9 6 1 2 6 8 , 1 9 9 6 .

7 ) C . H s ic h , “ A u to m o tiv e A p p lic a tio n s U s in g A R o b u s t D e s ig n A p p r o a c h ,” S A E 1 9 9 9 - 0 1 - 1 0 2 9 , 1 9 9 9 .

수치

Fig. 2 Parameter diagram
Table 2 Level of control factor
Table 4 Experimental results of orthogonal array
Table 6 Response table of S/N ratio
+5

참조

관련 문서

The study derived the problems according to results of field-centered synthetic analysis on yellow croakers of fishery system currently used in Chujado, Korea

A A A A Study Study Study Study Analysis Analysis Analysis Analysis of of of of the the the the J. Bach, a representative composer in Baroque period. Composed

In this study, the existing material of the air conditioner compressor and Al6061 material were applied through structural analysis and fluid-structure coupling analysis using

S., An Experimental Study on the Cooling and Heating Performance of a Residential Ground Source Heat Pump System, Korean Journal of Air-Conditioning

The results of the study on how Boswellia affects the hair cycle of the inflammatory skin(? scalp) caused by DNCB in mice are as follows, Experimental method : 5 week-old

일반사용자 2 ADJUSTMENT &amp; STATISTICS 정산 및 통계 관리 시스템 ECS 담당자 3 DAMAGE CONTAINER MANAGEMENT CONTAINER DAMAGE 관리..

In this paper, we propose a method to guarantee the system life as passive elements by using high efficiency operation and analog devices by tracking

출처 : IAEA 발표 자료(Comprehensive inspection exercise at bulk handling facilities, “U-235 Enrichment measurements by gamma-ray spectroscopy”) 13.  Uranium