• 검색 결과가 없습니다.

Introductive Study to the Antarctic Environmental Impact Assessment in Korea

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Introductive Study to the Antarctic Environmental Impact Assessment in Korea"

Copied!
9
0
0

로드 중.... (전체 텍스트 보기)

전체 글

(1)Vol. 26(2):155-163. Ocean and Polar Research. June 2004. Article. ÖÒ¾¢~ Î ~ã'Ëï&Bê ;Oj *‚ \. RÒÏ ÁRÁR' *. R]~ã;kÁï&\ö *Þßê Bï\ ®%ÿ 613-2. (122-706). Introductive Study to the Antarctic Environmental Impact Assessment in Korea Jaeyong Choi*, Jungyu Choi, and Junyoung Choi Korea Environment Institute Seoul 122-706, Korea. Abstract : The Protocol on Environmental Protection to the Antarctic Treaty was ratified in 1991. With the aim to ensure comprehensive protection of the Antarctic environment, it contains provisions on environmental protection and conservation of the Antarctic area, including provisions for Environmental Impact Assessment. Environmental Impact Assessment is a method used to predict environmental impacts at an early stage in project planning and design, and find ways to mitigate or prevent adverse impacts in order to maintain balance between development activities and environmental conservation. Internationally, the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) in the Antarctic is classified into three types - Preliminary, Initial, and Comprehensive - based on the environmental impacts of the proposed activities. In case of the Preliminary Environmental Review (PER), proposed activity may proceed in accordance to the national procedures and drafting of an outline. However, Initial (IEE) and Comprehensive Environmental Evaluation (CEE) assess and verify the impacts of the proposed activity, and require methods or alternatives for mitigating or eliminating negative impacts on the environment. Although Korea's Act of “Activities and Environmental Protection in Antarctica” also includes provisions on EIA for activities in Antarctica, there are obvious contrasts with the EIAs currently being conducted in Korea, in regards to deciding the level of EIA through screening and identifying key issues for assessment through scoping. In order to implement the proper EIA, more improved methods for drafting and reviewing the EIA to Antarctica in Korea are necessary.. Key words : Î(Antarctic), ~ãËï&(Environmental Impact Assessment), ~ã^ö ‚ Ζ £~;*(Protocol on Environmental Protection to the Antarctic Treaty). îæï Îf BB æbR ž*~ *5j –~ Aæ pf ö' ¶~㚠*>Ú ®º –&‚ ¶ þ ηj

(2) Ž~ Î* 60ê šÎ~ æj ¢ º Π˚¶ ¶ö~ š (‚]š·\ö 2001). æf æ\*Ú š'~ 6.8%¢ Næ~ ® . $‚, * æ\'ž ~ã^B& îRÚ ^BR &v>š* Î Î&f æ\Gæ š'~ 10ª~ 1~ \VR ž~ö² ~ã^~ 7º9š ]B'bR ž>Ú 1991j 10 ú ~ã^ö ‚ Ζ£~;*& j>î . ÿ ~ ;*º Î~ã ê ^¢ *~ Îö*º B *Corresponding author. E-mail : [email protected] 1. *. †.

(3) 156. Choi, J. et al.. >‚ ' ‚ÿšžö ÚÆ‚ BB¯*ê .æ~ ® b– Î~ãj ''bR ^~V *š ' “&~ ~ Z¢ ;~ ® . Vö

(4) ŽB ÚÏ 7 ~¾& ~ã 'Ëï&~ ~Zš (Protocol on Environmental Protection to the Antarctic Treaty, Article 8). ~ã'Ëï&¦ ¢>'bR ~ãö 'Ëj ~² F 곚¾ Òëö &~ Ò ¦ÆÁªC~ .GÁï &~ BB" š~ –z¢ Fæ‚ º NööB ~ã 'bR šRÚ 'Ëj N $º B–~–¾ 6²Ò > ®º O»j Îï~º ©j ö‚ (~ãÁvÛÁҚ ö&‚'Ëï&» B1–). ÖÒ¾¢º 1992j 7ú ~ã^ö &‚ Ζ£~; Bö B«j ~ 1996j 1ú ÿ ~;B¢ j&Žö V¢ “Ú«»~Z¢ š¯~V *š 2004j 3úö ‘΂ÿ5 ~ã^ö&‚»†’š B;>î . šö V¢ ΂ÿ5~ã^ö&‚»† B7–öB ;~ ®º ~ã'Ëï&–“~ Î"'ž Ú'j *‚ Onj Îï~º ©š  ’~ Ï'š . ÿö “Ú ~ã'Ëï&.N 5 ;"~ Nš6" šR ž‚ ^B 6 5 &wOnö &š C®¶ ‚ . 2. \ >¯O».  ’º ÎöB~ ~ã'Ëï&f &N‚ “B7 ;, '“~ » 5 &N B ~ ^ò¶òö &‚ j v 5 ªCj 7b‚ šÚr .  ’º Ñ, Î ‚ÿj *‚ “B' ~ã'Ëï& ÿËj ÚÚ, ~, ‚“~ ~ã'Ëï& *" “~ ÎöB~ ~ã'Ë ï& &N;j ªC‚ ê, îæïb‚ ÖÒ¾¢~ Î ‚ÿj *‚ ~ã'Ëï& æŽj B~& . 3. ΂ÿj *‚ ~ã'Ëï& ]* ÿË. ]*; ~ã^ö R Î`£ ~;* ~ã^ö &‚ Ζ£~;Bº B3–öB ‘Î~. ã 5 šö «³> &B ê~ ^f Î~ ¶ ' ' &~ 5 "' ’, ß® æ’~ãj šš ~º – j>'ž ’¢ >¯~V *‚ æb‚B~ & ~¢

(5) Ž‚ Î~ F‚ &~~ ^º ÎæöB ~ Î ‚ÿj ê³~ >¯Žö ®ÚB "'b‚  J>Ú¢ ‚ ’º ~ãöj ;~ ® . jÞ Î –£æ Ú ‚ÿ~ ê³" ¯ö ®Ú J† “Ï ‚ ` ~ãö k'Ëj ~º ¯*~ Oæ, a ê³B ¯* ~ Ò*~ã'Ëï& , b ê¯ 7ž ‚ÿ~ ~ã'Ëï &¢ *‚ 6 j ;~ ® . ÿ ~;B B8–öBº ~ã'Ëï&ö &š ғf "’ê³ö V¢ Ζ£æöB >¯>º ‚ÿ, &7 5 Ζ£ B7– B5“ö V¢ Ò*Û¢ º~º ғ "  ž~ ;¦ 5 j;¦¯*ö &‚ Ö;ö ê ~º ê³>ã";ö ®Ú B1¦³B(~ã'Ëï&)öB ;‚ ï&.N& 'Ï>êƒ ˚¢ ~–, $‚ *¯ ‚ÿ~ ;z $º £z, ‚ÿ~ º&, J~ šÚ $º  <~ O»ö ~~ .¾>º ÚÆ‚ ‚ÿ~ æãö &š Bê ~ã'Ëï&.N¢ 'Ï~êƒ «~ ® . ÎöB~ ~ã'Ëï&Bêº ~ã^ö &‚ Î –£~;B B1¦³Bö ;>Ú ®º– 𠦳Bº ‘~ã'Ëï&’¢º B~ö 8B –^b‚ ’W>Ú ® . Vöº ~;B B8–ö ;B ΂ÿš ~ãö  ~º 'Ëf ‚ÿš ·>V *ö '.‚ “Ú.Nö V ¢ ¦Æ>Ú¢ ~–, ÚÊ ‚ÿš ã~–¾ ¢'ž > & š~~ 'Ëj ~º ©b‚ Ö;>Ú¢ò ‚ÿj > ¯† > ®  ~º ‘Ò* ¦Æ~Z’¢ C® ® (B3 –). ÿö Î ‚ÿ~ 'Ëj ï&~ «Ã~V *š "º ~ãæRf '.‚ 6¢

(6) Ž‚ .N& îN>Ú ¢ ~–(B5–), .V~ã'Ëï&f ï&Ö" Ö;B Ò “ö &‚ * σ 5 ;º ғ ö² ²²> *ö²ö Ǧ>– B'b‚ šÏ &Ë ~êƒ š¢ ‚. º ~Z¢ ;~ ® (B6–). Îö*~ ]* ~ãËï æŽ  æŽf ‘~ã^ö ‚ Ζ£~;B’~ B3– 1). 2). 3). ÿ ~;B B3– B2“ ( )^öB ;~º Ò*~ã'Ëï&öB~ Jғf r" ? . – ‚ÿº*(‚ÿ æ, æ³V * 5 ;ê

(7) Ž), — ‚ÿ~ *'' 'Ë(‚ÿ¶Ú‚B Ò Î–£æöB~ ž ‚ÿ" ê>Ú B~º *'' 'Ë

(8) Ž), ˜ ‚ÿš Ζ£æöB~ ž ‚ÿö š‚Ú 'Ëj † ©žæ ¦, ™ ~ã'b‚ n*‚ Ú'j *~ šÏ &˂ VF" .N& ®ºæ ¦, š ‚ÿ~ š‚Ú 'Ë~ {ž 5 –V㢠*~ $‚ Î~ã 5 šö «³> & B êö &‚ 6~ Ö" $º Ã&B æö jºÚ jº‚ Ú'.N~ >;j *~ "º ~ãæ> 5 ê ’Wº² ¢ 6† > ®º ËK~ šÒ ¦, › Ò(ß® ~ãö 'Ëj † &ËWš ®º Ò) &‚ ³~ Î"'ž &wËK ~ šÒ ¦ Î&öþ, Îö J~B Væ, "–Ò 5 Væ ïz' Ï'j *š Îö V~B –ºö $º Ëj ÿ ~;B B1¦³B~ ’W –^ – .jê, — .V~ãï&, ˜

(9) *' ~ãï&, ™

(10) *' ~ãï&ö V.‚ Ö;, š 6 , › ;~ ²², œ Z/‚ ãÖ,  B; $º >; 1). 2) 3).

(11) Antarctic Environmental Impact Assessment in Korea. ~ãö(environmental principles) (c)“öB ;‚ Î ~ã^öö ‚ ^¦æŽš (COMNAP 1999).  VöBº ~ã'Ëï&B¢ ·W~º .N¢ ‚ÿ~ J ғ # ~ã' Jғb‚ ¾*Ú B~ ® . š¢ *Û® ²Bš š r ? . RÿN Jғ ‚ÿ" &N‚ Jғf ‚ÿ~ ;~, ‚ÿ~ &n, ‚ÿb‚ ž‚ Ö"~ ßW 3¦ªb‚ ’WB . Vö B ‚ÿš¦ ž*~ šÒ‚ žš 2>º Î Ö"‚, ÎöB~ ‚ÿf Î êöB ~ãö 'Ëj "º G šö &š ªC>Ú¢ ~– ß® &nö &‚ Jö ® ÚBº ‚ÿj ~æ pº ãÖê ?š J>Ú^¢ Žj ;~ ® . ~ãN Jғ ~ã&N Jғf BnB ‚ÿ 'öB~ &NB Î >Ò', >', z' “Ï" &~¢

(12) Ž‚ . ~ã&N Jғj 2k~V *šBº C&zB ¶ò& jº~æò, ' &~ 5 ã& ~ ãÖöBº "&'ž BFê &Ë~ . ~ã&N Jº Κ¢º ß> ç ~ ššf z®Ú Vš ~ã*ö &‚ J& ÷¯>Ú šÚ^¢ Žj C® ® . Ë ª+ '˚¦ ž*~ ‚ÿb‚ ž‚ &~ 5 ¶ö~ æz¢ ö‚ . š‚ 'Ë~ ªCj *šBº ‚ÿ~ Ö" ¢V B ©b‚ '>º ~㺲¢ Ö;š¢ ~º– š "; öB ¢' æ>(Temporal variation) 5 öž-Ö" &ê (Cause-effect relationship)ö &‚ {žš jº~ . š‚ ";j ۚ šÚæº 'Ëï&º ` Ò²~ –¾ ¢'ž © ò >&~ 'Ë, a Ò²~–¾ ¢ 'ž 'Ë, b Ò²~–¾ ¢'ž ©j ."~º >&~ 'Ë  3ê‚ ’ªB . š‚ 3ê ï&º æ~ ß>W 5 Vš 'Ëï& öB >¯‚ FÒÒëö &‚ ï&>&j ^–~ Òë ê‚ 'Ï>Ú¢ ‚ . 'Ëï& Ö" .ç>º 'Ëö &šBº š¢ b~– ¾ *š–¾ B–† > ®º '. O»~ B& jº‚ – š©f jz(mitigation)f ö(remediation)b‚ ’ª B . jzº ‚ÿ~ ' êö 'Ï>º Bvb‚B Bn B ‚ÿ~ 'Ëj ‚²z~–¾ B–~V *‚ .Nf V F~ šÏj ~‚ . öf 'Ëj Af ê &˂ ‚ ö¾~ ~ãç‚ >òÒV *š Òêö šÚæº – ~¢º Nš& ® .. 157. Î~ ~ãËï  ª+ ÎöB~ ~ã'Ëï&B¢ ÚÚš 1988j¦V 2001jræ Ζ£7~ғ(Antarctic Treaty Consultive Party, ATCP)ö ²²>Ú ‚ÿš î&B

(13) *' ~ã 'Ëï&(Comprehensive Environmental Evaluation, CEE) º C 12š, 2004j 2ú V&b‚ ê~ 7ž

(14) *' ~ã 'Ëï&º 6šš (www.cep.aq). .V~ã'Ëï&~ ãÖ 1987j¦V 2001jræ C 326šš ¯>îb– Fig. 1öB " > ®š 1988j  1šöB 2000j 68šb‚ æ³'ž Ã& º^ö ® . šº ' ғš ¶“~ Î ~ã'Ëï& &N»j ; j‚ >Ú¢ † > ® . “&ê .V~ã'Ëï& >¯š>¢ Fig. 2öB ÚÚ š “š 115š(35.2%)b‚ &Ë ôf .V~ã'Ë ï&¢ >¯~&b–, ʾž(43š, 13.2%), šîÂ(27 š, 8.3%), ^"(24š, 7.4%)~ Bb‚ 2kB . *ö  –B 4B“š 1987j¦V 2001jræ >¯B .V~ã' Ëï& C 326š 7 64.1%ž 209šj >¯~& . .V~ã'Ëï&~ &çf Fig. 3ö ¾æ¾ ®š ". ö* ** ÚÏj Ò\9. Fig. 1. Number of IEE by year. Source : www.cep.aq. ö* ** ÚÏj Ò\9. Fig. 2. Number of IEE by country. Source : www.cep.aq.

(15) Choi, J. et al.. 158. ö BÂ~êƒ >Ú ® . ï*~ ·9 ÎöB~ ~ã'Ëï&º Ζ£~;B B1¦³B öB ;~º :f ?š .j~ã'Ëï&, .V~ã' Ëï&,

(16) *' ~ã'Ëï& 3«~‚ ¾*Úæ– ~ã' Ëï&~ .ž‚ÿ j ž;~ ® . .j~ãËï .j~ã'Ëï&º &Ë *‚ ;~ ï&‚B ‚ÿ ö &‚ ÆÒ', çÁ*7' 'Ëö &‚ ªCj ~, F Ò ‚ÿš¾ ?f ˲öB~ ž ‚ÿ~ ãÖ¢ VF‚. . š‚ ªC~ Ö", ~ãö &‚ '˚ 얾 Ò² ~–¾ ¢'ž ©ö ~æ pj ãÖ ~ã'Ëï&B ~ ·Wf ®jº~ . ¾ BnB ‚ÿö &š  “ã"Ò kª¶& *ۂ VF(Action Memorandum) j 𢠂 . .8~ãËï(IEE) .V~ã'Ëï&º “Ò²~–¾ ¢'ž 'Ë”š . ç>º ‚ÿö 'Ï>– ` Ï', *~, V*, ;ê¢

(17) Ž ‚ BnB ‚ÿ VF, a &n~ J 5 Vš~ ‚ÿ" ê³B ‚ÿj J‚ *''Ëï&, b Îî8ç j

(18) Ž‚ '.‚ .N ~ “Ïj

(19) Ž~êƒ ;~ ®. . jÞ

(20) j .V~ã'Ëï&B ÏS # Ö;ғj “ZWö BÂ, “ZWš Ζ£7~ғ ö² ²² ÊêS ;š^ ® (ibid., ô641.17).

(21) * ~ãËï(CEE) &Ë 'f ÚÏj º

(22) *' ~ã'Ëï& &çb R *">º ãÖ, ¶º O &(Federal Register) ö ²Ò ê ~ãö ~º º²¢ Êzw(scoping) ~V *š &ê¶¢ ²÷‚ (ibid., ô641.18).

(23) *' ~ã'Ëï&Bº {»'š ªC'ž ^BR B ÊzwöB ž

(24) ê 76“Ïj ê ®² Ú¢ ‚. . Vöº ` Ï', *~, V*, ;ê¢

(25) Ž‚ BnB ‚ÿ VF, a ‚ÿš šÚæV *~ ~ãç 5 ‚ÿ š  ¯6j ãÖ~ ~ã.G, b BnB ‚ÿ~ ÆÒ EPA. 5). ö* ** ÚÏj Ò\9. Fig. 3. Percentage of IEE by activity. Source : www.cep.aq.  þ # ’ö &‚ ‚ÿš 99šbR £ 30%¢ Næ ~ ®b– Væ ÃÁB», VæÚ'&Ò~ BbR ¾æ Ò . 4). 4. ]~ Î~ã'Ëï& 5 *ê. “f &Ë ôf ÎöB~ ‚ÿ" ö 8ž 'Ëï &¢ ~ ®º “&RB Î ~ã'Ëï&f &N ‚ &N ; š jv' ç^~² B> ®Ú ªC &çb‚ ÚÚ~ . “~ ãÖ ‚ÿ"Ú& O;¦ž ãÖf "*ž ã ւ ¾*Ú ~ã'Ëï&¢ ¯~ ® . ;¦V&~ ‚ÿö &šBº 1969j B;B “&~ã;k»j 'Ï, “ã"Òš "Ú& >Ú ¯~ ®b– ;¦& > ¯~æ pº ‚ÿö &šBº ~ã^Ó(Environmental Protection Agency)öB j B;~ 2002j 1ú¦8 BÎ~& . “öBº ÎöB~ ~ã'Ëï& &çj Ò²ãB ~ãj Bž‚ ¾^æ ~ãb‚ ;~ ® (U. S. Code of Federal Regulation, ô641.14 (c)). Rÿ~ Ú ;¦V&~ Î ‚ÿf “ã"Ò(National Science Foundation)~ Î*‚Î “ã"Òf ï&B¢ ç 7 ·W~(ibid., ô641.14(m)) ÿ ï&B¢ EPA¢ j• ‚ &NV&~ ~ÒÖ; ¶ò‚ B‚ . ;¦& >¯~ æ pº ΂ÿf ‚ÿ~ ¯¶& ï&B¢ ·W~. %f 56š(17%) >j š ®º` 1993j Adventure Network Internationalö* ‚.R .8~ãËï&¢ ‚ ê 1995j 2 š bR *ö'ž Ã& º^¢ ž ê 1997j¦V Ï'bR Ã&º^ö ® . š‚ ÿËj Vãb‚ 2003j B26N ATCM öBº %ö &‚ ~ãËï&ö NB ¢~& 76'b‚ ê¯>î . ]ãÒf \‚ÿ 7 ` r jêö ¶'b‚ öF > ®j ;ê~ >Áæî Ò~ >÷, a ÆO ÿ> ö 'Ëj "æ pj æöB~ æê þj *‚ ²Î~ B>ÒÏ, b ²>† > ®º 8ê\Ï ³FÁ‚', c N; 5 ]ãÒ~ .N¢ 8ž OÒF ÿ*ö²¢ šÏ~º ãÖf 8š J>~ Ú BÁ> ·ëf “¢'š–¾ Ò²‚ ' Ë” š~‚ ;~ .8 5 « ~ã'Ë.NöB .ž‚ ž;‚ º –“j vÚ Î'ž \ê¯j û ® (U. S. Code of Federal Regulation ô641.16 (c)). 4). 5).

(26) Antarctic Environmental Impact Assessment in Korea. ' 'Ëj .G~8 *š šÏB O»† 5 ¶ò, ™ Bn B ‚ÿb‚ ž‚ ÆÒ' 'Ëö &‚ î, ;ê, ;êö &‚ .G, š BnB ‚ÿb‚ ž‚ ÆÒ' *7' 5 š N' 'Ëö &‚ J, › 8š~ ‚ÿ" ê³B ‚ÿj J‚ *''Ëï&ö &‚ J, œ &n(‚ÿj ~æ pj ãÖ

(27) Ž) 5 &n~ .ç>º 'Ë,  BnB ‚ ÿb‚ ž‚ 'Ëj ‚²z~8 *‚ jz(mitigation) O »~ « 5 Îî8ç ê³, ž ®&b‚ ~ã 'Ë, Bn B ‚ÿ~ "’ 5 ž 8š~ &~ö &‚ ÆÒ' 'Ëö &‚ J&

(28) Ž>êƒ ;~ ® . ·W.Nº b&

(29) *' ~ã'Ëï&B .nj “ZW ö BÂ~š 7~ ғö ²²j Ê ~–(90¢ šç), š-² >ZB ~Òf ‚«

(30) *' ~ã'Ëï&B ö «B . îæïbR ‚«

(31) *' ~ã'Ëï&Bº 7~ғö 'Úê ‚ÿ· 60¢ *ö Û>êƒ  ;~ ® . Îî8ç

(32) *' ~ã'Ëï&Bö

(33) ŽB ÎîVç ê³~ Ï. ‚ š¯j *šB ;V'b‚ {ž &˂ B ~ã'Ë ö &‚ Vƒj &j𢠂 . ß® š‚ ÎîVçf ~;Bö ~–‚ ‚ÿ~ ï&¢ &Ë~² † öò jî¢ ~ã'Ë~ ‚²z # jz¢ *‚ Fς ;¢ B~ –, jº~ š ‚ÿ~ >;, ;æ # 7æ¢ Ö;† > ® º ;¢ B‚ (ibid., ô614.21). 5. ÖÒ¾¢ Î~ã^ N ]Ú» *. ]Ú ê»_~ º ÚÏ 2004j 2ú “²¢ Û"‚ ‘΂ÿ#~ã^ö & ‚»†’f C6BË 27B –^b‚ ’W>Ú®b– ÖÒ ¾¢~ Î~ã^ÚBö &‚ '' ^¢ êÎ~ , "’Á&7ÁÒÁöÒ  Ã&> ®º Î ‚ÿb‚¦V Î~ãj ^~–, Î&N "VF ’  ÖÒ “"~ ΂ÿj /ê~º ©j Ï'b‚ ~ ® . ~ãËïN; B2Ë B5– 5 B7–ö ~ã'Ëï&ö &‚ ;j «~ ® . ÿ » B2–öBº ÎöB~ ‚ÿî& ~ Ój *š ΂ÿê³B, ~ã'Ëï&B, öV> &Òê³B 5 jçê³B ¢ žvÛç¦ Ë&ö² B ~êƒ ;~ ® . 6). 159. B7–öBº ~ã'Ëï&B ·Wj ;~ ®º– ÿ –“öB BnB ‚ÿf Î~ã" &Nêö  ~º 'Ëj Ò*ö ï&~V *~ ~ã^ö &‚ Î –£ ~;Bö ;B .j~ã'Ëï&B, .V~ã' Ëï&B,

(34) *' ~ã'Ëï&B¢ ·WÁBÂ~êƒ  ;~ ®b– BÂB Bº žvÛç¦ Ë&š ~ã ¦Ë&" š·>Ö¦Ë& 7~¢ –ö î&~êƒ ;~  ® (ÿ » B8–). 6. ÖÒ¾¢~ ΂ÿ ~ã'Ëï& æŽ. ΂ÿ5~ã^ö&‚»†’f ~ã'Ëï&>¯j ~êƒ ;~ ®æò *ö TVV *šBº B> ; 5 š~ ;j& jº‚ 珚 . šö  ’öB º ΂ÿö &‚ ~ã'Ëï& >¯j *‚ V'ž .N 5 O»j B~¶ ‚ . ~ãËï ; Î~ ~ã'Ëï&¢ ¯Žö ®ÚB ÖÒ¾¢~ ‘΂ÿ5~ã^ö&‚»†’~ B7–öBº ~ã'Ë ï&º ‚ÿš ~ãö ~º 'Ëj 3&æ V&(® Ò ²~–¾ ® ¢'ž 'Ë, Ò²~–¾ ¢'ž 'Ë, Ò²~–¾ ¢'ž ©j >º '‚ 'Ë)b‚ ’ª~  F'b‚ .j~ãï&B, .V~ã'Ëï&B,

(35) *' ~ã'Ëï&B¢ ·W~êƒ >Ú® . ÎöB~ ~ã'Ëï& ";f “ÚöB *Ò ¯~  ®º ~ã'Ëï&fº 皂 ßû ­ &æ¢ < ® . Ñ ®& ï& >&~ Ö; êš . “Ú~ ~ã 'Ëï&º »b‚ ;‚ ¢;Κç~ Òëf .ž ìš ~ã'Ëï&¢ ~¢‚ (~ãÁvÛÁҚ ö&‚'Ëï&» B4–). ¾ Î~ ~ã'Ëï& ";f Òë~ Î 5 ~ãö &‚ 'Ëj ۂ ï&> &~ Ö; ê¢ –~êƒ ~ ® . š êº Îö B~ ‚ÿғj ’Ú'b‚ VF‚ ÚÏj :ûbR z šç~ ~ã'Ëï& ";j >¯† jº& ìº .j ~ ã'Ëï&¢ ¯† ©ž& $º º&'ž ~ã'Ëï& ";j ê³ ê¯† ©ž&¢ Ö;‚ . v ®º 76ï &“Ï~ J; êš . “ÚöBº Bêç(~ãÁvÛÁ Қö&‚'Ëï&» B29–)bRº 76ï&“Ïj F;† > ®êƒ "– –“š ‚"ö J>îb¾,  ‚Ϧº jç æ>ž 珚 . 8¢B ‚"ræ  ¯B ~ã'Ëï&öB 76ï&“Ïj F;~º .Nº ìî  " > ® . ¢ ~ã'Ëï&¢ † ãÖ 3 ‘. ΂ÿ 5 ~ã^ö &‚»†ö*º ¾V>&Òê³* 5 jçê³*~ ·9f

(36) *' ~ãËï&*¢ BÂ~º ãÖö ‚ ;~ ® . 6).

(37) 160. Choi, J. et al.. Table 1. EIA Comparison between Antarctica and Korea. Act Item Authority Criteria for an appropriate EIA Evaluation items EIS Preparator Reviewer Monitoring Responsibility Public Availability. Act on Antarctic Activities and Environmental Protection Ministry of Foreign Affairs & Trade Screening Scoping Activity proponent Not decided Included 90 days for CEE. Act on Assessment of Impacts of Works on Environment, Traffic, Disasters, etc. Ministry of Environment Development size decided by the act Decided by the act (23 items in 3 areas) Licensed Agencies Ministry of Env't & KEI Included Limited. Bª¢ 23B “Ï *¦ö &š ;'š¢ê ï&¢  ~ N ©š Ò š . ¾ Î ~ã'Ëï&öBº “Ïö ’†Ar ìš ‚ÿö 8ž 7º“Ïj  F ~² J;† > ®b–,  7ºWö 8¢ .V~ã'Ëï & 5

(38) *' ~ã'Ëï& ¦¢ Ò ç Ö;~² B . ^ ®º ®{ W~ {ž 5 º£^š . “Ú ~ã 'Ëï& ê¯çöº º'ž ;‚ò šÒ~ ®b ¾, Î~ã'Ëï&öBº š¦ªö ;–> ® . * š~º "VF‚Bº .ç† > ìº ¦ªj VF~ê ƒ ~ ~ã'Ëï&~ ‚ê¢ «{® ~, $‚ ~ã' Ëï& ‚«Ö; ";j j*^&ê šš† > ®º ’Ú ^Ëj ÒÏ~ ¢Ò'b‚ B‚ º ©š . šº ~ ã ª¢ö &~ &¦ªš j*^&ž ‚~ÒÖ;¶¾ ¢>&7š 6j Ϛ~² † > ®êƒ ~V *Žš . “ÚöB Ûç'b‚ šÚæº ~ã'Ëï&f~ N š6f r Table 1" ? . š‚ ÎöB~ ‚ÿö &‚ ~ã'Ëï&~ ê¯ BBö &‚ Lªj r~ Fig. 4ö B~& . jÞ ï& êê Jғöº ' êöB J~¢~º ғj BB&‚ B~& . ï êê JÒ] Rÿ~ *º *Ú ";~ ·ö š~º  êöBº ‚ÿê³ ~ jºW" Ï'ö &‚ ’Ú' Þ/" z®Ú ‚ÿj ºê~æ ᆠãÖö B>º çö &šBê VF𠢂 . šf ?f ‚ÿ~ Bº¢ Æ&R &nj J;~º ©š jº~ . &n~ J;f j>'šÚ¢ ~– ‚ÿê³~ Ï' 5 jºWj W† > ®º º*Ú~ ©šÚ¢ ‚. . ’Ú'bRº ‚ÿê³ö &‚ «æ, Î, îRÚ V F, V, îRÚ ê³, ‚ÿê³~

(39) V š

(40) Ž>Ú¢ 7). Fig. 4. Antarctic EIA Process.. R]~ã;kï&\ö(2002), ~ã¦(2001), U.S EPA(1998). 7).

(41) Antarctic Environmental Impact Assessment in Korea. ~– ò£ &n J;š ®&Ë~ š  ÒF¢ VFš¢ ~ ò£ &nj j~&j ãÖöê . Ï'~ Ï' ϗ¦, ~ãö &‚ 'Ëã, ãB' Gš~ Ö>W  &nš jB F;ÒF¢ Þ/𢠂 . ÎöB ¯>º ‚ÿf ¢>'bR “ÚöB ¯> º ~ã'Ëï& &ç ‚ÿ Î& ·b¾, Îæ ~ ß>Wj J~  ’Ú'b‚ ‚ÿÚÏj VF 𢠂 . Vöº ~ãbš¢ FB† > ®º Î  J $º ; š

(42) Ž>Ú¢ ‚ . šf z®Ú ÎöB~ š 5 ^’, öV>&Ò, š· ö &‚ '« –£ 5 &N »_ö &‚ &/ ¦ & š êöB ¦Æ>Ú¢ ‚ . ï>~ Ö;(Screening) ï&>&~ Ö;f Î~ã'Ëï&ö ®Ú ›

(43) '  ê‚ " > ® . ï&>&~ Ö;j *šBº ÎöB ¯>º Î Bê ‚ÿÚÏö Vž ~ã'Ë~ >&j Table 2~ ÞÓÊ ;‚ ;Ò~ ‚Ï~º ©š jº ~– 𢠯&‚ .j, .V,

(44) * 'Ëï&~ ê¢ Ö ;~êƒ ‚ . %$ ï]Ï~ Ö;(Scoping) ‚ÿºêö V¢ 'V ž F;b‚ B>º ~ã' Ëö &‚ ÎN' ï&¢ *šBº Î º²ö &‚

(45) *' ï& º "º “Ïö &‚ Fê' ¦Æ 5 ï& & ÎN'š . š‚ 76ï&“Ï f ï&“Ï *'' 'Ë~ ¦ $º ;ê, &6&k~ FZ, öç’~ &ËW 5 Ò ~ &ËW j «'b‚ JšB F;>Ú¢ ‚ . š Table 2. Screening Matrix. Air Fuel Waste Noise Sewage Heat Emission Spills Vehicle Small - Medium s s Power Supply Large s m m Building m s s s s Fuel Storage m Table 3. Scoping Matrix. Fresh Water/ Soil Sea Water Small Medium m m Large m s L m Flora. Emission Noise Fuel Spills Waste Introduced Species. Fauna. Air m s -. 161. ";öB V ¯B FÒÒfö &‚ ¦Æ& šÚæº ©š :²ç~ . šf êê‚ F;B “Ïö V¢ ï&¢ >¯~V š* ö BžB “Ïö &‚ ’Ú'ž ÒF¢ VF~¢ ‚ . ]Ïê º ïÚÏ “Ïê "º ï&ÚÏf *, 'Ë.G, &6&k~ 3 ¦ªb‚ ’ªB . * *–Òº BnB ‚ÿê³~ bš.ç º* Úö ³ ~º bÒ', z', b', ž~' &~¢ æîº. r~ ғj Æ&‚ šÚ^¢ ~– š-² {B ¶ òº ~ã'Ëï&~ V. ¶ò‚ ‚Ï‚ . Ë./ 'Ë.Gš¦ ž*~ ‚ÿš ¶~ãö 'Ëj ö ¶~ã~ &~& æz>º ;ê¢ "' O»j ÒÏ ~ ‚&‚ ;{® ;ï' $º ;W'b‚ .Ò~º © j ¢ º . 'Ë~ .Gf '7' 'Ë, šN' 'Ë, *'' 'Ë b‚ ^ª>Ú šÚê . VöB ç7' '˚¦ ¢N' 'Ëb‚ ç7'š ‚ÿš ¢Ú¾º ˲öB b& B~º ©š . ¢N' 'Ëf J $º ‚ÿ~ šJ, Ú*, Ò Ú'Fæf &Nš ®b– «W~ ;Û'š . šN' 'Ëf ‚.~ ‚ÿbR¦8 *š vš–¾. ž ˲öB B~º ©bR *7'bR ¢V>º æ zš . *'' 'Ëf ¢;V*ö ž‚ ''~  ·f ‚ÿ~ ÷'ž 'Ëj

(46) Ž~– "–¦8 ¾ö šš º ‚ÿ~ 'Ëö Vž æzš . $k &6&kf .ç>º ~ãæz 5 bš¢ îÏ &˂ >&bR Ôºº O»j dº ©bR 'Ëj j*® b~ –¾ ¯~ ;ê¾ \V¢ B‚ŽbRB 'Ëj ‚²z ~º O»š ® . šf z®Ú BnB ‚ÿê³~ V*ÿ n ¯Fæf *ö ~šB Ë*ö žö 'Ëj 6² ʖ¾ B–~º On" *š~º ~ã~ >, ’, öj ۂ 'Ë~ >; š ®j > ® . Îî8ç ê³ ÎöB~ ~ã'Ëï&º B‚ ï&R «Ö>º © š jî¢ ºê æ³'ž ÎîVçj ۂ 'Ë.G~ æ Wj {ž~êƒ ;>Ú ® . ÎîVç ê³f 'Ë ï& .ç~æ á®~ ç~ Bö &j‚ ³‚ &.

(47) 162. Choi, J. et al.. w" '« &6&kj Î"'b‚ Fæ~V *‚ Ï'b ‚ >ãB . š‚ ÎîVç ê³~ >ãf ~ã^ö&‚Ζ £~;B B3– 2“, ΂ÿ5~ã^ö&‚»† B17 – Î~ãÎîVç ~ »'ғö "–~ ® . ÎîVç ê³öº –Òæ, “Ï, V, V*, –Ò" V 5 nê, žK" Ëj {ê³, .ç~æ ႠçB ö &‚ &wê³" š¢ >¯~V *‚ .Ö {ê³ š ’Ú'b‚

(48) Ž>Ú¢ ‚ . ®>R ~ãË ï&¢ ۂ 'Ë~ .G 5 &6&k~ >ã" ¯j ۚBê ¾æÆ > ®º ®&b~² B~º ~ãbš ~ «~ 5 ;ê& ~ã'Ëï&Bö ’Ú'b‚ VF> Ú¢ ‚ . ®{ 9 {ž ~ã'Ëï&º *š~º æ" VFj ÒÏ~ ¾ ¢ .G~º V»šæ‚  .G Ö"º j'b‚ ®{. Wj Ú

(49) ‚ º ‚ê¢ æî ® . V¢B ~ã'Ë ï& >¯ 7 ÒÏ®~ ®{ ‚ ž¶ $º V» j B F~ ~ã'Ëï&B~ ‚ê6j žæ† > ®êƒ ~ ¢ ‚ . º£^ 'Ëï&º  ßWç “Ï" ªïš O&šæº ãË š ®b– šº ‚«'b‚ 6j ÚÒº ~ÒÖ;²¶ ö² 'Ëï&~ "º ÚÏ 5 ֆj *~º– ‚ê‚ ·Ï† > ® . šö V¢ j*^&ž ~Ò Ö;²¶ $ º ²¶ š šš† > ®º  Úf ^Ëj Ò Ï~ *Û~šBê «{® VF~º º£^j

(50) Ž~ ¢ ‚ . š‚ º£^öº ï&~ &çš B ‚ÿ~ Bº, & çæö &‚ ~ã*, &n~ ¦Æ, 'Ë 5 &k  ' Ëï&B *>ö &‚ ғš Úê'b‚

(51) Ž>Ú¢ ‚. . ‚«'b‚ Ö;B ғö &‚ ÒFf Ö; "–& ’Ú'b‚ VF>Ú¢ ‚ . šf ?f ғj ϗÊV *šBº „B B‚ “ Ï š

(52) Ž>Ú¢† ©š– ß® VöB BB ғ. f îÒ ~;B¢ j•‚ “B7£öB º’~º Ònj ϗʺ ©š ..  ®º ΂ÿö &‚ ~ã'Ëï&º Ö ’Ú'ž ~ã'Ëï& æŽj B~ ’Ú' ÚÏ" ê¯.N j ;~ ® . 1980j& ê>¦V ·~ 2002j ræ 326š(IEEV&)~ 'Ëï&& šÚæº  ~ã ^¢ *‚ >b‚ {‚ *çj ’»~ ® . 1999j Ζ£7~ ғf ~ã'Ëï&¢ *‚ “B' æŽj B~&, ' Bê“&º ÿ æŽj ¶“ ~ ~ã'Ëï&»ö >'~& . ¾ ÖÒ¾¢~ ~ ã'Ëï&Bêº Table 1ö B‚ :f ?š “B'b ‚ ¯>º ~ã'Ëï&Ú'ʂ"º 皂 6š ô j êê~ “Ú»j B;~² >î . V¢B æÂ 20j*~ ÖÒ¾¢ ~ã'Ëï&Bê~ Ú'ʂj ç7'b‚ 'Ï~V& ¦~ “Ú~ B êÚ' ãþj :ûb‚ “~ Î~ã'Ëï&» " ?f ž“Òf j ^–~ ÖÒ¾¢~ Î~ã'Ëï &æŽj r" ?š B~& . ʒÒj ۚ ž* ‚ÿš ~ãö ~º 'Ëj 3 &æ V&(® Ò²~–¾ ® ¢'ž 'Ë, Ò²~– ¾ ¢'ž 'Ë, Ò²~–¾ ¢'ž ©j >º '‚ 'Ë)b‚ ’ª~ F'b‚ ~ã'Ëï&~ >&š .j~ã'Ëï&, .V~ã'Ëï&,

(53) *' ~ã'Ëï &‚ Ö;B . .j~ã'Ëï&Bº ‚ÿBº¢ BF~¢ ~º– Vöº Ï' 5 jºW, &n~ J;, ‚ÿ~ ÚÏ, æ »_ ¦Æ&

(54) ŽB . .V¾

(55) *' ~ã'Ëï&‚ >¯>Ú¢ F ‚ÿ f ÖF BnB ‚ÿö Vž ~ãö ~º 'Ë~ ž¶ö V¢ Êzwj Û~ 76'b‚ ï&~¢ † 76“ Ïj J;~, F;B 76“Ïê *–Ò¢ ‚ . *–ÒöBº BnB ‚ÿê³~ bš.ç º* Úö ³~º bÒ', z', b', ž~' &~¢ æî º Î &çj BnB ‚ÿê³ö &‚ ~ã'Ëï&~ V. ¶ò‚ ‚Ï‚ . Ò ž*~ ‚ÿš ¶~ãö 'Ëj ö ¶~ã~ &~& æz>º ;ê¢ "' ž O»j ÿö~ ‚&‚ ;{~² “Ïê‚ ·‚ ‚ V»j ÿö~ ;ï' $º ;W'b‚ ~ãö &‚ ç7', *7', *'' 'Ëj .G‚ . $‚ ~ãÏR ¢ J;~, ~ãÏR¢ J~ Bš .ç>º ¶ ~ã~ bš¢ ž~& îφ > ®º >&b‚ Ôºº &6&kj >゠ê ÎîVçê³j >ã~ îæïb ‚ Cï 5 º£j ‚ . ÎöB~ ~ã'Ëï& ¦Æf &N~Bº “Úö B *Ò ¯~ ®º ~ã'Ëï&f êê‚ »_š B 7. Ö † ;>îV r^ö î‚Ú ~ã'Ëï&B ¦Æ.N~ >ã ~ã^ö &‚ Ζ£~;Bº ÎöB~ ~ã š º’> ® . ^~ 7ºWš &v>šB ÚÖ>îb– VöB ;~ * ÖÒ¾¢~ ~ã'Ëï&º B;b‚ B*>.

(56) Antarctic Environmental Impact Assessment in Korea. ÚN >š Î ~ã'Ëï&º Fê“öB ¯> ® º ~ÒÖ;; Ú'ʂj j~ ®j öò jî¢, ]ÚBêöBº jç ‚Wz>æ pf Ê\Ò # Êz w Bê¢ ê«~ ®Ú šö žº îRÚ ¦Æ.N& jº~ . š¢ *š V'bR Îö &‚ ]&~ ~ã ;k OË, *¯–ç~ ‚Ï &ËW ¦, ¦ÆËK, î‚ Ú –ç~ J &ËW ¦f ?𠦯¢ ~² F –ç Ú~ Jғ öò jî¢ î‚Ú ;b‚ ¯~ ² F Î ~ã'Ëï&B~ * >¯ ' .G, "‚ ¯~² F ‚ÿÚÏ~ .G, ~ã'Ëï&B ÚÏ~ * ^W ;ê, N ª¢ö &‚ ]Ú *^& * ö &‚ º&'ž V jÞ ¦Æ¶~ †, ¶Ï, ¦Æ~Ò~ «O», ‚« ¦Æ~Ò~ ·W O» ~ ^¦'ž ¦Æ V»j BB~V *‚ ['ž º& \& º\B . Ò. Ò.  \º “Î^«Væ "æ ž*‚ÿb‚ ž‚ ~ã æz ÎîVç(PP03102)”~ \Öö :ûj vî . ‚]š·\ö ¦J æ\² f.ÿ ²Ë ;W^ ;Òö² pf îæj R‚ . $‚  \ö jº‚ Î~  šš¢ *‚ Î Òö ôf êæj " ‚]š·\ö ¦J æ\. 163. ² 궪  ^«Væ &ö ªö² 6Ò¢ Ö. . îæïb‚ [ *Ò &öö² pf †ê~ =j R ‚ . ^^ò. ‚]š·\ö. 2001. Î æ\~ã-š·+* 7. ‚ ]š·\ö. 139 p. ‚]~ã;kï&\ö. 2002. ~ã'Ëï&~ Ò' ./ ï&¢ *‚ 8»\. ~ãÁLÛÁҚö‚'Ëï &». ~ã¦. 2001. ~ã'Ëï&* ·9 ö ‚ ;. COMNAP. 1999. Guidelines for Environmental Impact Assessment in Antarctica from WWW : <www.cep.aq/ default.asp?casid=5074> [cited 2004-03-10] <www.cep.aq/default.asp?casid=5083> [cited 2003-03-10] Protocol on Environmental Protection to the Antarctic Treaty. U.S. Code of Federal Regulation. U.S EPA. 1998. Student Text for Principles of Environmental Impact Assessment Review. Received Apr. 14, 2004 Accepted Jun. 11, 2004.

(57)

참조

관련 문서

Life cycle impact assessment (LCIA) results showed that the environmental impacts of SVE were all higher than those of biopile.. Prominent four environmental impacts, human

This study aims to analysis the environmental impact on waste catalyst recycling technology using entire life cycle assessment.. Environmental impacts consist of the five

Key words: Life cycle assessment, Life cycle inventory, Agricultural environment, Environmental impact assessment..

Types of Development Plan and Project According to Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Act, there are 17 development plans which are the target of

● The supplements to the environmental impact assessment report preparation and review manual corresponded to the examination of the comparison of alternatives, calculation

Development of a Comprehensive Environmental Impact Assessment Evaluation by the Emergy Analysis.. Seo Hee Kang, Suk

The Chonggyecheon project in the process of environmental impact assessment (EIA) and prior environmental review system (PERS) reviewed the environmental impacts before

사후처리위주의 기술을 탈피하여 사전예방적인 환경기술의 개발·보급에 보다 커다란 비중을 두 고 있는 환경기술의 국제적 동향을 감안한다면 환경영향평가기술은 환경기술의