• 검색 결과가 없습니다.

A Study on Blasting Vibration Control Criteria for Pre-insulated Pipe through the Numerical Analysis

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "A Study on Blasting Vibration Control Criteria for Pre-insulated Pipe through the Numerical Analysis"

Copied!
8
0
0

로드 중.... (전체 텍스트 보기)

전체 글

(1)

*** ⦽ǎÕᖅʑᚁᩑǍᬱ Geo-ᯙ⥥௝ᩑǍᝅ ᖁᯥᩑǍ᭥ᬱ ([email protected])

Received August 24 2012, Revised October 23 2012, Accepted July 10 2013

Copyright ⵑ 2013 by the Korean Society of Civil Engineers

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0)

 ǣŠ––’ǣȀȀ†šǤ†‘‹Ǥ‘”‰ȀͳͲǤͳʹ͸ͷʹȀ•…‡ǤʹͲͳ͵Ǥ͵͵ǤͶǤͳͶ͹ͳ ™™™Ǥ•…‡Œ‘—”ƒŽǤ‘”Ǥ”

⟖㐖㬲⛛ⴂ#ⴲⱧ㬚#ⴲ⻏⊲⯦ኾ#⇚㣊⾂ᦗ#ኾὪᏮ⺾⮎#ኾ㬚#⮮ጪ

ࣲౖ෭ ȵ୺஼૴ ȵ׌஼࠮ ȵକ෉ָ

Choi, Bong-Hyuck*, Cho, Jin-Woo**, Kim, Jin-Man***, Yoo, Han-Kyu****

A Study on Blasting Vibration Control Criteria for Pre-insulated Pipe through the Numerical Analysis

ABSTRACT

In this paper, numerical analysis with varying distance and burial depth was performed to recommend the blasting vibration control standard for pre-insulated pipes. The blasting load model applied in the numerical analysis was verified to the comparison with the results of the field tests. It was determined from the results of the numerical analysis that the effective stress either exceeds or approaches the allowable stress of the inner steel pipe for vibration velocity greater than 4.0cm/sec while stability is obtained for vibration velocity below 4.0cm/sec. Therefore, it was determined that the blasting vibration control criteria for pre-insulated pipes must not exceed 4.0cm/sec.

Key words : Pre-insulated pipe, Blast, Vibration, Control criteria

Ⅹಾ

ᅙםྙᨱᕽ۵ᯕᵲᅕ᪉š᮹ၽ❭ḥ࠺šญʑᵡᱽ᜽ෝ᭥⦹ᩍᯕĊÑญ᪡ๅᖅᝍࠥෝᄡᙹಽ⦹ᩍᙹ⊹⧕ᕾᮥᙹ⧪⦹ᩡ݅. ᙹ⊹⧕ᕾᱢᬊၽ❭

⦹ᵲ༉ߙᮡ⩥ᰆ᜽⨹đŝ᪡᮹እƱෝ☖⦹ᩍá᷾⦹ᩡ݅. ᙹ⊹⧕ᕾđŝ, ᯕᵲᅕ᪉šᮡḥ࠺ᗮࠥ4.0cm/sec ᯕᔢᨱᕽၽᔾᮁ⬉᮲ಆᯕԕš ᮹⨩ᬊ᮲ಆᮥⅩŝ⦹Ñӹɝᱲ⦹۵äᮝಽӹ┡ԍᮝ໑, 4.0cm/sec ᯕ⦹ᨱᕽᦩᱶᖒᯕ⪶ᅕࡹ۵äᮝಽ⠪aࡹᨩ݅. ঑௝ᕽ, ᯕᵲᅕ᪉š᮹ḥ

࠺šญʑᵡᮡ4.0cm/secෝⅩŝ⦹ḡᦫࠥಾšญ⦹ᩍ᧝⧁äᮝಽ❱݉ࡽ݅.

áᔪᨕ ᯕᵲᅕ᪉š, ၽ❭, ḥ࠺, šญʑᵡ

1. ᕽು

ᮁḡ᜽ᖅྜྷಽᕽ, ݡᇡᇥḡᵲᨱๅᖅࡽ⩶┽ಽ᳕ᰍ⦽݅. ᯕ్⦽௝ᯕ⥥௝ᯙǍ᳑ྜྷᯕḡၹᧂᔢ⪵, ݉⊖ᬕ࠺, ᔑᔍ┽॒ᮝಽᯙ⦹ᩍ

✚⯩, 1964֥Niigata ḡḥŝ1994֥Northridge ḡḥᮡ௝ᯕ⥥௝ᯙǍ᳑ྜྷᇶƕᨱ᮹⦽⦝⧕᮹ᝍbᖒᮥᅕᩍᵝ۵ᳬᮡᔍಡ௝

‡‘–‡…А‹…ƒŽ‰‹‡‡”‹‰ ݓъėॡ

(2)

Table 1. Limitation standards and countermeasures on vibration in Korea Gas Corporation

Classification Safe range Countermeasures range Prohibition range

Maximum vibration velocity (kine)

Exposed Gas pipe Less than 0.4 0.4 - 2.0 more than 2.0

Buried Gas pipe Less than 1.0 1.0 - 4.0 more than 4.0

Countermeasures - Countermeasure of vibration - Countermeasure of vibration - Precision controlled blasting

- Prohibition of blasting - Non-Vibration method

Table 2. Underground construction section of Swiss Norm 640 312a (Ryu Chang-Ha (2005) and Seoul National Univ of Technology (2008) requote)

Sensitivity

ranges Underground construction Frequency

range

Maximum value of the velocity vector (VR) mm/s Determining frequency (Hz)

< 30* 30-60 > 60**

() a little sensitive

- Bridges in steel or reinforced concrete

- Steel, concrete or compact brickwork supporting structures - Lugs, tunnels, caverns, shafts in solid rock or well-reinforced

soil

Occasionally Frequently Permanently

Reference values: Up to 3 times the values corresponding to sensitivity class (3)

() somewhat

sensitive

- Underground caverns, tunnels, shafts, piping - Subterranean parking areas

- Underground piping (gas, water, sewage system, cable) - Dry stone walls

Occasionally Frequently Permanently

Reference values: Up to twice the values corresponding to sensitivity class (3)

() averagely

sensitive

- Reservoirs - Cast-iron piping

- Caverns, intermediate ceilings and carriageway ceilings in tunnels

- Sensitive cables

Occasionally Frequently Permanently

15 6 3

20 8 4

30 12 6 ()

particularly sensitive

- Old lead cables - Old cast-iron piping

Occasionally Frequently Permanently

Reference values: Between the reference values of class (3) and the half of those values

* For less than 8Hz, Frequency apply minimum standard value.

** For more than 150Hz, Frequency is able to apply in is greater than standard value.

ᯩᮝ໑, ǎԕ᮹Ğᬑ↽ɝᯕᨱݡ⦽šᝍᯕ׳ᦥḡŁᯩ۵ᝅᱶᯕ݅.

ᬑญӹ௝ࠥᝍḡ᮹ĞᬑḡᔢÕᖅŖᔍ۵ᯕၙ⡍⪵ࡹᨕḡ⦹₉

ࠥ, ḡ⦹℁॒ʫᮡǕ₊ᨱ᮹⦽Õᖅᯕᵝෝᯕ൉Łᯩ݅. ᯕ్⦽

ʫᮡǕ₊ᨱ᮹⦽Ŗᔍ۵ᦵၹ⊖ᯕӹ┡ԁĞᬑၽ❭ෝᙹ⧪⦹í

ࡹ໑, ᯕভၽᔾࡹ۵ḥ࠺ᮡᵝᄡ᮹௝ᯕ⥥௝ᯙᨱᝍb⦽ᩢ⨆ᮥ

ၙ⊽݅. ə᫙ᨱࠥÕᖅŖᔍ᜽ၽᔾ⦹۵ᰆእᵝ⧪ᨱ᮹⦽ḥ࠺,

ั૾᜽Ŗ᜽ၽᔾ⦹۵ั૾⧎┡ḥ࠺॒݅᧲⦽ḥ࠺ᬱᨱ᮹⦽

௝ᯕ⥥௝ᯙ᮹ ᗱᔢᯕ ၽᔾ⧁ ᙹ ᯩ݅.

ๅᖅš šಉ ḥ࠺šญʑᵡᮡ ǎԕ᮹ Ğᬑ ⦽ǎaᜅŖᔍᨱᕽ

ḥ࠺ᗮࠥอᮥʑᵡᮝಽTable 1ŝzᯕᱽ᜽⦹Łᯩ۵ᝅᱶᯕ໑, ǎ᫙᮹ Ğᬑ ඹ₞⦹(2005) ၰ ᕽᬙᔑᨦݡ⦺Ʊ(2008)ᨱ ঑෕໕

ᵝ❭ᙹݡᩎᮥŁಅ⦹ᩍᱽ᜽ࡽᜅ᭥ᜅ᮹Norm 640 312aaᯩ݅.

Table 2۵ᜅ᭥ᜅ᮹Norm 640 312a ᵲๅᖅšŝšಉࡽḡ⦹Õ⇶

ྜྷᇡᇥอᮥᱶญ⦽äᮝಽ, ၝq॒ࠥɪ, Õ⇶ྜྷ᳦ඹ, ḡၹ᳑Õ, ၽᔾኩ॒ࠥᮥŁಅ⦹ᩍ↽ݡḥ࠺ᗮࠥᄂ░ෝᵝ❭ᙹݡᩎᨱ঑௝

ᱽ᜽⦹Ł ᯩ݅.

⦽⠙, ḡᵲๅᖅᯕᵲᅕ᪉šᮡḡᩎӽႊᮥ᭥⦽௝ᯕ⥥௝ᯙᮝಽ

ԕᇡᨱ110ⳃԕ᫙᮹உÑᬕྜྷᯕ10⼸/⽉ԕ᫙᮹ᦶಆᮝಽ⮱෕ʑ

ভྙᨱ᪉ࠥၰᦶಆᨱ᮹⦽ᩢ⨆ᮥ⇵aಽၼŁᯩᮝ໑, ԕš(Steel pipe), ᫙š(HDPE), ᅕ᪉ᰍ(PUR) ॒ᮝಽǍᖒࡽᅖ⧊šᮝಽ⎹Ⓧ

ญ✙šᯕӹaᜅš ॒ ʑ᳕vᖒšŝ ݅ෙ ᩎ⦺ᱢ✚ᖒᮥ w۵

Ǎ᳑ྜྷಽᕽ᫙ᇡḥ࠺ᨱݡ⦽ᩑǍၰšญʑᵡ᮹ᱶพᯕ᫵Ǎࡹ۵

ᝅᱶᯕ݅.

঑௝ᕽ, ᅙםྙᨱᕽ۵ᙹ⊹⧕ᕾᮥ☖⦹ᩍḥ࠺ᬱᨱ঑ෙᯕᵲᅕ ᪉š᮹Ñ࠺✚ᖒᮥ⠪a⦹Ł, ᬕᩢᦩᱶᖒ⪶ᅕၰᔍŁႊḡෝ

᭥⦽ ᯕᵲᅕ᪉š᮹ ⧊ญᱢᯙ ḥ࠺šญʑᵡᮥ ᱽ᜽⦹Łᯱ ⦽݅.

2. ᙹ⊹⧕ᕾᮥᯕᬊ⦽ᯕᵲᅕ᪉šḥ࠺ᩢ⨆⠪a

2.1 ৤౿ැজԹ૬

ᙹ⊹⧕ᕾᮥᯕᬊ⦽ᯕᵲᅕ᪉šḥ࠺ᩢ⨆⠪a۵ḡၹŝᯕᵲᅕ ᪉šᮥ࠺᜽ᨱ༉⩶⪵⦹ᩍᱥℕĥ࠺⧕ᕾ(Full Dynamic Analysis)

(3)

Fig. 1. The blasting load application model (Charge weight 4kg) Fig. 2. The blasting load application numerical analysis model

Table 3. Numerical analysis using Pre-insulated Pipe and Soil properties Properties

Classification

Elastic Modulus (E, tonf / m2)

Unit Weight1) (Ĺ,tonf / m3)

Poisson's ratio (Ń)

Internal friction angle1) (ij,Ţ)

Cohesion1) (c,tonf / m2)

Casing(HDPE)2) ÕíÎÓZÎ×Ñ ×íÖÑ ×íÑ - -

Service pipe(Steel)2) ÏíÎÑZÎ×Ô ÔíÕÓ ×íÐ - -

Insulation (PUR) ÒíÎ×ZÎ×Ñ ×í×Ð ×íÐ - -

Backfill material ÐíÒ×ZÎ×Ð ÎíÔÒ ×íÑ× Ð×íÔÒ ÏíÐ

Ground or Foundation Îí×ZÎ×Ð ÎíÒÒ ×íÏÕ ÏÔíÒ ÑíÔ

1) Backfill and Ground properties(Ĺ,ij, c ) were obtained from lab-test.

2) Thickness of casing and service pipe are applied respectively 17.6mm and 9.5mm.

ᮥ ᝅ᜽⦹ᩡᮝ໑, ḡၹ᮹ b Ğĥᨱ۵ ᱱ┥ᖒ Ğĥෝ ᱢᬊ⦹ᩍ

ၹᔍ❭ᨱ ᮹⦽ ᩢ⨆ᮥ ↽ᗭ⪵⦹ࠥಾ ⦹ᩡ݅.

ᯕভ, ၽ❭⦹ᵲᮡၽ❭ḥ࠺⠪ašಉᙹ⊹⧕ᕾᨱᕽձญᔍᬊࡹ

Łᯩ۵ၙǎNational highway Institute(1991)ᨱᕽᱽᦩ⦽᜾

(1) ၰ(2)ෝᯕᬊ⦹ᩍᙹ⊹༉ߙ⪵⦹ᩡ݅. ᙹ⊹༉ߙ⪵ࡽၽ❭⦹ᵲ

ᮡ⩥ᰆ᜽⨹ᨱᕽᔍᬊࡽ⡎᧞᮹✚ᖒᮥŁಅ⦹ᩍ⡎᧞እᵲ(¬ ƃ) 1.07ŝ ⡎ᗮ(¯ƃ) 18,700ft/sෝ ᜾ (1)ᨱ ᱢᬊ⦹ᩍ ᔑ⇽⦽ ᰆ᧞

1kgݚ⡎ၽᦶಆ(©‹Œ›, 84.268kbar= 859,299tonf / m2)ᮥᯕᬊ⦹

ᩡ݅.

ੱ⦽, ᰆ᧞ 1kgݚ Ŗᄞ໕ᨱ a⧕ḡ۵ ᦶಆ(©›, 391,124tonf /m2)ᮡ⪵᧞᮹ḢĞ(ƂƁ) 50mm᪡ᰆ᧞Ŗ᮹ḢĞ(ƂƆ) 65mmෝ

᜾(2)ᨱᱢᬊ⦹ᩍᔑ⇽⦹ᩡ݅. ᯕভ, ʑᵡၽ❭ᰆ᧞పᮡᯕĊÑญ

15mᯙ ᯕᵲᅕ᪉š᮹ ᔢ݉ᨱ ḥ࠺ ᗮࠥ 2cm/secෝ ၽᔾ᜽┅۵

4kgᮝಽ, ᝅᱽၽ❭⧕ᕾᨱᔍᬊࡽ⡎ၽᦶಆᮡᰆ᧞ప1kgݚᦶಆ᮹

4႑ᯙ 1,564,496 tonf / m2ෝ Ŗᄞ໕ᨱ ᱢᬊ⦹ᩡ݅.

©‹Œ›á ćÎ â×íÕ¬ ƃ ÑíÎÕ Z Î×àÔZ ¬ ƃZ ¯ƃÏ

(1)

©›á ©‹Œ›Z

Þ

ćƂƂƆƁ

ß

Ð (2)

⦽⠙, ᜽eᄡ⪵ᨱ঑ෙ࠺ᦶಆᮡ⦹ᵲᔢᙹ(B, 16,338) ၰၽ❭⬉

ᮉ(0.83)ᮥᱢᬊ⦹ᩍᱥᔢᙹ॒(2007)᮹ᩑǍđŝᨱ঑௝, Starfield and Pugliese(1968)aᱽᦩ⦽wave-shape ⧉ᙹෝᯕᬊ⦹ᩍᱽ᜽

ࡽ᜾(3)ᮥᔍᬊ⦹ᩍᔑ⇽⦹ᩡᮝ໑, ᰆ᧞ప4kg ၽ❭᜽Ŗᄞ໕ᨱ

a⧕ḡ۵ ᜽eݚ ⦹ᵲ ༉⩶ᮡ Fig. 1ŝ z݅.

©Þƒß á Ñ©›

Þ

ŒŸ—Þ ćà ›ƒ ßàŒŸ—öćÏ ÞàöćÏ ›ƒß

ß

(3)

⧕ᕾ݉໕ᮡ Fig. 2ᨱᕽᅕॐᯕʫᯕ 20m, šŝ⠪⧪⦽ʙᯕ

120m, ၽ❭ᬱŝšᔍᯕÑญ5ⴇ30m Ⓧʑ᮹ḡၹ༉⩶ᮥᔍᬊ⦹

ᩍ⧕ᕾ⦹ᩡᮝ໑, ၽ❭⦹ᵲᮡḡ෥65mmᯙŖᄞ໕ᨱႊᔍ⩶ᮝಽ

a⧕ᵝᨩᮝ໑8m ʫᯕ᮹ᱩၹᯙŖᄞᱡ໕ᨱᕽᇡ░4m ʫᯕʭḡ

ᱢᬊ⦹ᩡ݅. ᯕভ, ḡၹ᮹Ğĥ໕ᮡᱱ┥ᖒĞĥෝᔍᬊ⦹ᩡᮝ໑,

⧕ᕾᨱ ᯕᬊࡽ ᯕᵲᅕ᪉š ၰ ḡၹ ྜྷᖒ⊹۵ Table 3ŝ z݅.

(4)

(a) Numerical analysis section (b) Field blast test diagram(Kim Jin-Man, 2012) Fig. 3. Numerical analysis model and Field view

Table 4. The comparison Numerical analysis results and Field test results for the blasting vibration

Sensor position B-1 Maximum vibration velocity real vector sum (cm/sec) B-2 Maximum vibration velocity real vector sum (cm/sec) Field test results Numerical analysis results Error (%) Field test results Numerical analysis results Error (%)

S-1 (Mid)

Left outside 2.913 2.901 0.41 2.03 2.019 0.54

Left inside 2.827 2.879 1.87 2.015 1.996 0.95

Right inside 2.852 2.881 1.03 1.821 1.996 9.63

Right outside 2.500 2.898 15.95 1.772 2.016 13.76

S-2 (End)

Left outside 2.851 2.829 0.76 2.05 2.015 1.70

Left inside 2.898 2.816 2.81 1.919 1.959 2.09

Right inside 2.601 2.816 8.28 1.896 1.956 3.17

Right outside 2.536 2.830 11.59 1.631 2.022 23.97

2.2 ৤౿ැজէր 2.2.1 ৤౿ැজࡦ܄Ցஹ

ᙹ⊹⧕ᕾ༉ߙá᷾ᮡʡḥอ॒(2012)ᨱ᮹⧕ၽ⢽ࡽĞʑࠥ

᧲ᵝᨱ ᭥⊹⦽ʼnᰍ ₥≉ᬊ ᕾᔑᨱᕽᙹ⧪ࡽ ⩥ᰆ᜽⨹ đŝᵲ

ᯕᵲᅕ᪉šᨱᕽĥ⊂ࡽḥ࠺ᗮࠥaᔢݡᱢᮝಽⓍíၽᔾ⦽B-1 ၰB-2ᨱᕽᙹ⧪ࡽၽ❭᜽⨹đŝෝᯕᬊ⦹ᩍ⠪aෝᙹ⧪⦹ᩡ݅.

ᯕভ, B-1 ၰB-2 ၽ❭᜽⨹ᮡbbᰆ᧞ప340, 40Ɖƅ,ᯕᵲᅕ᪉š

ᵲᝍᇡಽᇡ░ᯕĊÑญ۵99.8, 45.9Ƌᨱᕽᙹ⧪ࡹᨩᮝ໑, ᙹ⊹⧕

ᕾ݉໕᮹Ğᬑ⩥ᰆḡ⩶ᮥ༉ߙย⦹ᩡᮝ໑, ྜྷᖒ⊹۵Table 3᮹

sᮥ ᔍᬊ⦹ᩡ݅(Fig. 3 ₙ᳑).

ᙹ⊹⧕ᕾ༉ߙᮡTable 4ᨱᕽᅕॐᯕၽ❭ᬱŝaᰆᯙᱲ⦽ᯕᵲ ᅕ᪉š᳭⊂᫙ᇡᨱᕽᙹ⊹⧕ᕾᨱ᮹⦽ḥ࠺ᗮࠥ↽ݡᝅᄂ░⧊ŝ

ĥ⊂đŝ᮹᪅₉a0.41ⴇ1.70% ᱶࠥಽ᯲íၽᔾ⦹Ł, ᯕ⬥᪅₉ a᷾a⦹ᩍᯕᵲᅕ᪉šᬑ⊂᫙ᇡ᮹Ğᬑ11.59ⴇ23.97% ᱶࠥa

ࡹ۵ äᮝಽ ⠪aࡹᨕ ᯕᵲᅕ᪉š ᳭⊂ ᫙ᇡอᮥ Łಅ⧁ Ğᬑ

⩥ᰆđŝ᪡ๅᬑᯝ⊹⦹۵đŝෝᅕᯕ໑, ᅖᰂ⦽⩥ᰆ᳑Õᮥ

Łಅ⧁Ğᬑᱥℕᱢᮝಽᱽᦩࡽᙹ⊹⧕ᕾ༉ߙᮡ⧊ญᱢᯙäᮝಽ

❱݉ࡽ݅.

ᯕভ, B-1ŝB-2۵ၽ❭᭥⊹abbᦵၹŝᬱḡၹ(ๅพ☁)ᨱ ᕽၽ❭ෝᙹ⧪⦹ᩡʑভྙᨱ࠺ᯝ⦽ၽ❭⬉ᮉᮥᱢᬊ⦹ḡᦫŁ, ᙹ⊹⧕ᕾ᜽݅᧲⦽ၽ❭⬉ᮉᨱ঑ෙᩢ⨆ᮥ⠪a⦹ᩍ⩥ᰆ᜽⨹

đŝ᪡ aᰆ ᮁᔍ⦽ ḥ࠺✚ᖒᮥ ᅕᯕ۵ ၽ❭ ⬉ᮉ(B-1 27.8%, B-2 82.8%(᧞83%))ᮥᱢᬊ⦹ᩡ݅. ঑௝ᕽ, ᯕ⬥ᅙᩑǍᨱᕽ

ᙹ⧪ᩩᱶᯙᙹ⊹⧕ᕾᮥ☖⦽ᯕᵲᅕ᪉š࠺ᱢÑ࠺⠪a۵⩥ᰆ᜽

⨹đŝᇥᕾᮥ☖⧕᨜ᨕḥᬱḡၹ(ๅพ☁)ᨱᕽ᮹ၽ❭⬉ᮉ, 83%

ෝ ʑᵡᮝಽ ⠪aෝ ᙹ⧪⦹ᩍ᧝ ⧁ äᮝಽ ❱݉ࡽ݅.

2.2.2 ࠻ডਕܑ࣢஺ண࠻ডଲண࣪૊ւࢳ൞஼ܛ൉ন ๅᖅᝍࠥᄥၽ❭ḥ࠺✚ᖒᮡ࠺ᯝ⦽ၽ❭ḥ࠺ᨱݡ⦽ๅᖅᝍࠥ

᮹ᩢ⨆⠪aෝ᭥⦹ᩍ, ḥ࠺ᬱᮝಽᇡ░ᯕĊÑญ15m ᭥⊹᮹ᯕᵲ ᅕ᪉š↽ᗭๅᖅᝍࠥᯙ0.6m᪡3.8m᮹ᯕᵲᅕ᪉šᨱၽᔾ⦹۵

ၽ❭ᨱ ᮹⦽ ๅᖅᝍࠥ ᄥ ḡᵲๅᖅ ᯕᵲᅕ᪉š ḥ࠺✚ᖒᮡ

Table 5ᨱᕽᅕॐᯕᯕĊÑญ15mᨱᕽๅᖅᝍࠥ0.6m᮹ḥ࠺ᗮࠥ

ๅᖅᝍࠥᄡ⪵ᨱ঑ෙḥ࠺ᗮࠥqᗭእ۵ๅᖅᝍࠥ3.8mᨱᕽๅᖅ

(5)

Table 5. The location upper section vibration veolocity due to blast by burial depth Assessment location

Burial depth Casing (HDPE) Service pipe (Steel)

0.6m

Vsum=1.79cm/sec Vsum=1.78cm/sec

3.8m

Vsum=1.33cm/sec Vsum=1.32cm/sec

Ratio of reduction1) 25.70% 25.84%

1) Ratio of reduction = (V0.6m - V3.8m) ÷ V0.6m

Fig. 4. Pre-insulated inner & outer pipe behavior assessment location by the blasting load

ᝍࠥ 0.6mᨱ እ⧕ ᫙š 25.70%, ԕš 25.84% ᱶࠥ qᗭ⦹۵

äᮝಽ ⠪aࡹᨩ݅.

ᯕভ, ᖒᇥᄥḥ࠺ᗮࠥᄂ░Ⓧʑ۵❭᮹ḥ⧪ႊ⨆ᗮࠥᯙVxa

aᰆ⍙ᮝ໑, ݅ᮭᮝಽᙹḢᗮࠥᖒᇥᯙVz, ᙹ⠪ႊ⨆ᖒᇥᵲ

ḥ⧪ႊ⨆ŝ ᙹḢႊ⨆ᯙ Vy ᙽᮝಽ ⠪aࡹᨩ݅.

2.2.3 ࢳ൞஼ܛ઩ݗࠛଲண࣪૊ւੲ୨নඌԧ

ᯕᵲᅕ᪉šᮡԕš/ᅕ᪉ᰍ/᫙š᮹ᔝ⊖Ǎ᳑ಽԕᦶၰ᫙ᦶᯕ

᯲ᬊ⧁ Ğᬑ b ᰍഭ᮹ ᩎ⦺ᱢ ✚ᖒᨱ ঑௝ bb᮹ ᱲⅪ໕ᨱᕽ

ၽᔾ⦹۵Ğĥ໕ᦶಆᯕᔢᯕ⦹íၽᔾ⦽݅. ᅙםྙᨱᕽ۵ၽ❭ḥ

࠺ᨱݡ⦽ᯕᵲᅕ᪉š᮹ᦩᱶᖒ⠪aෝ᭥⦽ᩎ⦺ᱢÑ࠺✚ᖒ⠪aෝ

ḥ࠺ᗮࠥ(V, ƁƋŠ)᪡ᮁ⬉᮲ಆ(von-Mises stress, ƉƅƄîƁƋÏ)

ᮥ ᯕᬊ⦹ᩍ á☁⦹ᩡ݅.

ᯕᵲᅕ᪉š᮹ ԕ · ᫙šᨱ ݡ⦽ ᩎ⦺ᱢ Ñ࠺✚ᖒ ⠪a۵ Fig.

4ᨱᕽᅕॐᯕၽ❭⦹ᵲᯕᯕᵲᅕ᪉š᮹᳭⊂ᇡᨱ᭥⊹⦹໑, ⠪a᭥

ᯕভ, ᯕᵲᅕ᪉š᮹ᮁ⬉᮲ಆᮡɁᯝ⦽ᰍഭ᮹❭ƕᨱšᩍ⦹۵

᮲ಆॅᮥ⦹ӹ᮹❭ƕ༉ߙಽá☁⧁ᙹᯩࠥಾŁᦩࡽ⧊ᖒ᮲ಆᮝ ಽ ݅ᮭ ᜾ (4)ෝ ᯕᬊ⦹ᩍ ᔑ⇽⧁ ᙹ ᯩ݅.

ňƃáöÎîÏåÞňÎÎà ňÏÏßÏâÞňÏÏà ňÎÏßÏâÞňÎÏà ňÎÎßÏæ (4)

ᩍʑᕽ, ňÎÎ : hoop stress(ᬱᵝႊ⨆ ᮲ಆ) ňÏÏ : axial stress(⇶ႊ⨆ ᮲ಆ) ňÎÏ : shear stress(ᱥ݉ ᮲ಆ)

⠪a᭥⊹ᨱ঑ෙḥ࠺ᗮࠥ✚ᖒᮡTable 6ᨱᕽᅕॐᯕๅᖅᝍࠥ

(6)

Table 6. Vibration velocity characteristics due to blast load by location(cm/sec) Assessment location

Classification Distance

Top Bottom Left Right

Outer Inner Outer Inner Outer Inner Outer Inner

Burial depth 0.6m

5m 9.57 9.49 10.08 10.28 9.82 9.88 9.94 9.79

10m 4.14 4.09 3.81 3.86 4.13 4.10 3.82 3.84

15m 1.79 1.78 1.65 1.66 1.76 1.76 1.68 1.65

20m 0.94 0.93 0.89 0.90 0.93 0.93 0.90 0.90

25m 0.54 0.54 0.53 0.53 0.54 0.54 0.53 0.53

30m 0.34 0.34 0.33 0.33 0.34 0.34 0.33 0.33

Burial depth 3.8m

5m 27.78 27.29 28.30 29.03 29.87 30.07 26.31 26.46

10m 4.11 4.08 4.13 4.15 4.24 4.25 3.98 3.98

15m 1.33 1.32 1.28 1.29 1.33 1.33 1.27 1.27

20m 0.68 0.67 0.64 0.64 0.67 0.67 0.65 0.65

25m 0.43 0.43 0.41 0.41 0.42 0.42 0.41 0.41

30m 0.28 0.28 0.27 0.27 0.28 0.28 0.27 0.27

ভྙᨱḡ⢽໕ᇡɝᮥ঑௝ᱥݍࡹ۵┥ᖒ❭᮹ᩢ⨆ᨱ᮹⧕ᔢᇡ

ၰ᳭⊂ᨱᕽⓍŁ⦹ᇡၰᬑ⊂᮹Ğᬑᔢݡᱢᮝಽ᯲ᮡäᮝಽ

ӹ┡ԍᮝӹ, ᯕĊÑญ5m᮹Ğᬑ⦹ᇡၰ᳭⊂ᨱᕽ޵ⓑäᮝಽ

ӹ┡ԍ݅.

ᯕ᪡zᮡĞ⨆ᯕӹ┡ӽᯕᮁ۵ᯕĊÑญ5m᮹Ğᬑၽ❭ᬱᮝ ಽ ᇡ░᮹Ṉᮡ ᯕĊÑญ ✚ᖒᨱ᮹⧕ Ḣᱲᱢᯙ ၽ❭᮹ᩢ⨆ᮥ

ၼᦥ⦹ᇡᨱᕽ᮹ḥ࠺ᗮࠥaⓍíၽᔾ⦹ᩡʑভྙᯙäᮝಽ❱݉

ࡽ݅.

ᕽaᰆⓍŁə᫙᮹ḡᱱ᮹ĞᬑÑ᮹ᮁᔍ⦽äᮝಽ⠪aࡹᨩᮝӹ, ᯕĊÑญ5m᮹Ğᬑၽ❭᮹Ḣᱲᱢᯙᩢ⨆ᮥၼʑভྙᨱ⦹ᇡ᮹

ḥ࠺ᗮࠥa ᔢݡᱢᮝಽ Ⓧí ၽᔾ⦹ᩡ݅.

ၰ 10m᮹ Ğᬑ ๅᖅᝍࠥ 0.6mᨱ እ⧕ ๅᖅᝍࠥ 3.8m᮹ sᯕ

Ⓧ໑, ᯕĊÑญ15m ᯕᔢ᮹Ğᬑๅᖅᝍࠥ0.6ma݅ᗭⓑäᮝಽ

⠪aࡹᨩ݅. ᯕ᪡zᮡๅᖅᝍࠥᨱ঑ෙḥ࠺ᗮࠥ᮹₉ᯕ۵ᯕĊÑ ญ5m ၰ10m᮹Ğᬑๅᖅᝍࠥ3.8mᨱᕽၽ❭᮹ᩢ⨆ᮥᅕ݅

Ḣᱲᱢᮝಽ ၼʑ ভྙᯙ äᮝಽ ❱݉ࡽ݅.

Ñ࠺ ✚ᖒ

ᯕᵲᅕ᪉š᮹ᦩᱥᖒ⠪a۵ᱥᚁ⦽ၵ᪡zᯕၽ❭⦹ᵲᮥŁಅ

⦽࠺ᱢᙹ⊹⧕ᕾđŝ᪡ᯝၹᱢᬕᩢ᳑Õᮥၹᩢ⦽ᱶ⧕ᕾđŝ᮹

ᬱᵝႊ⨆᮲ಆ, ⇶ႊ⨆᮲ಆ, ᱥ݉᮲ಆ᮹ᖁ⩶ᵲℊᮥ☖⦹ᩍᔑᱶࡽ

ᮁ⬉᮲ಆ(von Mises Stress)ᮥ ᯕᬊ⦹ᩍ ᙹ⧪⦹ᩡ݅.

ᯕᵲᅕ᪉š᮹ᱶ⧕ᕾᮡๅᖅᝍࠥᨱ঑ෙᯱᵲ, ԕᇡᮁℕ᮹

᪉ࠥ(ᖅĥ᪉ࠥ120Ţ)ၰᦶಆ(ᖅĥᦶಆ16ƉƅƄîƁƋÏ)ᮥŁಅ⦹ᩍ

ᙹ⧪⦹ᩡ݅. ᯕভ, ᯕᵲᅕ᪉šᨱၽᔾ⦹۵ᩕ᮲ಆᨱ᮹⦽ᩢ⨆⠪a ۵vš᮹ᩕ➞₞ĥᙹÎíÏ Z Î×àÒîޜ,ᅕ᪉ᰍ(PUR)᮹ĞᬑÎíÒ Z Î×àÑîޜ,əญŁ᫙š(HDPE)᮹ĞᬑÎíÎ Z Î×àÑîޜ᮹sᮥ

ᔍᬊ⦹ᩡᮝ໑, ᯲ᬊᩕ᮲ಆᮡ⦽ǎḡᩎӽႊŖᔍ(2006)᮹ᩕ႑š

ᖅ⊹ʑᵡᨱ঑௝ᩩᩕ᪉ࠥ65ⳃෝŁಅ⦹ᩍᖅĥ᪉ࠥᯙ120ⳃʭ ḡ 55ⳃ᮹ ᄡ⪵పᮥ a⦹ᩡ݅.

ᱶᱢ⦹ᵲᮥŁಅ⦽ḡᵲๅᖅᯕᵲᅕ᪉šၽᔾᮁ⬉᮲ಆᮡTable 7ᨱᕽᅕॐᯕ᫙šᨱᕽ۵ᯝၹᱢᮝಽ5.72ⴇ7.22ƉƅƄîƁƋÏ ᱶࠥ᮹

᯲ᮡ᮲ಆᯕၽᔾ⦹ᩡᮝ໑, ԕšᨱᕽ۵᪉ࠥ⦹ᵲŝԕᦶ᮹ᩢ⨆ᮝ ಽᔍᬊᔢ┽ᨱᕽ1,585.29ⴇ1,628.47ƉƅƄîƁƋÏԕ᫙᮹᮲ಆᮥᅕ ᯕ۵ äᮝಽ ⠪aࡹᨩ݅.

ᯕভ, ᱶ⦹ᵲᨱ᮹⦽↽ݡᮁ⬉᮲ಆᮡๅᖅᝍࠥ3.8mᨱᕽ᧞

1,628.47ƉƅƄîƁƋÏᯕၽᔾ⦹໑ᯕ۵ᦩᱥᮉ1.2ෝŁಅ⦽SPW 400v᮹⨩ᬊ᮲ಆ1,682ƉƅƄîƁƋÏ᮹96.8%ᨱ⧕ݚ⦹۵sᮝಽ

⠪aࡹᨕᱶ⦹ᵲᔢ┽ᯕᵲᅕ᪉š᮹ᦩᱶᖒᮡ⪶ᅕࡹᨕᯩ۵äᮝ ಽ ❱݉ࡽ݅.

࠺⧕ᕾŝᱶ⧕ᕾđŝෝ⧉̹Łಅ⦹ᩍᔑᱶࡽⅾᮁ⬉᮲ಆᮡ

ᯕĊÑญၰๅᖅᝍࠥᨱ঑௝ၽ❭⦹ᵲᨱ᮹⦹ᩍၽᔾ⦹۵ԕ·᫙š᮹

ᮁ⬉᮲ಆᮥᅕᩍᵝ۵Table 8ᨱᕽᅕॐᯕᱥℕᱢᮝಽ⦹ᇡᨱᕽⓍí

ၽᔾ⦹Ł, ᯕĊÑญa᷾a⧉ᨱ঑௝qᗭ⦹۵äᮝಽ⠪aࡹᨩ݅.

ᯕভ, ⅾ ᮁ⬉᮲ಆᮡ ᯕĊÑญ 5mᨱᕽ ᦩᱥᮉ 1.2ෝ Łಅ⦽

SPW 400 v᮹⨩ᬊ᮲ಆ1,682ƉƅƄîƁƋÏᮥⅩŝ⦹۵ᮁ⬉᮲ಆᯕ

ၽᔾ⦹Ł, ᯕĊÑญ10m(4.0cm/sec ᯕᔢ; Table 6 ₙ᳑)᮹Ğᬑ

⨩ᬊ᮲ಆᨱÑ᮹ɝᱲ⦹۵ᮁ⬉᮲ಆᯕၽᔾ⦹۵äᮝಽ⠪aࡹᨩ݅.

(7)

Table 7. Buried pre-insulated pipe generated von-mises stress by the static load Location

Classification

Top Bottom Left Right

Outer pipe Inner pipe Outer pipe Inner pipe Outer pipe Inner pipe Outer pipe Inner pipe Bank load

(ƉƅƄîƁƋÏ)

0.6 m 0.17 3.28 0.29 3.80 0.13 15.17 0.13 15.17

3.8 m 0.98 20.61 1.07 22.36 0.99 66.63 0.99 66.63

Temperature (ƉƅƄîƁƋÏ)

0.6 m

4.95 1402.71 4.95 1402.87 5.02 1403.37 5.04 1403.37

3.8 m Internal pressure

(ƉƅƄîƁƋÏ)

0.6 m

1.64 578.93 1.64 579.19 1.67 580.07 1.67 580.07

3.8 m Total1)

(ƉƅƄîƁƋÏ)

0.6 m 6.57 1617.32 6.47 1618.17 6.68 1612.00 6.68 1612.00

3.8 m 5.72 1626.98 5.68 1628.47 7.22 1585.29 7.22 1585.29

1) Total stress : von-mises stress obtained by linear superposition of hoop-stress, axial-stress, shear-stress on Pre-insulated pipe caused by static loads

Table 8. Buried pre-insulated pipe generated von mises stress that considered the static load & the dynamic load

Burial depth 0.6m Top Bottom Left Right

Casing Service pipe Casing Service pipe Casing Service pipe Casing Service pipe

Total stress1) (ƉƅƄîƁƋÏ)

D=5m 6.89 1706.15 7.31 1817.53 7.16 1640.44 6.91 1667.26

D=10m 6.77 1665.50 6.63 1660.11 6.78 1631.88 6.84 1659.73

D=15m 6.67 1636.03 6.55 1631.86 6.76 1623.83 7.50 1636.36

D=20m 6.63 1626.62 6.52 1627.07 6.73 1619.17 6.73 1625.51

D=25m 6.61 1622.92 6.50 1624.42 6.71 1616.84 6.71 1620.13

D=30m 6.59 1621.05 6.49 1622.49 6.70 1615.50 6.70 1617.16

Burial depth 3.8m Top Bottom Left Right

Casing Service pipe Casing Service pipe Casing Service pipe Casing Service pipe

Total stress1) (ƉƅƄîƁƋÏ)

D=5m 7.48 1823.56 7.21 1786.22 7.65 1652.24 8.24 1965.89

D=10m 6.03 1673.08 5.95 1664.08 7.39 1606.33 7.41 1651.31

D=15m 5.82 1647.19 5.77 1642.54 7.29 1598.72 7.30 1609.47

D=20m 5.76 1638.39 5.73 1637.58 7.26 1594.61 7.26 1598.55

D=25m 5.74 1634.40 5.71 1635.18 7.25 1591.81 7.25 1585.32

D=30m 5.73 1631.89 5.70 1633.41 7.24 1589.90 7.24 1591.24

1) Total stress : von-mises stress obtained by linear superposition of hoop-stress, axial-stress, shear-stress on Pre-insulated pipe obtained from static and dynamic analysis

঑௝ᕽ, ၽ❭ḥ࠺ᨱ ݡ⦽ ⨩ᬊʑᵡᮡ ᯕĊÑญ 10m ᯕᔢ᮹

Ğᬑᦩᱶᖒᯕ⪶ᅕࡹ۵ᅙ⧕ᕾđŝၰ⦽ǎaᜅŖᔍ᮹ḥ࠺šญ ʑᵡ(Table 1 ₙ᳑)ᮥ Łಅ⦹ᩍ 4.0cm/sෝ šญʑᵡᮝಽ ⦹۵

äᯕ ၵ௭Ḣ⧁ äᮝಽ ❱݉ࡽ݅(Table 6 ₙ᳑).

3. đು

ᅙםྙᨱᕽ۵ᯕᵲᅕ᪉š᮹ḥ࠺šญʑᵡᱽ᜽ෝ᭥⦹ᩍᙹ⧪

ࡽ ḡᵲᨱ ๅᖅࡽ ᯕᵲᅕ᪉š᮹ ၽ❭⦹ᵲᨱ ݡ⦽ ࠺ᱢ Ñ࠺ᮥ

ᇥᕾ⦹ᩍ ݅ᮭŝ zᮡ đುᨱ ࠥݍ⦹ᩡ݅.

(1) ၽ❭ᨱ ᮹⦽ ๅᖅᝍࠥ ᄥ ḡᵲๅᖅ ᯕᵲᅕ᪉š ḥ࠺✚ᖒᮡ

ๅᖅᝍࠥ3.8mᨱእ⧕ⓑäᮝಽӹ┡ԍᮝ໑, ๅᖅᝍࠥᄡ⪵

(3.2m)ᨱ঑ෙḥ࠺ᗮࠥqᗭእ۵᫙š25.70%, ԕš25.84%

ಽ⠪aࡹᨩ݅. ᯕভ, ᖒᇥᄥḥ࠺ᗮࠥᄂ░۵❭᮹ḥ⧪ႊ⨆

ᗮࠥᯙVxaaᰆ⍙ᮝ໑݅ᮭᮝಽᙹḢᗮࠥᖒᇥᯙVza

⍙Ł ᙹ⠪ႊ⨆ ᖒᇥ ᵲ ḥ⧪ႊ⨆ŝ ᙹḢႊ⨆ᯙ Vya aᰆ

᯲ᮡ äᮝಽ ⠪aࡹᨩ݅.

(2) ḥ࠺ᗮࠥ✚ᖒᮡၽ❭ᬱᮝಽᇡ░᮹ᯕĊÑญaມᨕḩᙹಾ

qᗭ⦹۵äᮝಽ⠪aࡹᨩᮝ໑, ๅᖅᝍࠥᨱ঑ෙḥ࠺ᗮࠥ۵

(8)

ࠥ3.8maၽ❭᮹ᩢ⨆ᮥᅕ݅ḢᱲᱢᮝಽၼʑভྙᨱⓍí

ӹ┡ԍᮝ໑, ᯕĊÑญ5m ᯕᔢ᮹Ğᬑๅᖅᝍࠥ0.6mᨱᕽ

ḥ࠺ᗮࠥa ݅ᗭ ⓑ äᮝಽ ⠪aࡹᨩ݅.

(3) ᮁ⬉᮲ಆ(von Mises Stress)ᮡᱶ⦹ᵲᨱ᮹⦽↽ݡᮁ⬉᮲ಆ ᮹Ğᬑๅᖅᝍࠥ3.8mᨱᕽ᧞1,628.47ƉƅƄîƁƋÏ ᱶࠥಽ

ᦩᱥᮉ1.2ෝŁಅ⦽SPW 400 v᮹⨩ᬊ᮲ಆ1,682ƉƅƄîƁƋÏ ᮹96.8%ᨱ⧕ݚ⦹۵äᮝಽ⠪aࡹᨩᮝ໑, ࠺⧕ᕾđŝෝ

⡍⧉⦽⠪ađŝᯕĊÑญ5mᨱᕽᦩᱥᮉ1.2ෝŁಅ⦽SPW 400 v᮹⨩ᬊ᮲ಆ1,682ƉƅƄîƁƋÏᮥⅩŝ⦹۵ᮁ⬉᮲ಆᯕ

ၽᔾ⦹Ł, ᯕĊÑญ10m ᯕԕ(ḥ࠺ᗮࠥ4.0cm/sec ᯕᔢ)᮹

Ğᬑ⨩ᬊ᮲ಆᨱɝᱲ⦹ÑӹⅩŝ⦹۵ᮁ⬉᮲ಆᯕၽᔾ⦹۵

äᮝಽ ⠪aࡹᨩ݅.

(4) ၽ❭ḥ࠺ᨱݡ⦽⨩ᬊʑᵡᮡ࠺⦹ᵲŝᱶ⦹ᵲᮥ༉ࢱŁಅ⦹ᩍ

ᙹ⧪ࡽᦩᱶᖒ⠪ađŝၰ⦽ǎaᜅŖᔍ᮹ๅᖅaᜅšḥ࠺š ญʑᵡᮥ Łಅ⦹ᩍ 4.0cm/sෝ šญʑᵡᮝಽ ⦹ᩍ ⩥ᰆᨱᕽ

ၽ❭ᙹ⧪᜽ၽᔾ⦹ḡᦫࠥಾšญ⦹۵äᯕၵ௭Ḣ⧁äᮝಽ

❱݉ࡽ݅.

References

National Research Institute of Cultural Heritage (2008). Cultural heritage monitoring technology development, Research Report, Seoul National Univ of Technology (in Korean).

Kim, J. M., Choi, B. H., Cho, J. W. and Cho, W. B. (2012).

Pre-insulated pipe behavior characteristics by the blast vibration, Proceedings of The Korean Geotechnical Society Spring Conference, Korean Geotechnical Society, p. 539 (in Korean).

Ryu, C. H. (2005). “Review of national standards for allowable limit of blast vibration on structures, explosives and blasting.”

Explosives and Blasting Proceedings, Korea Society for Explosive and Blasting Engineerring, Vol. 23, No. 3, pp. 1-10 (in Korean).

Jeon, S. S., Kim, D. S. and Jang, Y. W. (2007). “Stability assessment of concrete lining and rock bolts of the adjacent tunnel by blast-induced vibration.” Proceedings of The Korean Geotechnical Society, Vol. 13, No. 10, pp. 33-45 (in Korean).

Korea District Heating Corporation (2006). Heat piping construction work guidelines, Korea District Heating Corporation, Seoul, p.

249 (in Korean).

National Highway Institute (1991). Rock blasting and overbreak control(NHI Course No. 13211), U.S. Dept. of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Virginia.

Starfield, A. M. and Pugliese, J. M. (1968). Compression waves generated in rock by cylindrical explosive charges: A Comparison Between a Computer Model and Field Measurements, Int. J.

Rock Mech. & Min. Sci. & Geomech. Abstr., Vol. 5, pp. 65-77.

수치

Table 1. Limitation standards and countermeasures on vibration in Korea Gas Corporation
Table 3. Numerical analysis using Pre-insulated Pipe and Soil properties Properties Classification Elastic Modulus(E,  tonf / m 2 ) Unit Weight 1)(Ĺ,tonf / m3) Poisson's ratio(Ń)
Table 4. The comparison Numerical analysis results and Field test results for the blasting vibration
Fig. 4. Pre-insulated inner &amp; outer pipe behavior assessment  location by the blasting load
+3

참조

관련 문서

(2014) Airgap control of a super-speed maglev experimental vehicle, Proceedings of 2014 Spring Conference of the Korean Society for Railway, Jeju,

Y., 2013, Stability Analysis of an Mounting Equipment for External Pod on Aircraft by Road Test, 2013 Annual Autumn Conference of the Korean Society for Noise and

H., 2013, Free Vibration Analysis of a Rotating Cantilever Beam Made-up of Functionally Graded Materials, Transactions of the Korean Society for Noise and Vibration

I., “Identification of Structural Characteristic Matrices of Steel Bar by Genetic Algorithm,” Proceedings of the Korean Society for Noise and Vibration Engineering

Application of Hydrodynamic and Water Quality Model EFDC in Geum River, Proceedings of the 2012 Spring Co-Conference of Korean Society on Water Environment and Korean

Lee, “Non contact vibration measurement of an automobile exhaust system,” Fall Conference Proceedings of The Korean Society of Manufacturing Technology Engineers,

Yang, &#34;Vibration Analysis of Station under Railway Lines with Floating Slab Track&#34;, 2010 spring academic conference of the Korean Society for Railway, pp. Jang, The

C., “An Experimental Study on the Behavior of Steel Column Base Plate Connections under Cyclic Loading”, Korean Society of Civil Engineers Annual Conference, 2002, pp.177-180.