• 검색 결과가 없습니다.

저작자표시

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "저작자표시"

Copied!
33
0
0

로드 중.... (전체 텍스트 보기)

전체 글

(1)

저작자표시-비영리-변경금지 2.0 대한민국 이용자는 아래의 조건을 따르는 경우에 한하여 자유롭게

l 이 저작물을 복제, 배포, 전송, 전시, 공연 및 방송할 수 있습니다. 다음과 같은 조건을 따라야 합니다:

l 귀하는, 이 저작물의 재이용이나 배포의 경우, 이 저작물에 적용된 이용허락조건 을 명확하게 나타내어야 합니다.

l 저작권자로부터 별도의 허가를 받으면 이러한 조건들은 적용되지 않습니다.

저작권법에 따른 이용자의 권리는 위의 내용에 의하여 영향을 받지 않습니다. 이것은 이용허락규약(Legal Code)을 이해하기 쉽게 요약한 것입니다.

Disclaimer

저작자표시. 귀하는 원저작자를 표시하여야 합니다.

비영리. 귀하는 이 저작물을 영리 목적으로 이용할 수 없습니다.

변경금지. 귀하는 이 저작물을 개작, 변형 또는 가공할 수 없습니다.

(2)

2013년 8월

교육학석사(수학)학위논문

The Nonexistence of Conformal Deformations on Riemannian Warped

Product Manifolds

조선대학교 교육대학원

수 학 교 육 전 공

김 잔 디

(3)

The Nonexistence of Conformal Deformations on Riemannian Warped

Product Manifolds

리만 휜곱다양체 위의 등각변형의 비존재성

2013년 8월

조선대학교 교육대학원

수 학 교 육 전 공

(4)

The Nonexistence of Conformal Deformations on Riemannian Warped

Product Manifolds

지도교수 정 윤 태

이 논문을 교육학석사(수학교육)학위 청구논문으로 제출함

2013년 4월

조선대학교 교육대학원

수 학 교 육 전 공

김 잔 디

(5)

김잔디의 교육학 석사학위 논문을 인준함.

심 사 위 원 장 조선대학교 교수 홍 성 금 (인) 심 사 위 원 조선대학교 교수 김 남 권 (인) 심 사 위 원 조선대학교 교수 정 윤 태 (인)

2013년 6월

(6)

CONTENTS

국문초록

1. INTRODUCTION ··· 1

2. PRELIMINARIES ··· 4

3. MAIN RESULTS ··· 14

REFERENCES ··· 22

(7)

국 문 초 록

The Nonexistence of Conformal Deformations on Riemannian Warped Product Manifolds

김 잔 디

지도교수 : 정 윤 태

조선대학교 교육대학원 수학교육전공

미분기하학에서 기본적인 문제 중의 하나는 미분다양체가 가지고 있는 곡률함수 에 관한 연구이다. 특히, 어떤 함수가 주어진 미분다양체의 곡률함수가 되는 문제 는 해석적인 방법을 적용하여 주어진 다양체 위에서의 편미분방정식의 해의 존재 성의 문제로 바꿀 수 있다.

Kazdan and Warner([13], [14], [15])의 결과에 의하면  위의 함수  가  위의 Riemannian metric의 scalar curvature가 되는 세 가지 경우의 타입이 있다.

(A)  위의 함수  가 Riemannian metric의 scalar curvature이면 그 함수  가 적당한 점에서      일 때이다. 즉  위에 negative constant scalar curvature를 갖는 Riemannian metric이 존재하는 경우이다.

(B)  위의 함수  가 Riemannian metric의 scalar curvature이면 그 함수  가 항등적으로  ≡  이거나 모든 점에서    인 경우이다. 즉,  위에서 zero scalar curvature를 갖는 Riemannian metric이 존재하는 경 우이다.

(8)

본 논문에서는 엽다양체  이 (C)에 속하는 compact Riemannian manifold 일 때, Riemannian warped product manifold인      ∞  × 위에 함수

   가 Riemannian warped product metric의 scalar curvature가 되도록 하 는 conformal deformation이 존재할 수 없음을 증명하였다.

(9)

1. INTRODUCTION

One of the basic problems in the differential geometry is to study the set of curvature function over a given manifold.

The well-known problem in differential geometry is whether a given metric on a compact Riemannian manifold is necessarily pointwisely conformal to some metric with constant scalar curvature or not.

In a recent study([10]), Jung and Kim have studied the problem of scalar curvature functions on Lorentzian warped product manifolds and obtained partial results about the existence and nonexistence of Lorentzian warped metric with some prescribed scalar curvature function. In this paper, we study also the existence and nonexistence of Riemannian warped metric with prescribed scalar curvature functions on some Riemannian warped product manifolds.

By the results of Kazdan and Warner([13], [14], [15]), if  is a compact Riemannian   manifold without boundary  ≥   then  belongs to one of the following three catagories :

(A) A smooth function on  is the scalar curvature of some Riemannian metric on  if and only if the function is negative somewhere.

(B) A smooth function on  is the scalar curvature of some Riemannian metric on  if and only if the function is either identically zero or strictly negative somewhere.

(C) Any smooth function on  is the scalar curvature of some

(10)

- 2 - Riemannian metric on  .

This completely answers the question of which smooth functions are scalar curvatures of Riemannian metrics on a compact manifold  .

In [13], [14] and [15] Kazdan and Warner also showed that there exists some obstruction of a Riemannian metric with positive scalar curvature (or zero scalar curvature) on a compact manifold.

For noncompact Riemannian manifolds, many important works have been done on the question how to determine which smooth functions are scalar curvatures of complete Riemannian metrics on an open manifold. Results of Gromov and Lawson([9]) show that some open manifolds cannot carry complete Riemannian metrics of positive scalar curvature, for example, weakly enlargeable manifolds.

Furthermore, they show that some open manifolds cannot even admit complete Riemannian metrics with scalar curvatures uniformly positive outside a compact set and with Ricci curvatures bounded([9], [16, p.322]).

On the other hand, it is well known that each open manifold of dimension bigger than 2 admits a complete Riemannian metric of constant negative scalar curvature([6]). It follows from the results of Aviles and McOwen([1]) that any bounded negative function on an open manifold of dimension bigger than 2 is the scalar curvature of a complete Riemannian metric.

In [16] and [17], the author considered the scalar curvature of some Riemannian warped product and its conformal deformation of warped product metric.

In this paper, when  is a compact Riemannian manifold, we consider

(11)

the nonexistence of warping functions on a warped product manifold

     ∞  × with specific scalar curvatures, where is a positive constant. That is, it is shown that if the fiber manifold  belongs to class (C) then  does not admit a Riemannian metric with some positive scalar curvature near the end outside a compact set.

(12)

- 4 -

2. PRELIMINARIES

First of all, in order to induce a partial differential equation, we need some definitions of connections, curvatures and some results about warped product manifolds.

Definition 2.1. Let i  denote the set of all smooth vector fields defined on   and let ℑ  denote the ring of all smooth real-valued functions on  . A connection ∇ on a smooth manifold  is a function

∇  i  × i  → i 

such that

(D1) ∇ is ℑ -linear in  , (D2) ∇ is  -linear in  

(D3) ∇      ∇ for  ∈ ℑ  , (D4)      ∇  ∇  and

(D5)         ∇        ∇  for all      ∈ i  

If ∇ satisfies axioms (D1)~(D3), then ∇ is called the covariant derivative of  with respect to  for the connection ∇. If ∇ satisfies

(13)

axioms (D4)~ (D5), then ∇ is called the     of   which is characterized by the Koszul formula([17]).

A geodesic       →  is a smooth curve of  such that the tangent vector  ′ moves by parallel translation along   In order words,  is a geodesic if

 ′ ′   (geodesic equation).

A pregeodesic is a smooth curve  which may be reparametrized to be a geodesic. Any parameter for which  is a geodesic is called an affine parameter. If  and  are two affine parameters for the same pregeodesic, then       for some constants    ∈ ℝ  A pregeodesic is said to be complete if for some affine parameterizion (hence for all affine parameterizations) the domain of the para metrization on is all of ℝ .

The equation ∇ ′ ′   may be expressed as a system of linear differential equations. To this end, we let       ⋯    be local coordinates on  and let 

  

  ⋯  

 denote the natural basis

with respect to these coordinates.

The connection coefficients  of ∇ with respect to    ⋯   are defined by





  

 

 (connection coefficients).

Using these coefficients, we may write the geodesic equation as the

(14)

- 6 - following system

 

   

  

 

 

 

  (geodesic equations in coordinates).

Definition 2.2. The curvature tensor of the connection ∇ is a linear transformation valued tensor  in om i  i  defined by :

       ∇  ∇  ∇     

Thus, for  ∈i  ,

        ∇   ∇   ∇     

It is well-known that        at  depends only upon the values of

   and  at

([21]).

If  ∈    is a cotangent vector at  and      ∈   are tangent vectors at   then one defines

                                

for    and  smooth vector fields extending    and   respectively.

The curvature tensor  is a     - tensor field which is given in local coordinates by

 

        

    

 ⊗   ⊗   ⊗  

(15)

where the curvature components    are given by

     

  

  

  

  

         

Notice that

                                   and       

Furthermore, if   ∑  

    ∑   

    ∑  

 and

  ∑   , then we have

       

       

   

and

          

        

  

Consequently, one has      

   

   

     

Definition2.3. From the curvature tensor  , one nonzero tensor (or its negative) is obtained by contraction. It is called the Ricci tensor. Its

(16)

- 8 - components are 

  

   The Ricci tensor is symmetric and its

contraction  

   

  is called the scalar curvature ([2], [3], [4]).

Definition2.4. Suppose  is a smooth, bounded domain in  and let

   ×  →  be a Caratheodory function.

Let  ∈       be given. Consider the equation

∆         in 

   on  

 ∈      is a (weak) sub-solution if  ≤  on   and

∇ ∇  

     ≤  for all  ∈     ≥  

Similarly  ∈      is a (weak) super-solution if in the above the reverse inequalities hold.

We briefly recall some results on warped product manifolds. Complete details may be found in [3] or [21]. On a semi-Riemannian product manifold

 ×   let  and  be the projections of  ×  onto  and   respectively, and let    be a smooth function on  .

(17)

Definition2.5. The warped product manifold    × is the product manifold    ×  furnished with metric tensor

       ∘    

where  and  are metric tensors of  and  , respectively. In order words, if  is tangent to  at       then

                               

Here  is called the base of  and  the fiber([21]).

We denote the metric  by < , >. In view of Remark 2.6. (1) and

Lemma 2.7., we may also denote the metric  by < , >. The metric 

will be denoted by ( , ).

Remark 2.6. Some well known elementary properties of the warped product manifold    × are as follows :

(1) For each  ∈   the map         ×  is an isometry onto  

(2) For each  ∈   the map        ×  is a positive homothetic map onto  with homothetic factor  

 

(3) For each      ∈   the horizontal leaf  ×  and the vertical fiber  ×  are orthogonal at     

(18)

- 10 -

(4) The horizontal leaf       ×  is a totally geodesic submanifold of  and the vertical fiber       × is a totally umbilic submanifold of  .

(5) If  is an isometry of  , then  ×  is an isometry of  , and if

 is an isometry of  such that    ∘  , then  ×  is an isometry of

 .

Recall that vectors tangent to leaves are called horizontal and vector tangent to fibers are called vertical. From now on, we will often use a natural identification

    ×   ≅       ×   ≅  ×   

The decomposition of vectors into horizontal and vertical parts play a role in our proofs. If  is a vector field on  , we define  at      by setting            Then  and   related to the zero vector field on   Similarly, if  is a vector field of  ,  is defined by

         

Lemma 2.7. If  is a smooth function on  , then the gradient of the lift

 ∘  of  to  is the lift to  gradient of  on  .

Proof. We must show that grad   ∘   is horizontal and   related to grad    on  . If  is vertical tangent vector to   then

(19)

⟨      ∘    ⟩     ∘            

since      Thus grad  ∘   is horizontal. If  is horizontal,

⟨       ∘       ⟩  ⟨      ∘         ∘      

 〈            〉

Hence at each point,         ∘            □

In view of Lemma 2.7, we simplify the notations by writing  for

 ∘  and      for      ∘    For a covariant tensor  on  , its lift  to  is just its pullback   under the projection    →   That is, if  is a       tensor, and if   ⋯  ∈        then

   ⋯          ⋯      ∈   . Hence if  is vertical, than    on   For example, if  is a smooth function on , the lift to

 of the Hessian of  is also denoted by  This agrees with the Hessian of the lift  ∘  generally only on horizontal vectors. For detailed computations, see Lemma 5.1 in [5]. □

Now we recall the formula for the Ricci curvature tensor  on the warped product manifold    ×  We write    for the pullback by

 of the Ricci curvature of  and similarly for   

(20)

- 12 -

Lemma 2.8. On a warped product manifold    × with   dim     let    be horizontal and    vertical.

Then

(1)                

   

(2)           

(3)                 ⟨   ⟩ where   

∆       

⟨              ⟩

and ∆         is

the Laplacian on

 

Proof. See Corollary 7. 43. in [17]. □

On the given warped product manifold    ×   we also write  for the pullback by

of the scalar curvature  of  and similarly for  From now on, we denote    by ∇ 

Lemma2.9. If  is the scalar curvature of    × with   dim    , then

(2.1)    

   

∆        

⟨∇  ∇⟩

where ∆ is the Laplacian on  

(21)

Proof. For each      ∈    ×  let  be an orthonormal basis for

  Then by the natural isomorphism

    

is an orthonormal set in       We can choose

on   such that

 

forms an orthonormal basis for       Then

  ⟨ ⟩                  

which implies that

    

forms an orthonormal basis for   By Lemma 2.8. (1) and (3), for each  and 

           



    

and

                

∆     

⟨∇ ∇⟩



Hence, for     

      

 

     

   

       

  

∆     

⟨∇  ∇⟩

which is a nonlinear partial differential equation on  ×  for each  ∈   □

(22)

- 14 - 3. Main Results

M.C. Leung ([16], [17], [18]), has studied the problem of scalar curvature functions on Riemannian warped product manifolds and obtained partial results about the existence and nonexistence of Riemannian warped metric with some prescribed scalar curvature function. He has studied the uniqueness of positive solution to the equation

     ∆

       

  

where ∆

is the Laplacian operator for an   dimensional Riemannian manifold

    and     

  

. Equation (3.1) is derived from the conformal deformation of Riemannian metric ([1], [12], [13], [17], [18]).

Similarly, let     be a compact Riemannian   dimensional manifold.

We consider the      dimensional Riemannian warped product manifold

     ∞  × with the metric        where  is a positive function on    ∞  . Let       be a positive smooth function on

 and let  have a scalar curvature equal to        If the conformal metric       

 has a prescribed function       as a scalar curvature, then it is well known that      satisfies equation

(23)

       

  □                                 

  

  

where

is the d'Alembertian for a Riemannian warped manifold

     ∞  × 

In this paper, we study the nonexistence of a positive solution to equation (3.2). This paper contains the results of Riemannian version of [20].

First of all, in order to prove the nonexistence of solutions of some partial differential equations, we need brief results about Young's inequality.

The following proposition is well known(Theorem 1 in [20], p.48).

Proposition 3.1. Let  be a real-valued, continuous and strictly increasing function on      with     If        ∈      and

 ∈       , then

      

    ≥   

where   is the inverse function of   Equality holds if and only if

   

(24)

- 16 -

Corollary 3.2. Let    ≥  and        such that 

  

   

For any    

 

  

  

 

  ≥   

Proof. In Proposition 1, we choose        for    

From now on, we let     be a compact Riemannian   dimensional manifold with  ≥  and without boundary. The following proposition is also well known(Theorem 5.4, [5]).

Proposition 3.3. Let      ∞  × have a Riemannian warped product metric        Then the Laplacian □ is given by

  

  

 ′ 

 

   

 ∆

where ∆ is the Laplacian on fiber manifold  

By Proposition 3.3, equation (3.2) is changed into the following equation

     

     

 

 ′

 

      

  

 ∆     

  

  

              

  

            

  

  

(25)

If          is a positive function with one variable  and if

          and            are also functions of one variable   then equation (3.3) becomes

     ″   

 ′

′                  

  

where       

  

    and      

  

   

The proof of the following theorem is similar to that of Theorem 2 in [12].

Theorem 3.4. Let  be a positive solution of equation (3.4). And let

        satisfy the following condition :     ≥  and    ≤   where  is positive constant. Assume that there exist positive constants

and  such that

   

′  

for all    Then     is bounded from above.

Proof. From equation (3.4) we have

    

 ′ ′

             

  

Let  ∈     ∞   be a cut-off function. Multiplying both sides of equation (3.5) by    and then using integration by parts we obtain

(26)

- 18 -

     

′

  

′  

     

     

   

  

Since     ≥  and    ≤   where  is a positive constant, equation (3.6) implies

  ′ 

  

′   ≥ 

    

   

  

From the left side of the above equation, we have

  ′ 

  

 ′         ′′    ′     ′ 

′

Applying the Cauchy inequality, we get

        ′  ′         

  

  ′   

 

  

 ′ 

≤         ′  

    ′ and

    ′ 

′     

  

 

′   



  

′ 

≤   

′ 

   ′

Together with the above equations, we obtain

(27)

 

′         

   ′ 

≥ 

    

   

   

    ′ 

Applying Corollary 2 and using the bound

′

 we have

    

   

≤    

     

  

   

  

    

   

 

and

   ′ 

 ′  

≤    

  ′    

  

   

  

    

   

  

For large     we obtain

     ′

    

   

   

   ′ 

≤  ″

   ′        

(28)

- 20 -

where  ′  ″ are positive constants. Let  ≡  on      ∪     ∞  with

   and  ≡  on            ≥  on    ∞  and   ′ ≤   From equation      we have

 ′

  

  

  

   

   

  

  

  ′  ≤  ″′

for all    where  ″′ is a constant independent on  

Therefore  is bounded from above. □

Theorem 3.5. Let      be a Riemannian manifold with scalar curvature equal to    Assume that there exist positive constants  and

such that

  

′   

for all     For a smooth function      let          satisfy the following condition :   ≥      ≤   where  is positive constant. Then equation      has no positive solution.

Proof. If      is a positive solution of equation       then by Theorem 4    is bounded from above on    ∞   Then, by Omori-Yau maximum principle(c.f. [22]), there exists a sequence

such that

lim

→ ∞

  

′ 

≤  and  ″  ≤ 

  Since  ∈    ∞       

there exist a number    and  such that

(29)

           

  

 

for all     which is a contradiction to the fact that

 ″    

′ 

′  ≤ 

  

for all     Therefore equation      has no positive solution. □

The following corollary is easily derived from the previous theorems.

Corollary3.6. Let           ∞  ×    be a Riemannian manifold with scalar curvature equal to      Assume that there exist positive constants  and  such that

  

′  

for all    For a smooth function     let       satisfy the following condition:     ≥  

    ≤   where  is positive constant. Then there does not exist a conformal deformation on  with scalar curvature     

(30)

- 22 - REFERENCES

[1] P. Aviles and R. McOwen, Conformal deformation to constant negative scalar curvature on noncompact Riemannian manifolds, Differential Geom.

27(1988), 225-239.

[2] T. Aubin, Nonlinear analysis on manifolds, Monge - Ampere equations, Spring - Verlag New York Heidelberg Berlin.

[3] J.K. Beem and P.E. Ehrlich, Golbal Lorentzian Geometry, Pure and Applied Math, Vol. 67, Dekker, New York, 1981.

[4] J.K. Beem, P.E. Ehrlich and K.L. Easley, Global Lorentzian Geometry, Pure and Applied Math. Vol. 202, Dekker, New York, 1996.

[5] J.K. Beem, P.E. Ehrlich and Th.G. Powell, Warped product manifolds in relativity, Selected Studies (Th.M. Rassias, G.M. Rassias, eds.), North Holland, 1982, 41-56.

[6] J. Bland and M. Kalka, Negative scalar curvature metrics on non compact manifolds, Trans. Amer. Math .Soc. 316(1989), 433-446.

[7] F. Dobarro and E. Lami Dozo, Positive scalar curvature and the Dirac operator on complete Riemannian manifolds, Publ. Math. I.H.E.S. 58(1983), 295-408.

[8] P. E. Ehrlich, Yoon-Tae Jung and Seon-Bu Kim, Constant scalar curvatures on warped product manifolds, Tsukuba J. Math. 20 no.1 (1996), 239-256.

[9] M. Gromov and H.B Lawson, Positive scalar curvature and the Dirac

(31)

operator on complete Riemannian manifolds, Math. I.H.E.S. 58(1983), 295- 408.

[10] Y.T. Jung and I.H. Kim, The Nonexistence of Warping Functions On Space-Times, Honam Math. J. 30(2008), No.4, 693-701.

[11] Y.T. Jung, The Nonexistence of Conformal Deformations on Space -Times(Ⅱ), Honam Math. J. 33(2011), No.1, pp.121-127.

[12] Y.T. Jung and S.C. Lee, The nonexistence of conformal deformations on space-times, Honam Math. J. 32(2010), 85-89.

[13] J.L. Kazdan and F.W. Warner, Scalar curvature and conformal deformation of Riemannian structure, J. Diff. Geom. 10(1975), 113-134.

[14] J.L. Kazdan and F.W. Warner, Existence and conformal deformation of metrics and prescribed Guassian and scalar curvature, Ann. of Math.

101(1975), 317-331.

[15] J.L. Kazdan and F.W. Warner, Curvature functions for compact 2-manifolds, Ann. of Math. 99(1974), 14-74.

[16] M.C. Leung, Conformal scalar curvature equations on complete manifolds, Comm. in P.D.E. 20(1995), 367-417.

[17] M.C. Leung, Conformal deformation of warped products and scalar curvature functions on open manifolds, preprint.

[18] M.C. Leung, Uniqueness of Positive Solutions of the Equation

     

  

and Applications to Conformal Transformations, preprint.

[19] H.B. Lawson and M.Michelsohn, Spin Geometry, Princeton University

(32)

- 24 - Press, Princeton, 1989.

[20] D.S. Mitrinovic, Analytic inequalities, Springer-Verlag, New York H eidelberge Berlin, 1970.

[21] B. O'Neill. Semi-Riemannian geometry with applocations to relativity, Academic Press, New York, (1983).

[22] A. Ratto, M. Rigoli and G. Setti, On the Omori-Yau maximum principle and its applications to differential equations and geometry, J. Funct. Anal.

134(1995), 486-510.

(33)

저작물 이용 허락서

학 과 수학교육 학 번 20108060 과 정 석사

성 명 한글: 김잔디 한문 : 金잔디 영문 : Jan-Dee kim

주 소 광주시 북구 운암동 남양휴튼 106동 1204호

연락처 E-MAIL : kjdpoul@naver.com

논문제목

한글 :

리만 휜곱다양체 위의 등각변형의 비존재성

영어 :

The nonexistence of conformal deformations on Rieman nian warped product manifolds

본인이 저작한 위의 저작물에 대하여 다음과 같은 조건아래 조선대학교가 저작물을 이용할 수 있도록 허락하고 동의합니다.

- 다 음 -

1. 저작물의 DB구축 및 인터넷을 포함한 정보통신망에의 공개를 위한 저작물의 복제, 기억장치에의 저장, 전송 등을 허락함

2. 위의 목적을 위하여 필요한 범위 내에서의 편집ㆍ형식상의 변경을 허락함.

다만, 저작물의 내용변경은 금지함.

3. 배포ㆍ전송된 저작물의 영리적 목적을 위한 복제, 저장, 전송 등은 금지함.

4. 저작물에 대한 이용기간은 5년으로 하고, 기간종료 3개월 이내에 별도의 의사 표시가 없을 경우에는 저작물의 이용기간을 계속 연장함.

5. 해당 저작물의 저작권을 타인에게 양도하거나 또는 출판을 허락을 하였을 경우에는 1개월 이내에 대학에 이를 통보함.

6. 조선대학교는 저작물의 이용허락 이후 해당 저작물로 인하여 발생하는 타인에 의한 권리 침해에 대하여 일체의 법적 책임을 지지 않음

7. 소속대학의 협정기관에 저작물의 제공 및 인터넷 등 정보통신망을 이용한 저작물의 전송ㆍ출력을 허락함.

동의여부 : 동의( O ) 반대( ) 2013 년 월

참조

관련 문서

Ironically, even though there exists some obstruction of positive or zero scalar curvature on a Riemannian manifold, results of [E.J.K.], say, Theorem 3.1, Theorem 3.5 and

socioeconomic status and thyroid cancer prevalence; Based on the korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey2010-2011. Jung YI, Kim

This researcher also has obtained a witness’ statement that Kim Hwan-gi's house was divided from the studio with walls and the sarangchae was arranged orthogonally to Kim

Improved Rainfall Estimation Based on Corrected Radar Reflectivity in Partial Beam Blockage Area of S-band Dual-Polarization Radar.. Jeong-Eun Lee, Sung-Hwa Jung*, Hae-Lim

The condition R ⫽0, where R is the four-dimensional scalar curvature, is used for obtaining a large class 共with an arbitrary function of r) of static, spherically symmetric

studied p-harmonic functions with finite L q energy in [4], and proved some van- ishing type theorems on Riemannian manifolds satisfying a weighted Poincar´ e inequality.. Later,

Substantial results in the geometry of Riemannian manifolds with additional structures are asso- ciated with the curvature tensor, the Ricci tensor, the scalar curvatures,

In this paper, using the same way as in McCarthy [4], we derive the scalar and dual Lorentzian formulations of the curvature theory of line trajectories and expose the