• 검색 결과가 없습니다.

백서 두개골에서 rhBMP-2와 다양한 carrier의 골재생유도효과

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "백서 두개골에서 rhBMP-2와 다양한 carrier의 골재생유도효과"

Copied!
43
0
0

로드 중.... (전체 텍스트 보기)

전체 글

(1)

백서 두개골에서 rhBMP-2와 다양한

carrier의 골재생유도효과

연세대학교 대학원

치 의 학 과

이 서 경

(2)

백서 두개골에서 rhBMP-2와 다양한

carrier의 골재생유도효과

지도 최 성 호 교수

이 논문을 석사 학위논문으로 제출함

2007년 12월 일

연세대학교 대학원

치 의 학 과

이 서 경

(3)

이서경의 석사 학위논문을 인준함

심사위원 인

심사위원 인

심사위원 인

심사위원 인

심사위원 인

연세대학교 대학원

2007년 12월 일

(4)

,

.

,

,

,

,

.

.

,

.

.

2007

12

(5)

ii

iv

v

.

1

.

4

1.

4

2. rhBMP-2 &

4

3.

4

4.

5

5.

6

1)

6

2)

6

3)

6

4)

7

.

8

1.

8

2.

8

3.

13

.

15

.

19

21

27

32

(6)

Fig 1. Schematic drawing showing the histometric analysis of the

calvarial defect.

27

Fig 2. Histological view of surgical control group

2 weeks (×20, H-E)

27

Fig 3. Histological view of surgical control group

8 weeks (×20, H-E)

27

Fig 4. Histological view of carrier control group

2 weeks (x20, H-E)

28

Fig 5. Histological view of carrier control group

8 weeks (×20, H-E)

28

Fig 6. Histological view of rhBMP-2 alone group

2 weeks (×20, H-E)

28

Fig 7. Histological view of rhBMP-2 alone group

8 weeks (×20, H-E)

28

Fig 8. Histological view of rhBMP-2/ACS group

2 weeks (×20, H-E)

29

Fig 9. Histological view of rhBMP-2/ACS group

(7)

Fig 10. Histological view of rhBMP-2/ACS group

8 weeks (×100, H-E)

29

Fig 11. Histological view of rhBMP-2/MBCP® group

2 weeks (×20, H-E)

29

Fig 12. Histological view of rhBMP-2/MBCP® group

8 weeks (×20, H-E)

30

Fig 13. Histological view of rhBMP-2/MBCP® group

8 weeks (×100, H-E)

30

Fig 14. Histological view of rhBMP-2/Bio-Oss® group

2 weeks (×20, H-E)

30

Fig 15. Histological view of rhBMP-2/Bio-Oss® group

8 weeks (×20, H-E)

30

Fig 16. Histological view of rhBMP-2/Bio-Oss® group

(8)

Table 1. Histometric Analysis of Defect Closure (mm, %)

13

Table 2. Histometric Analysis of New Bone Area (mm²)

14

Table 3. Histometric Analysis of Bone Density (%)

14

(9)

rhBMP-2

carrier

rhBMP-2 , . 60 8mm , 6 2 8 5 . , . rhBMP-2 1 , rhBMP-2 (Collatape®) 2 , (MBCP®) 3 , (Bio-Oss®) 4 . , , . 1. rhBMP-2 , rhBMP-2 . 2. rhBMP-2

(10)

, . 3. 8 2 . 4. rhBMP-2 . 5. 8 . rhBMP-2 , . , . rhBMP-2 . : rhBMP-2, , (Collatape®), (MBCP®), (Bio-Oss®)

(11)

rhBMP-2

carrier

< >

.

,

(Sennerby et al. 2005; Schwartz-Arad et al. 2005). (osteogenesis), (osteoconduction), (osteoinduction)

.

, .

(scaffold)

, , .

, DBM (demineralized bone matrix)

, ,

,

(12)

BMP (bone morphogenetic protein), PRP (platelet rich protein), PRGR (plasma rich in growh factor) polypeptide

(osteoactive agent) (Clokie et al. 2001).

,

. ,

,

(Goldberg et al, 1987; Damien et al, 1991; Misch, 1993; Cordaro et al. 2002). .

bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) transforming growth factor (TGF-β) superfamily 1965

Urist , 1980 DBM

(Urist. 1965, 1980). Wozney rhBMP (recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein) , BMP

20 , 30~38kDa homodimer 400~525 prepropetides

(Wozney, Rosen et al. 1988). ,

. BMP-2 ,

, ,

(13)

BMP FDA

, . BMP

,

(Hong, Kim et al. 2006). BMP

, ,

, ,

. ,

BMP (Cook,

Wolfe et al. 1995; Salkeld et al. 2005).

, β-TCP, polylactic acid polymer, collagen, demineralized bone matrix, hydroxy apatite, gelatin, fibrin sealant, polylactic- polyglycolic polymer, BMP

.

(Sigurdsson, Nygaard et al. 1996; Oda, Kinoshita et al. 1997; Terheyden, Jepsen et al. 1997; Choi, Kim et al. 2002; Ahn, Kim et al. 2003; Pang, Im et al. 2004; Kook, Salkeld et al. 2005; Hyun, Han et al. 2005; Hong, Kim et al. 2006).

rhBMP-2 ,

(14)

.

1.

250~300g (Sprague Dawley rat) 60

, . , .

2. rhBMP-2 &

0.05mg/ml rhBMP-2* , . rhBMP-2 (Collatape® ) , . (MBCP® ) (Bio-oss®§) 0.05mg/ml rhBMP-2 10 , .

3.

1 , * Sigma-Aldrich Co. MO

Collatape, Clacitek, Carlsbad, CA MBCP, Purgo Tissue Bank, Seoul, Korea

(15)

2 . rhBMP-2 , 1 , 2 , (MBCP®) 3 , (Bio-Oss®) 4 . 2 , 8 , 5 60 .

4.

ketamine hydrochloride (Ketalar®**) (70mg/kg)

. , povidone iodine . 2% lidocaine (1:10 epinephrine) , , . 8mm trephine bur , 8mm . , . .

** Ketalar, Yuhan Co, Seoul, Korea †† Kwangmyung Pharm. Seoul, Korea ‡‡ Monosyn, B. Braun, Melsungen, Germany

(16)

5.

1)

, .

2)

2 8 , . 20% 10 , 7 EDTA- HCl paraffin . 5μm , hematoxylin-eosin (HE) 20 , 100 .

3)

100 3 §§ . , (%) . (mm²) , , , (%) (fig 1).

(17)

4)

±

, Student's t test . p<0.05 .

(18)

.

1.

. , , . .

2.

.

1) 1 (1) 2 (figure2) , , . . (2) 8 (figure 3) 2 8 ,

(19)

. 2 . 2) 2 (1) 2 (figure 4) , . , . (2) 8 (figure 5) 2 , . 2 , , .

.

1) 1 (1) 2 (figure 6) . .

(20)

(2) 8 (figure 7) 2 , . . 2) 2 (1) 2 (figure 8) , . , , . . . (2) 8 (figure 9,10) 8 . . , . 2 , . 2 ,

(21)

, . 2 , . . 4) 3 (1) 2 (figure 11) MBCP® , . MBCP® MBCP® . , . MBCP® . (2) 8 (figure 12, 13) 2 MBCP® , . . MBCP® . . , 2 .

(22)

, MBCP® . 3) 4 (1) 2 (figure 14) Bio-Oss® , . . , . (2) 8 (figure 15, 16) 2 Bio-Oss® Bio-Oss® , . Bio-Oss® , . 2 , . .

(23)

3.

1, 2, 3 . rhBMP-2 rhBMP-2 . rhBMP-2 8 , , 2 8 .

Table 1. Defect closure (mm, [%]) (Group mean±SD ; N=5)

Group 2 weeks 8 weeks

Sham surgery control 0.9±0.3 [11.9±5.2]† 1.1±0.6 [13.1±8.0]† Carrier control 1.3±0.5 [21.9±10.4]* 1.6±0.7 [24.9±11.5]* rhBMP-2 alone 1.1±0.7 [13.1±10.9] 1.2±0.6 [14.0±9.3]† rhBMP-2/ACS 6.1±1.1 [95.4±8.7]*† 6.8±0.7 [100±0.0]*† rhBMP-2/MBCP® 5.8±1.3 [93.1±13.5]*† 6.3±1.0 [100±0.0]*† rhBMP-2/Bio-Oss® 5.6±0.9 [91.8±11.9]*† 6.4±1.9 [100±0.0]*† * Statistically significant difference compared to sham surgery control group (p<0.05) † Statistically significant difference compared to carrier control group (p<0.05)

(24)

Table 2. New bone area (mm²) (Group mean±SD; N=5)

Group 2 weeks 8 weeks

Sham surgery control 0.2±0.1† 0.3±0.2†

Carrier control 2.9±1.6* 1.9±3.2*

rhBMP-2 alone 0.4±1.8† 0.4±1.7†

rhBMP-2/ACS 3.9±1.5*† 4.8±0.9*†

rhBMP-2/MBCP® 5.1±1.1*† 6.0±1.3*†

rhBMP-2/Bio-Oss® 5.0±0.9*† 6.3±0.7*†

* Statistically significant difference compared to sham surgery control group (p<0.05) † Statistically significant difference compared to carrier control group (p<0.05)

Table 3. Bone density (%) (Group mean±SD; N=5)

Group 2 weeks 8 weeks

Sham surgery control 88.3±12.3† 91.6±4.9†

Carrier control 12.8±3.0* 86.3±11.9*

rhBMP-2 alone 89.1±11.1† 91.1±7.1†

rhBMP-2/ACS 51.9±13.9*† 90.1±8.1*†

rhBMP-2/MBCP® 57.9±18.4*† 72.1±17.2*†

rhBMP-2/Bio-Oss® 59.1±15.9*† 70.8±15.9*†

* Statistically significant difference compared to sham surgery control group (p<0.05) † Statistically significant difference compared to carrier control group (p<0.05)

(25)

.

rhBMP-2 . rhBMP-2

,

(Sigurdsson, Nygaard et al. 1996; Oda, Kinoshita et al. 1997; Terheyden, Jepsen et al. 1997; Choi, Kim et al. 2002; Ahn, Kim et al. 2003; Pang, Im et al. 2004; Kook, Salkeld et al. 2005; Hyun, Han et al. 2005; Hong, Kim et al. 2006).

BMP ,

(Wikesjo, Guglielmoni et al. 1999; Choi, Kim et al. 2002; Urist. 2002). , . BMP , . rhBMP-2 . , rhBMP-2 0.05ml/mg (absorbable collagen spongy (ACS); Collatepe®), (alloplast; MBCP®),

(xenograft bovine bone;Bio-Oss®) . 8mm critical-sized defect ,

(26)

(Tkagi and Urist. 1982; Schmitz and hollinger. 1986).

BMP , . rhBMP-2 , rhBMP-2 . rhBMP-2 2 90% , 8 . MBCP® Bio-Oss® , .

, β-TCP (Kim, Cho et al, 2004; Jung, Cho et al. 2006), fibrin-fibronectin sealing system (Han,Cho et al, 2005), polylactic- polyglycolic polymer (Buser, Wozney et al. 2006)

(Choi, Wikesjo et al, 2002).

BMP , . , . Bio-Oss® MBCP® , BMP . , .

(27)

rhBMP-2

. rhBMP .

(Cook, Baffes et al. 1994; Hong, Kim et al. 2006). 2 . 2 , . 8 , . . rhBMP-2 2 8 , . 8 . Bio-Oss® MBCP® . , 2 . ,

(28)

. BMP BMP . BMP , BMP inhibitory binding protein .

(29)

.

rhBMP-2 , , . 1. rhBMP-2 , rhBMP . 2. rhBMP-2 , . 3. 8 2 . 4. rhBMP-2 . 5. 8 . rhBMP-2

(30)

, .

,

. rhBMP-2 .

(31)

Ahn SH, Kim CS, Suk HJ, Lee YJ, Choi SH, Chai JK, Kim CK, Han SB, Cho KS. Effect of Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein-4 with Carriers in Rat Calvarial Defects. J Periodontol 2003;74:787-797.

Alam MI, Asahina I. Comparative study of biphasic calcium phosphate ceramics impregnated with rhBMP-2 as bone substitute. J Biomed Mater Res 2001;54:129-138

Alam MI, Asahina I. Evaluation of ceramics composed of different hydroxyapatite to tricalcium phosphate ratios as carriers for rhBMP-2. Biomaterials 2001;22:1643-1651

Boden SD, et al. Differential effects and glucocorticoid potentiation of bone morphogenetic protein action during rat osteoblast differentiation in vitro. Endocrinology 1996;137:3401-3407

Bosch C, et al. Importance of the critical-size bone defect in testing bone- regenerating materials. J Craniofac Surg 1998;9:310-316

Choi SH et al. Effect of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein- 2/absorbable collagen sponge (rhBMP-2/ACS) on healing in 3-wall intrabony defects in dogs. J Periodontol 2002;73:63-72

(32)

Cordaro L et al. Clinical results of alveolar ridge augmentation with mandibular block bone grafts in partially edentulous patients prior to implant placement. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002;13:103-111

Dragoo MR, Sullivan HC. A clinical and hitological evaluation of autogenous iliac bone trafts in humans. II External root resorption. J Periodontol 1973;44: 614-625

Goldbefg VM. Natural history of autografts and allografts. Clin Orhop 1987; 225:7-16

Hollinger JO, et al. Carriers for bone morphogenetic proteins. Biometerials 1996;17:187-194

Han DK, Kim CS, Jung UW, Chai JK, Choi SH, Kim CK,Cho KS. Effect of a Fibrin-fibronectin sealing system as a carrier for recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-4 on bone formation in rat calvarial defects. J Periodontol 2005 Dec;76:2216-2222.

Hong SJ, Kim CS, Han DK, Cho IH, Jung UW, Choi SH, Kim CK, Cho KS. The Effect of a Fibrin-Fibronectin/ß-Tricalcium Phosphate/Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 System on Bone Formation in Rat Calvarial Defects. Biomaterials 2006;27:3810-3816.

(33)

Hyun SJ, Choi SH, Chai JK, Cho KS, Kim CK, Kim CS. The effect of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2, 4 and 7 on bone formation in rat calvarial defects. J Periodontol 2005;76:1667-1674.

Jung UW, Choi SY, Pang EK, Kim CS, Choi SH,Cho KS. The Effect of varying the Particle Size of Beta Tricalcium Phosphate carrier of Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein-4 on Bone Formation in Rat Calvarial Defects. J Periodontol 2006;77:765-772

Karring T, Lindhe J, Cortellini P. Regenerative periodontal therapy. Clin Perio Imp Dent 2002;599-602

Kim CS, Choi SH, Choi BK, Chai JK, Park JB, Kim CK, Cho KS. The effect of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-4 on the osteoblastic differentiation of mouse calvarial cells affected by Porphyromonas gingivalis. J Periodontol 2002;73:1126-1132.

Kim CS, Kim JI, Kim J, Choi SH, Chai JK, Kim CK, Cho KS. Ectopic bone formation associated with recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 using absorbable collagen sponge and beta tricalcium phosphate as carriers. Biomaterials 2004;19:1-7.

(34)

factor-BB delivered with a chitosan/tricalcium phosphate sponge carrier. J periodontol 2000;71:418-424

Mallonig JT. Autogenous and allogenic bone grafts in peiodontal therapy. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 1992;3:333-352

Mao T, et al. An experimental study on rhBMP-2 composite bone substitute for repairing craniomaxillary bone defects. Clin J Dent Res 1998;1:21-25

Marden LJ, et al. Recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 is superior to demineralized bone matrix in repairing craniotomy defects in rats. J Biomed Mater Res 1994;28:1127-1138

Misch CE, Dietsh F. Bone-grafting materials in implant dentistry. Implant Dent 1993;2:158-167

Mizutani H, Urist MR. The nature of bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) fractions derived from bovine bone matrix gelatin. Clin Orhop 1982;171: 213- 223

Okura K, et al. Healing of segmental bone defects in rats induced by a β TCP-MCPM cement combine with rhBMP-2. J Biomed Mater Res 1999;44: 168-175

(35)

Pang EK, Im SU, Kim CS, Choi SH, Chai JK, Kim CK, Han SB, Cho KS. Effect of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-4 dose on bone formation in rat calvarial defects. J Periodontol 2004;75:1364-1370.

Quattlebaum JB, et al. ANtigenicity of freeze-dried cortical bone allograft in human periodontal osseous defects. J Periodnontol 1988;59:394-397

Sampath TK, Maliakal JC, Hauschka PV. Recombinant human osteogenic protein-1 (hOP-1) induces new bone formation in vivo with a specific activity comparable with natural bovine osteogenic protein and stimulates osteoblast proliferation and differentiation in vitro. J Biol Chem 1992;267:20352-20362. Schwartz-Arad D et al. Surgical success of intraoral autogenous block onlay bone grafting for alveolar ridge augmentation. Implant Dent 2005;14:131-138 Sigurdsson TJ, et al. Periodontal repair in dogs: Evaluation of rhBMP-2 carriers. Int J Perio Rest Dent 1996; 16:524-537

Takagi K, Urist MR. The reaction of the dura to bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) in repair of skull defects. Ann Surg 1982;196:100-109

Uludag H, et al. Implantation of recombinant human bone morphogenetic proteins with biomaterial carriers; A correlation between protein pharmacokinetics and osteoinduction in the rat ectopic model. J Biomed Mater Res 2000;50:227-238

(36)

Urist MR. Bone formation by autoinduction. Science 1965;150:893-899

Urist MR, et al. A bovine low molecular weight bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) fraction. Clin Orthop 1982;162:219-232

Wikesjoὂ UM, et al. Periodontal repair in dogs: Effect of BMP-2 concentration on regeneration of alveolar bone and periodontal attachment. J Clin Periodontol 1999;26:392-400

Winn SR, et al. Carrier systems for bone morphogenetic proteins. Clin Orhop 1999;367(suppl):95s-106s

Yamaguchi A, et al, Effects of BMP-2, BMP-4, and BMP-6 on osteoblastic differentiation of bone marrow-derived stromal cell lines, ST2 and MC3T3- G2/PA6. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1996; 220: 336-371

(37)

Figure 1.

Figure 2. Surgical control 2 weeks Figure 3. Surgical control 8 weeks (×20, HE) (×20, HE)

original bone new bone = n biomaterials = c

fatty marrow + fibrovascular tissue /marrow = m

Defect closure (%) = (a-b) /a× 100 New bone area = n+c+m

Bone density (%) = n/( n+c+m)×100 (a)

(38)

Figure 4. Carrier control 2 weeks Figure 5. Carrier control 8 weeks (×20, HE) (×20, HE)

Figure 6. rhBMP-2 alone 2 weeks Figure 7. rhBMP-2 alone 8 weeks (×20, HE) (×20, HE)

(39)

Figure 8. rhBMP-2/ACS 2 weeks Figure 9. rhBMP-2/ACS 8 weeks (×20, HE) (×20, HE)

Figure 10. rhBMP-2/ACS 8 weeks Figure 11. rhBMP-2/MBCP® 2 weeks (×100, HE) (×20, HE)

(40)

Figure 12. rhBMP-2/MBCP® 8 weeks Figure 13. rhBMP-2/MBCP® 8 weeks (×20, HE) (×100, HE)

Figure14. rhBMP-2/Bio-Oss® 2weeks Figure15. rhBMP-2/Bio-Oss® 8weeks (×20, HE) (×20, HE)

(41)
(42)

Abstract

Effects of rhBMP-2 with various carriers on bone regeneration

in rat calvarial defect

Seo-Kyoung Lee

Department of Dentistry

The Graduate School, Yonsei University (Directed by professor Seong-Ho Choi)

Bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) is a potent differentiating agent for cells of the osteoblastic lineage. It has been used in the oral cavity under a variety of indications and with different carriers. However, the optimal carrier for each indication is not known. This study evaluated the bone regenerative effect of rhBMP-2 delivered with different carrier systems.

8mm critical-sized rat calvarial defects were used in 60 male Sprague- Dawley rats. The animals were divided into 6 groups containing 10 animals each. Two groups were controls that had no treatment and absorbable collagen membrane only. 4 groups were experimentals that contained rhBMP-2 only and applied with absorbable collagen spongy, MBCP®, Bio-Oss® each. The histological and histometric parameters were used to evaluate the defects after 2- or 8-week healing period. The shape and total augmented area were stable

(43)

in all groups over the healing time. The results were as follows:

1. New bone formation was significantly greater in the rhBMP-2 with carrier group than control group.

2. rhBMP-2/ACS was the highest in bone density but gained less new bone area than rhBMP-2/MBCP® and rhBMP-2/Bio-Oss®.

3. The bone density after 8 weeks was greater than that after 2 weeks in all groups.

4. rhBMP-2 alone failed to show the statistically significant difference in new bone area and bone density compared to control group.

5. MBCP® and Bio-Oss® particles remained after 8 weeks healing period. These results suggest that rhBMP-2 with carrier system is an excellent inductive agent for bone formation and we can use it as the predictable bone tissue engieering technique. Future study will likely focus on the kinetics of BMP release and development of carriers that is ideal for it.

Key words:Bone regeneration; carrier; recombinant human bone morphogenetic

protein-2; rat calvarial defect, absorbable collagen spongy, macroporous biphasic calcium phosphate (MBCP®), Bio-Oss®

수치

Table 1. Defect closure (mm, [%]) (Group mean±SD ; N=5)
Table 2. New bone area (mm²) (Group mean±SD; N=5)
Figure 16. rhBMP-2/Bio-Oss® 8weeks (×100, HE)

참조

관련 문서

There was a significant increase in new bone formation in the group in which toothash and plaster of Paris and either PRP or fibrin sealants were used, compared with the groups

12 As such, using finite element modeling, the effect of stress distribution around the internal non-submerged type implants on marginal bone resorption

As a result of the study, it was confirmed that only human resource competency had a positive(+) effect on the intercompany cooperation method of IT SMEs,

Histopathologic findings of control group at 4 weeks show little bone- implant contact (BIC) around the implant (asterisks) and new-bone formation in the defect

The aim of this study was to compare the effect on bone regeneration relative to maintenance period of PTFE membrane in rabbit calcarial defects.. Eight adult

Effects of pulse frequency of low-level laser thrapy (LLLT)on bone nodule formation in rat calvarial cells.. Low-level laser therapy stimulats

LIPUS therapy is a recently developed method for application of mechanical stress, and used clinically to promote bone healing. Author evaluated the effect

In 4-week group, the group filled with bone graft with decortication revealed larger new bone formation area than shown in the group that had a defect area