• 검색 결과가 없습니다.

Overall Instrumentations for the ATLAS Integral Effect Test Program

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Overall Instrumentations for the ATLAS Integral Effect Test Program"

Copied!
2
0
0

로드 중.... (전체 텍스트 보기)

전체 글

(1)

Overall Instrumentations for the ATLAS Integral Effect Test Program

B.J.Yun, K.H.Kang, B.D.Kim,W.P.Baek

Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute, P.O.Box 105, Yuseong, Daejeon, 305-600, KOREA, bjyun@kaeri.re.kr

1. Introduction

Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute (KAERI) is constructing a thermal-hydraulic integral effect test (IET) loop, the ATLAS(Advanced Thermal-hydraulic Test Loop for Accident Simulation)[1]. The ATLAS test facility is basically designed according to the three-level scaling methodology of Ishii et al.[2]. The test facility has the following characteristics: (a) a 1/2-height, 1/288-volume, and full-pressure simulation of the APR1400, (b) geometrical similarity with the

APR1400 including 2 (hot legs)

×

4 (cold legs) reactor

coolant loops, a direct vessel injection(DVI), an integrated annular downcomer, etc.,(c)incorporation of the specific design character istics of the 1,000 MWe-class KSNP such as a cold leg injection(CLI) and the low-pressure injection pumps, (d) a maximum 8% of the scaled nominal core power, (d) simulation capability of broad scenarios, including the reflood phase of the large-break loss-of-coolant accidents (LOCAs), small-break LOCA scenarios including the DVI line breaks, steam generator tube ruptures, main steam line breaks, mid-loop operation, etc.

For the measurement of the thermal hydraulic phenomena in the ALTAS test facility, more than 1,200 instrumentations are installed in each components. Among them, some special instrumentations including related measurement method were developed for the measurements of mass flow rates in the primary piping and break system.

In this paper, an overall of instrumentation system of the ATLAS is introduced.

SIT -2 SIT -1 SG-1 SG-2 RCP -2A RCP -2B CD MWT IRWST PV CP/ HPSIP-1 HPSIP-2 HL-1 CL-1B CL-1A HL-2 CL-2A CL-2B SCHX SCP MFWP SDV CT CT PZR SL PSP N2 Gas N2 Gas DVI -1 DVI -4 DVI -3 DVI -2 Letd ow n CT SIT -4 SIT -3 AFWP-2 AFWP-1 CH MSIV-1 SV-2 ADV-2 SV-1 ADV-1 MSIV-2 PSV CT SRP HPI P MWT CT RCP -1B RCP -1A Atmosphere BS CS(I) BS CS(II) LC(I) LC(II) SCHX SCHX

Figure 1. Major Systems and Components for the ATLAS

2. Design of Instrumentation System

2.1 Design Procedure for the Instrumentation System

The instrumentations system of the ATLAS test facility is designed by the following procedures;

- Making major measurement requirements based

on the review on the important phenomena for each test matrix[3]

- Setup of measurement methods including

preliminary uncertainty analysis[4]

- Selection of instrumentations and their

installation locations

The test matrix of the LBLOCA(Large Break Loss of coolant accident), SBLOCA(Small Break Loss of Coolant Accident), SGTR(Steam Generator Tube Ruptur Accident), SLB(Steam Line Break) and mid loop operation were considered in the design.

For the selection of instrumentations, currently available instrumentations are reviewed and accuracy, reliability and robustness of instruments are considered. The distrubution of instrumentation in each component is determined by a) assuming one dimensional flow b) considering a conventional node size of safety analysis codes such as REALP5, MARS and TRACE.

2.2 Instrumentation in Each Component

The major requirements for the instrumentation system are measurements of the mass, energy inventories and thermodynamic state in each component, and the boundary flow between various components. For these purpose, fluid and structure temperature, system pressure, void fraction, water level, water inventory, applied heat flux and flow rate are required to measure in each component. Most of the measurements are possible by commercially available instrumentations. In the ATLAS, 922 thermocouples, 77 pressure transmitters, 121 differential pressure transmitters, 47 flow meters, 5 balances, 38 power meters, and 2 gamma densitometers are equipped. However, some special instrumentations or measurement methods were developed for the measurement of the mass flow rates in the primary piping system and break system.

2.3 Development of Special Instrumentations

Transactions of the Korean Nuclear Society Autumn Meeting Busan, Korea, October 27-28, 2005

(2)

Pressure Tab Partitio n Forward Flow Backward Flow Pipe

Figure 2. Schematics of the Average BDFT

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 wbi (kg/s) w(kg/s) +15% -15%

Figure 3. Comparison of Measured Mass Flow Rate with Reference Values by Average BDFT in the Stratified Two-phase Flow Rate

An average BDFT(Bidirectional flow Tube) was developed for the measurement of the mass flow rate in the primary system[5]. Fig.2 shows the schematics of the average BDFT. It can be applied in the measurements of low flow rate such as a natural convection and two phase mass flow rate in the stratified flow condition. Fig.3 shows the typical measurements results of two phase flow rate in the air/water stratified two-phase flow condition.

Break flow rate is measured in the containment system. Fig. 4 shows the instrumentations installed in the containment system. As shown in the figure, the water and steam flow rates are measured by the digital balances and vortex meters, respectively. In this containment system, a cold water injection system is equipped to condense the steam phase when its flow rate exceeds the measurements range of vortex flow meters. The estimated uncertainty of the measured break flow rate is dependent on the time difference of data acquisition. Fig.5 shows the estimated uncertainty according to the time difference of a measurement.

3. Conclusion

In this paper, an overall instrumentation system of ATLAS integral effect test facility was introduced. In the ATLAS test facility, more than 1,200 instrumentations are installed for the measurement of

3" SDS Discharge 6" MSLB 5" SG FW Break 3" DVI Line SBLOCA 5" LBLOCA(Vessel Side)

Load Cell Load Cell Load Cell Load Cell Load Cell

1500kg 600kg 600kg 600kg 150kg

Break Flow Separator 2 Break Flow

St e a m PT St e a m V TC V PT TC Separa tor 1 Load Cell Full Scale 3" 8" TC Water Flow Water Flow LC-CS-01 LC-CS-02 LC-CS-03 LC-CS-04 LC-CS-05 PT-CS-03 TF-CS-03 QV-CS-03 PT-CS-01 TF-CS-01 QV-CS-01 PT-CS-02 TF-CS-02 QV-CS-02 TF-CS-08 TF-CS-09 TF-CS-10 TF-CS-11 TF-CS-12 TC TF-CS-04 TC TF-CS-05 TC TC TF-CS-06 TF-CS-07 Coriolis TC Cold Water Injection(2") QM-CS-01 Rosemount CMS200 TF-CS-13 V 3" PT A B A A A B B From MWS PT PT PT-CS-04 PT-CS-05 5" LBLOCA(Pump Side) TF-BS-01C TF-BS-01D TC

Figure 4. Concept of Break Flow Measurement

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 0.45 0.50 0.55 0.60 Uwbr eak (k g /s) ∆t(sec) Containment Pressure : 2 bars Spray Injection Flow Rate:12.1kg/s

3" Vortex + LC(150kg )+Coriolis 3" Vortex + LC(600kg)+Coriolis 3" Vortex + LC(1500kg)+Coriolis 8" Vortex + LC(150kg)+Coriolis 8" Vortex + LC(600kg)+Coriolis 8" Vortex + LC(1500kg)+Coriolis

Figure 5. Uncertainty of Break Flow Rate According to the Time difference of Measurement

thermal hydraulics phenomena in the components. Most of the instrumentations are chosen from commercially available ones, however, an average BDFT and a break flow system are specially developed or designed for the measurements of mass and break flow rates in the primary piping and containment system, respectively.

REFERENCES

[1] W.P. Baek, C.-H. Song, B.J. Yun, T.S. Kwon, Sang.Ki. Moon and S.J. LEE, KAERI Integral Effect Test Program and

the ATLAS Design, To be published Nuclear Technology

.

[2] M. Ishii S.T.Revankarr, T.L.Leonardil, R.Dowlati, M.L.Bertodano,I.Babelli,W.WangH.Pokharna, V.H.RAansom, R.Viskanta and J.T.Han, The Three Level Scaling Approach with Application to the Purdue University Multi-dimensional Integral Test Assembly (PUMA), Nucl. Eng. Des., 186, 177 (1998).

[3] B.J.Yun, Design Requirement of Instrumentation System for the Integral Effect Test Facility, IET-IMS-DR001, Rev. 00, WS-1, 2003.

[4] B.J.Yun,I.C.Chu,K.H.Kang,S.Cho, D.J.Euh ,Design Report of the ATLAS Integral Effect Test Facility, ,ATLAS-IMS-DA001, Rev. 00, WS-2, 2003.

[5] B.J.Yun,,K.H.Kang,D.J.Euh, C.-H. Song, , W.P. Baek, Measurement of the Single and Two Phase Flow using a Newly Developed Average Bidirectional Flow Tube, Submitted to Nuclear Engineering and Technology, 2005.

수치

Figure 1.  Major Systems and Components for the ATLAS
Figure 5. Uncertainty of Break Flow Rate According to the  Time difference of Measurement

참조

관련 문서

1 John Owen, Justification by Faith Alone, in The Works of John Owen, ed. John Bolt, trans. Scott Clark, "Do This and Live: Christ's Active Obedience as the

Magnesium alloys that derive their strength from precipitation hardening are usually considered the most promising for such applications and the thermal stability of

The stepmother cannot break common notion that they are the evildoer since the children was killed from the trick of stepmother in the novel and there are

Since the overall thermal performance is dependent upon the internal flow regimes (Two-phase flows) starting from slug/plug flows to circulatory annular flow, these flow

Some most frequent words in the text collection forms the dimension words for the vector dimension space and the frequency count of bigrams constructed from the sentences are used

As part of this tender, the tenderer are required to make an similar boat available for a user evaluation test in connection with the evaluation of the tenderers best and

intensive properties are available. • The calculation of these properties from measurable ones depends on the availability of simple and accurate relations between the two

undergo a cyclic process whose sole effects are the flow of heat into the system from a cold. reservoir and the flow of an equivalent amount of heat out of the system into