• 검색 결과가 없습니다.

이전가격 사전합의(APA)에 관한 조세법제 연구

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "이전가격 사전합의(APA)에 관한 조세법제 연구"

Copied!
237
0
0

로드 중.... (전체 텍스트 보기)

전체 글

(1)Study on new way of Avoiding and Resolving Transfer Pricing Disputes: Advance Pricing Agreements(APA) Jong-Su Park. 이전가격 사전합의(APA)에 관한 조세법제 연구. 2003. 11.. 硏究者 : 朴鍾秀 (副硏究委員).

(2)

(3) 국 문 요 약 ‘이전가격. 사전합의(Advance. Pricing. Agreement,. APA)제도’는. 이미 미국을 위시한 각국에서 도입 실시하고 있으며 OECD차원에서도 그 통일적 규율을 위한 지침이 마련될 정도로 오늘날 이전가격의 조작을 통한 다국적기업의 조세회피행위에 대한 매우 효과적인 대응책으로서 학 문적으로는 물론 실무적으로도 심도 있게 논의되고 있는 문제영역이다. 다국적기업은 그 특성상 국경을 달리하는 특수관계에 있는 다른 기업과 의 거래시 당해 기업그룹 전체로서의 조세부담을 최소화하기 위해 가격 을 조작함으로써 특수관계기업간에 소득을 이전시키는 정책에 매료되기 마련이다. 그러나 이러한 다국적기업의 이전가격정책은 고세율국가의 조 세수입을 감소시키기 때문에 주로 선진국인 다국적기업의 소재지국에서 는 다국적기업의 신고소득이 부당하게 낮은 경우 이를 특수관계가 없는 독립기업간의 거래가격(정상가격)에 의하여 과세소득을 조정한다. 이러 한 이전가격세제는 그러나 매우 기술적인 부분이 많아서 과세당국이 당 해 가격이 적정가격이 아니라는 사실을 입증하기도 어렵고, 자료수집을 위해서는 외국정부의 협조에 의존해야 하는 경우가 많다. 또 납세의무자 로서도 과세당국으로부터 일일이 세무조사를 받아야 하는 부담이 있다. 이에 미국을 위시한 선진국들에서는 납세의무자의 신청에 의해 대략 3∼ 5년간의 국제거래 정상가격 산정방식을 과세당국간 상호협상을 통해 사 전에 확정하고, 대신 같은 기간 과세당국이 모․자회사에 대해 이전가격 조사를 면제하는 이전가격 사전합의제도를 시행하고 있다. 우리나라도 1995년 12월 국제조세조정에관한법률이 제정되면서 종래의 이전가격세제 를 선진국 수준으로 진일보시킴은 물론 특히 정상가격 산출방법의 사전 승인제를 도입함으로써 다국적기업의 조세회피행위에 대하여 선진국수준 의 대응이 가능하게 되었다. 그러나 아직 이 제도에 대해서는 그 효용성 에도 불구하고 활성화되지 못하고 있는 실정이다. 이에 정부에서도 국세 청을 중심으로 이 제도에 대한 관심을 높이고 이 제도의 적극활용을 유 도하기 위해 공청회와 각종 홍보활동을 계속하는 등 노력하고 있으나 아.

(4) 직 미흡하다고 볼 수 있다. 이전가격 사전합의는 분명 납세의무자나 과세 당국 양측에게 도움이 되는 제도임에 틀림없다. 그러나 제도운영상 제기 되는 문제점들은 그때그때 개별적으로 해결하여 반영함으로써 우리 실정 에 맞는 제도로서 정착시킬 수 있을 것이다. 이전가격 사전합의제에 있어 서도 논의의 본질적인 귀착점은 조세법률주의와 조세평등주의에 있음을 간과하여서는 아니된다..

(5) Abstract This. Paper. system. of. aims the. to. review. Advance. the. current. Pricing. tax. related. legal. Agreement(hereafter,. APA). and to find the improvement of it. The. APA. is. payers. and. the. become. a. general. made. the. even. a. program. tax. beneficial. to. administrations,. system OECD. all. over. prepare. so. the. a. both. individual. that world.. universal. tax. the. APA. has. This. trend. has. for. the. guideline. APA. So we can say the APA program is the one of the most up-to-dated issues in the international tax area. I. have. and. studied. pointed. out. domestic related. legal. system. problems. in. for. the. Chapter. APA. 2.. In. program. chapter. 3,. I studied the abroad legal systems for the APA, which might be. a. mirror. for. the. improvement. of. domestic. legal. system. I. suggested in Chapter 4. Most. of. thing. to. actively. all, do. for. however, is. the. to. we. should. manage. positive. result. the. confess. the. already. rather. most. important. established. than. only. to. system prepare. the new system itself. We can see some problems of the APA as the OECD once pointed offer for. out. For high. the. example,. confidence. MNE.. Also,. and when. if the APA reduction the. APA. is of. one-sided, doubled. program. it. cannot. tax. burden. operates. incom-. pletely, it may make lots of traps not only to the taxpayers and tax administration but also the wholesome economy..

(6) The. competent. Authorities. using. the. APA. program. should. try to diminish the problems in many ways as I suggested. The tax. APA payers. endeavor not. to. forget. program and check the. is. certainly. competent and. final. equality of tax system.. to deck. beneficial. authorities. reduce of. the. the. one with. problems.. program. is. to. both. the. the. intense. They. should. legality. and.

(7) 목 차. 제 1 장 연구의 개요 ··················································································· 13 제 1 절 연구의 목적 ···················································································· 13 제 2 절 연구의 내용과 범위 ····································································· 14. 제 2 장 이전가격 사전합의의 의의와 현행법제의 분석 ······ 17 제 1 절 이전가격 사전합의의 의의 ························································ 17 Ⅰ. 이전가격사전합의의 개념 ·································································· 17 Ⅱ. 일방적 APA ························································································ 19 Ⅲ. 쌍방적 APA ························································································ 21 Ⅳ. APA 논의의 의미 ·············································································· 24 Ⅴ. APA 개념사용의 불통일성 ······························································ 25. 제 2 절 이전가격사전합의에 관한 현행법제 분석 ··························· 26 Ⅰ. 국제조세조정에관한법률의 제정과 개정 ········································ 27 1. 국제조세조정에관한법률의 제정 ··················································· 27 2. 국제조세조정에관한법률의 개정연혁 ··········································· 28 Ⅱ. 우리나라의 이전가격세제 ·································································· 31 1. 국제조세조정에관한법률 제정 이전의 이전가격세제 ··············· 31 2. 국제조세조정에관한법률에 의한 이전가격세제 ························· 32 Ⅲ. 정상가격 사전승인제도 ······································································ 45 1. 사전승인신청 ····················································································· 46 2. 심 사 ··································································································· 46 3. 상호합의절차에 의한 사전승인 ····················································· 47 4. 일방적 사전승인절차 ······································································· 48 5. 연례보고서의 제출 ··········································································· 49.

(8) 6. 사전승인의 취소 ··············································································· 49. 제 3 절 현행법제상의 문제점 ··································································· 50 Ⅰ. 승인의 법적 성격과 용어상의 문제 ················································ 50 Ⅱ. 법 제6조제4항 단서의 문제 ····························································· 51 Ⅲ. 위임입법의 한계문제 ·········································································· 53 Ⅳ. 시행령 제14조의 문제 ······································································· 55 Ⅴ. 승인후의 사후관리 문제 ···································································· 56 Ⅵ. 비공개의 문제 ······················································································ 56. 제 3 장 주요국 및 OECD의 이전가격사전합의제도와 그 시사점 ························································································ 57 제 1 절 개 관 ································································································· 57 제 2 절 일 본 ································································································· 58 Ⅰ. 개 설 ······································································································ 58 Ⅱ. 일본의 이전가격세제 ·········································································· 60 1. 개 관 ··································································································· 60 2. 도입취지 ····························································································· 61 3. 적용대상 법인 ··················································································· 62 4. 적용대상 거래 ··················································································· 62 5. 국외관련자 ························································································· 63 6. 독립기업간 가격 ··············································································· 66 7. 자료정보의 제공의무 ······································································· 78 8. 추계과세 ····························································································· 80 Ⅲ. 대응조정 ································································································ 81 1. 개 관 ··································································································· 81 2. 차액조정 ····························································································· 82 3. 제2차 조정 ························································································· 83 Ⅳ. 사전확인제도 ························································································ 84.

(9) 1. 사전확인 대상 ··················································································· 85 2. 확인의 신청 ······················································································· 85 3. 자료의 첨부 ······················································································· 85 4. 번역자료의 첨부 ··············································································· 87 5. 확인 신청서의 수리 ········································································· 87 6. 이전가격 조사와의 관계 ································································· 87 7. 사전상담 ····························································································· 87 8. 확인대상 사업연도 ··········································································· 88 9. 확인신청의 심사 ··············································································· 88 10. 확인에 관한 상호협의 ··································································· 88 11. 심사결과 통지 ················································································· 88 12. 보고서의 제출 ················································································· 89 13. 확인의 효과 ····················································································· 90 14. 가격의 조정 ····················································································· 90 15. 확인의 개정 ····················································································· 91 16. 확인의 취소 ····················································································· 91 17. 확인의 갱신 ····················································································· 91 18. 기수행 사업연도에 소급적용 ······················································· 92 Ⅴ. 남은 과제 ······························································································ 92. 제 3 절 미 국 ································································································· 96 Ⅰ. 개 관 ······································································································ 96 Ⅱ. 세입절차 91-22의 내용 ···································································· 97 1. 목 적(Sec. 1) ·················································································· 97 2. 개 관(Sec. 2) ·················································································· 98 3. APA 처리의 원칙(Sec. 3) ·························································· 98 4. 사전상담(Sec. 4) ············································································ 99 5. APA 신청의 내용(Sec. 5) ·························································· 99 6. APA 의뢰서의 처리(Sec. 6) ···················································· 107 7. 관할 당국 심의(Sec. 7) ····························································· 108.

(10) 8. 독립적 전문가 의견(Sec. 8) ····················································· 110 9. 법적 효력(Sec. 9) ······································································· 111 10. APA 관리(Sec. 10) ································································· 111 11. 공 개(Sec. 11) ·········································································· 118 12. 기타 문서에 대한 효과(Sec. 12) ·········································· 118 13. 효력발생(Sec. 13) ···································································· 119 Ⅲ. 수정 세입절차 96-53의 내용 ······················································· 119 1. 주요 개정사항 ················································································· 119 2. 목 적(Sec. 1) ··············································································· 120 3. 개 관(Sec. 2) ··············································································· 120 4. APA 절차의 원칙(Sec. 3) ························································ 121 5. 사전상담(Sec. 4) ········································································· 123 6. APA 신청서의 내용(Sec. 5) ···················································· 124 7. APA 신청서의 처리(Sec. 6) ···················································· 135 8. 관할 당국 심의(Sec. 7) ····························································· 138 9. 소급적용(Sec. 8) ········································································· 140 10. 독립적 전문가 의견(Sec. 9) ··················································· 141 11. 법적 효력(Sec. 10) ·································································· 142 12. APA 관리(Sec. 11) ································································· 143 13. 공 개(Sec. 12) ·········································································· 151 14. 다른 문서에 대한 효과(Sec. 13) ·········································· 151 15. 유효일자(Sec. 14) ···································································· 151 16. 문서 작업 축소령(Sec. 15) ···················································· 151. 제 4 절 독 일 ······························································································· 152 Ⅰ. 개 관 ··································································································· 152 Ⅱ. 독일의 법상태 ··················································································· 153 1. 특별규정에 의한 경우 ··································································· 153 2. 연방재무부 서신 ············································································· 155 3. 양국간 구속적 사전정보제공에 관한 州지침 ··························· 159.

참조

관련 문서

The construction of Electric motor propulsion system are presumed arrangement of boat and compared The engine fuel of cost with battery charge of cost .The Model

이후 개시하는 과세연도에 상시근로자 수가 증가하는 경우부터 적용... 이후 개시하는

기초산업보건서비스는 일차보건의 개념을 산업보건 에 적용하여 모든 노동자에게 산업보건서비스 접근성을 제공하려는 구상이다.. 여기에 안전의

김인애(2002)의 ‘ 상업계 여고생의 진로 의식와 효율적인 진로지도에 관한 연구’ 에 서는 실업계고등학교 학생들이 건전한 직업관을 가지고 직업을 선택할 수

위와 같이 기존 선행연구들을 살펴보면 부적응 아동에 관한 미술치료 연구 가 활발히 진행되어 왔다고 보여 진다. 이는 미술치료연구의 흐름을 파악하고 연구 대상의

1990년대에 이르러 택지개발촉진법에 의한 도시 외곽의 집중개발과 재건축 사업과 재개발 사업이 활발해 짐과 더불어,용적률 등에 대한 규제가 완화

각 동아리활동 STEAM 프로그램을 위한 공동연구 / 주제관련 활동과제개발 연구 각 동아리활동 STEAM 프로그램을 위한 공동연구 /

우리 나라의 실업률 추세변화에 관한 연구 고학력